| opendevreview | Merged openstack/openstack-manuals master: Attempt at fixing broken docs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-manuals/+/881290 | 10:45 |
|---|---|---|
| *** gboutry[m] is now known as gboutry | 13:12 | |
| *** d34dh0r5| is now known as d34dh0r53 | 13:35 | |
| gmann | rest all doc links are ok but it seems we need to redirect this also https://releases.openstack.org/antelope/index.html to https://releases.openstack.org/2023.1/index.html | 15:29 |
| gmann | main doc page link to https://releases.openstack.org/2023.1/index.html and 404 | 15:29 |
| gmann | tosky: can you please add sahara PTL in the sahara repo core groups https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2023-May/033715.html | 15:32 |
| tosky | uh, do I have the permission to do so as a core? | 15:34 |
| clarkb | the groups should be self managed and when that is the case any group member can add and remove other groups members | 15:34 |
| fungi | yes, the expectation is that the outgoing ptl will add their incoming successor to the necessary groups (not just in gerrit but also possibly other places like launchpad). people who are involved with that project are suitable stand-ins to make it happen if the old ptl has flown the coop already. as a last resort, the tc can ask me or someone else with admin access to those platforms to | 15:38 |
| fungi | act on their behalf but we'd rather avoid that escalation path due to already limited time and resources | 15:38 |
| gmann | tosky: I think so, I saw your name there | 15:38 |
| gmann | tosky: as Jerry being solo maintainer in sahara, if you can add him all sahara repo then they can take care of next maintainers cleanup/addition etc | 15:39 |
| tosky | right, but I'm not the outgoing PTL :) | 15:59 |
| tosky | that's why I asked | 16:00 |
| gmann | tosky: it is ok as outgoing PTL is not active. you can add and reply on ML | 16:04 |
| gmann | in such case where there is no active maintainers left, TC take decision to add new PTL/maintainers in core group. for example mistral | 16:04 |
| gmann | As Jerry volunteering to maintain Sahara we should assign them permissions to maintain it | 16:06 |
| tosky | is the sahara-release group relevant? It's the only one which seems useful and doesn't include other groups that I can't modify | 16:07 |
| gmann | you mean you are not able to add in sahara-core https://review.opendev.org/admin/groups/eaacc8567578927f17620a288f00fea88063e9c2,members | 16:09 |
| gmann | ohk sahara-release does not have you https://review.opendev.org/admin/groups/12f2b259ab8174dd364a187496b67248dedbe641,members | 16:10 |
| tosky | I can add to sahara-core, but sahara-release doesn't include sahara-core; it only lists Telles | 16:10 |
| gmann | we can see that later | 16:10 |
| tosky | oki | 16:10 |
| gmann | yeah | 16:10 |
| gmann | tosky: may be you can add in this too https://review.opendev.org/admin/groups/97c186086508effefe98a993493d5828d9cb46c9,members | 16:27 |
| tosky | gmann: that's just for releasing sahara-tests, and as the group includes sahara-release I think it makes more sense to find a way to add a person to sahara-release directly | 16:32 |
| gmann | tosky: ok | 16:36 |
| gmann | may be fungi or clarkb can help here, adding zhouxinyong@inspur.com in sahara-release group | 16:37 |
| clarkb | gmann: I can do it | 16:41 |
| fungi | is the group still used in any acls? | 16:41 |
| clarkb | oh good question | 16:41 |
| clarkb | git grep says no | 16:41 |
| fungi | gerrit is littered with abandoned groups (particularly -release and -drivers groups) which were dropped from acls when we implemented automated release management | 16:42 |
| fungi | cleaning those up is doable, but would involve scripted queries and some manual effort we lack time for | 16:43 |
| clarkb | and impact is minimal as long as they have no permissions | 16:43 |
| fungi | back in the olden days, i used to remove all members, set them owned by adminsitrators, rename them with a prefix and flag as hidden | 16:43 |
| fungi | since there wasn't actually a "delete group" function in gerrit (no idea if one has been added since) | 16:44 |
| gmann | ohk, I see. strange that delete group is not there | 17:00 |
| gmann | anyways thanks for chekcing | 17:00 |
| fungi | it may be there these days, but also it would be a manual step or someone would need to write a pruner to find and clean up unused groups (which may be included in other groups and not mentioned in acls, so it's nontrivial to spider the network of them) | 17:10 |
| gmann | k | 17:16 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!