16:01:14 #startmeeting containers 16:01:14 Meeting started Tue Apr 25 16:01:14 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is juggler. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 16:01:15 have a good meeting :) 16:01:15 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 16:01:18 The meeting name has been set to 'containers' 16:01:22 ty tmorin1 16:01:26 I asked juggler to start for me 16:01:36 Our Agenda: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Containers#Agenda_for_2017-04-25_1600_UTC 16:01:43 #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Containers#Agenda_for_2017-04-25_1600_UTC Our Agenda 16:02:04 #topic Roll Call 16:02:09 Adrian Otto 16:02:23 Spyros Trigazis 16:02:25 Ton Ngo 16:03:03 Perry Rivera 16:03:27 hello adrian_otto strigazi tonanhngo...welcome! 16:03:38 #topic Announcements 16:04:12 no announcements prepared 16:04:33 I am at the departure gate for a flight this morning, so I am unable to stay for the full duration of our scheduled time 16:04:35 any additional announcements all? 16:04:42 I anticipate we'll have a shorter meeting 16:05:22 ok..moving on... 16:05:24 #topic Review Action Items 16:05:40 no additional Action Items planned... 16:05:45 Any new ones to add? 16:06:21 strigazi: I did not notice any actions in the past meeting transcript 16:06:27 there were none, correct? 16:06:30 yes 16:06:33 ok, thanks 16:06:51 great strigazi! 16:07:24 ok..moving on... 16:07:26 #topic Blueprints/Bugs/Reviews/Ideas 16:07:39 we have 3 items scheduled to cover.. 16:07:50 I was on holidays last week, 16:07:51 #link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/magnum/+spec/flatten-attributes 16:08:04 strigazi: did you want to cover the heat-agent topic this morning? 16:08:13 so I don't have anything to report. 16:08:20 adrian_otto yes 16:08:24 before that 16:08:37 I'm sure that there are no updates for the essential blueprints this week 16:09:10 next up: 16:09:11 #link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/magnum/+spec/nodegroups 16:09:32 don't recall seeing Drago here today... 16:09:44 any info on this one? 16:11:10 nothing here 16:11:26 ok...moving on... 16:11:42 strigazi, any news on: 16:11:43 #link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/magnum/+spec/cluster-upgrades 16:11:43 or 16:11:54 the addl work item? 16:12:08 let's get to the head-agent topic 16:12:11 heat 16:12:20 ok 16:12:22 ok 16:12:30 #topic Work Item 16:12:47 #link 30mb compressed / uncompressed 111mb containerized heat-agent based on alpine linux. https://hub.docker.com/r/strigazi/heat-container-agent/tags/ 16:12:53 oops correction: 16:13:13 #link https://hub.docker.com/r/strigazi/heat-container-agent/tags/ 30mb compressed / uncompressed 111mb containerized heat-agent based on alpine linux. 16:13:23 go for it strigazi 16:14:22 I tried it and seems to work fine. Could be used for use cases where if we can mount specific dirs 16:15:02 I don't know how it will go on the ci 16:15:23 another thing I tried was a "magnum agent" 16:15:48 how did that go? 16:16:00 not really an agent. I just put all our scripts an manifests in an alpine container ~5mb 16:16:08 ok ~6mb 16:16:30 nice 16:16:40 great! but it's like putting a large amount of magnum in a container 16:16:48 strigazi: does that image need to download more python libs, or does it have everything it needs to run? 16:16:55 bash 16:17:09 only bash 16:17:20 ah 16:17:20 oh, ok 16:17:26 to be percise sh 16:17:32 not even bash 16:17:44 any recommendations from your end? 16:17:51 (to strigazi) 16:18:07 I don't know about that direction, it's like a data container 16:18:36 ok 16:18:43 it's hard to get valid testing around an approach like this 16:18:43 It mostly solves the user data limit problem 16:18:46 thanks for your valuable feedback 16:18:49 strigazi 16:18:57 specifically, no unit tests. 16:19:25 #topic Open Discussion 16:19:28 but considering how simple this is, it might not justify a unit test 16:19:36 https://hub.docker.com/r/strigazi/heat-container-agent/~/dockerfile/ is pretty thin :-) 16:19:57 Entering Open Discussion...any topics/q's/concerns? 16:20:01 oh, on another subject, I think we should switch to meeting every two weeks 16:20:05 rather than weekly 16:20:13 thoughts? 16:20:21 works for me 16:20:23 Seems reasonable 16:20:38 ok, anyone opposed to it? 16:21:24 we can always switch back to weekly if necessary 16:21:39 good thought 16:21:40 cool, I'll take that as an action item 16:21:41 #action adrian_otto to update team meeting schedule to */2 weeks 16:21:46 thanks juggler 16:22:00 well, if there is no other news, shall we adjourn? 16:22:07 sure 16:22:20 that's all I wanted to cover today, thanks juggler for your help 16:22:41 oh wait 16:22:52 two weeks form now is during the OpenStack Summit in Boston 16:23:03 ah yes, who is attending? 16:23:09 me 16:23:12 I will be there 16:23:13 not me :( 16:23:15 so our next meeting should be three weeks out 16:23:16 o/ 16:23:19 their in spirit 16:23:22 er there 16:23:26 oh, you will be a sight for sore eyes, Ton! 16:24:00 :) 16:24:13 +1 :) 16:24:18 :) 16:24:28 final thoughts folks? 16:25:15 alright, so our next meeting will be 2017-05-16 at 1600 UTC in #openstack-meeting-alt 16:25:16 then */2 weeks from that point 16:25:34 +1 16:25:39 +1 16:25:45 +1 16:25:49 great seeing everyone! 16:26:00 thanks for attending. 16:26:03 #endmeeting