10:01:07 <icey> #startmeeting charms
10:01:08 <openstack> Meeting started Mon Mar 11 10:01:07 2019 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is icey. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
10:01:09 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
10:01:11 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'charms'
10:01:26 <icey> #topic Review ACTION points from previous meeting
10:01:54 <icey> looks like we actually had an action in the last one - reviewing http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2019-February/002488.html
10:03:52 * jamespage looks
10:04:08 <icey> that was regarding our growing use of Depends-On against Github PRs
10:04:30 <icey> a little side project of mine has been working on the reverse of that, allowing a PR to depend on a Gerrit review
10:04:40 <icey> which more closely resembles what we want to do with Zaza + charms
10:05:33 <icey> and, we (myself and fnordahl) have recently landed an update to OSCI's scripting to allow a new "codeword" to pull in a pull-request for testing purposes rather than blocking reviews merging with a Depends-On
10:06:07 <jamespage> oh how does that work? do you have an example?
10:07:13 <icey> it would look like adding: `Func-Test-PR: https://github.com/link/to/my/PR` to the commit message
10:07:37 <icey> coming from https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~uosci/ubuntu-openstack-ci/trunk/revision/415
10:08:55 <jamespage> sorry had to drop - chrome had consumed to much ram :-)
10:09:11 <jamespage> +1 sounds really useful
10:09:14 <icey> you were only gone for a moment ;-)
10:09:30 <icey> I'm really excited to be able to block a PR on a review landing too :)
10:09:55 <icey> unless there's anything else to discuss regarding that...
10:10:01 <icey> we can move on
10:10:16 <icey> #topic State of Development for next Charm Release
10:11:01 <icey> jamespage: do you know when our freeze is for the next charms release?
10:11:29 <jamespage> lemme check
10:12:28 <jamespage> -2 weeks from April 18th
10:12:34 <jamespage> so 4th April I guess
10:12:50 <jamespage> thats the Ubuntu release date and the OpenStack release date +1 week
10:12:55 <jamespage> which is where we normally aim
10:13:15 <icey> so, we're about 3.5 weeks out from freeze
10:13:34 <jamespage> hurrah! better get those feature in quick then!
10:13:44 <jamespage> icey: does you security guide actions work still need review and landing?
10:13:46 * jamespage peeks
10:13:57 <icey> jamespage: we've started landing, with the keystone charm
10:14:18 <jamespage> https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:security-checklist+(status:open+OR+status:merged)
10:14:22 <icey> there's a new zaza change pending (for ceph-osd), and we will probably want to start landing more of them soon
10:14:39 <jamespage> ack
10:15:00 <icey> I believe that beisner wanted to let the keystone one bake for a little bit before landing the rest
10:15:08 <icey> so we're in that time right now, but likely moving on soon
10:15:20 <jamespage> okies
10:15:26 <icey> I believe the ceph radosgw and rbd replication bits are looking good?
10:15:48 <jamespage> yes - I have one minor thing to add for rgw multisite replication + a test case
10:16:02 <icey> ack
10:16:02 <jamespage> fnordahl has all of the rbd replication bits landed now as well
10:16:22 <jamespage> http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/charm-specs/specs/stein/index.html
10:16:36 <jamespage> octavia and cells v2 landed earlier in the cycle
10:16:56 <icey> looks like we're going to miss on two, the keystone goal-state and release notes specs
10:16:58 <jamespage> I think we're generally looking quite good
10:17:04 <jamespage> yah
10:17:06 <icey> agreed
10:17:41 <icey> alright, anybody want to add anything else about the next charm release?\
10:17:53 <jamespage> gnuoy, tinwood ?
10:18:43 <icey> admcleod?
10:19:49 <icey> #topic High Priority Bugs
10:19:54 <icey> https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-charms/+bugs
10:19:55 <icey> Use stable-backport tag for bugs  http://tinyurl.com/charm-stable-backports
10:19:55 <icey> Critical bugs: https://tinyurl.com/osc-critical-bugs
10:19:55 <icey> High priority bugs: https://tinyurl.com/osc-high-priority
10:20:13 <admcleod> nope
10:20:24 <icey> Critical looks good, mostly fix-committed
10:20:34 <jamespage> apart from https://bugs.launchpad.net/charm-keystone-ldap/+bug/1819054
10:20:35 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1819054 in OpenStack Keystone LDAP integration "TLS parameter changes or removed" [Critical,Triaged]
10:21:38 <icey> it looks like that bug is somewhat undecided, as maybe it's more about misunderstanding the parameters than an actual bug
10:21:39 <jamespage> but looks like thedac has been handson - lets checkin with him later
10:22:05 <icey> can we toss an action into the US scheduled meeting?
10:23:13 <icey> and would it be worth it, or should we just discuss it this afternoon?
10:23:16 <jamespage> I've marked that bug as incomplete/undecided - I think maybe it moved to triaged to quick
10:23:20 <jamespage> icey: yeah second option
10:23:59 <icey> lots of high priority bugs still, we need to continue to ensure that we take up our bug rotas
10:24:23 <jamespage> agreed - we also need to keep focus on new bugs coming in
10:24:36 <jamespage> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-charms/+bugs?search=Search&field.status=New
10:24:58 <jamespage> I touched 30 last week but there are still 76 untouched
10:26:01 <jamespage> or https://tinyurl.com/osc-new-bugs
10:26:03 <icey> I'm scheduled tomorrow for an afternoon of bug-triage as well
10:26:25 <jamespage> +1 awesome
10:26:29 <icey> alright, we'll move on unless there's anything else?
10:26:35 <jamespage> please do
10:26:38 <icey> #topic Openstack Events
10:26:59 <icey> I don't know of any events off the top of my head, jamespage ?
10:27:13 <jamespage> yes - https://openinfradays.co.uk/
10:27:37 <jamespage> 1st April
10:27:53 <jamespage> I'm going to try to get to that one (although I don't have a talk submitted)
10:28:14 <jamespage> denver summit and ptg is next on the list at the end of april start of may
10:28:35 <icey> I'd be +1 to going to OpenInfraDays as well
10:29:41 <icey> alright, moving on
10:29:43 <icey> #topic Open Discussion
10:29:54 <icey> tinwood gnuoy admcleod jamespage anything else?
10:30:52 <jamespage> nothing from me - quiet this morning
10:31:09 <jamespage> oh PTL elections - I think its just icey and I standing right?
10:31:14 <jamespage> fnordahl bowed out
10:31:17 <icey> I think that's right
10:31:24 <jamespage> well good luck :-)
10:31:53 <icey> and you!
10:32:06 <icey> alrighty then, we'll let the
10:32:09 <icey> #topic Next Chair
10:32:14 <icey> go back to fnordahl !
10:32:31 <icey> thanks all!
10:32:41 <icey> #endmeeting