| opendevreview | Merged openstack/election master: Add Hao Wang candidacy for Zaqar PTL in Antelope https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/election/+/855068 | 11:04 |
|---|---|---|
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/election master: Adding andreykurilin candidacy for Rally PTL https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/election/+/855527 | 11:04 |
| *** carloss is now known as carloss|afk | 11:28 | |
| *** dasm|off is now known as dasm | 13:00 | |
| *** carloss|afk is now known as carloss | 13:03 | |
| opendevreview | chandan kumar proposed openstack/election master: Adding chandankumar candidacy for TC https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/election/+/855660 | 13:05 |
| *** johnthetubaguy[m] is now known as johnthetubaguy | 16:14 | |
| gmann | booked operators hour slots, along with 2 slots per day at 13/14 UTC I booked one more slot at 4 UTC for asia TZ teams https://ptg.opendev.org/ptg.html | 16:32 |
| gmann | sent email also for PTL to reserve those | 16:32 |
| gmann | spotz_: knikolla pinged skyline and venus project PTLs to add their(or plan someone else if they are not planning) nomination. | 17:43 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/governance master: Added Exception for the combined 2023.1(Antelope) elections https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/854624 | 17:46 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/governance master: Switch requirements to distributed leadership https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/854685 | 17:46 |
| spotz_ | Thanks gmann | 17:53 |
| spotz_ | We have 1 TC seat needing. second vote and +w, then we have the 2 TC appointed nominations. Everything else submitted is merged | 17:54 |
| jungleboyj | spotz_: Any reason for me to not merge Chandan Kumar's TC candidacy? Looks good to me. | 18:28 |
| spotz_ | jungleboyj: Oh you're an Election official and as you're not running you can! | 18:29 |
| jungleboyj | :-) | 18:29 |
| jungleboyj | Feel free to ping me for help on election stuff. I can do priority interrupts. | 18:29 |
| spotz_ | Will do:) | 18:31 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/election master: Adding chandankumar candidacy for TC https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/election/+/855660 | 18:38 |
| opendevreview | Jay Faulkner proposed openstack/election master: Adding JayF candidacy for Ironic PTL https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/election/+/855697 | 20:33 |
| *** dasm is now known as dasm|off | 21:32 | |
| JayF | Have a question: I submitted my candidacy for Ironic PTL, but I'm afraid I'm on the border of what would be considered eligible. My primary contributions this cycle have been backporting stable patches and performing code reviews. I don't believe I have a single originated-by-jay commit in a repo this cycle at all. | 21:46 |
| JayF | Does this mean I'm ineligible unless such a contribution is made? | 21:46 |
| JayF | actually, I think https://opendev.org/openstack/diskimage-builder/commit/fe0e5324d4248d114660ec35111ae9601e05b95b will likely count | 21:50 |
| JayF | Did more digging on my own, and I learned that DIB is not a part of any official project (at least as linked from the electorate page), but I would suspect https://github.com/openstack/nova/commit/2b8c1cffe409af1e1da6597ea0b7b96931a035f7 should be sufficient | 22:03 |
| JayF | The wording is extremely confusing for someone like me who mostly does contribution via backports, reviews, and ushering other patches through. | 22:03 |
| fungi | JayF: it's based on the "owner" field in gerrit, so basically the committer/uploader of the change | 22:24 |
| fungi | not the author in the commit | 22:24 |
| fungi | so if you pushed a first revision of a change to gerrit for one of those repositories, even if it was a backport targeting a stable branch, it should count as a qualifying contribution (as long as it merged in the qualifying timeframe) | 22:25 |
| JayF | In that case, I'm extremely clear. | 22:25 |
| JayF | That nova patch is a prime example, there are a handful in Ironic/IPA as well | 22:26 |
| fungi | for ironic ptl, it will need to be an ironic deliverable yes | 22:26 |
| fungi | dib belongs to the tact sig i think? so would still qualify someone to vote in tc elections (and any foundation individual member can run for tc even if they're not owner of a merged change) | 22:27 |
| JayF | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ironic/+/855704 should have me clear, in any event | 22:28 |
| JayF | that should land shortly | 22:28 |
| fungi | and yeah, dib is indeed under the tact sig. you'd think being the sig chair i'd have known that, but it's friday before a holiday weekend: https://opendev.org/openstack/governance/src/branch/master/reference/sigs-repos.yaml#L59 | 22:29 |
| JayF | What is the sig:project relationship? Is it like, a lesser status? | 22:29 |
| JayF | I was stunned to find DIB wasn't in a top level official project | 22:30 |
| JayF | when it's basically required for some amount of Ironic-Python-Agent CI | 22:30 |
| fungi | sig's aren't lesser (he says, as a totally unbiased party) | 22:30 |
| fungi | https://governance.openstack.org/sigs/ | 22:31 |
| JayF | I guess it makes sense the wording; I was thinking it said "you can vote in elections if you committed to a top level project" | 22:31 |
| JayF | when it really meant "you can vote in elections /for a top level project you have committed to/" | 22:31 |
| fungi | you can vote in a ptl election if you've contributed to the team for that ptl | 22:31 |
| JayF | (it was probably written right; I'm a bit sick right now so eye->brain highway is moving slow lol) | 22:31 |
| fungi | you can vote in tc elections if you've contributed to any team or sig | 22:31 |
| JayF | Thanks for the education :) | 22:33 |
| JayF | I was joking in my internal chat that I feel like I need an openstack law degree to understand some of this. | 22:33 |
| JayF | I think that makes you John Jay, or something like that :P | 22:33 |
| * JayF should add diskimage-builder to his normal review rotation | 22:37 | |
| fungi | JayF: but yes, the reason dib is under the openstack tact sig and didn't move to be part of the opendev collaboratory tools instead is because of ironic relying heavily on it | 22:41 |
| JayF | I don't care where something lives, really, as long as the folks maintaining it are friendly and take contributions. | 22:42 |
| JayF | Just don't want something to be under the OpenStack umbrella but not treated as valuable if it is :) (and it sounds like the sig does treat it that way :D) | 22:42 |
| fungi | yeah, the tact sig is essentially the shell of the old infra team after its guts moved out to become a separate entity | 22:43 |
| JayF | well sounds like a doubly good reason to add DIB to my review rotation | 22:43 |
| JayF | since I know infra folks are usually by definition overworked lol | 22:44 |
| fungi | i'm sure the other folks reviewing dib will be happy to have the assistance. i don't often look at it (and i don't think i even have core reviewer rights on it, despite being the sig chair) | 22:44 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!