14:00:43 <mattmceuen> #startmeeting Airship
14:00:44 <openstack> Meeting started Tue Feb  5 14:00:43 2019 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is mattmceuen. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
14:00:45 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
14:00:47 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'airship'
14:00:49 <mattmceuen> #topic Rollcall
14:00:56 <mattmceuen> Hey all, good morning/evening
14:01:18 <nishant_> Good morning
14:01:22 <levmorgan> Hiya
14:01:23 <mattmceuen> we have a very light agenda today, so if there's anything you'd like to discuss please add it :)  https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/airship-meeting-2019-02-05
14:01:53 <dwalt> o/
14:02:02 <georgk> hi
14:02:03 <mattmceuen> A couple thing I'd hoped to discuss this week are pushed off to next week, because I was too late in asking people to lead the discussion, oops
14:02:16 <b-str> hi
14:03:01 <mattmceuen> But let me take the opportunity -- levmorgan, there have been some really good pegleg advances recently, would you mind walking us through those next week?
14:03:36 <levmorgan> Yep! Can do.
14:03:48 <mattmceuen> awesome! thanks!
14:04:32 <mattmceuen> #topic Airship Community Feedback meeting
14:05:01 <mattmceuen> Last Thursday hogepodge led a feedback meeting for the Airship dev community
14:05:21 <mattmceuen> Was a really productive session I think, and I appreciate everyone who was able to join
14:05:35 <mattmceuen> Since not everyone was able to make it, here's the etherpad that captured a lot of good notes: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/airship-community-feedback
14:06:23 <mattmceuen> One of the "themes" was that although different modes of communication are preferred by differenet folks, IRC is a tried-and-true common denominator
14:06:53 <mattmceuen> It's also good for async communication if we're diligent about catching up on it :)
14:08:14 <mattmceuen> So my ask is that we increase our focus on IRC, and drive more dev conversation into it -- it's not just a Q&A tool, and if it is seen as a frequented channel then more folks will come, helping us to reach some critical mass
14:08:57 <mattmceuen> Another good point of feedback is that we need to focus on our developer onboarding
14:09:09 <mattmceuen> Part of that is docs
14:09:18 <mattmceuen> Part of that is just getting the right docs in front of people
14:09:32 <mattmceuen> Part of that is encouraging questions & getting them answered
14:09:45 <mattmceuen> (tying back to the IRC comment above)
14:10:15 <mattmceuen> I'm formulating some plans in my own mind for how we can attack this (and other bits) and plan to discuss more in future meetings
14:10:46 <mattmceuen> Does anyone have any good thoughts, ideas, etc that they'd like to discuss now?
14:13:13 <mattmceuen> Well you'll have another opportunity next week ;-)  please do review and reflect on the notes so we can make it a smooth onboarding and development experience for all of us
14:13:56 <mattmceuen> #topic Patchsets needing review
14:14:42 <mattmceuen> Re: the aiab proxy update change discussed last week:  https://review.openstack.org/#/c/615387/
14:15:10 <mattmceuen> I reached out to the developer, and he's a little slammed at the moment.  He'll try to get an update pushed to that by next week.
14:15:29 <b-str> Sorry for not having anything exciting - the thing I'm tracking at the moment is introduction of a new pod configuration for Shipyard, and some slightly smaller docker image sizes - all kinda "behind the scenes" stuff that people should eventually not notice.
14:15:42 <mattmceuen> However,  if anyone else is interested in contributing for that PS, he'd be happy to collaborate on it
14:17:06 <mattmceuen> thanks b-str, smaller is better
14:17:25 <mattmceuen> any other PS that are itching for reviews guys?
14:17:43 <b-str> https://review.openstack.org/#/q/projects:openstack/airship+status:open+NOT+label:Verified=-1+NOT+label:Workflow=-1+NOT+message:DNM+NOT+message:WIP
14:17:55 <b-str> how I look at the things ready for review ^^^^
14:18:29 <evgenyl> I also have a small patch for aiab with some fixes for behind the proxy configuration: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/630726/ we've been discussing this a couple of meetings back. It needs a few more reviews.
14:19:35 <mattmceuen> Thanks evgenyl!  I'll get a review on that today or tomorrow
14:19:58 <evgenyl> Thank you!
14:20:41 <mattmceuen> #topic Roundtable
14:20:55 <mattmceuen> Any other topics or random thoughts, guys?
14:21:30 <mbeierl> Where can I find the latest roadmap/progress on Airship + Ironic work?
14:23:20 <mattmceuen> hey mbeierl -- there is a spec out there, but I believe it's a little out of date
14:23:53 <mattmceuen> Pavlo Shchelokovs was going to do a deep dive into it and I believe take a stab at updating the spec
14:23:57 <mbeierl> thanks, mattmceuen.  Is there anything beyond the spec?  I have heard that it is actively being investigated
14:24:09 <mbeierl> ok, sounds like a plan!
14:24:12 <mattmceuen> We're hoping to do a review of this on our Thursday design call, if you're able to join!
14:24:17 <mbeierl> I will.
14:24:34 <mattmceuen> Awesome - would love to get you tied into that effort if you're interested mbeierl
14:25:11 <mbeierl> I am, but I suspect there will be a learning curve for me as I know very little about helm/armada and Airship in general :(
14:26:39 <mattmceuen> I actually have a list of onboarding doc references I put together yesterday, let me send that out on the ML
14:27:02 <mbeierl> that would be perfect.  Thanks, mattmceuen
14:27:18 <mattmceuen> You bet & feel free to drop any questions here, in the ML or on the Thursday call
14:27:55 <mattmceuen> Any other topics team?
14:28:38 <mattmceuen> In that case you're all very busy & I won't keep you - have a good week
14:28:43 <mattmceuen> #endmeeting