20:01:40 #startmeeting climate 20:01:41 Log: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/ironic/2013/ironic.2013-12-09-19.01.log.html 20:01:42 Meeting started Mon Dec 9 20:01:40 2013 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is bauzas. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 20:01:43 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 20:01:45 The meeting name has been set to 'climate' 20:01:48 o/ 20:01:50 o/ 20:01:52 o/ 20:01:57 \o/ 20:02:03 Sorry for the over run guys! 20:02:07 sorry for this very late meeting 20:02:12 NobodyCam, np 20:02:13 NobodyCam: no pb :) 20:02:23 NobodyCam, don't worry :) 20:02:24 :) 20:02:37 first time we're meeting this time 20:02:40 ok, guys 20:02:41 hoping the last one :) 20:02:47 what's for agenda? 20:02:49 so, let's be brief 20:03:06 o/ 20:03:06 temporary :) 20:03:17 Nikolay_St, hello) 20:03:20 we're doing regulars at 1000UTC 20:03:39 so, the agenda : https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Climate#Agenda_for_December_9_2013 20:03:56 #topic Action items from previous meeting 20:04:18 #link http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/climate/2013/climate.2013-12-02-10.02.html 20:04:22 #link http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/climate/2013/climate.2013-12-02-10.02.html 20:04:26 ooops :) 20:04:30 you were faster 20:04:31 ) 20:04:43 I count only a few missing actiosn 20:04:48 all my action items done ;) 20:04:58 SergeyLukjanov, cool 20:05:00 because of no action items O_O 20:05:05 My too :) 20:05:10 But I have ones 20:05:12 Nikolay_St: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/52296 20:05:27 DinaBelova: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/52296 20:05:30 oops 20:05:40 We've reviewed it today, I suppose 20:05:45 DinaBelova: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/49363/ 20:06:04 and the last one was abandoned 20:06:10 bauzas, I've +2 for the new patch set 20:06:17 ok 20:06:20 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/59827/ 20:06:27 It's ok for me 20:06:41 that's the new version for https://review.openstack.org/#/c/49363/ 20:06:45 Nikolay_St: when do you plan to deliver new patchset for https://review.openstack.org/#/c/52296 20:06:46 ? 20:06:58 we just reviewd it, bauzas :) 20:07:04 today, as I remember 20:07:09 bauzas: yeap 20:07:13 ok, don't take further action then 20:07:24 so I think tomorrow Nick will do it 20:07:26 Nick? 20:07:47 Nikolay_St: ? 20:07:58 bauzas: I don't take a look at it. Today I just rebased all this old patches about utils, trusts and vms 20:08:02 nothing new 20:08:13 so, tomorrow I'll read you comments 20:08:17 and work on it 20:08:21 Ok, will you add new patchset tomorrow? 20:08:23 ok, let's take action for this week 20:08:24 ok 20:08:33 #action Nikolay_St deliver new patchset for https://review.openstack.org/#/c/52296 20:08:42 +! 20:08:46 +1** 20:08:54 that's it for the prev. actiosn 20:09:11 Ok,let's move to the next 20:09:11 we need some reviews to be prioritized 20:09:12 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/59827/ - I'll review it tomorrow 20:09:38 #action Nikolay_St review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/59827/ 20:09:44 ok thanks 20:10:10 But I think it's almost ok with it :) 20:10:17 could we agree to review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/57200/ asap ? 20:10:22 policies ? 20:10:34 I need this one for the Host Reservation Admin API 20:10:40 Ok, tomorrow will take one more look on it 20:10:49 #action DinaBelova Review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/57200/ 20:10:55 that's it for me 20:11:03 any other reviews you want to prio. ? 20:11:07 bauzas, I'll take a look on it too 20:11:08 I think I can review it tomorrow too 20:11:12 ok 20:11:13 :D 20:11:16 :D 20:11:29 SergeyLukjanov, add :D :) 20:11:36 Ok 20:11:39 any top prio review ? 20:11:46 if not, moving to the next topic item 20:11:48 bauzas, I think not now 20:11:50 +1 20:11:54 also, I'll try to add new patchsets to https://review.openstack.org/#/c/48002/ 20:12:05 and https://review.openstack.org/#/c/49142/ 20:12:06 #topic blueprints scoped for 0.1 20:12:11 and test it on devstack 20:12:29 #link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/climate 20:12:43 #link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/climate/0.1.x 20:12:55 bauzas, I've made some steps to for our Launchpad to look good with 0.1.x 20:13:00 yep 20:13:02 yup, saw it 20:13:40 as it's pretty late for you guys, let's agree to send any concerns about 0.1 by email tomorrow 20:13:42 I think it's ok for most of them 20:13:48 +1 20:14:08 Can think about nothing except sleeping :) 20:14:14 sure, understand 20:14:15 https://blueprints.launchpad.net/climate/+spec/remove-empty-copyrights - change it status to implemented 20:14:36 I can't remember my password for Launchpad( 20:14:37 #agreed Discuss blueprints scope for 0.1 by email 20:14:52 and for the dates for 0.1 20:14:52 Nikolay_St, really strange 20:15:03 Nikolay_St: will do 20:15:07 canonot see if Gerrit has dote it 20:15:09 ** 20:15:14 that should be automated 20:15:17 but it was merged 20:15:25 #action bauzas fix status of https://blueprints.launchpad.net/climate/+spec/remove-empty-copyrights to implemened 20:15:29 I'm proposing Dec 24 for code freeze for testing and Dec 26 for release 20:15:43 sounds good 20:15:44 SergeyLukjanov, nice for me 20:15:45 the common Tue -Thu dating 20:15:58 I have to discuss this with f_rossigneux 20:16:04 afair, that's common for OpenStack projects 20:16:11 bauzas, ok 20:16:28 Let us know about results asap 20:16:32 sure 20:16:34 if we'd like to postpone release than it should be at least mid Oct due to the ru holidays 20:16:54 mid Oct?? 20:16:55 mid Jan * 20:16:56 *thumbs up* 20:16:59 ok 20:17:08 thinking about H release ;) 20:17:10 haha 20:17:18 lol 20:17:20 #action bauzas f_rossigneux Agree on delivery date 20:17:31 Ok, I think that's it for this topic 20:17:33 bauzas? 20:17:37 like Jan 14, Jan 16 20:17:37 sure 20:17:45 #topic Open discussion 20:18:04 devstack gate job is still under review 20:18:09 I skipped the hooks discussion 20:18:13 yes, saw it... 20:18:14 SergeyLukjanov: I made +1 20:18:22 and I currently have no time to complete devstack integration 20:18:33 hope to return back to this task this week 20:18:41 bauzas, I think we may discuss that tomorrow day (hooks, I mean) 20:18:58 In our channel 20:19:01 DinaBelova: yup, that was just a notice :) 20:19:05 and I think that it's time to resurrect client reviews 20:19:06 ok 20:19:13 no precise things to raise 20:19:20 btw it could be released after the main release 20:19:21 SergeyLukjanov, +2 20:19:28 please take a look at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/54285/ 20:19:49 albeit it's WIP 20:19:51 there are some Jenkins problems 20:19:57 and we need to start discussion about nova implementation (virtual resources) 20:20:08 Nikolay_St: sure 20:20:27 Nikolay_St, I think it's almost decided thing 20:20:31 DinaBelova: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/54285/ is about hooks, not inheritance :) 20:20:56 so, should you have time to take a look tomorrow, let's discuss on this afterwards :) 20:20:57 bauzas, sure 20:21:25 DinaBelova: I mean we need smth like a msg for NOVA-guys "Hey! Here we are!" 20:21:41 Nikolay_St, it would be amazing if you'll have POC for instance plugin using shelved instances 20:21:52 because if it will be ok 20:22:03 we need no more dirty hacks to Nova 20:22:11 I'll work on it this week 20:22:14 Nikolay_St: Nova folks are already aware of our existence :) 20:22:18 Would be great 20:22:23 and I hope everything will be okat 20:22:29 Nikolay_St, cool 20:22:37 Nikolay_St: there was a previous thread I opened on the ML about Nova interactions 20:22:56 And also there were some discussions on summit, afair 20:23:01 yup 20:23:07 Ok 20:23:23 for first look I can't see anything what can fail, but you know how it can be :( 20:23:24 Have we mentioned everything needed? 20:23:26 we actually have tight integrations with Nova, esp. on the physical side plugin 20:23:31 DinaBelova: yup 20:23:33 think so 20:23:39 ok, great 20:23:43 time for you getting back to bed 20:23:50 let's continue working tomorrow 20:23:53 bauzas, yeee 20:23:54 many many thanks for the effort 20:24:01 bye, guys! 20:24:03 ahahaha 20:24:03 really appreciated 20:24:09 bye, all! 20:24:18 bye 20:24:21 #endmeeting