| bauzas | tc-members : after thinking about the issue from all the weekend, I'd prefer to first discuss with all the RH members to see who would then be moving off, so please understand that if I'm now providing a -1 comment for 914024 it would be because maybe it shouldn't be me | 19:15 |
|---|---|---|
| zaneb | gmann: this is not true -> "I am saying the voting weightage could be different when electorates see the final candidates before voting" | 21:15 |
| zaneb | under Condorcet there is no incentive to vote 'strategically' | 21:16 |
| zaneb | votes must be assumed to represent the genuine preferences of the voters. this is the main strength of Condorcet and the reason we use it | 21:17 |
| zaneb | in the past we made extensive use of this property in the former release naming process | 21:18 |
| zaneb | there is absolutely no justification for another election | 21:18 |
| zaneb | and I'd note that we don't even do additional election when the affiliation requirement comes into play for the board seats, which (sadly) do not use Condorcet, and where the votes would absolutely be different | 21:21 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!