Thursday, 2021-08-05

opendevreviewTim Burke proposed openstack/swift master: DNM: Add MultiprocessInternalClient  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/swift/+/80353602:31
timburkejust getting ^^^ off my machine -- it turned out not near as bad as i'd feared (cc clayg, acoles, mattoliver)02:32
opendevreviewMatthew Oliver proposed openstack/swift master: conatiner-server: return objects of a given policy  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/swift/+/80342303:27
mattoliver^ acoles that's a stand alone version with tests.03:28
mattolivertimburke: nice! I'll take a look post lunch :) 03:28
opendevreviewMatthew Oliver proposed openstack/swift master: conatiner-server: return objects of a given policy  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/swift/+/80342304:55
opendevreviewMerged openstack/swift master: Quiet more deprecation warnings on py2  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/swift/+/78396805:46
mattolivertimburke: your multi process internal client looks pretty neat. Start up a proxy that then can also use workers. Neat, might give it a play to see how it does :) 06:29
*** diablo_rojo is now known as Guest337108:27
opendevreviewAlistair Coles proposed openstack/swift master: Fixups for container-server: return objects of a given policy  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/swift/+/80358911:55
*** Guest3371 is now known as diablo_rojo11:56
opendevreviewAlistair Coles proposed openstack/swift master: Fixups for container-server: return objects of a given policy  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/swift/+/80358914:05
opendevreviewAlistair Coles proposed openstack/swift master: Fixups for container-server: return objects of a given policy  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/swift/+/80358915:53
diablo_rojotimburke, YO!16:15
timburkediablo_rojo, o/16:20
timburkepain points, yeah?16:20
diablo_rojoYes please :) 16:20
timburkewas thinking about them some yesterday16:21
diablo_rojoNeed the etherpad link again?16:21
diablo_rojolol16:21
timburkewill write something up today16:21
* diablo_rojo will just be massively annoying until she gets what she seeks :) 16:21
diablo_rojoThank you!16:21
diablo_rojoI appreciate it16:21
timburkepain point: diablo_rojo ;-)16:22
timburke🤗16:22
diablo_rojoLOLOLOL16:26
diablo_rojoTouche sir16:26
diablo_rojoBut I cannot be solved by a single community goal :) 16:26
diablo_rojoSo try something else timburke ;) 16:26
opendevreviewTim Burke proposed openstack/swift master: Kill coros when shutting down ECAppIters  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/swift/+/80363817:55
timburkediablo_rojo, i added three pain points for swift to https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/pain-point-elimination18:10
timburkeanybody else, feel free to update it further :-)18:11
opendevreviewTim Burke proposed openstack/swift master: Move "Client disconnected" message to ECAppIter  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/swift/+/80364318:57
clayg@timburke given all that do you think we can abandon https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/swift/+/79673519:00
claygmaybe you could steal the test and move it over to https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/swift/+/803638 19:01
timburkeclayg, oh, maybe... haven't tried your repro script against it19:01
claygoh right it had the error limit fix baked in too - I guess I need to pull that out19:03
timburkeyeah -- i was about to say, looks like my patch(es) don't pass that test :-/19:08
timburkeand if i do an early return before we get to checking the error-limiting, the test still passes on master :-(19:11
opendevreviewTim Burke proposed openstack/swift master: proxy: Add an option to turn off pipeline modification  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/swift/+/80364719:53
-opendevstatus- NOTICE: The Gerrit service on review.opendev.org is going down for a quick restart to adjust its database connection configuration, and should return to service momentarily20:04
zaitcevtimburke: what's going on? What did make you disable pipeline modification?21:08
timburkezaitcev, it's related to https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/swift/+/803536 -- basically, i've got some code that already uses InternalClient, but (as far as we can tell) it gets bottle-necked on EC/encryption and being stuck on a single core. so i wanted to make a shim that looks like InternalClient, but actually spins up a proxy-server with multiple workers and routes requests through that21:11
timburkebut internal clients often (usually?) don't have things like a gatekeeper, so...21:11
zaitcevthanks21:12

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.2 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!