21:00:03 #startmeeting ceilometer 21:00:04 Meeting started Wed May 22 21:00:03 2013 UTC. The chair is jd__. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 21:00:05 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 21:00:07 The meeting name has been set to 'ceilometer' 21:00:08 #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/MeteringAgenda 21:00:14 o/ 21:00:18 o/ 21:00:18 o/ 21:00:19 o/ 21:00:21 o/ 21:00:24 hey everybody 21:01:06 o/ 21:01:11 o/ 21:01:30 o/ 21:02:07 #topic Last week action: jd__ and dhellmann to write formal statement about limiting support for pre-grizzly versions of ceilometer 21:02:22 I plead innocent 21:02:39 o/ 21:02:40 * dhellmann hangs head in shame 21:02:49 o/ 21:03:12 OTOH more time passes more useless it is :) 21:03:33 shall we re-action, dhellmann ? 21:03:46 yes 21:04:02 o/ 21:04:04 #action jd__ and dhellmann to write formal statement about limiting support for pre-grizzly versions of ceilometer 21:04:16 #topic Review Havana-1 milestone 21:04:22 #link https://launchpad.net/ceilometer/+milestone/havana-1 21:04:34 h1 is next week, in 8 days 21:04:34 o/ 21:04:37 (I can only stay a couple of minutes) 21:04:57 asalkeld: ack 21:05:02 asalkeld: hola! 21:05:08 we're in good shape, we just need to review at this point 21:05:14 so review ! 21:05:35 are we expecting any dependency changes for h1? 21:05:48 (e.g. a new release of WSME before then) 21:05:59 I don't think so 21:05:59 * eglynn_ just thinking about packaging up h1 21:06:04 cool enough 21:06:25 well, I seem to remember we upgraded our dep on WSME recently if that was the question 21:07:14 git diff 2013.1..master -- tools/pip-requires indicates you need wsme 0.5b2 instead of wsme 0.5b1 21:07:15 I thought there was a further pending issue around status code returning 21:07:33 e.g s/400/404/ for NotFound 21:07:50 eglynn_: ah maybe, but I don't think it'll be in time for h1 21:07:52 * sandywalsh has allocated every friday as full review days 21:08:00 jd__: grand so 21:08:02 sandywalsh: good news :) 21:08:43 I'll rework my UDP patch tomorrow FWIW, the test failing is probably trivial so feel free to review even if Jenkins said -1 21:08:57 in the case you'd have nothing to do in the next hours :-) 21:09:27 jd__: I'll take a look at the UDP patch tmrw also 21:09:35 well, I think that's it for h1, next week you'll be able to flood again 21:09:41 eglynn_: thanks, that'll be helpful :) 21:10:18 also don't hesitate to change milestone on bp or bugs you got merged for h1 and that were not planned for h1 initially, if any 21:10:28 shall we move on or anybody has a question about h1? 21:11:01 do we have any client stuff we need for h1? 21:11:15 or, I guess, are we tracking client features with the milestones? 21:11:25 no we are not 21:11:30 clients do not follow this schedule 21:11:31 ok 21:11:43 so no pressure on this, though it's obviously good that work is done on it 21:12:59 #topic Open discussion 21:13:04 out of topic 21:13:30 wow so fast even I can stay:) 21:13:41 since we don't do this usually, I'd like to mention I've created a bp for ceilometerclient about supporting metadata query for APIv2, since I don't think we have this yet 21:13:43 https://blueprints.launchpad.net/python-ceilometerclient/+spec/metadata-query-v2 21:13:55 wanted to call to everyone's attention a bp Gordon and I submitted today 21:14:01 this is mainly as a tracker for terriyu's job 21:14:21 https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ceilometer/+spec/support-standard-audit-formats 21:14:23 jd__, we can pass a generic query 21:15:17 asalkeld: but I guess we can still enhance our shell interface, right? 21:15:25 https://github.com/openstack/python-ceilometerclient/blob/master/ceilometerclient/v2/shell.py#L48 21:17:20 asalkeld: hm. 21:17:33 you're embarassing me 21:17:54 * dhellmann thinks jd__'s memory is getting as bad is mine 21:18:03 all good 21:18:06 I was happy I found a good idea to enhance ceilometerclient and now it seems mainly covered by this 21:18:27 asalkeld: any other thing we could tackle on ceilometerclient? I'm trying get terriyu familiar with the API 21:18:34 dhellmann, just a heads up, the hp guys should have a proposal for v2 API changes to expose Events coming your way soon. 21:18:55 mrutkows: since you've code, I think I'll take a look at it, though I'm not sure I understand the purpose at first glance :) 21:18:58 jd__, I'll have a think (no coffee yet) 21:19:31 asalkeld: thanks 21:19:41 sandywalsh: sounds good, I'll keep an eye out for the review 21:20:01 dhellmann, it'll likely be a bp spec (elaboration on the existing bp) 21:20:07 btw review client please 21:20:13 sandywalsh: or that :-) 21:20:19 I have a bunch there 21:20:29 asalkeld: I'm going to try to catch up on reviews this evening/tomorrow morning (next 16 hrs or so) 21:21:16 thanks 21:22:53 * asalkeld heading off - wave 21:22:57 see ya 21:23:14 .blueprint killer 21:23:16 :) 21:24:05 do we have anything else to discuss? 21:24:29 do you guys need site-packages = True in python-ceilometerclient tox.ini ? 21:24:57 ahah, I think we don't have the period support in ceilometerclient 21:25:08 mordred: I don't think we should 21:25:15 mordred: probably not 21:25:25 that was probably copied from the tox.ini we had in the main repo at one point 21:26:53 cool. I'm going to send in a patch 21:26:59 mordred, no need 21:27:02 it's - well - breaking something with teh jinja crap 21:27:17 asalkeld: that was fast 21:27:27 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/29876/ 21:27:30 asalkeld: whee! 21:27:36 just need to review people 21:28:17 approved 21:28:30 too fast for me 21:29:04 you guys are sexy 21:29:20 /me thinks this is getting out of hand 21:29:33 \o/ 21:29:58 * jd__ nods 21:30:25 closing in a minute if nobody yells 21:30:36 early dinner! 21:30:58 early to bed! ;) 21:31:03 later kids! 21:31:13 Cheers 21:32:03 see you guys, have fun 21:32:06 and happy hacking! 21:32:08 #endmeeting