15:00:55 <eglynn> #startmeeting ceilometer
15:00:55 <openstack> Meeting started Thu Jun 19 15:00:55 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is eglynn. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
15:00:56 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
15:00:58 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'ceilometer'
15:01:05 <eglynn> hey y'all
15:01:10 <sileht> o/
15:01:13 <nealph> o/
15:01:14 <ityaptin> o/
15:01:16 <_nadya_> o/
15:01:20 <enikanorov> \o
15:01:20 <ildikov> o/
15:01:21 <Fabio> o/
15:01:23 <cdent> o/
15:01:46 <KurtRao> o/ too. though I don't know what it means
15:02:00 * eglynn promises to type quietly, in deference to the sore heads in Paris today ... ;)
15:02:31 <eglynn> #topic Juno-2 planning, progress on blueprint filing
15:03:06 <eglynn> so our rel mgr is pushing for the juno-2 pipeline to be populated sooner rather than later ...
15:03:29 <eglynn> we have a number of j2-oriented specs reviews in flight ...
15:03:33 <eglynn> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/ceilometer-specs,n,z
15:04:02 <eglynn> thanks to all who have filed and/or reviewed specs
15:04:18 * eglynn is hoping to see a few more proposals in the coming days
15:04:34 <eglynn> juno-2 is slated for July 24th BTW
15:04:46 <eglynn> #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Juno_Release_Schedule
15:05:01 <eglynn> anything else on juno-2?
15:05:10 <Fabio> eglynn: would make sense to have inside the juno folder for the specs, things like juno-1, juno-2 and juno-3 so people submitting bp can already target the right release?
15:05:19 <Fabio> just a suggestion
15:05:38 <eglynn> Fabio: juno-1, juno-2 are milestone as opposed to full releases
15:05:59 <Fabio> eglynn: yes, but those could be sub folders
15:06:04 <eglynn> Fabio: and they're quite fluid ... i.e stuff is easily bumped from one milestone the next
15:06:43 * eglynn doesn't want to be moving specs around in the tree to reflect this kinda milestone reassignment
15:06:59 <Fabio> no problem
15:07:01 * eglynn prefers to just push buttons in launchpad ... ;)
15:07:12 <eglynn> Fabio: coolio
15:07:33 <_nadya_> I wanted to ask about https://review.openstack.org/#/c/87869/
15:08:17 <_nadya_> I've asked in review about data expiration, in general
15:09:21 <eglynn> _nadya_: in the sense of selection expiration? ... i.e. not just the existing TTL fall-off-the-cliff-at-a-certain-age?
15:09:26 <_nadya_> eglynn: what do you think, should it be a separate spec or partial implementation as a bug is ok?
15:09:56 <eglynn> _nadya_: "partial implementation" ==> "just for alarm changes"?
15:10:26 <_nadya_> eglynn: maybe smth more intelligent... e.g. one value for alarm history, another for events
15:10:54 <eglynn> _nadya_: yeah for a chunky new feature like that, I would definitely envisage a BP spec being needed
15:11:25 <eglynn> move on?
15:11:31 <_nadya_> eglynn: yep
15:11:37 <eglynn> OK, please do fire up your spec-writing engines folks!
15:11:40 <eglynn> thanks! :)
15:11:54 <eglynn> #topic TSDaaS/gnocchi update
15:12:04 <eglynn> jd__: around?
15:12:24 * cdent is a bad boy who has been hassling jd__ all day with inane questions
15:12:40 <eglynn> on the channel?
15:12:55 <cdent> on the review for the dispatcher
15:13:07 <eglynn> a-ha, linkee?
15:13:30 <cdent> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/98798
15:14:11 <eglynn> cdent: ... interesting!
15:14:14 <cdent> I've been in a position of not quite getting it, so I've been pressing him to a bit more explicit about how things work.
15:14:50 * eglynn adds that review to his to-do list, thanks cdent for the heads-up ...
15:15:22 <amalagon> agreed - very useful
15:15:37 <cdent> It makes the gnocchi stuff much more concrete than it has been previously, becuase it is in the ceilometer context, rather than the abstraction of tsdaas
15:15:49 <eglynn> yeah
15:16:08 * eglynn is happy to see folks digging into gnocchi and getting involved :)
15:16:25 <eglynn> I guess the g+ hangout helped in that regard?
15:16:41 <cdent> yeah, it was a good kick from vague thing over there to something real
15:17:10 <amalagon> cdent: do you have a working gnocchi install? maybe I'll bother you with some questions later
15:17:33 <eglynn> cdent: please do share ^^^ :)
15:17:34 <cdent> I don't, no. Thus far I've just been making questions based on the code.
15:17:41 <eglynn> a-ha, I see
15:17:54 <cdent> But I do want to get it spun up asap
15:18:04 <amalagon> cool
15:18:12 <cdent> I'll keep you posted
15:18:12 <eglynn> amalagon: I'm gonna try to get it up and running on Fedora tmrw
15:18:23 <eglynn> ... the joys of dog-fooding ;)
15:18:35 <amalagon> eglynn: alright!
15:18:40 <eglynn> amalagon: I'm guessing you're on precise?
15:18:43 <amalagon> yeah
15:18:57 <eglynn> ... fair nuff, let's compare notes tmrw
15:19:07 <amalagon> :DD thanks, looking forward to it
15:19:16 <eglynn> k, since jd__ appears to be still nursing his hangover ;) ... let's move on
15:19:28 <eglynn> #topic open discussion
15:19:47 <shengjie_m> guys, quick one - it's been a while for me, do we have a wiki page describing the bp submission process now?
15:20:06 <shengjie_m> is it like -  I write a bp specs, that gets reviewed & merged, then I fire a bp on launchpad?
15:20:17 <eglynn> shengjie_m: well there's https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Blueprints#Ceilometer
15:20:40 <eglynn> shengjie_m: but in general you won't even need to file on launchpad anymore
15:20:50 <shengjie_m> aha - i c
15:20:55 <eglynn> shengjie_m: ... that'll happen automagically once the spec lands
15:21:05 <shengjie_m> will write a zabbix specs this week
15:21:09 <shengjie_m> then discuss with u guys
15:21:22 <eglynn> shengjie_m: ... note however the script to that auto-filing isn't fully ready yet
15:21:22 <shengjie_m> alrite - thanks :)
15:21:26 <eglynn> shengjie_m: cool, thanks!
15:21:33 <_nadya_> shengjie_m: looking forward!
15:21:44 <shengjie_m> _nadya_:cheers
15:22:07 <eglynn> BTW folks if you're planning to attend the sprint in Paris, please do add your moniker to the wiki
15:22:10 <eglynn> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Sprints/ParisJuno2014#Ceilometer
15:22:27 * eglynn notes the lists are growing :)
15:23:10 <shengjie_m> Ceilometer has a big list there ;)
15:23:29 <eglynn> yeap :)
15:24:31 <eglynn> in other news, the TC did a quick progress review on the ceilometer gap coverage plan
15:24:38 <eglynn> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Governance/TechnicalCommittee/Ceilometer_Gap_Coverage
15:25:09 <eglynn> they were happy enough with progress, holding us to juno-2 for completion
15:25:12 <eglynn> "#info Ceilometer is on track, still targeting j2 for fully covering the gap"
15:26:48 <eglynn> I mentioned this os-infra ML thread on the channel a couple times ...
15:26:51 <eglynn> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-infra/2014-June/001368.html
15:27:07 <eglynn> more on the never-ending saga of getting mongodb in the gate
15:28:40 <eglynn> TL;DR: resistance to rebasing unit test jobs on f20, strong preference for LTS distros
15:28:56 <_nadya_> eglynn: and no reaction, right?
15:29:06 <eglynn> "no reaction"?
15:30:29 <_nadya_> eglynn: I mean from infra-team
15:30:55 <_nadya_> eglynn: no answers to ML I meant :)
15:31:11 <eglynn> _nadya_: ... to that mail? ... no, there were replies from sdague, clarkb and monty
15:31:34 <eglynn> _nadya_: see http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-infra/2014-June/thread.html
15:32:02 <_nadya_> eglynn: ah, sorry, I see
15:32:05 <eglynn> _nadya_: ... it was the reaction that I summarized as "resistance to rebasing unit test jobs on f20, strong preference for LTS distros"
15:32:58 <eglynn> k, that's all I got this week folks
15:33:09 <eglynn> anyon got anything else they want to raise?
15:34:00 * cdent nopes
15:34:00 <eglynn> ... k, let's call it a wrap in that case
15:34:11 <_nadya_> thanks!
15:34:12 <eglynn> thanks y'all!
15:34:19 <eglynn> #endmeeting ceilometer