09:00:19 #startmeeting blazar 09:00:20 Meeting started Tue Jul 28 09:00:19 2020 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is priteau. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 09:00:21 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 09:00:23 The meeting name has been set to 'blazar' 09:00:30 #topic Roll call 09:01:14 o/ 09:01:20 o/ 09:01:31 Hi tetsuro and tosky 09:02:16 I guess since tosky is here, we should discuss: 09:02:19 #topic Victoria OpenStack-wide Goals 09:02:36 yep 09:03:03 I managed to understand the reason for the failure of https://review.opendev.org/#/c/732694/: I totally missed the statement which reduces the concurrency of the tests to 1 09:03:14 Ah, that totally explains it 09:03:27 it seems those tests need to be run in serial mode, but anyway the statement was there in the original job and I missed it >.< 09:03:34 it seems to work, but please double check 09:03:34 The logs looked like multiple tests were running in parallel 09:04:10 Yes, our tests are meant to run sequentially because we have only one compute node that we can reserve 09:04:15 Hi masahito 09:04:17 hello 09:04:19 if that works as expected and it's merged, then the next step is https://review.opendev.org/#/c/732697/, whose only error is openstack-tox-py38 09:04:34 and I would say that failure is totally unrelated to the zuul patch 09:04:57 openstack-tox-py38 was passing when you first submitted the patch 09:05:21 I can try to recheck but it may be something else and I don't know that code too much 09:06:06 but the error, "Working outside of request context." looks familiar 09:06:14 I think I have seen a similar error in another project 09:06:38 Maybe our tests are not using Flask as intended 09:06:50 There are docs about it: https://flask.palletsprojects.com/en/1.1.x/reqcontext/#manually-push-a-context 09:07:14 oh, right, in sahara: https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2007596 09:07:32 we had to rewrite the way the tests were written, maybe this may help: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/724675/ 09:07:39 https://review.opendev.org/#/c/724675/ 09:08:19 so something that should be fixed regardless 09:08:26 Sounds like the right approach to follow 09:08:50 anyway, that's it from my side - the zuul part seems to be working, and if it passes your review, that should be it 09:10:04 Thanks a lot for your perseverance tosky 09:11:08 The other Victoria priority is migrate-to-focal which is underway, we've already merged a few patches 09:11:22 So, please review tosky's patch at https://review.opendev.org/#/c/732694/ 09:12:27 with the native jobs you won't need any other change on the zuul side to switch to focal - only fix the job failures in case of packaging changes, for example 09:13:50 Great 09:14:17 Anyone would like to look into the py38 issues we just discussed? 09:16:58 Let's record it as an action 09:17:17 #action Fix py38 issues in https://review.opendev.org/#/c/732697/ following what was done for Sahara in https://review.opendev.org/#/c/724675/ 09:17:35 #topic Other Victoria priorities 09:18:10 First, specs 09:18:23 I had an action item to create a new draft spec for PCI passthrough 09:18:45 Sorry, I haven't been able to do this yet, I'll aim for next week 09:19:42 Another code review priority is this patch: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/731586/ 09:21:54 Anything else to highlight? 09:25:26 By the way we are at Victoria-2 milestone this week 09:25:42 Let's focus on the highest priorities during August 09:25:49 #topic AOB 09:25:51 Anything else? 09:26:11 Holiday schedules, etc? 09:27:08 I was off earlier this month but should be working every week for the rest of the summer 09:27:38 I'm going to be off on Aug. 14 09:28:02 oh no I meant Aug. 11 Tue 09:28:52 Thanks for letting us know tetsuro 09:29:44 Let's wrap up 09:29:50 Thanks everyone for joining today 09:29:56 Talk to you next Tuesday 09:29:58 #endmeeting