19:01:35 <shamail> #startmeeting auc
19:01:35 <openstack> Meeting started Thu Jul  7 19:01:35 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is shamail. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
19:01:36 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
19:01:38 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'auc'
19:02:27 <shamail> Hi all!  Who’s here for the AUC recog meeting?
19:02:36 <MeganR> o/ - I am also in another meeting, so I may be slower than usual responding
19:03:01 <shamail> hi MeganR
19:03:03 <shamail> brb in 1 sec
19:06:14 <shamail> Just us MeganR?
19:07:17 <MeganR> lol - looks like it
19:07:21 <shamail> :[
19:07:33 <shamail> Any chancce to email Tom or do you want me to take the first stab?
19:07:42 <shamail> We can probably cancel the meeting for today
19:08:02 <MeganR> that is fine, I actually have a question about that - brb
19:08:22 <shamail> sure
19:09:32 <MeganR> sorry - long story, I won't bore you with it  :)
19:09:50 <shamail> haha
19:09:57 <MeganR> I was focusing on Tom's email and doc - and missed Jimmy's response until this week
19:10:03 <shamail> All good…
19:11:07 <MeganR> Now, I am wondering if I am overthinking all of this - we have two routinely active WG that do not use IRC.  I started an email asking if we can establish an IRC channel to "track" attendance/activity
19:11:20 <MeganR> I am not certain that we need another "tool"
19:11:29 <shamail> Good point and I agree
19:11:57 <shamail> I think the fact that we only have 2 (and newer ones are all on IRC) probably makes the cost > benefit
19:12:11 <MeganR> ok, that's what I was writing, but thought it would be best to bounce that off of you first - that helps take away some of the manual work
19:12:34 <MeganR> I agree - and that is where all WG seem to be headed, and can be a requirement for future/new WG
19:12:39 <shamail> +1
19:13:22 <MeganR> ok - otherwise I added a comment to Tom's doc about creating a form for the user submission - that will also help with manual entry
19:13:41 <MeganR> but taking out some of the manual processing, made me rethink my approach
19:13:58 <shamail> I am going to reply to Tom/Jimmy and ask about whether they are just going expose API or help us with calculations as well
19:14:16 <MeganR> hmm, yes, that is a good point
19:14:32 <shamail> for example, whether they are only making an API to see meeting attendence or could we ask for an API that gives only eligble attendees (e.g. more than 4 meetings at 25 lines)
19:15:05 <MeganR> so question - what about WG members that are active, but unable to attend meetings?
19:15:39 <MeganR> I was thinking that the WG chair could add them to the IRC "bot", since we are only focused on participation.
19:15:41 <shamail> that would probably be a self-nomination (e.g. going through the review board  for AUC)
19:16:05 <shamail> Hopefully, there aren’t too many cases of that.
19:16:13 <MeganR> good point
19:16:18 <MeganR> that's it from me today
19:16:20 <shamail> It wont be possible to add them since the logs contain lines spoken by IRC name
19:16:34 <shamail> so even if the chair mentions them, they wouldn’t show up in the right section of the log
19:16:51 <shamail> Sounds good!
19:16:53 <MeganR> actually, that is what I was wondering - if there is some way to "log" participation for the current WG that are not using IRC
19:17:22 <shamail> not really since the logs capture who said how many lines
19:17:49 <shamail> it would require adjustments to our scripts if we designated a tag to ID members
19:17:55 <MeganR> hmm, ok - I may still pose that in my email, just to see if anyone has any ideas or suggestions
19:17:56 <shamail> possible but probably overkill
19:18:02 <MeganR> ok
19:18:02 <shamail> Yes, please do!
19:18:09 <shamail> Thanks MeganR
19:18:11 <shamail> See you later
19:18:15 <MeganR> bye!
19:18:18 <shamail> I did start the prelim count by the way
19:18:21 <shamail> havent tallied it yet
19:18:40 <MeganR> oh cool - I saw your email to the Ops list as well - good forward movement
19:18:42 <shamail> but I was able to extract Ask OpenStack mods, IRC WG attendees… need to fix the repo stats script
19:19:17 <shamail> I am thinking I might start an email thread with prelim count early next week
19:19:22 <shamail> Anyways, thanks for joining!
19:19:30 <MeganR> awesome, bye!
19:19:50 <shamail> #endmeeting