09:00:06 #startmeeting blazar 09:00:07 Meeting started Tue Mar 14 09:00:06 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is priteau. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 09:00:08 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 09:00:10 The meeting name has been set to 'blazar' 09:00:20 #chair hiro-kobayashi 09:00:21 Current chairs: hiro-kobayashi priteau 09:00:30 #topic Rollcall 09:00:34 o/ 09:00:41 I’m sorry but I can attend just first 30 minutes today. 09:00:46 o/ 09:01:22 masahito cannot attend today because he attends Ops meetup now 09:01:42 OK hiro-kobayashi, we'll try to be efficient 09:01:46 Hello tejaswi 09:01:53 hi all 09:01:57 hi priteau 09:01:57 Hi bertys_ 09:02:04 Hi r-mibu 09:02:17 hi, 09:02:58 #topic Agenda 09:03:14 The agenda for today is: 09:03:19 Action items from last call 09:03:19 Ocata (0.2.0) release 09:03:20 Pike blueprints 09:03:22 Boston Summit 09:03:24 AOB 09:03:41 #topic Action items from last call 09:04:28 I didn't see any explicitly highlighted action item from last week's meeting 09:04:40 tejaswi: could you report a bug about host-update? 09:05:11 I think that is an item from past meeting 09:05:12 hiro-kobayashi: host-update is working fine in my setup now 09:05:36 Did anyone else face issue with host-update ? 09:05:38 tejaswi: What was the cause? 09:05:43 I see it was an action item from the meeting before last 09:06:21 tejaswi: you have reported something wrong with host-update of Blazar CLI 09:06:48 Wasn't it a bug? 09:07:09 priteau, seems so, there is no action items in the last minutes 09:07:11 http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/blazar/2017/blazar.2017-03-07-09.00.html 09:07:15 hiro-kobayashi: yes, the REST API to update a host was throwing error. However, it is working fine now. 09:07:44 So, I want to check if anyone else is getting an error for host-update / 09:07:45 ? 09:08:14 tejaswi: I haven't tried host-update 09:08:20 I don't think I've run it recently, we may want to add a Tempest test for it 09:08:30 hiro-kobayashi: ok. 09:08:36 priteau: good idea 09:08:52 It's not a command that is run frequently so there is a chance that bugs in it will be missed 09:09:01 #action Add a Tempest test for host-update 09:09:24 Any other action item? 09:09:33 anyways, I have a question regarding the host-update 09:10:02 What is your question tejaswi? 09:10:08 let's say we run the command climate host-update --extra abc=1 1, where is the value abc stored ? 09:10:17 climate host-show does not show the value 09:10:32 It is stored in the SQL database, computehost_extracapabilities table 09:10:50 tejaswi: have you checked the table? 09:11:31 bertys_: yes, I checked the tables. Did the DB schema change recently ? Let me check one more time 09:11:51 tejaswi: However, the Blazar service refuses to create new extra capabilities 09:12:24 https://github.com/openstack/blazar/blob/master/blazar/plugins/oshosts/host_plugin.py#L284-L285 09:12:43 priteau: ok 09:12:55 In Chameleon we have changed that because it is not convenient. I think it can be tackled for 0.3.0 09:13:15 +1 09:13:19 +1 09:13:45 I think there is some change required in python-blazarclient UI as well, to support removing extra capabilities 09:13:51 It is not possible at the moment 09:14:05 Could someone open a bug or blueprint about it? 09:14:32 #action Create a bug/blueprint about support for changing/removing extra capabilities with host-update 09:14:37 Absolutely 09:14:44 Thanks! 09:15:01 I'll take this one 09:15:31 Have we covered all action items? 09:15:52 The specs directory that we discussed last week was created by Masahito 09:16:16 yes 09:16:31 #topic Ocata (0.2.0) release 09:16:51 Just a quick announcement if you didn't see yet 09:16:56 0.2.0 has been tagged 09:17:12 We'll likely backport some patches, I am still working on one 09:17:45 It's a great progress! 09:17:51 Yes indeed. 09:18:16 I'll ask Masahito if he is planning to update tarballs on launchpad as well 09:18:32 thanks 09:18:56 I see we have automatically generated tarballs at https://tarballs.openstack.org/blazar/ 09:19:25 and https://tarballs.openstack.org/blazar-nova and https://tarballs.openstack.org/python-blazarclient/ of course 09:20:11 if we need some backports, we might need to use 0.2.1 or 0.2.x? 09:20:22 I see that there is no stable/ocata branch 09:20:30 I'll check with Masahito what he wants to do 09:20:45 I think after we have enough backports, we would tag 0.2.1 09:20:56 ok 09:21:12 #action priteau to check with Masahito about Launchpad tarballs, stable/ocata branch, and future 0.2.x tags 09:21:40 Let's move on to Pike discussion before hiro-kobayashi has to leave 09:21:49 #topic Pike blueprints 09:21:57 thanks 09:22:11 Work has started on blueprints identified for Pike 09:22:17 I've pushed a SPEC for on-end-options which we discussed at the last meeting 09:22:21 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/445270/ 09:22:33 I want you guys to review it 09:22:57 Thanks, will do 09:23:03 And I think you also contributed a patch? 09:23:04 got it 09:23:18 priteau: Yes 09:23:35 Sorry for break a right procedure 09:23:49 Spec should be approved before implementation 09:24:24 So, please focus on the Spec review for the first 09:24:33 It can be good to have a WIP patch to see how it might work in practice 09:24:47 But maybe mark it as Workflow:-1? 09:25:13 OK, I'll update it 09:25:37 Thanks 09:25:55 I'm sorry but I should quit 09:26:01 See you! 09:26:09 Good bye hiro-kobayashi, thanks for joining 09:26:38 I also created a blueprint from an issue raised during a discussion I had with bauzas 09:26:51 It is about how Blazar would work with Nova quotas 09:26:57 https://blueprints.launchpad.net/blazar/+spec/nova-quota-cooperation 09:27:07 Please contribute if you have ideas about this issue 09:27:55 I am not sure if we'll be able to tackle it at all during the Pike cycle, but it's important to keep track issue 09:28:43 priteau, nice work! 09:29:40 Anything else to discuss about Pike blueprints? 09:30:06 #action (all) review on-end-options spec: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/445270/ 09:31:18 Moving on then 09:31:22 #topic Boston Summit 09:31:51 We've received confirmation that one of our talks was selected for the Boston Summit 09:32:14 As part of the Project Updates track 09:32:31 #link https://www.openstack.org/summit/boston-2017/summit-schedule/events/18586/project-update-blazar 09:32:51 congrats! 09:33:17 The second talk has also been accepted!? 09:33:29 #link https://www.openstack.org/summit/boston-2017/summit-schedule/events/17769/collaboration-of-openstack-blazar-and-opnfv-promise-for-meeting-nfv-resource-management-requirements 09:34:06 As part of the Telco/NFV operations 09:34:13 bertys_: That's great news! I didn't see it because I am not in speakers 09:34:23 And I didn't have time to study the summit schedule yet 09:34:34 priteau: yep, that's great 09:35:22 So if you're coming to the summit, mark your calendar: 09:35:38 #info Project Update - Blazar: Mon 8, 12:05pm-12:45pm 09:35:52 #info Collaboration of OpenStack Blazar and OPNFV Promise for meeting NFV resource management requirements: Wed 10, 11:00am-11:40am 09:36:08 Who's going to Boston? 09:36:37 I suppose all speakers of those sessions 09:36:52 I will also join 09:37:37 Looking forward to see you there r-mibu 09:37:56 tejaswi and bertys_ are you planning to go? 09:38:20 priteau: no, I cannot come to Boston 09:38:21 priteau: Only GeraldK this time 09:39:02 OK, hopefully another time 09:39:32 #topic AOB 09:39:37 Any other business to discuss? 09:40:53 If nothing else, we will finish the meeting early 09:41:36 ok for me, have a nice day/week 09:41:49 OK, thanks everyone for attending 09:41:57 thanks, all - bye 09:41:59 #endmeeting