15:06:06 <tmorin> #startmeeting bgpvpn
15:06:07 <openstack> Meeting started Tue Sep  6 15:06:06 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is tmorin. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
15:06:08 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
15:06:10 <tmorin> hi everyone
15:06:11 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'bgpvpn'
15:06:15 <pcarver> hi
15:06:42 <tmorin> hi bfernando, doude, eon`, matrohon, michchap, pcarver, timirnich, wdeclercq...
15:07:06 <matrohon> hi
15:07:12 <eon`> hello
15:07:26 <wdeclercq> hi
15:07:51 <wdeclercq> (i'll be afk in 30 min to go sit in another meeting..)
15:07:55 <bfernando> hello
15:08:03 <tmorin> wdeclercq: ok :)
15:08:29 <tmorin> let's see what we have on our agenda
15:08:34 <tmorin> feel free to add items
15:08:51 <tmorin> I have: 1) questions on backport branches
15:09:01 <tmorin> 2) status on things merged in last week
15:09:32 <tmorin> 3) go through launchpad bugs
15:10:55 <tmorin> matrohon: do you see anything else ?
15:11:02 <tmorin> (or anyone)
15:11:36 <tmorin> #topic backport/* branches
15:12:24 <tmorin> the question that we have is: as is, we can't merge anything in our backport/juno and backport/kilo branches, because the stable/juno and stable/kilo branches do not exist anymore in neutron
15:12:58 <tmorin> we could tweak our deps and config, but the general wisdom seems to be to invest *zero* time in maintaining branches so old
15:13:21 <tmorin> would anyone object to a decision to not backport anything more in backport/juno and backport/kilo ?
15:13:31 <pcarver> tmorin: do we know of anyone using them? I would agree with the general wisdom
15:14:09 <tmorin> eon`, timirnich  ?
15:15:03 <eon`> no objection
15:15:11 <eon`> we plan to use bgpvpn with mitaka
15:15:19 <tmorin> eon`: makes sense
15:15:56 <tmorin> let's assume noone objects
15:16:09 <tmorin> I will abandon the two pending change I had on these branches
15:16:38 <tmorin> #topic merged in last week
15:17:22 <tmorin> hmm
15:17:26 <tmorin> not much to say in fact
15:17:42 <eon`> sorry just one question for the last topic. The tempest tests will be backported to the mitaka branch ?
15:17:43 <tmorin> we mostly cherry-picked various fixes onto stable branches
15:18:19 <tmorin> eon`: the previous question was about our "backport/*" branches --> nothing closed for "stable/*" branches
15:18:37 <eon`> ok, sorry :)
15:18:47 <tmorin> eon`: if you want the recent tempest changes to be backported, I think we can try that
15:19:01 <bfernando> cool :)
15:19:02 <tmorin> eon`: the decision will be made by the neutron stable maintainer team
15:19:19 <eon`> I can work on it if needed
15:19:52 <tmorin> ihrachys: can you tell what the policy is with reference to increasing test coverage with a change to a stable/x branch ?
15:20:05 <tmorin> ihrachys: more tempest tests in our precise case ?
15:20:36 <ihrachys> tmorin: tests are always welcome
15:20:44 <ihrachys> tmorin: as long as we prove they work
15:20:48 <ihrachys> with a gate job
15:22:08 <tmorin> ok, so it means that our recent change to enable tempest in our gate job need to first be backported to stable/*
15:22:14 <tmorin> ihrachys: thanks for the reply
15:22:31 <tmorin> eon`: you've got your roadmap: 1) backport gate changes 2) backport tempest changes
15:23:26 <eon`> tmorin: ok
15:23:45 <tmorin> next topic ?
15:23:51 <matrohon> here is the gate change for the master branch : https://review.openstack.org/#/c/352401/
15:24:18 <tmorin> matrohon: the project-config change above applies to all of our branches
15:24:57 <matrohon> tmorin, so what gate change are tolking about?
15:24:59 <tmorin> the change that need to be backported to our stable/* branches is https://review.openstack.org/#/c/355999/
15:25:13 <matrohon> ha yep
15:25:23 <matrohon> sorry gong back to sleep :)
15:26:26 <tmorin> ;)
15:26:40 <tmorin> #topic pending bugs for next release
15:26:49 <tmorin> nothing changed much since last week
15:27:20 <tmorin> one minor annoyance in bagpipe ovs extension is likely to go away thanks to a change in neutron API for agent extensions
15:27:39 <tmorin> that's bug #1602296
15:27:39 <openstack> bug 1602296 in networking-bgpvpn "Can't load extension bagpipe_bgpvpn" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1602296
15:28:12 <tmorin> then we have bug #1537067 which matrohon offered to solve
15:28:12 <openstack> bug 1537067 in networking-bgpvpn "enforce constraints on "neutron router-interface-add"" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1537067 - Assigned to Mathieu Rohon (mathieu-rohon)
15:28:22 <tmorin> comment matrohon ?
15:28:41 <tmorin> matrohon: ^
15:28:45 <matrohon> tmorin, yep, I didn't have time so submit any patch
15:30:06 <tmorin> do you see what needs to be done to solve it, or not fully yet ?
15:31:56 <tmorin> then we have a contrail driver improvement suggested by eon`
15:32:29 <tmorin> this is #1619651
15:32:46 <tmorin> bug #1619651
15:32:46 <openstack> bug 1619651 in networking-bgpvpn "OC driver: use VN api to associate RTs" [Wishlist,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1619651
15:32:50 <matrohon> yep, I have a clear idea, but it needs tests
15:32:51 <tmorin> though not specifically targetted for next release AFAIK
15:33:12 <tmorin> matrohon: ok, always the part that takes time...
15:34:40 <tmorin> anything else on bugs ?
15:34:42 <tmorin> next topic ?
15:34:53 <tmorin> ... do we have a next topic ?
15:35:06 <tmorin> #topic open dicussion
15:35:19 <tmorin> go ahead everyone :)
15:36:16 <eon`> I'm having a hard time to setup a master devstack with bgpvpn ;) seems to me that master bgpvpn does not work with mitaka
15:36:25 <eon`> what's your dev setup ?
15:37:03 <tmorin> enable_plugin networking-bgpvpn git@github.com:openstack/networking-bgpvpn.git stable/mitaka
15:37:38 <tmorin> works fine, as long as you point your enable_plugin to the right branch
15:39:27 <eon`> yep I know. I was just trying to setup everything on master
15:39:59 <eon`> devstack breaks randomely.. anyway it's devstack
15:40:02 <tmorin> I don't follow you
15:40:24 <tmorin> I also have a devstack master branch, pointing to master on all components
15:40:47 <tmorin> working fine, most of the time (may break if a particular checkout of a particular project has a bug)
15:41:09 <eon`> At first I wanted to use bgpvpn master with devstack mitaka because devstack mitaka builds ok
15:41:17 <tmorin> but indeed net-bgpvpn master will not work with neutron's and neutron-lib stable/mitaka
15:41:43 <eon`> yes ok
15:41:45 <tmorin> I think most of the incompatibilities are due to things we now import from neutron-lib
15:42:17 <tmorin> but you are likely to have the general issue of the requirements not being in sync anyway
15:43:19 <eon`> have to try again.. and again ;)
15:45:08 <tmorin> :)
15:45:16 <tmorin> ok, I guess we're done for today
15:45:21 <tmorin> thanks everyone!
15:45:30 <tmorin> #endmeeting