21:00:22 #startmeeting ceilometer 21:00:23 Meeting started Wed Jun 5 21:00:22 2013 UTC. The chair is jd__. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 21:00:24 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 21:00:27 The meeting name has been set to 'ceilometer' 21:00:30 o/ 21:00:36 #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/MeteringAgenda 21:00:39 o/ 21:00:42 o/ 21:00:44 o/ 21:00:45 o/ 21:02:09 #topic Last week action: dhellmann to send email to the openstack list about the support policy 21:02:22 #link https://lists.launchpad.net/openstack/msg24076.html 21:02:28 this is done :) 21:02:35 #topic Review Havana-2 milestone 21:02:48 #link https://launchpad.net/ceilometer/+milestone/havana-2 21:03:07 I'm not worried yet, but I might be if some bp don't start soon 21:03:18 hint hint dhellmann :] 21:03:31 I've cleared the decks for the next couple weeks 21:03:32 * dhellmann can take a hint 21:03:44 eglynn: ah I like that :-) 21:03:45 ... nose back to the coding grindstone ... 21:05:34 dhellmann: anyhow keep me updated if you think like you won't make some of your bp for h2 21:05:47 I'll give you a heads up 21:05:56 I'm not too worried at this point 21:06:24 me neither honestly 21:06:41 the next project status meeting is in 2 weeks from now and I'll have to update the release manager of our status 21:07:13 he may be worried at this point in the future, but we are not there yet :) 21:07:17 #topic Open discussion 21:07:28 reminder: apevec is pulling the trigger on the next stable/grizzly ceilo release tomorrow 21:07:38 here's what's backported so far: https://launchpad.net/ceilometer/+milestone/2013.1.2 21:07:51 so if you've anything else you want to get in, speak now or forever hold your peace ;) 21:07:54 looks great 21:07:59 cool 21:09:04 I'm out of topic for tonight 21:09:13 please review more code? I've too many patches waiting 21:09:19 I don't think I missed -1 this time 21:09:39 jd__, for console_scripts. do we want to keep bin scripts like nova/quantum 21:09:59 gordc: I've asked the same question :) 21:10:11 :) 21:10:24 unless we have a real reason to, I'd say no 21:10:38 and unless I miss something :) 21:11:21 jd__. no preference myself. it just breaks devstack the way it is right now. so we'll need to patch that too 21:11:34 fair enough 21:11:41 but not a blocker for me :) 21:12:08 gordc: I think it breaks devstack because we still have the bin directory. when we remove all bin/scripts, it should be ok 21:12:38 ah also 21:12:49 llu-laptop, oh. didn't know that. just quickly tried it this morning 21:13:12 if someone as time to kill, feel free to make a first pass on the hardware agent support https://review.openstack.org/#/c/30700/ 21:13:36 the path is utterly big like I saw it in my prophetic nightmare, but still… 21:13:44 1766 lines changed... 21:13:53 is the related requirements patch got in? 21:14:10 llu-laptop: there will always be a bin directory because I think one of the bin comes from oslo at least 21:14:37 jd__: ok, that means we have to patch devstack 21:15:14 llu-laptop: no, dhellmann -1'ed the requirement patch for now for good reasons, but it'll go in at some point 21:15:33 this was supposed to be merged for h1, not it's targetting h2, it'd be great we have it in h2 21:15:53 we've a ton of other thing for h3 already, slipping this one isn't a good idea 21:16:24 * gordc will try looking at it... most likely won't understand any of it. 21:17:12 i'll try too. 21:17:45 thanks guys 21:17:51 anything else or should I wrap up? 21:18:10 who's patching devstack? 21:19:43 i guess i'll do it. 21:20:01 ok :-) 21:20:06 thanks 21:20:12 see you soon guys! 21:20:14 happy hacking! 21:20:16 #endmeeting