Monday, 2019-07-22

*** tkajinam has quit IRC00:12
*** takamatsu has quit IRC00:18
*** baojg has quit IRC03:01
*** m75abrams has joined #openstack-swift03:05
*** baojg has joined #openstack-swift03:07
*** psachin has joined #openstack-swift03:33
*** baojg has quit IRC03:47
*** baojg has joined #openstack-swift03:58
*** BjoernT has joined #openstack-swift04:08
*** BjoernT_ has joined #openstack-swift04:13
*** BjoernT has quit IRC04:14
*** BjoernT has joined #openstack-swift04:23
*** BjoernT_ has quit IRC04:24
*** baojg has quit IRC04:28
*** threestrands has joined #openstack-swift05:00
*** new_student1411 has joined #openstack-swift05:27
*** viks___ has joined #openstack-swift05:28
*** BjoernT has quit IRC06:02
-openstackstatus- NOTICE: Due to a failure on the logs.openstack.org volume, old logs are unavailable while partition is recovered. New logs are being stored. ETA for restoration probably ~Mon Jul 22 12:00 UTC 201906:06
*** ChanServ changes topic to "Due to a failure on the logs.openstack.org volume, old logs are unavailable while partition is recovered. New logs are being stored. ETA for restoration probably ~Mon Jul 22 12:00 UTC 2019"06:06
*** ChanServ changes topic to "OpenStack Swift object storage | Logs: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23openstack-swift/ | Meetings: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Swift | Priority Reviews: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Swift/PriorityReviews | Ideas: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Swift/ideas"06:26
-openstackstatus- NOTICE: logs.openstack.org volume has been restored. please report any issues in #openstack-infra06:26
*** pcaruana has joined #openstack-swift06:32
*** baojg has joined #openstack-swift06:41
*** tesseract has joined #openstack-swift07:01
*** rcernin has quit IRC07:07
*** tkajinam has joined #openstack-swift07:08
*** tkajinam has quit IRC07:36
*** m75abrams has quit IRC08:12
*** threestrands has quit IRC08:14
*** m75abrams has joined #openstack-swift08:28
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-swift09:04
*** FlorianFa has joined #openstack-swift09:42
openstackgerritMatthew Oliver proposed openstack/swift master: Auto-sharding: Initial steps  https://review.opendev.org/66703009:49
openstackgerritMatthew Oliver proposed openstack/swift master: sharding: first attempt at _elect_leader  https://review.opendev.org/66757909:49
mattoliverau^ just rebasing off timburke's p 67067309:49
patchbothttps://review.opendev.org/#/c/670673/ - swift - ring: Track more properties of the ring - 3 patch sets09:49
*** m75abrams has quit IRC09:54
*** new_student1411 has quit IRC10:20
*** new_student1411 has joined #openstack-swift10:20
*** ccamacho has joined #openstack-swift10:29
*** ccamacho has quit IRC10:29
*** ccamacho has joined #openstack-swift10:29
*** psachin has quit IRC11:50
*** tdasilva has joined #openstack-swift12:33
*** ChanServ sets mode: +v tdasilva12:33
*** irclogbot_0 has quit IRC12:39
*** irclogbot_1 has joined #openstack-swift12:43
*** BjoernT has joined #openstack-swift13:02
*** mikecmpbll has joined #openstack-swift13:22
*** BjoernT has quit IRC13:24
*** BjoernT has joined #openstack-swift13:25
*** BjoernT has quit IRC13:25
*** BjoernT has joined #openstack-swift13:26
*** BjoernT has quit IRC13:26
*** BjoernT has joined #openstack-swift13:27
*** BjoernT has quit IRC13:27
*** BjoernT has joined #openstack-swift13:28
*** BjoernT has quit IRC13:28
*** BjoernT has joined #openstack-swift13:28
*** BjoernT has quit IRC13:28
*** BjoernT has joined #openstack-swift13:29
*** BjoernT has quit IRC13:29
*** BjoernT has joined #openstack-swift13:30
*** BjoernT has quit IRC13:30
*** BjoernT has joined #openstack-swift13:30
*** BjoernT has quit IRC13:31
*** BjoernT has joined #openstack-swift13:32
*** BjoernT has joined #openstack-swift13:33
*** BjoernT has quit IRC13:33
*** BjoernT has joined #openstack-swift13:34
*** BjoernT has quit IRC13:34
*** BjoernT has joined #openstack-swift13:34
*** BjoernT has quit IRC13:35
*** BjoernT has joined #openstack-swift13:35
*** BjoernT has quit IRC13:35
*** BjoernT has joined #openstack-swift13:37
*** BjoernT has joined #openstack-swift13:38
*** BjoernT has quit IRC13:38
*** BjoernT has joined #openstack-swift13:39
*** BjoernT has quit IRC13:39
*** BjoernT has joined #openstack-swift13:39
*** BjoernT has quit IRC13:39
*** BjoernT has joined #openstack-swift13:40
*** BjoernT has quit IRC13:40
*** BjoernT has joined #openstack-swift13:41
*** BjoernT has quit IRC13:41
*** BjoernT has joined #openstack-swift13:42
*** BjoernT has quit IRC13:43
*** new_student1411 has quit IRC13:43
*** BjoernT has joined #openstack-swift13:45
*** BjoernT has quit IRC13:45
*** BjoernT has joined #openstack-swift13:45
*** BjoernT has quit IRC13:46
*** BjoernT has joined #openstack-swift13:46
*** BjoernT has quit IRC13:46
*** BjoernT has joined #openstack-swift13:47
*** BjoernT has quit IRC13:47
*** BjoernT has joined #openstack-swift13:48
*** BjoernT has quit IRC13:48
*** BjoernT has joined #openstack-swift13:49
*** BjoernT has quit IRC13:49
*** BjoernT has joined #openstack-swift13:50
*** BjoernT has quit IRC13:50
*** BjoernT has joined #openstack-swift13:50
*** BjoernT has quit IRC13:50
*** BjoernT has joined #openstack-swift13:51
*** BjoernT has quit IRC13:51
*** BjoernT has joined #openstack-swift13:52
*** BjoernT has quit IRC13:52
*** tesseract has quit IRC13:55
*** tesseract has joined #openstack-swift14:00
claygtdasilva: have you peeked at p 671882 this morning?14:00
patchbothttps://review.opendev.org/#/c/671882/ - swift - slo: Better handle non-manifest responses when ref... - 1 patch set14:00
tdasilvaclayg: I started looking just a bit earlier, currently running tests on my dev. environ14:01
claygsweet!  let me know if you want me to look at it before merge or if you need any help getting it landed 👍14:02
tdasilvaok, i'll ping you once i'm done reviewing and before merging14:03
tdasilvaclayg: also noticed this: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/633094/15/test/functional/swift_test_client.py@82314:04
patchbotpatch 633094 - swift - Allow "harder" symlinks - 15 patch sets14:04
claygoh, that was a debug thing - thank you brother!14:05
tdasilvanot sure if that `or True` was left as debugging statement or if that is what's causing the tests to fail, but just FYI...14:05
claygyeah totally14:05
openstackgerritClay Gerrard proposed openstack/swift master: Allow "harder" symlinks  https://review.opendev.org/63309414:07
claygwe'll see if that works better14:07
openstackgerritThiago da Silva proposed openstack/swift master: py3: port SLO func tests  https://review.opendev.org/65967314:07
tdasilva+114:08
*** m75abrams has joined #openstack-swift14:47
*** ccamacho has quit IRC15:05
*** gyee has joined #openstack-swift15:08
timburkegood morning15:31
*** zaitcev has joined #openstack-swift15:36
*** ChanServ sets mode: +v zaitcev15:36
*** henriqueof has quit IRC15:43
*** henriqueof has joined #openstack-swift15:54
*** henriqueof has quit IRC15:55
tdasilvatimburke: hello! why in the case of the re-fetch returning a 404, do we want to return a 503? and not just the 404?15:56
*** henriqueof has joined #openstack-swift15:57
tdasilvahttps://review.opendev.org/#/c/671882/1/swift/common/middleware/slo.py@84715:57
patchbotpatch 671882 - swift - slo: Better handle non-manifest responses when ref... - 1 patch set15:57
tdasilvaa newer (more recent timsestamp) tombstone is correct to return a 404, but a 404 from the object server (probably a handoff) seems like a gray area where returning either a 404 or 503 are not necessarily wrong16:01
*** SkyRocknRoll has joined #openstack-swift16:02
*** e0ne has quit IRC16:05
timburketdasilva, my perspective was, newer timestamp wins. so if the refetch produced a 404 with a newer timestamp, return that 404. if it produced a 404 with an older timestamp (or no timestamp at all, i.e. there was no tombstone), 503 -- we know there's newer data out there, but we couldn't actually get it16:08
tdasilvayeah, i gotcha16:08
timburkesimilar reasoning for 200 responses, btw. if there's a newer object, we can return that directly. if it's older, 50316:09
timburkethe one exception is that if the refetch produces an older SLO manifest, i'm willing to serve the old data. not sure whether i like that decision or not. it was easiest to implement, though16:10
tdasilvaright, on one hand we can rely on eventual consistency argument, OTOH we know there's newer data there :/16:12
tdasilvaemphasis on *we know*16:12
timburkeyup16:13
tdasilvatimburke: thanks! i'm happy to +2 as is. clayg, let me know if you want to take a look or I can +A16:20
*** zaitcev has quit IRC16:21
claygi don't have any specific concerns - it even has a lp bug!  ❤️16:21
claygunless there's something specific you want to draw my attention to pls to be making the merge 👍16:22
*** tdasilva_ has joined #openstack-swift16:23
*** ChanServ sets mode: +v tdasilva_16:23
*** tdasilva has quit IRC16:26
*** zaitcev has joined #openstack-swift16:35
*** ChanServ sets mode: +v zaitcev16:35
*** baojg has quit IRC16:42
*** baojg has joined #openstack-swift16:43
tdasilva_clayg: sounds good, thanks!16:43
*** baojg has quit IRC16:43
*** baojg has joined #openstack-swift16:43
*** baojg has quit IRC16:44
*** baojg has joined #openstack-swift16:44
*** baojg has quit IRC16:44
*** baojg has joined #openstack-swift16:45
*** baojg has quit IRC16:45
*** baojg has joined #openstack-swift16:46
*** baojg has quit IRC16:46
*** baojg has joined #openstack-swift16:47
*** baojg has quit IRC16:47
*** baojg has joined #openstack-swift16:47
*** baojg has quit IRC16:48
*** baojg has joined #openstack-swift16:48
*** baojg has quit IRC16:48
*** baojg has joined #openstack-swift16:49
*** baojg has quit IRC16:49
*** mikecmpbll has quit IRC16:50
*** baojg has joined #openstack-swift16:50
*** baojg has quit IRC16:50
*** baojg has joined #openstack-swift16:51
*** baojg has quit IRC16:51
timburketdasilva_, sorry, i realized i misread one of your comments16:51
*** baojg has joined #openstack-swift16:51
*** baojg has quit IRC16:52
*** baojg has joined #openstack-swift16:52
timburkeadded a follow-up to clarify for future code-archaeologists16:52
*** baojg has quit IRC16:52
*** baojg has joined #openstack-swift16:53
*** baojg has quit IRC16:53
*** baojg has joined #openstack-swift16:54
*** baojg has quit IRC16:54
tdasilva_timburke: yep! thanks for the follow-up16:54
openstackgerritAndreas Jaeger proposed openstack/swift master: Update api-ref location  https://review.opendev.org/67210716:54
*** baojg has joined #openstack-swift16:55
*** baojg has quit IRC16:55
*** baojg has joined #openstack-swift16:55
*** baojg has quit IRC16:56
*** baojg has joined #openstack-swift16:56
*** baojg has quit IRC16:56
*** baojg has joined #openstack-swift16:57
*** baojg has quit IRC16:57
*** baojg has joined #openstack-swift16:58
*** henriqueof has quit IRC16:58
*** baojg has quit IRC16:58
*** baojg has joined #openstack-swift16:58
*** baojg has quit IRC16:59
*** baojg has joined #openstack-swift16:59
*** baojg has quit IRC16:59
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-swift17:05
openstackgerritAndreas Jaeger proposed openstack/swift master: Update api-ref location  https://review.opendev.org/67210717:18
*** mvkr_ has quit IRC17:18
openstackgerritMerged openstack/swift master: slo: Better handle non-manifest responses when refetching manifest  https://review.opendev.org/67188217:43
*** SkyRocknRoll has quit IRC17:55
*** SkyRocknRoll has joined #openstack-swift17:55
*** SkyRocknRoll has quit IRC17:56
*** tesseract has quit IRC18:01
*** klamath has joined #openstack-swift18:25
*** m75abrams has quit IRC18:26
*** mikecmpbll has joined #openstack-swift18:35
*** henriqueof has joined #openstack-swift18:43
tdasilva_zaitcev: any chance you might be able to look at p 659673? you had raised an issue there just wanted to be sure you are ok with the patch before it gets merged18:44
patchbothttps://review.opendev.org/#/c/659673/ - swift - py3: port SLO func tests - 6 patch sets18:44
*** zaitcev has quit IRC18:49
*** zaitcev has joined #openstack-swift18:50
*** ChanServ sets mode: +v zaitcev18:50
*** tdasilva_ has quit IRC18:56
*** baojg has joined #openstack-swift19:01
*** e0ne has quit IRC19:01
openstackgerritMerged openstack/swift stable/stein: Update UPPER_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/stein  https://review.opendev.org/64754419:04
*** baojg has quit IRC19:05
timburkehuh. https://github.com/openstack/swift/blob/2.21.0/test/unit/proxy/controllers/test_obj.py#L2941-L2970 seems like somewhat screwy behavior... can/will the reconstructor make those durable? or does it essentially become dark data?19:18
rlediseztimburke: IIRW, reconstructor will make them durable. but if it does not, they will be reclaimed19:25
timburke👍 thanks. i guess it makes sense enough then... proxy isn't going to make things durable, so just wait for someone else to19:36
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-swift19:50
*** e0ne has quit IRC20:04
*** tdasilva has joined #openstack-swift20:38
*** ChanServ sets mode: +v tdasilva20:38
timburke\o/ we have a 2.22.0 tag!20:50
*** mvkr_ has joined #openstack-swift21:04
*** tdasilva_ has joined #openstack-swift21:09
*** ChanServ sets mode: +v tdasilva_21:09
*** pcaruana has quit IRC21:10
DHEhorray!21:10
*** tdasilva has quit IRC21:12
*** tdasilva_ has quit IRC21:22
openstackgerritTim Burke proposed openstack/swift master: Ignore 404s from handoffs for objects when calculating quorum  https://review.opendev.org/67218622:21
*** rcernin has joined #openstack-swift22:30
*** tkajinam has joined #openstack-swift22:39
*** baojg has joined #openstack-swift23:02
*** baojg has quit IRC23:07
*** henriqueof has quit IRC23:14
*** threestrands has joined #openstack-swift23:42
*** mikecmpbll has quit IRC23:44

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.15.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!