17:01:48 #startmeeting charms 17:01:48 Meeting started Mon Nov 14 17:01:48 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is thedac. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 17:01:49 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 17:01:52 The meeting name has been set to 'charms' 17:02:03 Welcome everyone 17:02:13 #topic Review ACTION points from previous meeting 17:02:22 o/ 17:02:39 Looking at the meeting notes ... 17:02:41 * thedac beisner regular upgrade tests 17:02:47 o/ 17:02:49 beisner: around? ^^ 17:02:53 I think that ones supposed to be closed 17:02:59 ok next 17:03:04 * thedac jamespage to identity alternate week slot and get scheduled (carried forward) 17:03:15 * jamespage hangs head in shame 17:03:18 please carry that forward 17:03:20 heh 17:03:24 will do 17:03:26 I'm not doing a great job at that I am 17:03:38 * thedac all to read through the charm specs: http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/charm-specs/ 17:03:56 Now I am holding my head in shame. I'll do that today 17:04:20 Should we carry that forward as well? 17:04:27 +1 17:04:29 +1 17:04:30 o/ 17:04:33 ok 17:04:36 last one 17:04:38 * thedac jamespage allocate days in month for bug squashing. 17:04:54 carry pls 17:05:00 will do 17:05:10 #topic State of Development for next Charm Release 17:05:26 jamespage and gnuoy any comments from the last couple of weeks? 17:05:39 Input on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/397241/ would be much appreciated 17:05:52 o/ apologies, was tied up. hi all. 17:05:59 hey beisner 17:06:17 ok so focus should be on specs right now 17:06:22 we have a few already approved 17:06:33 I have gnuoy's lb spec on my list to review tomorrow 17:06:41 specs only required for new features 17:07:11 ok, I'll take a read through the LB spec as well to see how it has evolved since my last conversation with gnuoy on the topic 17:07:25 Any other comments on the state of development? 17:07:27 re: regular upgrade tests; we do run the single-hop upgrades now (L:M or M:N). but, we've got that on the list for doing multi-step L:K:M type upgrades. no cycles to move forward on that so far. 17:08:01 thedac, tinwood has a charm inbound I believe 17:08:07 M-something 17:08:10 ha! 17:08:11 Manilla! 17:08:14 manila, manila-generic 17:08:16 :) 17:08:25 \o/ 17:08:26 Murano, Manilla, Mistral it blurs 17:08:32 indeed. 17:08:37 beisner: got it. Should that remain on this list of actions? Or due to its long running nature be tracked somwhere else? 17:08:45 All the Ms 17:08:52 o/ 17:09:06 Ok, moving forward 17:09:10 #topic High Priority Bugs 17:09:10 thedac, not sure. it will likely not be resolved before the next meeting. 17:09:23 OpenStack bugs at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-charms 17:09:32 Anything to highlight? 17:09:38 How are the rabbits? 17:09:57 I think we quashed the DNS short hostname bug. 17:10:06 kk 17:10:06 That is out in the wild and I have not heard complaints yet 17:10:12 🐇🐇🐇 17:10:20 feedback welcome of course 17:10:38 others? 17:10:58 Moving on ... 17:11:03 #topic Openstack Events 17:11:21 What is coming up? 17:11:31 beisner: you mentioned some deadlines recently can you post those here? 17:12:33 ah, yes. juju charmer summit proposals + config mgmt camp proposals. one sec, links inbound. 17:12:42 thank you 17:13:44 fosdem: deadline is today Nov 14 - https://fosdem.org/2017/news/2016-07-20-call-for-participation/ 17:13:52 urgh 17:13:59 I though it wsa end of the week 17:14:22 cfg mgmt camp: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSeAMyDhrz4Z-xcSvCIroDoA1EKy-FhWIRwg8CEwjB1Lt9GM_g/viewform?c=0&w=1 (not sure of deadline but i believe it is this wk) 17:14:35 juju charmer summit: http://summit.juju.solutions/ 17:14:45 thanks, beisner 17:14:46 yah 18th 17:14:53 Also Project Teams Gathering is in February in Atlanta, correct? 17:15:03 #link https://www.openstack.org/ptg/ 17:15:13 any others? 17:15:14 #link http://summit.juju.solutions/ 17:15:22 #link https://fosdem.org/2017/news/2016-07-20-call-for-participation/ 17:15:31 forgat about that fancy meet bot stuff 17:15:36 :) 17:15:41 moving forward ... 17:15:44 #topic Open Discussion 17:16:10 Release the orangutans! 17:16:15 do we need to charm up any more ceilometer fragments 17:16:18 ? 17:16:40 I'm just going to pick random words 17:16:44 gnochi ? 17:17:43 gnuoy: is gnochi in Ocata? I suspect we will need to 17:18:10 not sure tbh 17:18:57 thedac, action me with taking a look 17:19:07 was panko a new thing spinning out of/around ceilo? 17:19:16 #action gnuoy determine which openstack release gnochi will be in 17:19:54 yeah i think we need to get an understanding of which pieces of ceilometer we need, also affects getting packages into main 17:20:07 coreycb, agreed 17:20:28 as beisner says panko is definitely a thing too 17:20:42 gnuoy: can I update that action item to be ceilometer micro services 17:20:48 +1 17:20:53 ok 17:20:56 Any other open discussion items? 17:20:59 o/ 17:21:06 yeah sorry doing two things at once does not work 17:21:09 re the PTG 17:21:15 yes 17:21:41 we can have a room for the event, but I only think that's worth doing if we get some wider attendees 17:22:02 so I was going to ping the devs who expressed interest in barcelona in becoming official projects as part of charms 17:22:29 OK 17:22:43 One more call for open discussion 17:23:02 Alright thanks everyone 17:23:04 #endmeeting