Wednesday, 2020-04-08

gmanno/01:30
*** ijolliffe has quit IRC01:40
*** ricolin has joined #openstack-tc01:58
*** evrardjp has quit IRC04:36
*** evrardjp has joined #openstack-tc04:37
*** zaneb has quit IRC04:48
*** zaneb has joined #openstack-tc04:49
*** iurygregory has quit IRC06:25
openstackgerritTony Breeds proposed openstack/election master: Include Leaderless projects in the PTL series results  https://review.opendev.org/71831706:26
*** iurygregory has joined #openstack-tc06:27
*** dklyle has quit IRC06:48
*** slaweq_ has joined #openstack-tc06:57
*** lpetrut has joined #openstack-tc07:09
*** rpittau|afk is now known as rpittau07:17
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-tc07:38
evrardjpmnaser: do you intend to propose a community goal for migrating all the projects to building their containers, based on your PoC ?07:43
*** tosky has joined #openstack-tc08:00
*** dmellado has quit IRC08:01
*** dmellado has joined #openstack-tc08:05
*** witek has joined #openstack-tc08:11
*** asettle has joined #openstack-tc08:22
*** witek has quit IRC08:33
*** slaweq_ is now known as slaweq08:36
*** ricolin_ has quit IRC09:29
*** ricolin_ has joined #openstack-tc09:30
*** ricolin has quit IRC09:30
*** ricolin_ has quit IRC09:57
*** ricolin_ has joined #openstack-tc09:57
*** ricolin has joined #openstack-tc10:00
*** ricolin_ has quit IRC10:02
*** slaweq has quit IRC10:23
*** rpittau is now known as rpittau|bbl10:24
*** slaweq has joined #openstack-tc10:25
*** ricolin has quit IRC10:39
openstackgerritIan Y. Choi proposed openstack/election master: Fix missing option on README  https://review.opendev.org/71838610:50
*** e0ne has quit IRC10:58
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-tc10:58
evrardjpttx: Pete was okay for a regrouping of LOCI/OSH at first sight. I will be proposing a regroupment of the projects, see how folks are happy in the community.11:08
*** ijolliffe has joined #openstack-tc12:17
*** rpittau|bbl is now known as rpittau12:23
cloudnullo/12:23
ttxevrardjp: ++12:30
njohnstono/12:51
*** ricolin has joined #openstack-tc12:57
ricolino/13:02
gmanno/14:04
mnaserevrardjp: i think that's a good idea14:07
mnaserhow ok are we with a project saying they are shipping features which don't work with uwsgi.14:10
fungiif memory serves, glance said that for the longest time14:32
smcginnisGlance was required because of a technical issue. I wouldn't think we would want any others not using our "standard" uwsgi deployment method unless there is a similar strong reason they can't.14:36
*** gouthamr has left #openstack-tc14:42
*** gouthamr has joined #openstack-tc14:42
*** lpetrut has quit IRC14:46
*** asettle has quit IRC14:59
*** dklyle has joined #openstack-tc15:00
mnaserbecause we have users who want to use the interop image import and we pretty much just cant do it without having to go back to running old eventlet ;\15:04
mnaserand to me that feels like we have to take a few steps back to accomplish a 'feature'15:06
cloudnullmnaser +1 ^15:32
cloudnulljust as a note, TripelO does not deploy any services with uwsgi.15:34
cloudnullit wasn't available in Cent7 and we've not looked into it for Cent815:34
fungiout of curiosity, which project is adding a new feature which won't worth with uwsgi?15:34
mnaserfungi: since pike, the "interop image import" is listed as "non-functional when using uwsgi":16:13
fungimnaser: oh, you were actually talking about glance?16:16
mnaserfungi: yeah, they have a big red warning on their deployment page too16:16
fungii just raised glance as an example of a project which has historically claimed a feature wouldn't work with uwsgi16:16
mnaserhttps://docs.openstack.org/glance/latest/admin/apache-httpd.html16:16
fungii figured you were referring to something new16:16
fungiyeah, i find it unfortunate that a feature glance added years ago turned out to be incompatible with the later goal for uwsgi deployment support, but the question is how to deal with that. remove glance? remove the feature? convince somebody it's worth their time to redesign and make it work?16:18
*** rpittau is now known as rpittau|afk16:23
mnaserIMHO: remove the feature or make ti work16:28
fungiright, who is going to make it work though?16:30
fungior are you saying if there's nobody to make it work then we can at least find somebody to remove the feature?16:31
smcginnisCuz who needs to import images.16:31
clarkbeh I think user functionality trumps ops needs in this case16:33
*** freefood has joined #openstack-tc16:33
clarkbit provides important functioanlity for end users. Ops can manage to run a service without uwsgi16:33
clarkbthen work to close the ops gap, but removing an important end user feature because of deployment concerns seems to have priorities backwards16:34
*** abhishekk has joined #openstack-tc16:34
smcginnisVery. Another case of users taking a hit for the sake of architectural purity.16:34
smcginnisIf someone wants to look at doing something about it, fixing the uwsgi bug is the right thing to do, not crippling the service.16:35
smcginnishttps://github.com/unbit/uwsgi/issues/154016:35
*** rosmaita has joined #openstack-tc16:36
*** evrardjp has quit IRC16:37
*** evrardjp has joined #openstack-tc16:37
abhishekkapart from this, I guess reloading configuration is also not supported16:38
mnaser_honestly_ though, who is actually using the "interop image import" feature16:40
mnaserand afaik, the issue stems from the fact that we need to start another service for glance to make that feature work16:40
mnaserbecause of taskflow-y things16:40
abhishekk#link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/uwsgi-issues16:40
mnaserand uwsgi not being ok with running a process/thread that does things which are _not_ api/http16:41
abhishekkThis is old one, but I am not sure most of the problems are addressed or not16:41
mnaseras an operator, it's taken me this long of running clouds to have someone finally today bring it up, most people are just uploading16:42
mnaserand also there is a all sorts of kinda-terrifying things you can do16:42
mnaserwith something like a web-download import of an image16:42
mnaserweb-download image src http://127.0.0.1:123416:43
mnaser(let's be honest, show of hands, who's _actually_ used that feature)16:45
clarkbmnaser: fwiw I think that particular featuer is why the existing direct upload wasn't extended when thinking of the future there16:45
clarkbbasically people demand that16:45
clarkbI don't remembe who they were and we definitely don't use it16:46
fungimnaser: also apparently you can specify multiple urls for the same image17:17
fungiand they're just assumed to be identical17:17
*** diablo_rojo has quit IRC18:02
*** diablo_rojo has joined #openstack-tc18:06
*** e0ne has quit IRC18:21
*** rosmaita has left #openstack-tc18:35
*** diablo_rojo has quit IRC18:53
*** slaweq_ has joined #openstack-tc18:59
*** slaweq has quit IRC19:00
mordredclarkb, fungi, mnaser: fwiw - one of the main users calling for web-download was heat21:05
mordredbecause piping an image through heat didn't seem like a good idea to people21:05
clarkbah21:05
mordredthat said - I mean, we certainly don't use that feature21:05
mordredI don't think anyone has added support to sdk for using it yet for similar reason to what mnaser was saying - nobody has requested it21:06
fungiis it covered by an interop guideline capability at all, i wonder?21:08
mnaserrelatively certain that it is not21:08
mordredI do not believe we've gotten "ability to upload images into cloud" as a thing people agree users shoudl be able to do21:08
mordredmuch less any specific mechanism for doing so21:08
fungioh, right, the reason being hpcloud has decided not to implement user-controlled images ;)21:09
mordredbecause - in a fit of *wut* - you can apparently put metadata into an image that can cause the images to do things some cloud providers aren't comfortable with21:09
mordredlet's not address the fact that that concept is completely bonkers21:09
mordredfungi: amazingly enough, it's not hpcloud in this case.21:10
mnaseri'm seriously worried about the implication of web-download being enabled by default now21:10
mordredthere is a reason it was removed from v121:12
*** slaweq_ has quit IRC21:38
*** slaweq_ has joined #openstack-tc21:40
*** slaweq_ has quit IRC21:45
fungimnaser: with your openstackansible ptl hat on, you may or may not care to try to work out a dco statement from the author of https://github.com/openstack/ansible-hardening/pull/9 so you can git am it into gerrit21:47
fungijust figured i'd bring the attempted contribution to your attention21:47
mnaserfungi: oh neat, thank you22:03
*** iurygregory has quit IRC22:09
*** slaweq_ has joined #openstack-tc22:13
mnaseralso, another thing about glance: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=155258322:56
openstackbugzilla.redhat.com bug 1552583 in openstack-tripleo-heat-templates "[Glance] Interoperable image import should be disabled by default on 3 node HA setup" [Urgent,Closed: errata] - Assigned to pdeore22:56
*** ijolliffe has quit IRC22:56
mnaserthat image import doesnt work other than in a single node.22:56
fungimnaser: and https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/OSSN/OSSN-0065 looks like it's still applicable too (or at least bug 1549483 doesn't claim to be fixed yet)23:12
openstackbug 1549483 in Glance "Normal user can replace active image data if show_multiple_locations has been set to true" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/154948323:12
*** tosky has quit IRC23:20

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.15.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!