14:00:07 <whoami-rajat> #startmeeting cinder
14:00:07 <opendevmeet> Meeting started Wed Jul 27 14:00:07 2022 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is whoami-rajat. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
14:00:07 <opendevmeet> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
14:00:07 <opendevmeet> The meeting name has been set to 'cinder'
14:00:12 <whoami-rajat> #topic roll call
14:00:20 <TusharTgite> hi
14:00:23 <simondodsley> here - but can't join on video
14:00:30 <Alexander> hi!
14:00:33 <felipe_rodrigues> o/
14:00:34 <whoami-rajat> today's meeting is in video+IRC format so join here https://redhat.bluejeans.com/556681290
14:00:42 <luizsantos[m]> o/
14:01:08 <whoami-rajat> simondodsley, ack np
14:01:20 <caiquemello[m]> o/
14:01:20 <raffaelacunha[m]> Hi
14:01:30 <nahimsouza[m]> o/
14:01:51 <aneeshp1> o/
14:02:51 <whoami-rajat> #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/cinder-zed-meetings
14:04:39 <enriquetaso_> hi
14:05:49 <HappyStacker> hi
14:06:23 <HappyStacker> Is Antelope, OR or is this the animal?
14:07:21 <whoami-rajat> #topic announcements
14:07:33 <whoami-rajat> OpenStack next release name is out and it's Antelope
14:07:47 <whoami-rajat> HappyStacker, i think it is
14:07:56 <whoami-rajat> next, Driver merge deadline this week
14:08:01 <HappyStacker> oh great
14:13:14 <simondodsley> is the pure driver being looked at with the associated dependencies?
14:14:35 <whoami-rajat> simondodsley, do you mean the os-brick dependencies?
14:14:51 <simondodsley> there is also a tempest patch dependency which in itself is dependent on a small cinder patch
14:16:50 <simondodsley> added those to the etherpad
14:17:20 <whoami-rajat> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/849841
14:17:50 <whoami-rajat> simondodsley, will take a look at the tempest patch but QA team can merge it so good to ask them for reviews
14:17:58 <whoami-rajat> and for the driver, geguileo and I have agreed to review it
14:18:15 <simondodsley> thery have already seen it and are waiting on the cinder patch
14:18:59 <whoami-rajat> so we need the cinder driver In first and tempest is dependent on it?
14:19:20 <simondodsley> cinder patch, then tempest, then os-brick then the driver
14:19:40 <whoami-rajat> ack
14:19:41 <simondodsley> sorry for the deep dependencies, but this is a new protocol we are messing with here...
14:19:59 <whoami-rajat> 1) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/849690
14:20:01 <whoami-rajat> 2) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/849841
14:20:15 <whoami-rajat> 3) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/799871
14:20:26 <whoami-rajat> sorry, 3) os-brick patches (MERGED)
14:20:27 <whoami-rajat> 4) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/799871
14:20:33 <simondodsley> yep
14:21:21 <whoami-rajat> we're discussing it right now
14:30:43 <whoami-rajat> next, Cinder midcycle-2 planning
14:31:43 <whoami-rajat> simondodsley, not sure i remember correctly but did you have a conflict on 10th august -- related to midcycle-2
14:34:39 <whoami-rajat> #topic os-brick CI follow-up
14:36:32 <whoami-rajat> #topic Ceph: add option to keep only last n snapshots per backup
14:36:40 <whoami-rajat> jhartkopf that's you
14:36:54 <jhartkopf> yes
14:37:08 <jhartkopf> So there was an issue with incremental backups when base backups were deleted by the new feature, but this should be resolved now. I pushed that patch some months ago.
14:37:37 <jhartkopf> Is it realistic to get this merged before Zed releases?
14:37:43 <eharney> do we have any tempest tests that exercise this functionality?  (just for risk assessment)
14:37:56 <whoami-rajat> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/810457
14:38:16 <geguileo> jhartkopf: there's still time to merge it
14:38:28 <HappyStacker> I don't see any link to the blueprint, as it seems to be a new feature
14:38:49 <jhartkopf> Well, maybe more of a refinement instead of a new feature
14:39:41 <HappyStacker> ok, so we're good if no blueprint is provided?
14:39:54 <enriquetaso_> it has a related bug linked https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1703011
14:39:58 <geguileo> jhartkopf: we definitely don't have this covaered by tempest
14:41:59 <HappyStacker> enriquetaso: Yep I saw it. thanks
14:42:03 <whoami-rajat> jhartkopf, the releasenote mentions it's a new feature, we need some clarity on it since deadlines for features and bug fixes are different
14:42:51 <whoami-rajat> jhartkopf, we discussed that a tempest test is needed, even if it doesn't cover the whole feature, it will make sure we're not breaking anything
14:44:00 <jhartkopf> whoami-rajat: Ok, so should I add another test to tempest? Or what would be the best way going forward with this?
14:45:05 <geguileo> jhartkopf: probably best to add it to the cinder tempest tests and not tempest itself
14:45:13 <geguileo> (that's what I think)
14:46:55 <enriquetaso_> i.e https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder-tempest-plugin/+/791921
14:47:22 <geguileo> enriquetaso_: thanks for the link  :-)
14:48:05 <whoami-rajat> let's move to open discussion
14:48:08 <whoami-rajat> #topic open discussion
14:48:16 <aneeeshp1> Hi, i have created a third party CI setup for Fungible driver. Would like to request permission to test against the Cinder repo. Shall I enable commenting on Cinder patches? The setup is validated using ci-sandbox and look good.
14:48:36 <eharney> cinder-mypy (non-voting) is failing on all patches until we merge https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/851032
14:48:51 <whoami-rajat> aneeeshp1, we allow third party CIs to comment on patches but it should be non voting
14:49:05 <jhartkopf> geguileo, enriquetaso_: Thanks, will look into this
14:49:28 <aneeeshp1> whoami-rajat okay thank you. I will enable it only after removing the voting.
14:49:55 <geguileo> eharney: I added a comment
14:50:15 <geguileo> jhartkopf: thank you for working on it
14:50:43 <whoami-rajat> aneeeshp1, thanks, but I'm afraid we're too close to the deadline that fungible driver might not be able to make it into this release
14:51:20 <aneeeshp1> whoami-rajat I understand that. I too think it will slip to the next release.
14:52:11 <whoami-rajat> aneeeshp1, ack, good to know, we can start reviewing it early next release
14:52:29 <aneeeshp1> whoami-rajat great thank you
14:52:39 <whoami-rajat> thanks!
14:53:47 <whoami-rajat> thanks everyone for attending
14:53:48 <whoami-rajat> #endmeeting