14:01:11 #startmeeting airship 14:01:12 Meeting started Tue Sep 4 14:01:11 2018 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is mark-burnett. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:01:13 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 14:01:16 The meeting name has been set to 'airship' 14:01:24 Hey all, today's agenda is here: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/airship-meeting-2018-09-04 14:01:34 o/ 14:01:36 The main item today will be PTG planning 14:01:48 o/ 14:02:03 o/ 14:02:15 o/ 14:02:22 #topic Meeting re-schedule 14:02:37 Unfortunately, there wasn't much participation in the doodle this week: https://doodle.com/poll/4dn5nckrdz6p6sbe 14:03:00 Can we beg one more week :) 14:03:09 * mattmceuen failed but will do it now 14:03:15 I'm in no hurry to change it 14:03:21 I propose this alternative to extending 14:03:27 Just take the 1330-1400 slot 14:03:32 But I have no strong feelings 14:04:31 Sounds good to me - that's a half hour earlier than currently right? 14:05:42 We could leave the doodle up to keep gathering opinions 14:05:44 in the meantime 14:07:14 Ok, my only concern is changing the time temporarily including updating all the postings etc, then changing it again with more info 14:07:19 Shall we just finalize it next week? 14:08:10 I'll send a bump email for the doodle 14:08:19 #action mark-burnett send bump email for the rescheduling doodle 14:08:41 #topic PTG Agenda 14:08:43 https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/AirshipPTG4 14:09:44 Pete suggested last week that we do kind of 1 day of discussion and 1 day of hacking/whatever 14:10:07 I was thinking that we could spend one morning helping newcomers spin up AIAB, or component tests 14:10:12 As part of a hacking/lab day 14:11:00 Sounds good to me! It wouldn't surprise me if the stuff we have on the agenda ends up taking more than one full day though, content takes on a life of its own 14:11:11 So maybe we play it by ear and start hacking when we're done talking? 14:11:28 Might have some Azure space that could be usable for a multinode demo 14:11:47 ++ 14:12:31 Sounds like a good idea sthussey 14:13:16 mattmceuen: I think you're basically right, but I would like a defined time to help onboard folks so we can invite people to drop in 14:13:27 Alternatively, we could maybe just pull away to help folks as they can attend 14:15:35 Maybe that fluidity will be useful 14:20:26 One ad-hoc topic: 14:20:47 We had our first open design call last thursday, went quite well 14:21:00 This coming Thursday we're planning to discuss service bundles among other things 14:21:11 so if you'd like to participate in that please come! 14:27:40 Good point, thanks 14:28:36 I assume all work out of that meeting ends up in a reviewable spec? 14:32:59 Thursday's meeting was related to some existing specs, but hopefully we get some reviewable specs as tangible items out of these over time 14:33:45 Looks like agenda planning is tapering off 14:33:52 Does anyone have any other thoughts/topics? 14:33:56 #topic Roundtable 14:35:16 Ok, thanks for coming all 14:35:20 #endmeeting