Thursday, 2022-11-03

*** dasm|off is now known as dasm14:28
gmannspotz: are you online to start the meeting at google meet ? https://meet.google.com/uzo-tfkt-top15:00
gmannnot sure if any other redhat member can do? dansmith ^^15:01
dansmithI'm in there15:01
dansmithbut nobody else is15:01
gmannI am still waiting to be in15:01
jungleboyjI have another meeting right now but will join when it is done.15:01
dansmithgmann: redhat people are in15:02
dansmithgmann: I really think it's better that we create a new meeting each time, whoever is around15:02
dansmithbecause none of us are being asked to permit outsiders on this meeting15:02
gmannohk15:02
noonedeadpunkshouldn't it be even open one?15:02
dansmithshould we switch to a different one?15:03
arne_wiebalckI am in the waiting room as well15:03
JayFI mean, it seems improper to have the meeting in a different venue than the one announced ahead of time15:03
JayFwe don't know if there are non-TC members in the lobby as well15:03
gmannyeah, dansmith can you start one and we can figure out some permanent link there 15:03
dansmithJayF: yeah understand, but if she's not here and can't admin people...15:03
noonedeadpunkbut all other meetings are open for public...15:03
JayFExactly15:04
JayFthis is essentially a non-public meeting if we change the venue15:04
JayFIRC as a fallback would at least be logged; but still non-ideal15:04
noonedeadpunkSo which brings me to thought why not use https://meetpad.opendev.org/ :D15:04
gmannwe can update and ping it in IRC15:04
gmannwe do start the meeting in IRC also15:04
dansmithhttps://meet.google.com/eai-mwxm-ktm15:04
JayFnoonedeadpunk: hm, that's a pretty good idea for moving forward ++15:04
dansmithJayF: we should just not pre-post the url and say "find it in irc"15:04
rosmaitai don't think you can record in meetpad, at least not easily15:04
JayFI'm OK with that too; but that doesn't fix the problem with this time15:04
gmanntc-members: let's join here  https://meet.google.com/eai-mwxm-ktm15:04
JayFI do not concur15:05
gmann#startmeeting tc15:05
opendevmeetMeeting started Thu Nov  3 15:05:56 2022 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is gmann. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.15:05
opendevmeetUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.15:05
opendevmeetThe meeting name has been set to 'tc'15:05
JayFo/15:06
gmanneveryone, tc-members video call meeting to join @ https://meet.google.com/eai-mwxm-ktm15:06
gmanno/15:06
noonedeadpunkrosmaita: you can - jitsy is capable of recording15:06
noonedeadpunkat least I do see record button in some test channel15:07
gmann#topic Roll call15:07
knikollao/15:07
gmann#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/TechnicalCommittee#Next_Meeting15:07
arne_wiebalcko/15:07
gmann^^ today agenda15:07
JayFo/15:08
dansmitho/15:08
gmann#topic Follow up on past action items15:08
gmann#topic Gate health check15:08
gmann#topic 2023.1 TC tracker15:14
gmann#link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tc-2023.1-tracker15:14
gmannadd osc goal in the tracker15:18
gmann#topic TC questions for the 2023 user survey15:18
gmann#link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tc-2023-user-survey-questions 15:19
gmann#topic TC chair election process15:20
gmann#link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/86277215:20
gmann#link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/86277415:20
gmanngo for the dir structure than single file15:24
gmann#topic TC weekly meeting time15:25
gmann#link https://framadate.org/xR6HoeDpdXXfiueb15:25
gmann#startvote wed 16 UTC for TC weekly meeting with one video call in month? Yes, No15:39
opendevmeetBegin voting on: wed 16 UTC for TC weekly meeting with one video call in month? Valid vote options are Yes, No.15:39
opendevmeetVote using '#vote OPTION'. Only your last vote counts.15:39
gmannYes15:39
dansmith#vote Yes15:39
arne_wiebalckYes15:39
gmann#vote Yes15:39
arne_wiebalck#vote Yes15:39
noonedeadpunk#vote yes15:39
rosmaita#vote yes15:39
JayF#vote yes15:40
spotz#vote yes15:40
slaweq#vote yes15:40
knikolla#vote Yes15:40
gmann#endvote 15:40
opendevmeetVoted on "wed 16 UTC for TC weekly meeting with one video call in month?" Results are15:40
opendevmeetYes (9): gmann, slaweq, arne_wiebalck, rosmaita, spotz, dansmith, JayF, knikolla, noonedeadpunk15:40
TheJuliaHi folks, I see a vote and a start meeting, but I don't see any discussion. This concerns me because the actual discussion of the TC is not publicly available from the meeting log for review as a result.15:45
gmannit is video call and it is public, recorded and will be published in youtuve15:46
gmannyoutube15:46
TheJuliaThat seems insufficient since the words used are not searchable nor directly associated with the meeting as far as I can see. 15:46
JayFAs I said in PTG; that's still not as accessible as full IRC logs. I agree with TheJulia but understand that I'm the minority opinion now. I don't think doing video calls is nearly as open as an IRC meeting where 100% of the discussion is logged in an accessible format.15:46
TheJuliaBottom line, video meetings were supposed to be the exception, not the rule.15:47
gmannit is one meeting in month as video and rest in IRC15:47
TheJuliaSearchable format as well.15:47
dansmithwe've been doing video meetings once a month for, what, over a year now? I'm a fan.15:47
JayFI also have hearing problems and can't understand spoken word as well, but I got outvoted 15:48
diablo_rojo_phoneI was always -1 on video meetings. 15:48
TheJuliaAs someone who also has hearing damage, it does not help to be forced into going and finding video meetings that cannot be text searched.15:49
diablo_rojo_phoneAgreed about the searchability. 15:49
diablo_rojo_phone+2 TheJulia 15:49
noonedeadpunkhttps://meetpad.opendev.org/tc-meeting ?15:49
gmann#action gmann to test the meetpad for video call15:49
TheJuliaBottom line, it is reduced transparancy, so unless there is is notes being taken, voted on, and approved for publishing, it really is not helpful to treat a posted video someplace on youtube as an acceptable option.15:50
diablo_rojo_phoneIt's not as timezone inclusive or where English isn't the first language. 15:50
JayFI hear, it's OK that once a month we exclude people who have hearing loss or can't understand english15:50
diablo_rojo_phoneAlso, in my experience it seems to exacerbate people talking over one another. 15:51
TheJuliaJayF: Yeah, that is my take as well.15:51
TheJuliawhich is frankly, just not cool.15:51
TheJuliadiablo_rojo_phone: which makes it even harder for those of us with hearing damage15:51
diablo_rojo_phoneExactly. 15:52
* TheJulia grumbles, since it is all the travel for this community which contributed to her hearing damage15:52
JayFspotz++15:53
JayFFor those not in the video; spotz proposed that we do all TC meetings in IRC and supplement with a video office hours once a month.15:53
TheJuliaJayF: I was just going to ask, thanks!15:53
TheJuliasee, that is totally cool to me15:53
diablo_rojo_phoneJust because the k8s community does video calls (which they just talked about ramping down for a variety of reasons ) doesn't mean it's a solution for us. 15:53
diablo_rojo_phone+2 I like that plan15:53
TheJuliaand I know is cool with so many others who have expressed similar concerns about a default to video meetings15:54
jungleboyjJayF:  ++15:54
knikollaI'm torn on the subject. Seeing and talking to each other is an important activity that builds community and we seldom do in these days of working from home and slack and emails.15:54
knikollaI understand all the concerns.15:54
TheJuliadiablo_rojo_phone: I've had some folks in the k8s community I know express similar transparency concerns with their own usage, so it is good to know they are starting to shift15:54
TheJuliaknikolla: i completely agree, but a vote in irc for a discussion taking place on a video call is not transparency unfortunately15:56
spotzknikolla: hence still having something once a month like it is now to still get the bonds in person/visual helps with15:56
diablo_rojo_phoneIt was actively being discussed as something that prevents community members from rising to the steering committee. 15:56
knikollaTheJulia: I agree. That vote specifically was asked by me to confirm the results of the poll. 16:00
gmann#topic Recurring tasks check16:02
JayFI'm taking an action item to write a resolution to change us in line with spotz's suggestion: 4 IRC meetings + an added office hours video call16:03
gmannBare 'recheck' state16:03
dansmithspotz: in case it's not clear, I think we agree what the problem is (no context) and I was just saying, let's not do the same thing again right here and now :)16:03
gmann#action JayF to propose the resolution for the TC weekly meeting on IRC or video call 16:03
TheJuliaJayF: Much appreciated, thank you16:03
gmann#topic Open Reviews16:03
gmann#link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/86263716:04
arne_wiebalckknikolla: ++16:04
gmann#endmeeting16:05
opendevmeetMeeting ended Thu Nov  3 16:05:12 2022 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)16:05
opendevmeetMinutes:        https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/tc/2022/tc.2022-11-03-15.05.html16:05
opendevmeetMinutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/tc/2022/tc.2022-11-03-15.05.txt16:05
opendevmeetLog:            https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/tc/2022/tc.2022-11-03-15.05.log.html16:05
slaweqany url for the meetpad test?16:06
gmannare we trying with this or any other url ? https://meetpad.opendev.org/tc-meeting16:07
spotz4 of us are in https://meetpad.opendev.org/osf-diversity-and-inclusion16:09
gmannohk, let's try https://meetpad.opendev.org/tc-meeting16:09
gmannspotz: JayF noonedeadpunk knikolla rosmaita ^^16:09
clarkbjitsi meet does support recording, but not in the way ours is currently deployed. It requires you to run an additional service and you need a running version of that services for every concurrent meeting that may need to be recorded. If someone wants to figure out how to add that to our deployment I'm sure it would be appreciated. Also it works by streaming the video to another16:13
clarkbsink like youtube whihc can then store the video long term.16:13
clarkbyou can also theoretically record the webrtc content on the client side. I think there are browser plugins that do htis16:13
clarkbhttps://github.com/jitsi/jibri is the component that would need to be added16:14
clarkbhttps://recordrtc.org/ is a client side option16:16
clarkb(that has a browser plugin so you don't have to write js aiui)16:16
clarkboh yup they have a link to the chrome extension at the top of that page16:17
gmannrecording is not so good, voice are echoing in recording 16:19
clarkbgmann: in what recording?16:19
gmannlocal recording16:19
clarkbusing recordrtc?16:19
gmannwe are testing in https://meetpad.opendev.org/tc-meeting16:19
clarkbright, I'm trying to clarify what specifically isn't working since meetpad itself does not directly support recording16:20
gmannyeah16:20
clarkbgmann: they have a bit about fixing echo issues on the page I linked16:20
gmannok16:20
clarkbthose might be toggles in the chrome extension? I dunno I haven't used it myself16:20
gmanntc-members: as we need to record video call, I will ask the zoom pro if availabile. 16:21
JayFAlthough I apprecaite and agree it shouldn't be a personal account forever; I do have a Zoom Pro account paid for by GR-OSS for my open source work; I'm happy to let it be used for this if no other option exists.16:22
gmannsure, will let you know. thakns16:24
gmanntc meeting recording is available @ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cjpxiT2Egok17:37
gmanndansmith: thanks for sharing recording, you can unshare now. 17:37
dansmithcool17:37
*** gibi is now known as gibi_pto19:15
*** dasm is now known as dasm|off22:58

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!