16:12:43 <DuncanT> #startmeeting Cinder -unofficial meeting
16:12:44 <openstack> Meeting started Wed Nov 12 16:12:43 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is DuncanT. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
16:12:45 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
16:12:48 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'cinder__unofficial_meeting'
16:13:05 <DuncanT> <rhe00_> DuncanT: Question for you.  I am waiting for code reviewers to review version 1.0 of my driver https://review.openstack.org/#/c/116186/12 . I already have version 1.1 in the pipeline with added QoS support. Should I submit blueprint and submit code for review now or wait? Would submitting version 1.1 risk delaying acceptance of version 1.0
16:13:07 <jgriffith> unofficially official
16:13:12 <DuncanT> DuncanT> rhe00_, I'd put it up as a dependant review if it were me. I don't think it will slow down the base driver
16:13:12 <DuncanT> <rhe00_> Ok. I will do that. Thanks!
16:13:23 <DuncanT> <mtanino> DuncanT: In my driver case, I need to be approved cinder-spec until Nov 15th. I will update the spec. Could you review it?
16:13:31 <jgriffith> DuncanT: +1 on dependent review
16:13:32 <DuncanT> <DuncanT> mtanino, You can and should submit the code even if the spec isn't approved as long as it isn't looking contentious, but I will certainly take a look
16:13:38 <DuncanT> <mtanino> DuncanT: I understand. I will post latest code.
16:13:42 <jgriffith> DuncanT: mtanino DEF work on the code
16:14:13 <mtanino> jgriffith: sorry, What meanings of DEF work?
16:14:24 <jgriffith> mtanino: DEF is short for definitely ;)
16:14:25 <DuncanT> (trying to keep the agenda just to new driver folks today, most of the core team is still away post-summit
16:14:28 <DuncanT> )
16:15:08 <mtanino> jgriffith: I understand.
16:15:34 <jgriffith> mtanino: cool
16:17:39 <jgriffith> mtanino: have you spent much time looking at the Nova side of this yet?
16:19:17 <mtanino> jgriffith: As for nova side, I have not spent much time.
16:20:08 <mtanino> jgriffith: The spec had +2 previously and also have +2 for kilo.
16:20:16 <jgriffith> mtanino: cool
16:20:31 <DuncanT> mtanino, do you have a definite sponsor from nova-core?
16:21:25 <mtanino> jgriffith: Daniel gave me +2, but I don't have definite sponsor in nova side.
16:22:29 <DuncanT> mtanino, getting somebody to sign up as a named sponsor is worth doing
16:23:12 <mtanino> DuncanT: If my proposal approved cinder side, I will talk about sponsor with nova core member.
16:23:15 <DuncanT> Offtopic - Philae done gone and successfully roped itself a comet
16:23:24 <DuncanT> mtanino, Makes sense
16:30:12 <jgriffith> DuncanT: avishay so do we want to plan a sort of "recap" for next weeks meeting?
16:30:23 <jgriffith> ie recap of the summit?
16:30:30 <jgriffith> Major bullet items at least
16:30:46 <DuncanT> jgriffith, That'd be a good plan
16:31:10 <DuncanT> jgriffith, I need to write it up for the HP team, I'll probably post it on the list too
16:31:26 <jgriffith> DuncanT: yeah, was thinking a descent summary (not the etherpads) and maybe some prioritization and owners/sponsors
16:31:44 <DuncanT> jgriffith, yup
16:32:01 <jgriffith> honestly I thought more of us would be back today, kinda quiet :)
16:32:28 <DuncanT> jgriffith, The midcycle meetup etherpad was more readable that the summit ones, because it was largely the work of one person
16:32:46 <jgriffith> DuncanT: yeah, tends to work out that way
16:33:26 <DuncanT> jgriffith, hopefully we can get a similarly coherent writeup of the summit, and get people to chip in on the none-cinder-track sessions I wasn't at
16:38:14 <jgriffith> DuncanT: should we just cut out and go back to Cinder channel?
16:38:25 <DuncanT> Yeah
16:38:28 <DuncanT> #endmeeting