Tuesday, 2019-03-19

*** gyee has quit IRC00:15
kota_notmyname: thx, the email covered my case so I also wait Tim's response. I'll check the thread again later.00:34
openstackgerritMatthew Oliver proposed openstack/swift master: py3: port staticweb middleware  https://review.openstack.org/64385500:47
mattoliverautimburke: lol, thanks. Cause I'm been running nosetests directly on the test_staticweb.py I didn't realise.00:48
kota_mattoliverau: o/00:55
mattoliveraukota_: afternoon o/ (you being in the US) :)00:56
kota_mattoliverau: yup00:58
*** sleterrier has joined #openstack-swift01:24
sleterrierHello! After going through a few design documents, I am unclear about how to run object-expirer in my geo-replicated cluster. I was hoping one of you could shed some light for me01:29
sleterrierIs the object-expirer suppose to run on only one node of the cluster?01:29
sleterriers/suppose/supposed01:29
tdasilvasleterrier: actually you can run as many expirers instances as you want, you just have to make sure that you configure these two config options correctly: https://github.com/openstack/swift/blob/master/etc/object-expirer.conf-sample#L54,L5901:43
sleterrierThanks tdasilva. I see... So I could split the load among more nodes, but if one of the node was to go down, the objects its "process" is responsible for would not be expired until it comes back, correct?02:39
sleterrierWell, "would not be deleted until it comes back" is more accurate. The objects would already be expired since their metadata specify it.02:42
sleterrierSo there's no way to make the object-expirer HA if I understand correctly? I suppose it's ok, since it's far from a time critical operation.02:43
*** itlinux has joined #openstack-swift03:05
*** DHE has quit IRC03:10
*** DHE has joined #openstack-swift03:15
*** _david_sohonet has quit IRC03:59
openstackgerritMatthew Oliver proposed openstack/swift master: py3: port staticweb middleware  https://review.openstack.org/64385505:49
*** ccamacho has quit IRC06:37
*** itlinux has quit IRC06:57
*** itlinux has joined #openstack-swift06:58
*** pcaruana has joined #openstack-swift07:14
*** itlinux has quit IRC07:21
*** pcaruana has quit IRC07:33
*** pcaruana has joined #openstack-swift07:34
*** hseipp has joined #openstack-swift07:43
*** ccamacho has joined #openstack-swift08:14
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-swift08:25
*** mikecmpbll has joined #openstack-swift09:03
*** kukacz has quit IRC09:11
*** tkajinam has quit IRC09:18
openstackgerritMatthew Oliver proposed openstack/swift master: py3: port staticweb middleware  https://review.openstack.org/64385509:23
mattoliveraulol, seems when it comes to py3 I'll never remember to actaully test it from tox, another typo :P09:25
*** kukacz has joined #openstack-swift09:28
*** kukacz has quit IRC09:29
*** kukacz has joined #openstack-swift09:30
*** kukacz has quit IRC09:39
*** kukacz has joined #openstack-swift09:39
*** e0ne has quit IRC09:56
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-swift10:50
openstackgerritMerged openstack/swift master: Fix bulk responses when using xml and Expect 100-continue  https://review.openstack.org/64368411:02
openstackgerritMerged openstack/swift master: manage-shard-ranges: nicer message if we can't get_info()  https://review.openstack.org/63852411:02
openstackgerritMerged openstack/swift master: Add non-voting py37 unit test job  https://review.openstack.org/64318311:02
*** psachin has joined #openstack-swift11:07
*** rcernin has quit IRC11:24
*** psachin has quit IRC11:54
*** ccamacho has quit IRC12:08
*** zaitcev_ has joined #openstack-swift13:09
*** ChanServ sets mode: +v zaitcev_13:09
*** zaitcev has quit IRC13:12
*** mvkr has quit IRC14:18
*** mvkr has joined #openstack-swift14:47
*** itlinux has joined #openstack-swift14:47
*** itlinux has quit IRC16:17
*** e0ne has quit IRC16:32
*** _david_sohonet has joined #openstack-swift16:33
*** itlinux has joined #openstack-swift16:44
*** mvkr has quit IRC16:47
*** henriqueof2 has quit IRC16:51
timburkethanks for all the review mattoliverau! if you want to get that fancy new py37 job *passing*, we can go land https://review.openstack.org/#/c/638019/ ;-)16:54
patchbotpatch 638019 - swift - Clean up how we walk through ranges in ECAppIter - 2 patch sets16:54
*** hseipp has quit IRC17:24
*** gyee has joined #openstack-swift17:24
*** ChanServ sets mode: +o notmyname17:43
*** notmyname sets mode: -o notmyname17:43
*** mikecmpbll has quit IRC17:48
*** sleterrier_ has joined #openstack-swift17:58
*** itlinux has quit IRC18:02
*** sleterrier_ has quit IRC18:05
*** sleterrier_ has joined #openstack-swift18:06
*** sleterrier has quit IRC18:08
*** sleterrier has joined #openstack-swift18:11
*** sleterrier_ has quit IRC18:16
claygrledisez: what do you think about https://bugs.launchpad.net/swift/+bug/1820893 and https://bugs.launchpad.net/swift/+bug/182089418:38
openstackLaunchpad bug 1820893 in OpenStack Object Storage (swift) "Unable to limit number of REPLICATE requests per drive" [Undecided,New]18:38
openstackLaunchpad bug 1820894 in OpenStack Object Storage (swift) "object-replicator using rsync needs a post-rsync command that is cheaper" [Undecided,New]18:38
claygtimburke: I'll poke at p 629301 - but as best I can tell there's no client observable impact?  there's a theoretical attack that you discovered and a potential correctness improvement?  Does that sound right?18:42
patchbothttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/629301/ - swift - Verify client input for v4 signatures - 1 patch set18:42
claygtimburke: did you attempt to triage lp bug #182084718:44
openstackLaunchpad bug 1820847 in OpenStack Object Storage (swift) "Retrieving lists of objects using aws-cli fails with error Incorrect Padding" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/182084718:44
claygI didn't get very far... https://www.irccloud.com/pastebin/AXfR4yO9/18:45
timburkeclayg, thanks. yeah -- though there were also some knock-on effects with https://github.com/openstack/swift/commit/79539ea18:45
timburkei *think* now that we have https://github.com/openstack/swift/commit/1a51604 it isn't quite such an issue?18:46
timburkeyeah, i'll take a look at that bug. Bhaskar has been doing a good job putting s3api through its paces -- i'd wager it's a legit bug18:48
clayg@timburke great let me know if you have any other easy ones that need to merge18:55
timburkeclayg, https://review.openstack.org/#/c/641855/ would make me feel a lot better about the state of our func tests...18:56
patchbotpatch 641855 - swift - Fix how we UTF-8-ify func tests - 1 patch set18:56
timburkei'm working on pulling together a list of patches i'd like to see landed ahead of a release (which will be our final tag for Stein!); i'll see what else hits that nice size/reward payoff18:57
claygsounds good19:01
claygyou'll probably keep most of us reviewers busy19:01
claygrledisez: wanna help click some buttons?19:01
*** mikecmpbll has joined #openstack-swift19:03
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-swift19:28
*** renich has quit IRC19:47
*** renich_ has joined #openstack-swift19:48
*** e0ne has quit IRC19:51
*** _david_sohonet has quit IRC20:01
*** _david_sohonet has joined #openstack-swift20:04
*** itlinux has joined #openstack-swift20:13
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-swift20:41
*** e0ne has quit IRC20:46
*** renich_ has quit IRC20:58
*** renich has joined #openstack-swift21:15
*** itlinux has quit IRC21:40
*** pcaruana has quit IRC22:08
*** mvkr has joined #openstack-swift22:09
*** renich has quit IRC22:13
*** itlinux has joined #openstack-swift22:16
*** rcernin has joined #openstack-swift22:16
*** itlinux has quit IRC22:27
openstackgerritTim Burke proposed openstack/swift master: Remove uncalled function  https://review.openstack.org/64469122:29
mattoliveraumorning22:32
*** tkajinam has joined #openstack-swift22:57

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.15.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!