Thursday, 2020-04-02

*** evrardjp has quit IRC04:36
*** evrardjp has joined #openstack-uc04:37
*** melsakhawy has joined #openstack-uc12:59
*** ianychoi_ has joined #openstack-uc13:17
*** ianychoi has quit IRC13:20
*** ianychoi_ is now known as ianychoi13:23
melsakhawy#srartmeeting uc13:30
jayahno/13:30
melsakhawy#startmeeting uc13:30
openstackMeeting started Thu Apr  2 13:30:30 2020 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is melsakhawy. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.13:30
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.13:30
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: uc)"13:30
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'uc'13:30
melsakhawy#topic Roll Call13:30
*** openstack changes topic to "Roll Call (Meeting topic: uc)"13:30
jayahno/13:30
jayahnhi13:31
melsakhawyGood morning jayahn13:31
melsakhawy*or evening :)13:31
jayahnhey, good evening here actually :)13:31
melsakhawyyeap13:31
melsakhawy#topic Merger Business13:31
*** openstack changes topic to "Merger Business (Meeting topic: uc)"13:32
melsakhawyso I wanted to go through the three options for UC/TC merger13:33
jayahnyes.13:33
melsakhawyper Thierry's email , there are two options with little, to no, impact on the bylaws13:33
jayahnwere there three options with no, little, and big impact on the bylaws13:34
jayahn?13:34
melsakhawyand a heavyweight one that requires bylaws changes. This heavyweight option is the one where we changes the name of the merged committee13:34
melsakhawyyeah you'r right , the big impact one is the one where we form an amalgmated steering comittee13:34
melsakhawywhat do you think ?13:35
jayahnit seems bylaws change is really hard process.13:36
jayahnif we can make sure there is no confusion, i would prefer option 1, which make things done.13:37
melsakhawyYeah I was with the same opinion as well13:38
jayahni am not sure though, having uc and tc name together would not create confusion among people.13:38
melsakhawyIt may , Thierry prposed to have a designated "5" people team under TC that do UC business13:39
jayahnhowever, it would be better than option 2. if we removing "uc" word, even if it does not mean anything, it will have negative impact.13:39
melsakhawyyeah agreed13:39
jayahnso i prefere option 1 over option 2. even option 2 requires by laws change13:40
melsakhawyYeah that makes sense. I don' think that we need "5" desingnated members though13:40
melsakhawywith the summarized set of goals , we can probably do that by reducing the number of "designated" members to 313:41
jayahnyeah, you are right. i also think we don't need "5" desingnated members13:41
melsakhawyjust to have a quoram13:41
jayahnyah, i agreed13:41
jayahnokay, so what it takes to officially change "designated" members to 3?13:42
melsakhawythat's to be determined I think , but it'd be under the TC's governance to arrange that13:43
melsakhawythose members I assume will be elected/appointed by the TC's regular nomination process13:43
melsakhawyand then can be "designated" as UC responsible13:44
jayahnthen do we really need to keep ATC and AUC seperate?13:44
melsakhawyBasically UC will exist, however it'll have empty memberships, with its business redirected to the TC's UC members13:44
melsakhawyGood point , I think we do13:45
melsakhawyAUC's have much less technical requirements to be on the list13:45
melsakhawyfor example, at one point completing the survey was a criteria to be on the AUC list, It's not any more13:46
jayahnTC's regular nomination process.. will it be among ATC or AUC or both?13:47
jayahneven if nomination/election process happens under TC, if we keep only AUC can vote, will it be same as now?13:48
*** VW_ has quit IRC13:49
melsakhawygood point. I see your point now , either AUC and ATC can vote or the list has to be merged13:49
jayahnyes13:49
melsakhawyI am not sure though, with the UC business being entierly under TC that AUC can vote on TC members13:50
jayahni am not sure either.13:51
melsakhawyokay , that's a good point to raise13:52
melsakhawyI think what we want to ensure is that AUC is involved in UC's business13:52
melsakhawyright now we do this through elections13:52
melsakhawybut if the membership will be entirely TC, we need to ensure AUC also remains involved13:53
melsakhawythe other thing we probably want to raise is the process for merger13:55
melsakhawyshoudl we wait until upcoming elections and not hold one ? , or should we start asap13:55
jayahnwe probably need to compare the number of ATC vs. AUC. how big AUC can impact in terms of percentage?13:55
jayahnhm..13:56
melsakhawytrue, but in principal , even if the niumbers do not sway the votes. AUCs are not involved in TC business so voting on TC members doesn't make sense13:56
jayahnthat is true.13:57
jayahndo you think it will be good to  communicate our prefered merge option and our thought from ops-meetup and from all the user group coordinators?13:58
melsakhawyyeah we probably should see our preferences from UC standpoint. Then we will communicate14:00
jayahnokay14:00
melsakhawymy personal merger option is to "not hold" an upcoming elections14:00
melsakhawyso our aim remains at August/September , this way we don't rush into skupping important details14:01
jayahngot it. i am with you on this14:01
melsakhawyokay , so how about we spend some time to think about the AUC/ATC issue14:03
jayahnyes, we need to think on this for sure.14:03
jayahnI will also get some second opinion as well. :)14:04
melsakhawysounds good :)14:04
melsakhawyand maybe by next week we share our thoughts ?14:04
jayahnokay, sounds good. :)14:04
melsakhawyokay perfect14:05
melsakhawy#topic new business14:05
*** openstack changes topic to "new business (Meeting topic: uc)"14:05
jayahndo you have any new business? :)14:06
melsakhawythe only other item I had in mind is the PTG ,I put my name in for attendance14:06
melsakhawyit's virtual , hopefully by then we have a plan for the merger so we can present it14:07
melsakhawyother than this I'm good14:07
melsakhawyokay let's call it a meeting  then14:08
spotzHey all!14:08
melsakhawyhey spotz14:08
jayahnhey14:08
melsakhawyokay see you next week then jayahn14:09
spotzI just wanted to pop in as I finished something and see how everything was going14:09
melsakhawyhav a good one !14:09
melsakhawy#endmeeting14:10
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack UC: Meetings Tuesdays @ 1230 UTC | Agenda - https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/uc"14:10
openstackMeeting ended Thu Apr  2 14:10:03 2020 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)14:10
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/uc/2020/uc.2020-04-02-13.30.html14:10
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/uc/2020/uc.2020-04-02-13.30.txt14:10
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/uc/2020/uc.2020-04-02-13.30.log.html14:10
melsakhawyThanks spotz, so far we;r working on getting the merger details sorted out14:10
melsakhawyhopefully by August/Sept14:11
spotzmelsakhawy: Sounds good, if you need me for anything ping here or email me, not always around early morning but if I am I'll peek in14:11
melsakhawyThanks spotz, will do14:12
spotzmelsakhawy: take care14:14
*** melsakhawy has quit IRC14:21
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-uc15:55
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC16:11
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-uc16:12
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC16:16
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-uc16:18
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC16:21
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-uc16:34
*** evrardjp has quit IRC16:36
*** evrardjp has joined #openstack-uc16:36
*** VW_ has joined #openstack-uc16:48
*** VW_ has quit IRC16:50
*** KeithMnemonic has joined #openstack-uc17:28
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC17:28
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-uc17:29
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC17:54
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-uc17:55
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC18:24
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-uc18:25
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC18:26
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-uc18:26
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC19:15
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-uc19:16
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC19:16
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-uc19:16
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC20:02
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-uc20:02
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC20:19
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-uc20:26
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC21:03
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-uc21:03
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC21:08
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-uc21:26
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC21:26
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-uc21:26
*** openstackstatus has quit IRC22:56
*** openstack has joined #openstack-uc23:00
*** ChanServ sets mode: +o openstack23:00

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.15.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!