14:00:06 <whoami-rajat> #startmeeting cinder
14:00:06 <opendevmeet> Meeting started Wed Jul  6 14:00:06 2022 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is whoami-rajat. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
14:00:06 <opendevmeet> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
14:00:06 <opendevmeet> The meeting name has been set to 'cinder'
14:00:13 <geguileo> hi! o/
14:00:17 <whoami-rajat> #topic roll call
14:00:22 <eharney> hi
14:00:33 <enriquetaso> hi
14:00:40 <rosmaita> o/
14:00:46 <felipe_rodrigues> o/
14:01:04 <luizsantos[m]> o/
14:01:04 <caiquemello[m]> o/
14:01:10 <jungleboyj> o/
14:01:13 <whoami-rajat> #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/cinder-zed-meetings
14:01:42 <simondodsley> hi
14:01:54 <HappyStacker> hi
14:02:04 <nahimsouza[m]> o/
14:02:09 <lucasmoliveira059> o/
14:03:14 <whoami-rajat> good turnout today
14:03:24 <tosky> hi
14:04:05 <whoami-rajat> we don't have many things on the agenda today but anyway let's get started
14:04:11 <whoami-rajat> #topic announcements
14:04:35 <whoami-rajat> first, spec freeze exception week
14:04:52 <whoami-rajat> so we had spec freeze on R-15 week
14:04:58 <TusharTgite> hi
14:05:17 <whoami-rajat> then we provided the time of R-14 to request a spec freeze exception
14:05:27 <whoami-rajat> and this is the week where the spec freeze exception deadline is
14:05:38 <whoami-rajat> there was only one request for the quota system spec from geguileo
14:05:48 <whoami-rajat> #link https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2022-July/029374.html
14:06:00 <whoami-rajat> so please review that spec on priority
14:06:19 <geguileo> sorry about the size of the spec
14:06:39 <enriquetaso> ack
14:06:39 <whoami-rajat> no worries, verbose = good (at least for me)
14:07:10 <whoami-rajat> please review and get it merged before 8th July!
14:07:17 <HappyStacker> what is supposed to be the merge freeze for Zed? next week also?
14:07:47 <whoami-rajat> HappyStacker, you mean the feature freeze? that's R-5 milestone 3
14:07:56 <whoami-rajat> HappyStacker, here's the whole schedule https://releases.openstack.org/zed/schedule.html
14:08:40 <HappyStacker> for any patchset which are pending, I think yes it's feature freeze
14:08:59 <whoami-rajat> so M-3 is for features and then we've time till RC-1 for bug fixes
14:10:25 <whoami-rajat> moving on then, next announcement, October 2022 PTG Dates & Registration
14:10:56 <whoami-rajat> I've brought this topic up before but doing it again just to get a realistic idea of the number of people visiting
14:11:32 <whoami-rajat> from Red Hat's perspective, it is not final but might be 3-5 people visiting
14:11:38 <simondodsley> It clashes with 2 other conferences so I have to see which takes priority
14:11:49 <whoami-rajat> ok
14:11:58 <hemna> I won't be able to make it.  no travel budget
14:12:04 <jungleboyj> I haven't started investigating yet but I think it is unlikely that I will be in person.
14:12:27 <simondodsley> AnsibleFest always seems to clash - Red Hat should take note of this
14:12:27 <whoami-rajat> oh ok, good to know
14:13:07 <jungleboyj> Wow, that is a clash for sure.
14:13:13 <geguileo> simondodsley: we'll pass on the feedback
14:13:24 <geguileo> simondodsley: will that be a problem for you?
14:13:29 <whoami-rajat> thanks for bringing it up simondodsley
14:13:43 <simondodsley> Yes - I am a senior Ansible contributor as well.
14:13:55 <geguileo> ouch :-(
14:13:56 <simondodsley> Plus I have an Observability conference in NYC the same week
14:14:11 <simondodsley> All my things at the same time
14:14:25 <jungleboyj> simondodsley:  I find you very observable.  So, all good there.  ;-)
14:14:38 <simondodsley> he he
14:14:47 <jungleboyj> :-)
14:15:23 <geguileo> simondodsley: at least the Observability one is not RH's fault, right?
14:15:38 <simondodsley> True - that is DataDog
14:15:57 <geguileo> so, is anybody actually going?
14:16:02 <whoami-rajat> so if not a lot of people will be there in person then we can also continue with our current method of virtual PTG
14:16:10 <whoami-rajat> geguileo, good question lol
14:16:22 <whoami-rajat> i think sfernand said they might send someone for cinder
14:16:24 <rosmaita> well, i don't want to go if no one is going to be there!
14:16:39 <sfernand> hi folks I will be there :)
14:17:02 <simondodsley> probably not - I think either Ansible (Chicago) or DataDog will take precedence currently
14:17:11 <simondodsley> I did go to Berlin though...
14:17:22 <rosmaita> oh, good, sfernand and I can find a conference room and zoom with the rest of the team
14:17:40 <jungleboyj> :-)
14:17:47 <HappyStacker> I'm too newbie to attend ;-)
14:18:09 <sfernand> Nahim will be with me and we will be splitting between Cinder and Manila
14:18:10 <simondodsley> never to new to attend...
14:18:29 <geguileo> hemna: will you be attending?
14:18:55 <hemna> I won't be able to make it.  no travel budget
14:19:06 <geguileo> :-(
14:19:14 <hemna> yah :(
14:19:54 <geguileo> this isn't looking too good if only NetApp and RH plan to attend for Cinder...
14:20:07 <jungleboyj> geguileo:  True.
14:20:17 <sfernand> yep
14:20:17 <hemna> SAP has locked down travel currently.   Otherwise I'd be there.
14:20:18 <rosmaita> no, and i really don't want to go to Columbus to have virtual meetings
14:20:19 <whoami-rajat> agreed
14:20:22 <simondodsley> Damn COVID. It's been a great excuse for companies to slash travel budgets
14:20:46 <jungleboyj> rosmaita: Oh come on, that sounds like a blast.  ;-)
14:20:49 <geguileo> rosmaita: yeah, that's why whoami-rajat is asking
14:21:01 <sfernand> hahaha rosmaita I'm  already paying for the US visa so please do not give up from attending
14:21:05 <sfernand> :P
14:21:15 <geguileo> simondodsley: true, because "virtual meetings are the same thing"  :-(
14:21:20 <rosmaita> i've been to columbus ... would rather go to Hoboken
14:21:29 <simondodsley> lol - so true
14:21:32 * jungleboyj laughs
14:21:35 <geguileo> sfernand: to be honest it's not looking good
14:21:38 <hemna> worse than Atlanta though?
14:21:40 <simondodsley> nothing wring with Hoboken
14:21:51 <jungleboyj> hemna: It is Ohio.
14:22:14 <simondodsley> Lots of good bars and restaurants in Hoboken now
14:22:20 <hemna> never been, so I have no idea.  lots of good racing there afaik
14:22:24 <rosmaita> simondodsley: ++
14:23:26 <sfernand> geguileo: are you planning to attend?
14:24:05 <whoami-rajat> thanks everyone for the feedback, it is helpful to plan further for the cinder PTG
14:24:26 <whoami-rajat> which looks likely to be not many people there for cinder
14:24:41 <rosmaita> so how does the count stand?  sounds like sfernand ?
14:24:44 <geguileo> sfernand: not by the looks of it, because I'm not sure RH will consider it necessary if only NetApp is going to be there
14:25:15 <geguileo> I've been told by management that there is budget and that RH would be sending Cinder people
14:25:22 <whoami-rajat> rosmaita, looks like it
14:25:36 <geguileo> but it's going to be hard to justify the expense if it's going to be mostly redhatters
14:26:16 <sfernand> geguileo: makes sense
14:26:32 <geguileo> which sucks :-(
14:26:35 <whoami-rajat> as geguileo said, it is true for most/all of the red hatters
14:26:47 <sfernand> in case I'm the only Cinder folk there I could bring some content to Cinder newcomers or something
14:27:00 <sfernand> I don't know
14:27:16 <whoami-rajat> sfernand, that would be great, and we will conduct the virtual PTG so you can join from there as well
14:27:31 <whoami-rajat> but i will leave that planning to the future and just proceed with the feedback received
14:27:43 <rosmaita> sfernand: you will get a much better internet connection in Columbus!
14:27:43 <sfernand> yes that would be actually very sad
14:27:51 <sfernand> to join a virtual PTG in person
14:27:56 <sfernand> haha
14:28:05 <whoami-rajat> lol true
14:28:22 <HappyStacker> new concept
14:28:49 <geguileo> yeah, the worst of both worlds
14:28:56 <rosmaita> well, this is a bummer, i was really looking forward to seeing people again for realz
14:29:09 <geguileo> me too  :-(
14:29:58 <whoami-rajat> so i think we're done with the discussion or anyone has anything else to add to it?
14:30:27 <rosmaita> well, on the plus side, i dont' have to go to columbus
14:30:39 <simondodsley> ROFL
14:30:50 <whoami-rajat> :D
14:30:54 <jungleboyj> rosmaita: ++
14:31:43 <simondodsley> feedback for the next PTG - make it in Hawaii
14:31:53 <jungleboyj> Bwah ha ha!
14:32:00 <enriquetaso> hawaii++
14:32:19 <HappyStacker> a newbie in Hawaii, that's a good starting point haha
14:32:23 <geguileo> that actually sound great, but unlikely
14:32:44 <simondodsley> bahamas then
14:32:59 <rosmaita> or Hoboken
14:33:27 <whoami-rajat> ok, moving on to the next announcement else we will never finish with the agenda (sorry guys), New project added Dell EMC PowerStore Charm
14:33:39 <whoami-rajat> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/846890
14:33:58 <whoami-rajat> I'm not sure how much that affects us as a project but thought it would be good to mention
14:34:14 <whoami-rajat> the upstream repo is https://github.com/nobuto-m/cinder-dell-emc-powerstore.git (which is external)
14:34:35 <simondodsley> good luck to them - i did the Pure charm
14:35:06 <whoami-rajat> cool, so we've a charm repo for each driver?
14:35:20 <simondodsley> only if the vendor decides to do one
14:35:51 <whoami-rajat> ok, I'm not very much familiar with the project
14:36:04 <whoami-rajat> next announcement, SRBAC goals for Zed
14:36:10 <whoami-rajat> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/847418
14:36:14 <simondodsley> its basically for Canonical OpenStack deployment using JuJu
14:36:39 <whoami-rajat> ack
14:37:21 <whoami-rajat> so we've discussed about the RBAC work for Zed, which is not much but we've to do a bunch of cleanup in policy files
14:37:42 <whoami-rajat> but the link points to an OpenStack wide goal, so feel free to go through it
14:37:57 <whoami-rajat> i won't recommend until it's merged due to it's nature of constant change
14:38:36 <whoami-rajat> but yeah, there's a patch on the revised goals based on the ops feedback at berlin
14:39:12 <whoami-rajat> that's all the announcements from my side, anyone has anything else?
14:40:35 <whoami-rajat> okay, moving on to topics then
14:40:38 <whoami-rajat> #topic RBD backend QOS
14:40:45 <whoami-rajat> #link https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2022-July/029403.html
14:41:08 <whoami-rajat> so there a mail thread asking for reviews on a patch implementing backend QoS for RBD driver
14:41:20 <geguileo> In my opinion that didn't need a spec
14:41:26 <whoami-rajat> and the author has also proposed a spec which we traditionally don't require
14:41:36 <whoami-rajat> but anyway i thought it would be good for documentation
14:41:38 <geguileo> it's just a cinder base feature implementation
14:41:52 <simondodsley> it does need a BP though
14:41:57 <whoami-rajat> geguileo, yep, same thoughts
14:42:10 <geguileo> simondodsley: true, I forgot to say it in my reply
14:42:12 <whoami-rajat> simondodsley, yes, they've registered one, in the introduction part of the spec
14:42:36 <geguileo> oh, then I didn't forget, I saw it! I saw it!
14:42:52 <whoami-rajat> geguileo, i said it in my reply that they require one, but later noticed they already have one :D
14:43:02 <simondodsley> OK - I really don't care if they want to raise a spec but I get it isn't required
14:43:24 <simondodsley> it does need your reviews addressing though whoami-rajat
14:44:01 <whoami-rajat> so my point of bringing this up is it doesn't have to follow the spec deadlines and can be merged even in the exception phase, at least that are my thoughts
14:44:13 <simondodsley> agreed
14:44:18 <whoami-rajat> simondodsley, yes, i left some comments, if they can address that then we should be good
14:45:08 <whoami-rajat> okay, so i don't think we've much conflict there
14:45:11 <sfernand> as soon as they send a blueprint in time for the driver feature proposal deadline they should be fine, right? I would say to ask them to abandon the spec..
14:45:24 <whoami-rajat> let's see if they can revise it in time
14:46:04 <whoami-rajat> sfernand, so I did abandon it since it wasn't worked upon for > 4 months but recently they brought it up and i think the spec is a good point of documentation for the backend QoS
14:46:17 <whoami-rajat> but maybe it's just me
14:47:18 <geguileo> whoami-rajat: I prefer they update the RBD driver docs, though  ;-)
14:47:30 <geguileo> and I noticed that our QoS docs are a bit of a mess
14:47:30 <simondodsley> that is a given
14:47:50 <geguileo> we have it split in one without anything explaining how everything works together
14:47:52 <simondodsley> the main code patch will have to have that. It is is merge conflict as well at the moment
14:47:59 <geguileo> split in 2
14:49:32 <whoami-rajat> geguileo, yeah, i was referring to apart from driver docs, since they're already written the spec so it at least provides the reasoning for why we are introducing it
14:50:01 <whoami-rajat> anyway, let's see if there's an update by Friday
14:50:18 <whoami-rajat> but the spec shouldn't stop anyone from reviewing the actual code patch
14:51:28 <whoami-rajat> so i don't see any other topics, let's move to open discussion
14:51:33 <whoami-rajat> #topic open discussion
14:53:23 <geguileo> I have a question for driver maintainers
14:53:47 <geguileo> Do any of you use 2 synchronize decorators in a single method?
14:54:06 <geguileo> for example in a migration to lock on the source and on the destination?
14:54:21 <simondodsley> not in Pure that I'm aware of
14:54:43 <eharney> remotefs does
14:54:59 <geguileo> eharney: thanks, I'll see if I can find it
14:55:12 <eharney> (create_cloned_volume)
14:55:57 <geguileo> ok, doesn't look like problematic
14:56:16 <geguileo> since it locks on the volume id and not on host or some other storage thingy
14:57:30 <geguileo> I'm asking because I've noticed a driver that can have a deadlock
14:58:00 <geguileo> and I'm working on some improvements to coordination.synchronized to make it easier for drivers
14:58:24 <geguileo> and wondering if this could be happening for other drivers
15:00:04 <whoami-rajat> we're out of time, thanks everyone for attending!
15:00:05 <sfernand> could share the line with the possible deadlock you've found
15:00:09 <whoami-rajat> #endmeeting