Thursday, 2021-03-25

*** tosky has quit IRC00:12
gmanntc-members I have created the doodle poll to select the slots for TC PTG, please fill those before tomorrow meeting - https://doodle.com/poll/2zy8hex4r6wvidqk?utm_source=poll&utm_medium=link01:17
gmanntc-members also created the etherpad to collect the topics - https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tc-xena-ptg01:18
diablo_rojo_phonThanks gmann!01:18
gmannsent the poll link to TC members email id also as we need to select the time slots by tomorrow01:22
*** diablo_rojo has joined #openstack-tc01:29
ricolingmann, voted02:12
*** evrardjp has quit IRC03:33
*** evrardjp has joined #openstack-tc03:33
*** abhishekk|away is now known as abhishekk04:21
*** vishalmanchanda has joined #openstack-tc04:23
*** belmoreira has joined #openstack-tc06:15
*** ralonsoh has joined #openstack-tc06:49
*** dklyle has quit IRC07:11
*** lpetrut has joined #openstack-tc07:12
*** slaweq has joined #openstack-tc07:18
*** diablo_rojo has quit IRC07:23
*** tkajinam has quit IRC07:33
*** tkajinam has joined #openstack-tc07:33
*** andrewbonney has joined #openstack-tc08:10
*** rpittau|afk is now known as rpittau08:13
*** tosky has joined #openstack-tc08:43
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-tc09:20
*** Luzi has joined #openstack-tc10:27
*** e0ne has quit IRC10:33
*** ralonsoh_ has joined #openstack-tc10:48
*** ralonsoh has quit IRC10:48
*** lpetrut has quit IRC10:56
*** lpetrut has joined #openstack-tc11:52
*** ralonsoh_ is now known as ralonsoh12:02
*** lbragstad has quit IRC13:01
*** lbragstad has joined #openstack-tc13:05
openstackgerritRico Lin proposed openstack/governance-sigs master: Update retire SIG process  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance-sigs/+/78300013:20
openstackgerritRico Lin proposed openstack/governance-sigs master: Retire Containers SIG  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance-sigs/+/78300113:20
*** dansmith has quit IRC13:22
*** dansmith has joined #openstack-tc13:25
gmannricolin: thanks13:59
ricolingmann, I also send a ML out for seek for volunteer to drive Containers sig http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-March/021298.html14:04
gmannricolin: thanks.14:04
gmannalso for the retiring SIG process checking those patches14:05
gmannricolin: 1 comment on adding the ML link also in this - https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance-sigs/+/783001/1/archived-sigs.yaml#3514:10
gmannrest all looks perfect14:10
ricolingmann, let's wait for the result of the ML before we update the patch14:15
dansmithgmann: I put myself as "maybe" for all slots on Tue-Thu, because I'm expecting that's when most of the project sessions are going to be14:16
dansmithand I'm hoping to have fewer clashes with TC sessions this time around,14:16
dansmithbecause I think TC is important, but project stuff is too14:17
gmanndansmith: yeah, we can try to avoid conflict.14:17
gmannlet's see how it goes, we are waiting for 4 more TC to vote at least14:18
gmannmnaser: diablo_rojo_phon belmoreira yoctozepto Gentle Reminder for the TC PTG time slot vote https://doodle.com/poll/2zy8hex4r6wvidqk14:18
gmannthough we already passed the deadline to book the slot, hoping diablo_rojo_phon can help us to buy out the time.14:19
yoctozeptogmann: done! :-)14:53
mnaser#startmeeting tc15:00
openstackMeeting started Thu Mar 25 15:00:01 2021 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is mnaser. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.15:00
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.15:00
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: tc)"15:00
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'tc'15:00
*** abhishekk is now known as abhishekk|afk15:00
mnaser#topic rollcall15:00
mnasero/15:00
*** openstack changes topic to "rollcall (Meeting topic: tc)"15:00
gmanno/15:00
ricolino/15:00
belmoreirao/15:00
*** Luzi_ has joined #openstack-tc15:00
yoctozeptoo/15:01
mnaser#topic Follow up on past action items15:02
*** openstack changes topic to "Follow up on past action items (Meeting topic: tc)"15:02
mnaserricolin Add retired SIGs section for governance-sigs repo15:02
ricolin#link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance-sigs/+/78300015:02
*** diablo_rojo has joined #openstack-tc15:02
ricolinjust propose a patch to update current retire process15:02
ricolinplease take a review:)15:03
ricolinalso send a ML for discuss about retire Containers SIG http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-March/021298.html15:03
ricolin#link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-March/021298.html15:03
ricolinHopefully we can have someone take over containers sig15:04
mnasergreat15:04
mnasermnaser drop "Audit SIG list and chairs" from agenda <- done15:04
*** Luzi has quit IRC15:04
mnasermnaser reach out to OSA team about dropping nv jobs from gate <- did reach out, but did not follow up on it15:05
mnaser#topic PTG15:06
*** openstack changes topic to "PTG (Meeting topic: tc)"15:06
mnasergmann: wanna take this as you've taken most of the lead on this?15:06
gmannsure15:06
gmann#link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-March/021283.html15:06
gmannposted on ML about doodle poll and etherpad15:06
*** Luzi_ has quit IRC15:06
gmann#link https://doodle.com/poll/2zy8hex4r6wvidqk15:06
gmannwe need to select the slots by today as we already passed the deadline15:07
gmannand this is etherpad to collect the topics #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tc-xena-ptg15:07
gmannmnaser: diablo_rojo_phon are pending to vote for slots15:07
gmannand after that we can decide here about best available non-conflicting slots15:08
mnaserok, i'll add my times t oday15:08
gmannthanks15:08
gmannthen we can wait for tomorrow to discuss the final slots?15:09
mnasersounds good to me15:09
*** dklyle has joined #openstack-tc15:09
gmannwe have penalty of slots available in PTG rooms https://ethercalc.net/oz7q0gds9zfi15:09
gmannone item i think diablo_rojo_phon added 'Teams that usually meet that aren't signed up:'15:10
gmannI think there are many teams have not signed up for the PTG but may be diablo_rojo_phon has the data15:10
yoctozeptoyes, that would be interesting to know15:11
yoctozeptoand yes, let's discuss the best slot tomorrow15:11
gmannonce we have data, as TC liaisons we can reach out to teams?15:11
gmannyeah.15:12
yoctozeptoI agree15:12
gmannonce we select the slots, we have time to add topics15:12
yoctozeptobut do we have current liaisons?15:12
gmannyoctozepto: I need to reset, waiting for PTL assignment patches to merge15:12
yoctozepto(I mean, did not they reset?)15:12
yoctozeptoah, OK!15:12
gmannwhich can be done in this meeting15:12
yoctozeptolet's do it then :-)15:13
gmannotherwise they conflict on merge with the PTL assignments patches15:13
gmannthat all form my side on PTG topic15:13
mnaserawesome15:13
ricolingmann, while you plan to reset TC liaisons, can you also added TC liaisons for SIGs too?15:13
yoctozeptoagreed, nice15:13
ricolinAs we discussed in last meeting15:14
gmannricolin: sure, let me check the script for that15:14
ricolingmann, thx15:14
mnasercool, can we move ono?15:14
gmannyeah15:15
mnaser#topic Gate performance and heavy job configs (dansmith)15:15
*** openstack changes topic to "Gate performance and heavy job configs (dansmith) (Meeting topic: tc)"15:15
dansmithsorry, rc1 fire in -nova15:16
yoctozeptouh-oh15:16
yoctozeptohappy extinguishing!15:16
dansmithI don't really have anything for this this week15:16
mnaserno worries15:16
mnaserit'll be on our list15:16
mnasergood luck :)15:16
dansmithI haven't been involved in enough traffic to know if there are still lots of cinder fails or not15:16
dansmithbut lower volume has made life better regardless :)15:16
yoctozeptoack15:16
mnasercool, we can hop onto next topic15:17
mnaser#topic Consensus on lower constraints testing (gmann)15:17
*** openstack changes topic to "Consensus on lower constraints testing (gmann) (Meeting topic: tc)"15:17
gmannsent the consensus of our last meeting on ML #link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-March/021204.html15:18
diablo_rojogmann, sorry double meeting-ing15:18
diablo_rojowe can circle back to my topic at the end15:18
gmannand added patch for project-team-guide #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/project-team-guide/+/78190015:18
gmanndiablo_rojo: sure, np!15:18
dansmithglance has already proposed patches to drop those tests in wallaby and victoria15:18
gmann+115:18
gmannonce 781900 is merged then we are done on l-c things15:19
mnaserperfect15:19
mnaserawesome, happy we were able to move forward with it15:19
gmannand from next meeting, we can drop this topic15:19
gmanndiablo_rojo: can you please check the reply on your question in 781900 ?15:20
diablo_rojogmann, yes I can do that too15:20
gmannthanks15:20
mnaserok, cool, well no that note15:20
mnaser#topic Elect TC chair15:20
*** openstack changes topic to "Elect TC chair (Meeting topic: tc)"15:20
mnaseri noticed gmann put up their tc chair nomination and i support them, i've done this for a while and it'll be good to cycle things up15:20
mnaser(i.e. i'm not running for chair)15:21
yoctozepto'tis the link ~> https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/78281115:21
mnaserperhaps if anyone else is interested they could also post their nomination, otherwise we can land this15:21
gmann+115:21
yoctozeptoare we waiting only today?15:21
yoctozeptois there a schedule?15:21
mnaserwe've never really had a system or a schedule for this15:22
yoctozeptoack15:22
gmannyeah, may be we can wait for next meeting or so?15:22
gmannor until all TC members ack on current nomination15:22
mnasereh, maybe lets just ask tc-members to vote on that patch15:22
gmannyeah15:22
mnaserif they vote yes, that means they arent running i assume15:22
ricolinmnaser, +115:22
yoctozepto++15:23
fungiworth remembering, this is not going to be a vote of the entire tc because you're still missing a member15:23
belmoreira+115:23
belmoreirafungi good point15:23
yoctozeptounfortunately!15:23
belmoreirashouldn't we discuss that first?15:23
yoctozeptoI think we are going to today?15:23
gmannyeah, we have that as next topic15:23
mnaserwell, for what it's wroth, it'll be tc-115:24
gmannor after PTL one15:24
yoctozeptotc--15:24
mnaserlets hop into the tc one15:24
yoctozeptoand then liasons15:24
mnaser#topic Discussion for one Vacant TC seat (gmann)15:24
*** openstack changes topic to "Discussion for one Vacant TC seat (gmann) (Meeting topic: tc)"15:24
mnaserpersonally i think leaving it at 8 is ok15:24
dansmithme too15:24
fungithe charter disagrees?15:25
jungleboyjo/15:25
yoctozeptoexcept for it being an even number and the sad charter15:25
jungleboyjSorry for being late btw.15:25
mnaserthen we can make a charter change, i doubt we're going to enter some giant deadlock as 815:25
ricolinI think we can keep it 8 till next chances to correct it15:25
yoctozeptojungleboyj: it's only 25/60, still below the half15:25
fungiand i'd hesitate to suggest taking votes of the tc to alter the charter when the tc is incomplete, if you want to be certain the changes you make to the charter are valid you need to fill the vacancy first15:25
yoctozeptomnaser: yeah, I don't expect deadlocks15:25
jungleboyj:-)  Missed the first ping and got distracted by other people pinging me.15:26
fungii'm curious why there's a desire not to actually follow the guidlines laid out in the charter15:26
belmoreiraeven numbers are not good!15:26
gmanncharter change need 2/3 of total TC which still can be completed15:26
mnaserfungi: what exactly do we do in this case?15:26
jungleboyjWhat happened to a special election for spotz ?15:26
mnaseri don't know how i feel about late entrances, we've previously denied people for late proposals to be honest15:26
fungimnaser: the charter says, quite plainly, that if there's a vacant seat and it's more than a few weeks to the next election, you hold a special election15:26
yoctozeptoyeah, I remember that special election promise15:27
fungisee the election section of the charter, last bullet15:27
mnaserok cool, so i guess then we have nothing to discuss15:27
mnaserlets get an election for one person going15:27
yoctozepto++15:27
belmoreiramnaser this is not "late entrances". It's a new election15:27
gmannfor me it is not clear if special election mention in charter is for election vacant term or in between vacancy15:27
jungleboyj++  Assuming that spotz is still interested.15:27
fungii'm happy to set that up, just wanted to make sure that was the plan first15:27
fungigmann: this is between terms now15:28
mnaserit doesn't seem like there's much of other choices15:28
fungiit's a technicality that the seat was vacated on the day the election closed15:28
belmoreira++ for the new election. But we should expect new candidates15:28
yoctozeptoI'm with fungi on this, we have nothing better15:28
mnaserso maybe we should start to do that asap so we can have a chair15:28
yoctozeptobelmoreira: ++ on that comment15:28
jungleboyj++15:28
gmannok.15:28
fungiyes, i'll get the announcements going today, we can have a short period for nominations, and for voting15:28
yoctozeptoverrry short15:29
yoctozepto:-)15:29
jungleboyjbelmoreira:  agreed15:29
gmannso we should open campaign also for that?15:29
mnaserhaving said that, if we have enough people voting for gmann to be chair15:29
mnaserwe should probably just land that change15:29
dansmithshould be normal nom time if we're going to do an election right/15:29
gmannor just nomination and then election15:29
dansmithtotally not fair to have a 1-hour nom time or anything like that15:29
yoctozeptolol15:29
dansmithtbh, this seems like kinda weird to me15:29
fungiyes, i think the only concern there would be if whoever wins the special election wanted to volunteer as a chair candidate, but i haven't looked closely at the chair selection part of the charter to know if that's really a problem15:29
dansmithlike making a special exception for a late submission15:29
ricolinmnaser, but that will give the new elected member no chance to run for chair15:30
gmannyeah, we should follow the week or so nomination at least15:30
dansmithand if it was some random person, I wonder if that would really be happening, but.. whatever :)15:30
mnaserricolin: but if the majority of tc members already want gmann to run15:30
fungidansmith: no special exception, there's going to be an election, additional people can volunteer if they want to be candidates15:30
belmoreiramnaser it would be great if we give the new member the opportunity to vote15:30
mnaserok15:30
mnaser(i gotta admit, this seems very bureaucratic right now and going to slow us down a bunch)15:30
jungleboyjfungi:  ++15:30
yoctozeptomnaser: yeah, it's a sad occurrence15:31
mnaserbut sure, let's have a full on election, i'll keep serving chair duties for another week or two as we settle all this out.15:31
dansmithso, we need what like two weeks?15:31
gmannyeah, we can hold Chair by then, with our charter previous Chair is default chair until new chair is being elected15:31
jungleboyjYay for red tape.15:31
dansmitha week to let people know that noms will open in a week, then a week for noms,15:31
dansmiththen a week for voting right?15:31
belmoreiramnaser ++ but I think is the right thing to do15:31
fungigood reason to put more effort into getting people to run for the tc next time, or spending this cycle amending the charter to schedule further reducing the tc size15:31
yoctozeptojungleboyj: YAY!15:31
mnaserwe've got other important topics to deal with like, keystone not having a ptl15:31
jungleboyjIndeed.15:31
fungidansmith: i said "short" we can make it a few days for nominations, no campaigning period, a couple days for voting15:31
mnaserso can we just get started with a full on election for one vacant tc seat15:31
yoctozeptoagreed15:31
dansmithfungi: how is that fair?15:32
fungidansmith: how is it not? almost everyone volunteers candidacy or votes on the last day anyway15:32
dansmithfungi: people need time to run it by their managers, consider the commitment, etc15:32
gmannhow about this: noms open 25-3 until 1-4 and then election form 2-4 until 8-4 ?15:32
yoctozeptodansmith: people already had a chance to participate15:32
yoctozeptothis is a special election15:32
yoctozeptodoes not have to be full blown15:32
yoctozeptobut realistic15:32
mnaserthis isn't a special election imho, it has to be normal if we want to be following 'the charter'15:32
yoctozeptooh15:33
mnaserif this is just a procedural thing so we can put one more name to make it 915:33
gmannyeah special election but we should give time to people to think on running15:33
fungithe charter doesn't say how long a special election needs to be, it just says to hold a special election15:33
mnaserthen let's just not pretend it is and just put in the late candidate and call it a day15:33
yoctozeptoxD15:33
* dansmith has a call, brb15:33
fungii'm all for less bureaucracy, but if you want less bureaucracy YOU NEED THE CHARTER REVISED15:33
yoctozeptoI love it how each one of us has a slightly different opinion on that15:33
mnaseryoctozepto: welcome to the tc :)15:33
mnaserthat is healthy though, mostly.15:34
gmannI feel noms for a week and then election can be of 3-4 days if needed to be15:34
yoctozeptomnaser: yeah, it looks fine sof ar15:34
yoctozeptoso far*15:34
mnaserhow about this15:34
mnaseropen noms for 2 weeks and announce it today15:34
mnaserthat way we'll have the same normal 1 week notification before hand15:34
yoctozepto(we surely need to prioritise the charter revision)15:34
mnaserjust merged into two15:34
fungii can do that. will send it shortly after the tc meeting wraps15:35
jungleboyjyoctozepto: ++15:35
yoctozeptothat's very permissive and closes the discussion15:35
yoctozeptolet's go with that15:35
yoctozeptowhat about voting time, another week?15:35
gmann+115:35
mnaseryes, a week for election, same way we always do, if we have an election that is15:35
yoctozeptowell, it would be all for nothing if nobody actually stepped up15:36
gmannyeah that is fair enough15:36
yoctozeptowhat then :D15:36
diablo_rojoRight, if no one else puts their name up then we wouldn't need the polling period.15:36
yoctozeptoneed to get the charter right next time15:36
diablo_rojoAnd we can be done after nominations close15:36
jungleboyj\o/15:36
yoctozeptodiablo_rojo: well, if we stay with 8 out of 915:36
yoctozeptowe are still deadlocked15:36
yoctozepto:D15:36
mnaserthat's the thing i find silly15:37
mnaseris that if we don't have anyone15:37
yoctozeptome too15:37
mnaseranyone can just show up15:37
mnaserput tehir name15:37
diablo_rojoRight, like I said, if we only get one nomination to fill the one seat15:37
mnaserbe 9th15:37
mnaserand stay afk15:37
mnaserso that's why this just feels like we want to have 9 people for the sakes of having 9 people15:37
yoctozeptodiablo_rojo: we were discussing as if 0 came ;-)15:37
* jungleboyj is shaking my head15:37
mnaserbut anyways, this is something we should work out in the charter15:37
diablo_rojoohhh15:37
yoctozeptojungleboyj: whose head?15:37
diablo_rojothis is what I get for doing two meetings in parallel15:37
gmannyeah, we need clear wording in charter15:37
jungleboyj:-)  My own at the moment.15:38
yoctozepto:D15:38
fungimnaser: anyone could already just show up and put in their name15:38
fungithat's what the charter *says*15:38
jungleboyjmnaser:  Yeah, that is no different than if we only had one candidate during the election.15:38
fungiif you want some minimum merit barrier to entry for being a tc candidate, you need to adjust the charter15:38
mnaserok15:39
mnasernow15:39
* jungleboyj nominates my cat15:39
yoctozeptofungi run that election and we worry during it15:39
mnaserdo we all ABSOLUTELY feel like the 9th person to come here HAS to be present for us to nominate a chair?15:39
gmannjungleboyj: :)15:39
yoctozeptothat's the plan :D15:39
spotzI'll resend my nomination15:39
mnasermy concern is that given this might be 3 weeks15:39
fungi(your cat needs to be a foundation individual member, might not qualify on legal grounds as a "person")15:39
jungleboyjOh fungi, I can always count on you to know the charter.15:40
mnaserwe'll be so close to PTG time15:40
jungleboyjspotz:  Do you want to run for chair?15:40
gmannthen let's make nomination as 1 week and result 1 week, if that can help15:40
spotzNo on chair15:41
gmanns/result/election15:41
* dansmith is back15:41
ricolinI think 1 for nom and 1 for election will be a good plan15:41
yoctozeptoI read the charter, can't find anything that would block us from selecting the chair15:41
mnaserthe 9th member can show up and disagree on gmann being a chair, if all 7 of us want to nominate them as chair, then that's a bit of a waste of time15:41
jungleboyjI am ok with still voting on chair, but I know it is technically not fair.15:41
dansmithI think that waiting on the chair voting is crazypants15:41
yoctozeptodansmith ++15:41
dansmithso please, we're doing the red tape thing for the election, let's not delay the chair deal15:41
* diablo_rojo crosses fingers no one else tries to run and its just spotz and we can have all this done in a week15:41
jungleboyjOk, so lets go with a week nomination, week selection.15:42
yoctozeptocome on, the chair election is not blocked by any legal yadda-yadda15:42
jungleboyjThen do the chair now.15:42
* yoctozepto remembers being taught to never use the phrase "do somebody"15:43
mnasertc-members: please vote on https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/782811 if you feel like gmann is a good chair candidate.  if we have consensus that cant be broken by another vote, then we'll look into it15:43
belmoreiraok... about the 4 TC candidates? When they start the new term?15:43
mnaserand merge it15:43
mnaserthey've already started, acls are updated15:43
mnaserand they will be voting on that change15:43
yoctozeptobelmoreira: yes, hi!15:43
jungleboyjyoctozepto: Ooops.15:43
mnaserthe reason i'm strerssing about this15:44
yoctozeptojungleboyj: TIL? :D15:44
ricolin5 tc +1 already15:44
mnaseris because PTG is coming up soon15:44
belmoreiramnaser ok15:44
mnaserand i really don't think a chair transition a week before PTG15:44
mnaseris probably going to do us any good15:44
jungleboyjAgreed.  Thankfully gmann has already started organizing things.  Thank you!15:44
ricolinmnaser, agreed15:44
gmannjungleboyj: np!15:45
mnaseranyways, we can discuss this more, but please be mindful of that15:45
*** abhishekk|afk is now known as abhishekk15:45
mnaseri'm happy to continue to do my job as chair, but i just think for our overall health, we should settle this out15:45
diablo_rojoWhile not ideal, its not like the new chair is going to be super new to everything and not have the context?15:45
mnaserright, but PTG organization is generally a chair responsiblity amongst other things, so do i start doing all of those only to talk out a week before15:46
mnaseror do i organize them with gmann and have them do the same thing which essentially means we're just red taping stuff and we're all just agreeing for something that's going to inevitebly happen15:46
diablo_rojoWell its not like it *has* to be *only* the chair doing it ahead of time and its already happening anyway?15:46
dansmithwe have 5 already,15:46
dansmithcan we not just merge that thing?15:46
yoctozeptomerge15:46
dansmithmerge15:47
dansmithmerge15:47
dansmithmerge15:47
dansmithmerge15:47
mnaserlol15:47
jungleboyjmerge15:47
yoctozeptostop it15:47
diablo_rojoLol15:47
mnaseri feel bad because gmann gets a not-so-great welcome :(15:47
mnaserand im sorry they got caught in all of this15:47
gmannno worry, its TC :)15:47
yoctozeptogmann, know we want you as our chair!15:47
yoctozeptoat least the 5 of us :D15:47
diablo_rojoUnfortunate timing, but that doesn't mean we appreciate gmann any less :)15:48
jungleboyj++15:48
yoctozeptodiablo_rojo: you vote too :D15:48
mnaserim going to merge this.  if any tc member disagrees with it, please propose a revert with reasoning and if enough tc members agree wih the revert, we can revert.15:48
yoctozepto~> https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/78281115:48
diablo_rojoyoctozepto, as soon as I stop being split in half by meetings15:48
belmoreiraops15:49
yoctozeptodiablo_rojo: is it vertical split? or a horizontal one?15:49
mnasernow, we have a chair pending zuul.  congrats gmann, with 5/9 votes you're at 55% so over 50%15:49
* yoctozepto needs to know15:49
jungleboyjI had 9 meetings scheduled in 3 hours this morning.15:49
* jungleboyj is tired of meetings.15:49
diablo_rojoyoctozepto, vertical15:49
mnaserand for the vacant seat, we'll wait for the results of the election15:49
yoctozeptodiablo_rojo: ack!15:49
mnaserwe have very little time15:49
jungleboyjgmann:  Congratulations and thank you!15:49
mnaser#topic PTL assignment for Xena cycle leaderless projects (gmann)15:49
*** openstack changes topic to "PTL assignment for Xena cycle leaderless projects (gmann) (Meeting topic: tc)"15:49
mnaseri'd like to focus on keystone15:49
gmannthanks15:49
gmannyeah next topic15:50
yoctozepto( gmann: congrats! )15:50
jungleboyj++15:50
gmannthanks15:50
belmoreiracongrats gmann15:50
gmannkeystone meeting did not happen i think15:50
yoctozeptoat all?15:50
gmanni pinged on keystone channel and gagehugo added it in their meeting agenda15:50
gmannbelmoreira: thanks15:50
yoctozeptohm15:50
gagehugogmann: we had a meeting this week15:51
diablo_rojoI did see knikolla sign up for PTG time for keystone.15:51
gmanngagehugo: ohk, sorry15:51
gmannany updates15:51
gagehugogeneral consensus is using the DPL15:51
gagehugoDPL model*15:51
mnaseroh cool15:51
gmann+1,15:52
mnasergagehugo: do you need help in figuring out the roles etc15:52
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-tc15:52
gagehugo#link http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/keystone/2021/keystone.2021-03-23-16.59.log.txt15:52
mnasergagehugo: i feel like i can already identify the security liaison :p15:52
gagehugohaha15:52
gagehugoknikolla mentioned he would propose moving to DPL15:53
yoctozeptothat's one very compressed meeting15:53
gagehugoand yeah I'll assume that role15:53
gmanngagehugo: these are three roles need as mandatory https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/782195/2/reference/projects.yaml#93915:53
gagehugoit is :(15:53
gmanngagehugo: knikolla thanks for taking responsibility15:54
mnaserok well this is some good news15:54
gmannother than keystone, all PTL assignments and Mistral DPL model is all up and might be ready to merge?15:54
jungleboyjgagehugo: and knikolla  Thank you!15:54
mnasergmann: i think so, i can go over them or  work with you on those15:55
gmannmnaser: +1 thanks15:55
yoctozeptothanks to our keystone heroes, gagehugo and knikolla, let the keystone realm prosper under their reign15:55
yoctozepto(or so it says)15:56
gagehugo:)15:56
mnasercool, anything else?15:56
yoctozeptoptls clear15:56
yoctozeptonow tc liaisons?15:56
*** lpetrut has quit IRC15:57
gmannnothing from my side, its great we figured out all the leaderless things before PTG \o/15:57
yoctozepto++15:57
gmannyoctozepto: yes, I will propose15:57
yoctozeptoack, thanks15:57
mnaserhaving said that15:57
yoctozeptoI was just wondering if we want to discuss anything regarding them15:58
mnaseri think if anyone wants to propose themselves as a liaisnon for a specific project15:58
mnaserand then the rest are randomized15:58
knikollao/ sorry, i'm out sick and haven't had a chance to propose the change15:58
yoctozeptodoes it make sense to be the PTL and tc liaison for a project?15:58
yoctozepto(thinking about Masakari here)15:58
yoctozepto(tbh, that would be the shortest path result)15:58
dansmithI forget,15:59
dansmithdo I propose my change before gmann proposes the random ones?15:59
mnaseryes15:59
gmannyeah, I will reset it and then we can start proposing ourselves as liaisons and then random assignments for remaining projects15:59
mnaserother tc-members too15:59
dansmithor do I slip gmann a $20 under the table to give me the "random" things I want15:59
yoctozeptolol15:59
gmannyoctozepto: there is no restriction on PTL and liaison at same time15:59
yoctozepto( dansmith: psst, it's $30 nowadays )15:59
gmanndansmith: heh15:59
openstackgerritMerged openstack/governance master: Add Ghanshyam nomination as chair  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/78281115:59
dansmithman, inflation15:59
yoctozepto:-)16:00
mnasernice change to merge to end on16:00
mnaserthanks for having me as chair y'all :)16:00
yoctozeptogmann: officially the new chair during the meeting16:00
mnaser#endmeeting16:00
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Technical Committee office hours: Tuesdays at 09:00 UTC, Wednesdays at 01:00 UTC, and Thursdays at 15:00 UTC | https://governance.openstack.org/tc/ | channel logs http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23openstack-tc/"16:00
openstackMeeting ended Thu Mar 25 16:00:18 2021 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)16:00
yoctozeptothanks mnaser16:00
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/tc/2021/tc.2021-03-25-15.00.html16:00
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/tc/2021/tc.2021-03-25-15.00.txt16:00
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/tc/2021/tc.2021-03-25-15.00.log.html16:00
jungleboyjGood work!16:00
* mnaser fixes acls16:00
gmannmnaser: thanks for serving and contributing a lot as Chair for many cycles.16:00
ricolinmnaser, Thank you for all the great works:) and congrats gmann :)16:00
mnasergmann: i added you, i havent removed any previous chairs from tech-commitee-chair as i always thought it was a nice little thing to keep in the acl :)16:01
gmannricolin: thanks16:01
diablo_rojoWe didn't get to circle back to my topic, mostly just wanted to draw attention to projects that usually come that aren't signed up: Monasca, Oslo, Popups, Storlets16:01
gmannmnaser: thanks, i agree to keep.16:01
belmoreirathanks mnaser for all your work and congrats again to gmann16:01
diablo_rojoMostly just for like, project health heads up.16:01
gmannbelmoreira: thanks again16:01
bnemecOh shoot, we meant to sign up. Is it too late?16:01
mnasermonasca is generally pretty active i think right16:01
gmanndiablo_rojo: only 4 projects?16:01
gmanndiablo_rojo: i signed up for policy popup yesterday16:02
ricolindiablo_rojo, Oslo just speak:)16:02
jungleboyjThat isn't too bad.16:02
diablo_rojoWell there are others, but those normally do and aren't signed up yet and the deadline today16:03
fungijust a reminder, to any tc members who feel your published charter is full of unnecessary red tape and bureaucracy, i encourage you to propose patches to simplify it during your term16:03
yoctozeptomnaser: not sure about the correctness of that statement16:04
gmannpinged monasca PTL for PTG sign up16:04
fungijust because you inherited bureaucracy doesn't mean you can't fix it (even if the bureaucratic path to fixing it does require some effort)16:04
yoctozeptofungi: right, we can start discussing in the ptg16:05
gmanndiablo_rojo: also for TC slots, we will be deciding it tomorrow once you and mnaser vote for availability https://doodle.com/poll/2zy8hex4r6wvidqk16:05
ricolingmann, we still not merged Monasca PTL assign patch16:05
yoctozeptoso make charter happy16:05
gmanndiablo_rojo: is that fine?16:05
gmannricolin: yeah, it is ready and we can merge today16:05
ricolingmann, cool, I will try to ping chaconpiza now to see if he aware about PTG deadline16:06
gmannok, monasca is going to reserve today, got response form proposed PTL16:06
ricolincool:)16:06
gmannricolin:  yeah got the response on monasca channe;16:06
gmannotherwise i was about to ping you to knock their door :)16:07
ricolinSo popups and Storlets16:08
diablo_rojogmann, yeah16:08
gmanncool, thanks16:08
gmannricolin: policy popup is done, not sure if encryption pop up team also register. may be fungi knows?16:09
diablo_rojoSo pop ups was more specifically the policy one that has been meeting just about every ptg the last couple rounds16:10
ricolintkajinam, ^^^16:10
fungigmann: i expect they'll try to piggy-back on sessions for barbican, cinder and glance16:10
fungibut i'll try to remember to ask during the weekly meeting on monday16:10
gmannfungi: i see.16:11
diablo_rojoI don't care either way if any of these teams do or don't meet, just wanted to point it out for project health reasons like I said.16:11
fungiat the moment most of the image encryption work is happening in or blocked on various specs and features in those three projects16:11
fungimeetings are usually short, we didn't talk about ptg this week i guess: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/image_encryption/2021/image_encryption.2021-03-22-13.00.log.html16:13
ricolindiablo_rojo, indeed good chance to check on the health of projects16:13
diablo_rojofungi, no pressure :)16:13
* ricolin is checking the reason why storlets is not sign up16:13
fungiyeah, looked back through the last several meetings and it wasn't brought up, i'll add it to the agenda16:13
fungifor image encryption pop-up16:14
gmannthanks16:15
diablo_rojofungi, if they end up wanting to meet, let me know ASAP please :)16:15
ricolintc-members please help to review the SIG retire process so we can make sure it's idea for you all https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance-sigs/+/78300016:16
fungidiablo_rojo: will do, but as i said i expect they'll just hold discussions in the relevant project sessions instead16:17
diablo_rojoTotally cool.16:23
*** belmoreira has quit IRC16:30
openstackgerritMerged openstack/governance master: Appoint Shengqin Feng as Zun PTL  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/78006716:36
openstackgerritMerged openstack/governance master: Appoint Douglas Mendizábal as Barbican PTL  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/78007216:40
openstackgerritMerged openstack/governance master: Appoint XueFeng Liu as Senlin PTL  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/78006816:48
openstackgerritMerged openstack/governance master: Appoint Martin Chacon Piza as Monasca PTL  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/78007016:48
openstackgerritMerged openstack/governance master: Appoint Hao Wang as Zaqar PTL  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/78027916:49
openstackgerritMerged openstack/governance master: Appoint Xinran Wang as Cyborg PTL  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/78007116:49
yoctozeptogmann: why does https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/782195 need to wait 4 more days?17:02
gmannyoctozepto: as per charter formal-vote need to be open for at least 7 days.17:03
gmannthis one https://governance.openstack.org/tc/reference/charter.html#motions17:04
fungiand the exceptions for that rule are documented at https://governance.openstack.org/tc/reference/house-rules.html17:04
yoctozeptogmann, fungi: thank you both!17:05
*** rpittau is now known as rpittau|afk17:06
fungihouse rules also say that ptl appointment changes follow standard (charter) reviewing and approval process. it's not been updated since the dpl became an option i think, but would expect similar treatment of ptl to dpl change17:09
gmannfungi: yeah, we can add DPL things too to be clear.17:10
openstackgerritGhanshyam proposed openstack/governance master: Resetting projects' TC liaisons empty  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/78305517:14
gmanntc-members ^^ resetting the TC liaisons list, please assign yourself to your interesting projects. As per the current TC and projects count, it will be around 8-9 projects per TC.17:18
*** tobberydberg has quit IRC17:18
*** jeremyfreudberg has quit IRC17:18
*** mugsie has quit IRC17:20
*** timburke__ has quit IRC17:20
*** freefood_ has quit IRC17:20
*** gibi has quit IRC17:20
*** valleedelisle has quit IRC17:20
*** smcginnis has quit IRC17:20
*** ttx has quit IRC17:20
*** logan- has quit IRC17:20
*** abhishekk has quit IRC17:20
*** mugsie has joined #openstack-tc17:20
*** tobberydberg has joined #openstack-tc17:20
*** ttx has joined #openstack-tc17:20
*** smcginnis has joined #openstack-tc17:20
*** jeremyfreudberg has joined #openstack-tc17:20
*** gibi has joined #openstack-tc17:20
*** freefood_ has joined #openstack-tc17:20
*** valleedelisle has joined #openstack-tc17:20
*** ttx has quit IRC17:20
*** akahat has quit IRC17:20
*** johnthetubaguy has quit IRC17:21
*** logan- has joined #openstack-tc17:21
*** ttx has joined #openstack-tc17:22
openstackgerritDan Smith proposed openstack/governance master: Add danms liaison preferences  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/78306017:23
*** abhishekk has joined #openstack-tc17:23
dansmithgmann: like that? ^17:23
dansmithoh,17:24
*** johnthetubaguy has joined #openstack-tc17:24
dansmithis it supposed to be our launchpad/openid or our irc nic?17:24
gmanndansmith: yeah, thanks17:24
gmanndansmith: irc nick17:24
openstackgerritDan Smith proposed openstack/governance master: Add danms liaison preferences  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/78306017:24
dansmithfixed17:24
openstackgerritGhanshyam proposed openstack/governance master: Resetting projects' TC liaisons empty  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/78305517:27
openstackgerritGhanshyam proposed openstack/governance master: Add danms liaison preferences  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/78306017:27
*** abhishekk has quit IRC17:27
*** abhishekk has joined #openstack-tc17:27
*** timburke has joined #openstack-tc17:27
gmannjust rebased on top of latest master17:27
*** akahat has joined #openstack-tc17:30
openstackgerritGhanshyam proposed openstack/governance master: Add gmann liaison preferences  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/78307017:32
jungleboyjgmann:  What if we are ok with the current liaison listing for us?17:36
gmannjungleboyj: you can assign those again, but we need to reset as we have new TC members now.17:37
jungleboyjI must be looking at the wrong file.  :-)17:37
gmannjungleboyj: this is current list https://governance.openstack.org/tc/reference/tc-liaisons.html17:38
fungijungleboyj: git review -d the current stack (783055,783060) and then base your edits on that, restoring your old entries if desired17:39
fungithe list hasn't officially been reset *yet* the reset is still in review17:39
jungleboyjGotcha.  That is what I was missing.  :-)17:39
fungii would git-review -d 783060 since that's the end of the stack17:40
fungiand then commit on top of it17:40
fungijust to avoid merge-conflicts17:40
jungleboyjSounds good.  Thank you!17:40
gmannthis one 783070 you can take as base unless someone else push before you17:41
*** tkajinam has quit IRC17:42
*** vishalmanchanda has quit IRC17:42
*** evrardjp has quit IRC17:42
*** cloudnull has quit IRC17:42
*** jmorgan has quit IRC17:42
*** aprice has quit IRC17:42
*** diablo_rojo has quit IRC17:42
*** EmilienM has quit IRC17:42
*** redrobot has quit IRC17:42
*** dtruong has quit IRC17:42
*** jroll has quit IRC17:42
*** ildikov has quit IRC17:42
*** lbragstad has quit IRC17:42
*** ricolin has quit IRC17:42
*** adriant has quit IRC17:42
*** frickler has quit IRC17:42
*** yoctozepto has quit IRC17:42
*** openstackgerrit has quit IRC17:42
*** zaneb has quit IRC17:42
*** spotz has quit IRC17:42
*** akahat has quit IRC17:42
*** johnthetubaguy has quit IRC17:42
*** abhishekk has quit IRC17:42
*** dansmith has quit IRC17:42
*** mrunge has quit IRC17:42
*** ianw has quit IRC17:42
*** bnemec has quit IRC17:42
*** corvus has quit IRC17:42
*** gouthamr has quit IRC17:42
*** gmann has quit IRC17:42
*** diablo_rojo_phon has quit IRC17:42
*** rm_work has quit IRC17:42
*** mrunge has joined #openstack-tc17:42
*** corvus has joined #openstack-tc17:42
fungioh, yep, i guess 783070 is actually the end of the stack17:42
fungii missed that third cange17:43
fungichange17:43
*** adriant has joined #openstack-tc17:43
fungianyway, whichever one is at the end when you're ready to push17:43
*** lbragstad has joined #openstack-tc17:43
*** lbragstad has quit IRC17:43
*** bnemec has joined #openstack-tc17:44
*** rm_work has joined #openstack-tc17:44
*** johnthetubaguy has joined #openstack-tc17:44
*** zaneb has joined #openstack-tc17:44
*** evrardjp has joined #openstack-tc17:44
*** tkajinam has joined #openstack-tc17:44
*** ianw has joined #openstack-tc17:44
*** lbragstad has joined #openstack-tc17:44
*** dtruong has joined #openstack-tc17:44
*** gmann has joined #openstack-tc17:44
*** dansmith has joined #openstack-tc17:44
*** abhishekk has joined #openstack-tc17:45
*** timburke has quit IRC17:46
*** frickler_ has joined #openstack-tc17:47
jungleboyjArgh, was on 738060 .17:49
jungleboyjI will fix that.17:49
*** frickler_ has quit IRC17:49
*** akahat has joined #openstack-tc17:50
*** cloudnull has joined #openstack-tc17:51
*** jmorgan has joined #openstack-tc17:54
fungino worries, lots of netsplits due to freenode server restarts, you've got that excuse17:54
fungifor some reason openstackgerrit didn't rejoin here, but i'll do my best impersonation...17:56
fungi<openstackgerrit> Jeremy Stanley proposed openstack/election master: Set up TC Vacancy Special Election  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/election/+/78307417:56
*** mwhahaha has quit IRC17:57
*** masayukig has quit IRC17:57
*** johnsom has quit IRC17:57
*** TheJulia has quit IRC17:57
*** melwitt has quit IRC17:57
*** mnaser has quit IRC17:57
*** mwhahaha has joined #openstack-tc17:57
*** TheJulia has joined #openstack-tc17:57
*** johnsom has joined #openstack-tc17:58
*** mnaser has joined #openstack-tc17:58
*** melwitt has joined #openstack-tc17:58
*** masayukig has joined #openstack-tc17:58
*** iurygregory has quit IRC17:58
*** rpittau|afk has quit IRC17:58
*** jrosser has quit IRC17:58
*** knikolla has quit IRC17:58
*** jungleboyj has quit IRC17:58
*** fungi has quit IRC17:58
*** rpittau|afk has joined #openstack-tc17:58
*** jrosser has joined #openstack-tc17:58
*** jungleboyj has joined #openstack-tc17:58
*** knikolla has joined #openstack-tc17:58
*** openstack has joined #openstack-tc18:03
*** ChanServ sets mode: +o openstack18:03
gmannyeah, thanks18:03
jungleboyjI have pushed up my preferences.18:03
*** jmorgan has quit IRC18:03
*** akahat has quit IRC18:03
*** csatari has quit IRC18:03
*** mnasiadka has quit IRC18:03
*** guilhermesp has quit IRC18:03
*** jungleboyj has quit IRC18:03
*** jrosser has quit IRC18:03
*** mwhahaha has quit IRC18:03
*** TheJulia has quit IRC18:03
*** persia has quit IRC18:03
*** jmorgan has joined #openstack-tc18:04
*** csatari has joined #openstack-tc18:04
*** mnasiadka has joined #openstack-tc18:04
*** guilhermesp has joined #openstack-tc18:04
*** jungleboyj has joined #openstack-tc18:04
*** jrosser has joined #openstack-tc18:04
*** TheJulia has joined #openstack-tc18:04
*** mwhahaha has joined #openstack-tc18:04
*** persia has joined #openstack-tc18:04
*** jungleboyj has quit IRC18:05
*** jrosser has quit IRC18:05
*** mwhahaha has quit IRC18:05
*** TheJulia has quit IRC18:05
*** persia has quit IRC18:05
*** persia has joined #openstack-tc18:05
gmannjungleboyj: thanks18:05
*** openstackstatus has joined #openstack-tc18:05
*** ChanServ sets mode: +v openstackstatus18:05
*** TheJulia has joined #openstack-tc18:05
*** abhishekk has quit IRC18:06
*** tkajinam has quit IRC18:06
*** zaneb has quit IRC18:06
*** gmann has quit IRC18:06
*** lxkong has quit IRC18:06
*** Jeffrey4l has quit IRC18:06
*** gagehugo has quit IRC18:06
*** jungleboyj has joined #openstack-tc18:06
*** Jeffrey4l has joined #openstack-tc18:06
*** zaneb has joined #openstack-tc18:06
*** gagehugo has joined #openstack-tc18:06
*** gmann has joined #openstack-tc18:06
*** tkajinam has joined #openstack-tc18:06
*** lxkong has joined #openstack-tc18:07
*** Guest76033 has joined #openstack-tc18:07
*** mwhahaha has joined #openstack-tc18:07
*** jrosser has joined #openstack-tc18:08
*** andrewbonney has quit IRC18:08
*** abhishekk has joined #openstack-tc18:10
*** akahat has joined #openstack-tc18:10
yoctozeptoadded mine as well18:12
*** ralonsoh has joined #openstack-tc18:13
gmannyoctozepto: ack, thanks18:14
*** ralonsoh has quit IRC18:15
*** ildikov has joined #openstack-tc18:15
*** ttx has quit IRC18:16
*** valleedelisle has quit IRC18:16
*** gibi has quit IRC18:16
*** jeremyfreudberg has quit IRC18:16
*** mugsie has quit IRC18:16
*** e0ne has quit IRC18:16
*** bauzas has quit IRC18:16
*** tristanC has quit IRC18:16
*** amotoki has quit IRC18:16
*** logan- has quit IRC18:16
*** freefood_ has quit IRC18:16
*** smcginnis has quit IRC18:16
*** tobberydberg has quit IRC18:16
*** tosky has quit IRC18:16
*** slaweq has quit IRC18:16
*** irclogbot_3 has quit IRC18:16
*** jbryce has quit IRC18:16
*** ShadowJonathan has quit IRC18:16
*** pojadhav has quit IRC18:16
*** gibi has joined #openstack-tc18:16
*** ttx has joined #openstack-tc18:16
*** mugsie has joined #openstack-tc18:16
*** valleedelisle has joined #openstack-tc18:17
*** amotoki has joined #openstack-tc18:17
*** tosky has joined #openstack-tc18:17
*** pojadhav has joined #openstack-tc18:18
*** bauzas has joined #openstack-tc18:18
*** tobberydberg has joined #openstack-tc18:18
*** logan- has joined #openstack-tc18:18
*** iurygregory has joined #openstack-tc18:20
*** tristanC has joined #openstack-tc18:21
*** cgoncalves has joined #openstack-tc18:21
*** smcginnis has joined #openstack-tc18:21
*** irclogbot_3 has joined #openstack-tc18:22
*** jeremyfreudberg has joined #openstack-tc18:43
*** openstackgerrit has joined #openstack-tc18:46
openstackgerritJeremy Stanley proposed openstack/election master: Set up TC Vacancy Special Election  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/election/+/78307418:46
fungiwelcome back, openstackgerrit18:46
fungihopefully that one is now typo-free18:48
fungitox says it's good anyway18:51
*** EmilienM has joined #openstack-tc18:56
fungiassuming nobody has any problems with that change, i'll merge that in the next few hours and send the announcement to openstack-discuss opening nominations at 23:45 utc19:03
gmannfungi: +1 on plan.19:11
*** slaweq has joined #openstack-tc20:49
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-tc21:47
*** e0ne has quit IRC21:47
*** ralonsoh has joined #openstack-tc22:10
*** gibi has quit IRC23:23
*** gibi has joined #openstack-tc23:30
openstackgerritMerged openstack/election master: Set up TC Vacancy Special Election  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/election/+/78307423:33
fungisending announcement about ^ that in ~10 minutes23:33

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.2 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!