20:01:43 #startmeeting Barbican Weekly Meeting 20:01:44 Meeting started Thu Dec 5 20:01:43 2013 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is jraim. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 20:01:45 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 20:01:47 The meeting name has been set to 'barbican_weekly_meeting' 20:02:12 #topic Barbican tasks for incubation 20:02:32 For those that haven't used the bot before, here are the commands: https://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot 20:03:13 #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Barbican/Incubation 20:03:53 Another minute or two and we'll get started 20:05:13 Alright, let's get rolling 20:05:37 #info I'd like to cover the status of our current tasks, then we can see if anyone has any new ones 20:06:09 #Info Let's start with moving python-barbican client to stackforge, where are we on that? 20:06:40 electrichead ping 20:06:48 #info the PR to infra to get the project started has been submitted 20:07:06 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/60101/ 20:07:17 great, so we just need to wait for that to be merged? 20:07:39 yes, also we've added a new project to launchpad to track python-barbicanclient 20:07:57 #link https://launchpad.net/python-barbicanclient 20:08:00 great 20:08:11 #info Alright, moving on to prb and requirments.... reaperhulk? 20:08:39 #info There's currently a PR in gerrit for aligning our dependencies with global requirements and migrating to using pbr for setup.py 20:08:42 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/59817/ 20:08:59 So the only thing left in conflict there is the Celery dependency, right? 20:09:00 #info We still have our celery dependency while investigating oslo messaging so this won't be 100% complete until after that is complete 20:09:02 Correct 20:09:06 #info Regarding oslo.messaging: Looking at nova and climate pull requests now, working on a prototype for Barbican to start reviewing later today 20:09:43 How far do you think the current implementation is from something we could merge? Do we have a lot of work left? Or are we just checking to see how well we did? 20:10:12 jraim: is that wrt global reqs or woodster's statements? 20:10:23 I have the basic peices in place now, but trying to get it working with rabbit MQ cluster 20:10:25 sorry, woodster 20:10:59 woodster is the implementation in parity with what we had? Or is there still work we need to do there? 20:11:01 I will post that CR not matter what today, but hopefully will have it working completely (with rough edges) too 20:11:07 okay, great 20:11:24 #action woodster will post the PR for olso.messaging in the next day our two for review 20:11:29 it doesn't require much change to the api/resource layer or the task layer, just the queue structure in between 20:11:39 #info okay, moving to the devstack-gate 20:11:48 I think this is blocked until we resolve the other issues, yes? 20:12:17 it is. we need full global requirements alignment before we can gate there 20:12:32 okay 20:12:36 removing celery should be the last part of that, correct? 20:12:39 correct 20:12:54 #action barbican will tackle the devstack gate once oslo.messaging is merged 20:13:13 I think we may also need to start looking at the actual devstack integration 20:13:22 adding the gate seems easy enough 20:13:34 good point, I have no idea what that entails right now 20:13:35 you mean getting barbican deployed with teh devstack script? 20:13:35 we have the option of not blocking on that gate 20:13:52 yeah, the gate is so that zuul knows to run devstack tests 20:13:58 but I think it may also need something to run 20:14:06 that seems like a good idea 20:14:13 #action barbican will look at integrating into devstack 20:14:29 #info testr 20:14:44 Did we hear anything back from Monty on the needs of testr? 20:15:02 iirc, they have some upcoming infra project that will use it 20:15:17 didn't get any details on what the upcoming project may be 20:15:22 reaperhulk: you said that nova and neutron use it now? 20:15:33 That's what he said but I haven't followed up to learn more details. Nova and neutron both use it yes 20:15:39 okay 20:15:45 Heat does as well 20:15:48 (There may be more) 20:15:52 #action follow up with infra to see what the deal with testr is 20:16:00 cool 20:16:09 #info oslo.messaging 20:16:14 I think we've mostly covered this now 20:16:19 anything else to note? 20:16:40 not right now 20:16:44 cool 20:16:47 keep -> barbican rename? That's blocked on stackforge migration though so probably not a big deal 20:17:14 ahh okay, we need to land the stackforge stuff before we make any more changes? 20:17:23 was there a pending PR that we need to move over too? 20:17:34 The author of that PR agreed to resubmit once we land in stackforge 20:17:38 oh great 20:17:44 We had a few more changes we wanted him to make so we didn't want to land in GH 20:17:51 fair enough 20:18:03 cool, that's all the tasks I have listed in the wiki right now 20:18:16 Anyone have anything else they'd like to talk about? 20:18:42 Seems like its just Barbican people in here today :) 20:19:06 Alright, if there isn't anything else people have for the incubation request right now, we can call it 20:19:16 short meeting - thanks all 20:19:20 #endmeeting