09:00:08 #startmeeting blazar 09:00:09 Meeting started Tue Jun 25 09:00:08 2019 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is priteau. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 09:00:10 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 09:00:12 The meeting name has been set to 'blazar' 09:00:17 #topic Roll call 09:00:21 o/ 09:01:00 Hi tetsuro 09:04:34 No masahito or bertys this week? 09:08:44 We should start… 09:08:49 looks like they are not here. 09:08:49 Agenda for today: 09:08:51 1. Code review priorities 09:08:54 2. Floating IP reservation 09:08:56 3. Next meeting 09:08:59 4. AOB 09:09:04 #topic Code review priorities 09:09:37 Thanks tetsuro for reviewing asmita's patches and proposing the placement client change 09:09:49 np 09:10:00 Did you see that there was a question from cdent on https://review.opendev.org/#/c/666202/ 09:10:30 I need to answer to it 09:11:47 I dont think there is a serious problem to not store the rquest pools 09:12:00 I'd like to try your patch and see how it impacts the global request id stuff. Need to refresh my DevStack environment 09:12:07 as far as I can see 09:12:37 right, thanks 09:12:55 I also need to do that 09:13:08 What are your thoughts on https://review.opendev.org/#/c/637140/ as a result? 09:13:38 i can +2 if it works 09:14:13 OK. I will test it as well. 09:14:41 the code lgtm. I just havent tried it in my environment 09:14:50 so let me try 09:14:58 Hello masahito 09:14:59 o/ 09:15:00 sorry being late 09:15:02 o/ 09:15:44 We were discussing the request_id middleware patch and tetsuro's associated placement client patch 09:16:45 got it 09:16:59 We'd like to try it in DevStack to make sure it all works fine 09:17:09 right 09:19:18 Minor patches that would be nice to approve to keep the queue smaller 09:19:21 https://review.opendev.org/#/c/666924/ 09:19:23 https://review.opendev.org/#/c/666927/ 09:19:25 https://review.opendev.org/#/c/666926/ 09:19:27 https://review.opendev.org/#/c/666925/ 09:19:48 All for adding Python 3 Train unit tests 09:21:50 Let's move to the next agenda item 09:21:55 #topic Floating IP reservation 09:22:49 masahito: Last week you said you resumed working on this. As it turns out, Jake Colleran from Chameleon is trying to add lease update support as well. Do you think you could join forces? 09:23:31 it's okay. 09:25:02 If you already wrote the patch feel free to submit it of course 09:25:16 got it. 09:26:01 It's more for encouraging new contributors than anything :-) You still need to review the patch… 09:27:38 Any progress on your side on the other missing pieces for floating IP? 09:28:43 I have one item to discuss. 09:29:11 Go ahead 09:29:46 In case of the reservation is in ACTIVE, should the update API be acceptable? or not? 09:30:52 We could use the same approach as compute hosts. Support requesting more floating IPs, but not removing them (because it's difficult to chose which one to remove) 09:32:37 What do you think? 09:32:38 I agree it. And my patch doesn't accept changing the requested fip too. Is it same as your idea? 09:33:10 Yes, let's keep it simple 09:33:25 Okay. 09:34:15 Thanks for working on this 09:34:51 Anything else to discuss on this topic? 09:35:03 nothing from my side 09:35:18 #topic Next meeting 09:35:34 I will be on travel next Tuesday and won't be able to join the call 09:35:50 Anyone want to chair it, or should we cancel? 09:37:01 I won't have items. 09:37:05 I'm not sure if I get any specific topic to discuss next week. 09:37:21 Let's cancel then 09:37:34 We will meet on July 9 09:38:31 ah, speaking of a travel. I will be on travel in 9th July. 09:38:48 Thanks for letting us know 09:39:36 #topic AOB 09:39:41 Anything else? 09:41:11 If nothing else, let's get back to our code :-) 09:41:20 Thanks for joining folks 09:41:27 thanks priteau 09:41:33 and all 09:41:35 Bye 09:41:37 #endmeeting