21:01:54 <jd__> #startmeeting Ceilometer 21:01:55 <n0ano> here 21:01:56 <openstack> Meeting started Wed Jan 2 21:01:54 2013 UTC. The chair is jd__. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 21:01:57 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 21:01:59 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'ceilometer' 21:01:59 <dhellmann> o/ 21:02:01 <jd__> #link http://wiki.openstack.org/Meetings/MeteringAgenda 21:02:03 <eglynn> o/ 21:02:16 <jd__> #topic dhellmann experiment with passing arrays of parameters to WSME for queries 21:02:21 <dhellmann> #link https://github.com/dhellmann/wsme-experimentation 21:02:43 <dhellmann> tl; dr: we don't need indexes on array arguments 21:02:43 <jd__> did it explode? 21:02:56 <dhellmann> that repo has a sample client file showing a few different forms 21:03:04 <dhellmann> that work and don't work 21:03:27 <jd__> okay 21:03:30 <dhellmann> and I pasted the output in the README for reference during the meeting 21:04:30 <jd__> ok 21:04:48 <jd__> I'm moving on then :) 21:04:52 <dhellmann> ok 21:04:53 <eglynn> the indices always seemed a little unnatural to me, this looks a lot cleaner 21:04:59 <jd__> #topic llu-laptop to report agreement result to wiki page 21:05:07 <jd__> llu: around? 21:05:22 <asalkeld> eglynn, what about : input.0.left 21:05:56 <eglynn> asalkeld: in what sense? 21:06:04 <jd__> #action llu to report agreement result to wiki page http://wiki.openstack.org/Ceilometer/CeilometerAndHealthnmon 21:06:06 <jd__> I report 21:06:22 <asalkeld> instead of input[0].left 21:06:29 <eglynn> asalkeld: a-ha, I see 21:06:30 <jd__> I guess since nijaba isn't here I'm going to report all of his stuff too 21:06:39 <jd__> #action nijaba to get in touch with the healthmon team to see what their reaction is to our plan for integration 21:06:39 <eglynn> asalkeld: sorry, I'm a bit slow this evening ... 21:06:56 <jd__> #action nijaba to find out if EmilienM wishes to commit on https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ceilometer/+spec/api-aggregate-average 21:07:02 <jd__> #action nijaba to send an email to openstack-dev listing the orphan bps 21:07:05 <eglynn> asalkeld: yeah, that's less intrusive that full indexing 21:07:09 <jd__> #action nijaba to add bp skeleton to remind ourselves to implement higher level tests for db backends 21:07:19 <jd__> #topic API v2 proposal review http://wiki.openstack.org/Ceilometer/blueprints/APIv2 21:07:47 <jd__> I guess that's rejoin the topic you're discussing 21:07:53 <dhellmann> I'm ready to start implementing that new API, if we've agreed on what it should look like. 21:07:54 <jd__> s/'s// 21:08:03 <asalkeld> dhellmann, I have started 21:08:09 <dhellmann> asalkeld: cool 21:08:17 <asalkeld> just was blocking on the array stuff 21:08:35 <asalkeld> but I got pulled into some clustering bug 21:08:41 <dhellmann> asalkeld: that's in the tip version of WSME, so make sure you install from source 21:08:58 <dhellmann> #action dhellmann to talk to WSME author about packaging a release 21:09:14 <asalkeld> so if I can't attack it in the next day I'll post what I have 21:09:22 <dhellmann> asalkeld: sounds good 21:10:11 <asalkeld> so is everyone happy with that api? 21:10:17 <eglynn> can our CI running against the WSME tip, or just the last packaged version? 21:10:36 <dhellmann> eglynn: it can use the tip (we have an hg url in the test-requires, IIRC) 21:10:37 <eglynn> test-requires can include a dependency on a particular commit hash, right? 21:10:52 <eglynn> a-ha, yep, I remember that now ... 21:11:14 <jd__> API seems ok to me 21:11:15 <dhellmann> asalkeld: I'm happy enough to keep going with implementation. We may want to tweak as we go, but I don't have any specific objections. 21:11:37 <asalkeld> see the "Unresolved issues" 21:11:38 <dhellmann> well, aside from the things I've already noted in the wiki page and we've said we would leave for later 21:12:11 <asalkeld> ok 21:12:45 <dhellmann> how much have you needed to change the db api so far? 21:13:05 <asalkeld> not much yet 21:13:15 <asalkeld> but early stages 21:13:19 <dhellmann> ok 21:13:39 <asalkeld> I'll get stuck in and share with you 21:13:54 <asalkeld> taking a while to get back up to speed 21:14:04 <asalkeld> to much eggnog:) 21:14:09 * dhellmann needed 3 days to remember what his job was after his vacation 21:15:15 <jd__> good you remembered you had a job already 21:15:30 <asalkeld> jd__, we can probably move on. 21:15:39 <jd__> #topic open discussion 21:16:16 <eglynn> how are we fixed for the bug squashing day? 21:16:33 * eglynn hasn't triaged the bug queue as yet ... 21:16:42 <jd__> nijaba triaged a lot of bugs already 21:16:47 <dhellmann> have we had anyone express interest in participating outside of the existing team? 21:16:48 <eglynn> great! 21:16:54 <jd__> and I'll do it too tomorrow 21:17:05 <jd__> dhellmann: not that I am aware of 21:17:12 <asalkeld> so it's on friday (saturday my time)? 21:17:18 <jd__> asalkeld: yup 21:17:18 <eglynn> have we an agreed low-hanging-fruit tag? 21:17:35 <jd__> eglynn: there's t-shirt size tags on bugs 21:17:43 <dhellmann> is nijaba using effort-s for that easy? 21:17:47 <eglynn> jd__: cool, even better 21:17:52 <jd__> yep effort-s it is 21:17:58 <eglynn> sounds good 21:18:58 <jd__> anything else? 21:19:22 <dhellmann> has anyone had a chance to look at the changes I posted to the way timestamps are handled in the v2 api? 21:19:39 <jd__> dhellmann: tomorrow I will 21:19:41 <dhellmann> asalkeld, you may want to roll that into what you're doing already 21:19:43 <dhellmann> ok, thanks 21:19:48 <asalkeld> I'll look 21:20:05 * jd__ is sick, and therefore, slow 21:20:34 <dhellmann> what's the plan for friday as far as coordinating? are we going to try to have someone online "all day" to help newcomers, or are we assuming it's going to just be us and follow the usual work procedures? 21:20:59 <eglynn> dehellmann: we could divide the TZs between us 21:21:07 <eglynn> dhellmann: ^^^ 21:21:09 <jd__> I'll be online most of my CET daytime, and we'll see 21:21:20 <jd__> if other TZ can be around, that'd be good 21:21:33 <dhellmann> I may focus on afternoon, then 21:21:34 <eglynn> I'll be online for all day GMT also 21:21:57 <dhellmann> we're supposed to be going out looking for new office space that day, so I was going to carve out a chunk of time to be on irc for the bug day 21:22:09 <dhellmann> it sounds like we have "early" in my day covered pretty well 21:22:09 <jd__> I don't think we're going to be overwhelmed 21:22:17 <dhellmann> no, I agree 21:22:21 <eglynn> yep 21:22:48 <jd__> dhellmann: yes, your afternoon would be great indeed 21:23:06 <dhellmann> ok, I'll plan on that, then 21:23:07 <jd__> we'll cover the dawn 21:24:29 <jd__> anything else? 21:24:54 <asalkeld> nope, all good 21:25:01 <dhellmann> that's it for me 21:25:10 <eglynn> me too 21:25:11 <jd__> #endmeeting