02:31:06 <ekcs> #startmeeting congressteammeeting
02:31:06 <openstack> Meeting started Fri Apr 13 02:31:06 2018 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is ekcs. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
02:31:07 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
02:31:09 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'congressteammeeting'
02:31:34 <ekcs> hi all!
02:31:39 <ekcs> topics here as usual: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/congress-meeting-topics
02:31:52 <masahito> hi
02:31:56 <ramineni_> ekcs: hi
02:32:03 <ramineni_> masahito: hi
02:32:12 <ekcs> hi ramineni_
02:32:14 <ekcs> hi masahito
02:32:18 <ekcs> how’s it been?
02:34:51 <ekcs> ok let’s dive in then
02:35:38 <ekcs> first just reminder that next week is R-1 release milestone. nothing special for us. Mostly just for me to acknowledge community goals and tag the releases.
02:36:29 <ramineni_> ok
02:36:31 <ekcs> #topic monasca push driver
02:36:52 <ekcs> ramineni_: do you want to talk more about monasca push driver here? or just continue over email later?
02:37:36 <ramineni_> ekcs: thanks for digging up, i think if execute actions are not executed multiple times, then my concern is resolved
02:38:15 <ramineni_> ekcs: we can finalize your approach , ill look into it more today , and reply if find any more queries
02:38:32 <ekcs> ramineni_: ok great! thanks!
02:38:42 <ekcs> ramineni_: one question:
02:39:04 <ekcs> I’ve been using 1:1 email because I don’t know if all the NEC stuff is ok for public discussion.
02:39:56 <ekcs> but we can discuss over ML and potentially benefit from more perspective if you think that’s ok.
02:40:19 <ekcs> what do you think?
02:40:49 <ramineni_> ekcs: i think should be ok, but ill get back to you on that
02:41:15 <ekcs> ok cool we can figure it out later. thanks!
02:41:25 <ekcs> ok moving on then.
02:41:35 <ekcs> #topic lower-constraints
02:42:04 <ekcs> I’m not really caught up on that whole thing. but thanks ramineni_ for getting on patches for it.
02:42:27 <ekcs> is there something to discuss here?
02:43:21 <ramineni_> ekcs: ya, recent changes in requirements causing that , i think should be fine now
02:43:22 <ekcs> mainly two things I’m confused about: 1. is the lower-constraints.txt file something we need to manually update each time the requirements.txt changes? I don’t totally understand why the duplicate info.
02:44:01 <ramineni_> ekcs: from what i understand i think there wont be automatic update of requirements
02:44:26 <ekcs> oooh. so the entire requirements management is changing.
02:44:30 <ramineni_> if we need for the project , the minimum version we can updte it accordingly
02:44:44 <ramineni_> and change the corresponding requirement
02:44:51 <ekcs> wow ok. I guess I need to read up on that. must have been a big discussion.
02:45:10 <ramineni_> ekcs: yes, let me dig up, if i find the links again
02:45:29 <ekcs> wonder what that does to packaging...
02:45:42 <ekcs> got it thanks. well I’ll have to catch up on that.
02:46:36 <ekcs> well let’s move on then.
02:46:39 <ekcs> #patches
02:46:43 <ekcs> #topic patches
02:46:49 <ekcs> any patches to discuss?
02:46:51 <ramineni_> ekcs: here https://review.openstack.org/#/c/560108/4
02:46:51 <patchbot> patch 560108 - requirements - remove lower bounds from global requirements (MERGED)
02:47:23 <ramineni_> there is big discussion on ML also i suppose
02:47:34 <ramineni_> ya, you can look into it later
02:48:36 <ekcs> thanks a lot!
02:51:46 <ramineni_> ekcs: move on?
02:52:04 <ekcs> only thing for me is I think the monasca test patches are ready.
02:52:05 <ekcs> ok.
02:52:34 <ekcs> don’t see any additional topics on topics etherpad.
02:52:43 <ekcs> #topic open discussion
02:52:48 <ekcs> anything else at all to talk about?
02:53:37 <ekcs> I’m curious, masahito , what are you guys doing with eventlet on blazar?
02:54:43 <masahito> Any problem happens in eventlet?
02:54:54 <masahito> We didn't hit an issue yet.
02:55:28 <ekcs> masahito: ah. just wondering whether you guys have moved to latest version yet.
02:55:42 <ekcs> and maybe what your plans are around testing.
02:56:07 <ekcs> I haven’t had much experience myself but from ML discussions it sounds like people are expecting things to break left and right haha.
02:56:22 <masahito> Looks like I don't catch up with the topic in ML.
02:57:20 <masahito> And sorry for slow review to generic push driver. I don't have enough time to review the spec.
02:57:49 <ekcs> got it.
02:58:07 <ekcs> here’s a quick reference on eventlet stuff. I’m not totally caught up either. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/559367/
02:58:08 <patchbot> patch 559367 - requirements - uncap eventlet (MERGED)
02:58:15 <masahito> We started testing Doctor driver to deploy Congress to some production now.
02:59:11 <ekcs> thanks all good. we’re going to hold off on the generic driver for now. will focus first on monasca and vitrage separately. be great to have your thoughts if/when we move monasca push discussion to ML/gerritt
02:59:13 <masahito> Not enough time to do upstream but downstream ;-(
02:59:22 <ekcs> masahito: oh that’s exciting.
03:00:28 <ekcs> I don’t know if there’s anything I can help with, but if there is I’d love to.
03:01:28 <ekcs> also as more details become ok to share I’d love to hear/read it!
03:02:10 <masahito> Of course.
03:03:11 <ekcs> thanks! and again definitely let me know if there’s anything I can help with. I’m happy to carve out time and cycles for it.
03:04:23 <ekcs> ok then. should we end early if there’s nothing else to discuss now?
03:08:40 <ekcs> alright then. let’s end meeting.
03:08:49 <ekcs> have a great weekend all and talk to you soon!
03:08:52 <ekcs> #endmeeting