| *** itlinux has joined #openstack-swift | 00:05 | |
| *** itlinux has quit IRC | 00:06 | |
| *** [diablo] has quit IRC | 00:37 | |
| *** [diablo] has joined #openstack-swift | 00:39 | |
| *** mvkr has quit IRC | 00:40 | |
| *** mvkr has joined #openstack-swift | 00:42 | |
| *** mikecmpb_ has quit IRC | 00:49 | |
| *** mikecmpbll has joined #openstack-swift | 00:50 | |
| *** mikecmpbll has quit IRC | 01:13 | |
| *** gyee has quit IRC | 02:06 | |
| *** psachin has joined #openstack-swift | 02:52 | |
| openstackgerrit | Pete Zaitcev proposed openstack/swift master: py3: port the container https://review.openstack.org/570320 | 03:31 |
|---|---|---|
| *** spsurya has joined #openstack-swift | 03:34 | |
| openstackgerrit | Pete Zaitcev proposed openstack/swift master: py3: port proxy container controller https://review.openstack.org/638329 | 04:05 |
| *** ianychoi has quit IRC | 04:31 | |
| kota_ | alecuyer: thanks for checking the version conflict. I think it's UPPER CONSTRAINT so that we could use 1.3.3 unless the lower constraint requires higher version. | 04:37 |
| kota_ | let me check | 04:37 |
| kota_ | hmm... it looks like we don't require any lower constraint about grpcio. interesting. | 04:42 |
| kota_ | I see, got it why it happened. | 05:18 |
| kota_ | `-c constraint_file` forces the version rather than, requirements pin... I'm not sure it's expected or not tho. | 05:19 |
| *** spsurya has quit IRC | 06:25 | |
| kota_ | thanks mattoliverau for the group E-mail! | 06:57 |
| *** psachin has quit IRC | 07:10 | |
| *** rcernin has quit IRC | 07:13 | |
| *** spsurya has joined #openstack-swift | 07:17 | |
| *** pcaruana has joined #openstack-swift | 07:19 | |
| *** psachin has joined #openstack-swift | 07:32 | |
| openstackgerrit | Kota Tsuyuzaki proposed openstack/swift feature/losf: Add upper-constraints file https://review.openstack.org/638356 | 07:42 |
| *** ccamacho has quit IRC | 08:18 | |
| *** tkajinam has quit IRC | 08:23 | |
| alecuyer | kota_: yes that confused me (the "upper" name does not seem to match what it's doing) | 08:31 |
| kota_ | alecuyer: alright, I'm trying to resolve it now and also asked at openstack-infra channel | 08:37 |
| kota_ | i didn't get any answers in the channel tho. | 08:38 |
| kota_ | ok, just `tox -e py27` doesn't reproduce the issue so that I have to look at openstack's tox-py27 job base. probably there is in somewhere around zuul setting. | 08:51 |
| alecuyer | ok hmm | 08:57 |
| *** mikecmpbll has joined #openstack-swift | 08:57 | |
| *** ccamacho has joined #openstack-swift | 09:09 | |
| *** ccamacho has quit IRC | 09:10 | |
| *** ccamacho has joined #openstack-swift | 09:11 | |
| *** e0ne has joined #openstack-swift | 09:14 | |
| *** hseipp has joined #openstack-swift | 09:15 | |
| kota_ | I found `tox_constraints_file` definition there, perhaps, the variable overwrite something? | 09:23 |
| alecuyer | I have to say I didn't even know what a pip constraint file was until today, so I have some reading to do | 09:27 |
| kota_ | I read docs briefly about the constraint file, it says "it's for OpenStack" :/ | 09:36 |
| kota_ | it seems like, constraints is not a requirement. if a package exists in constraints and it doesn't present in requirements, the package won't be installed. | 09:37 |
| alecuyer | OK, but if it's in requirements, and in constraints, it will pick the version from constraints, right ? | 09:39 |
| openstackgerrit | Kota Tsuyuzaki proposed openstack/swift feature/losf: WIP: Add upper-constraints file https://review.openstack.org/638356 | 09:43 |
| kota_ | alecuyer: it seems like current pip behaves so. | 09:43 |
| kota_ | I cannot find the specification when the version conflicted with the constraints and the requirements. I looked for the tests for such a situation but that doesn't exist in the pip repo (https://github.com/pypa/pip/) | 09:45 |
| alecuyer | Well, maybe we can upgrade grpcio version and the problem goes away, I'm testing that (also, I wonder if the constraint file would let us have a higher version than 1.15.0 ) | 09:49 |
| kota_ | not sure but the current constraint looks intended by the other openstack project, https://github.com/openstack/requirements/commit/cef8feb0b so it might be difficult to bump up higher version... | 10:02 |
| kota_ | ok, the last change affects the behavior like http://logs.openstack.org/56/638356/2/check/swift-tox-py27/2b2dd44/job-output.txt.gz#_2019-02-21_09_47_00_344848 so that my direction seems correct. | 10:05 |
| kota_ | I need to find the path to upper-constraint in the gate tho. | 10:05 |
| openstackgerrit | Kota Tsuyuzaki proposed openstack/swift feature/losf: WIP: Add upper-constraints file https://review.openstack.org/638356 | 10:08 |
| kota_ | alright, it looks it's working as I intended http://zuul.openstack.org/stream/9db025033ab04a94b25ea7fda0ee4e1a?logfile=console.log | 10:14 |
| kota_ | gprcio==1.3.3 is in the gate! | 10:14 |
| alecuyer | nice, well done ! | 10:14 |
| *** [diablo] has quit IRC | 10:15 | |
| kota_ | though I couldn't find the place the variable affected :P | 10:15 |
| kota_ | alecuyer: helpful link is http://zuul.openstack.org/status, we can see the status that currently are running in the gate. | 10:16 |
| *** [diablo] has joined #openstack-swift | 10:17 | |
| alecuyer | I see, thank you for the link | 10:17 |
| kota_ | query, `swift` at left top box. | 10:17 |
| kota_ | that shows only results for swift patches. | 10:18 |
| kota_ | yey, at least, py35 gates succeeded! | 10:18 |
| alecuyer | ok that's handy! | 10:18 |
| kota_ | hmm... we got still a failure at lower constraints but we're going to progress step by step. | 10:19 |
| kota_ | OMG, lower constraint was testing against to grpc 1.15.0, hah? Is it exactly *LOWER*? | 10:20 |
| alecuyer | Ah right I see it in job-output :/ | 10:20 |
| *** spsurya has quit IRC | 10:22 | |
| kota_ | it inherits openstack-tox-lower-constraints directly so the change at swift-tox-base doesn't affect to the test. | 10:23 |
| kota_ | hmm... nice almost all green except the lower-constraint so far. | 10:24 |
| kota_ | alecuyer: can i squash the change into the LOSF patch? | 10:30 |
| alecuyer | kota_: sure | 10:30 |
| kota_ | alright, let's do it. | 10:31 |
| alecuyer | functest passed it seems | 10:31 |
| openstackgerrit | Kota Tsuyuzaki proposed openstack/swift feature/losf: Lots Of Small Files - alternate diskfile https://review.openstack.org/636578 | 10:32 |
| kota_ | great | 10:32 |
| *** psachin has quit IRC | 10:38 | |
| *** psachin has joined #openstack-swift | 10:42 | |
| kota_ | ok, I'm heading to my home today. If you find anything, please leave it here. | 10:42 |
| alecuyer | yes I will, | 10:42 |
| alecuyer | thanks for your work with this ! | 10:43 |
| kota_ | no worries. That is great job because all tests succeeded so far unless the version conflicts. AWESOME. | 10:43 |
| *** mikecmpb_ has joined #openstack-swift | 11:12 | |
| *** mikecmpbll has quit IRC | 11:13 | |
| *** psachin has quit IRC | 11:22 | |
| *** FlorianFa has joined #openstack-swift | 11:55 | |
| *** FlorianFa has quit IRC | 11:56 | |
| *** FlorianFa has joined #openstack-swift | 11:56 | |
| *** godog has quit IRC | 11:58 | |
| *** godog has joined #openstack-swift | 12:02 | |
| *** e0ne has quit IRC | 12:24 | |
| *** e0ne has joined #openstack-swift | 12:31 | |
| alecuyer | kota_: everything passed with your latest patch set | 12:49 |
| *** mvkr has quit IRC | 15:00 | |
| *** jistr is now known as jistr|afk | 15:22 | |
| *** mvkr has joined #openstack-swift | 15:24 | |
| *** jistr|afk is now known as jistr | 15:32 | |
| alecuyer | It seems grpc (client, no streaming) and eventlet work together again from grpcio version 1.11.0 and later (have also superficially tested 1.18.0 as latest stable, and 1.15.0 as present in openstack pip constraints file). there are 694 commits between 1.10.1 (last "broken" release) and 1.11.0. Among these are commits about gevent support but I don't see how these could affect eventlet. Still reading | 16:17 |
| *** e0ne has quit IRC | 16:23 | |
| tdasilva | alecuyer: that sounds like good news...maybe :) | 16:34 |
| alecuyer | tdasilva: yes, exactly, "maybe" :) | 16:36 |
| *** gyee has joined #openstack-swift | 16:48 | |
| notmyname | good morning | 17:00 |
| *** pcaruana has quit IRC | 17:07 | |
| openstackgerrit | Tim Burke proposed openstack/python-swiftclient master: Make proper functions instead of assigning lambdas https://review.openstack.org/638465 | 17:26 |
| *** hseipp has quit IRC | 17:29 | |
| *** mikecmpb_ has quit IRC | 17:35 | |
| *** ccamacho has quit IRC | 17:36 | |
| openstackgerrit | Tim Burke proposed openstack/swift master: py3: port some more middleware tests https://review.openstack.org/638287 | 17:44 |
| *** mvkr has quit IRC | 18:12 | |
| openstackgerrit | Tim Burke proposed openstack/swift master: py3: Flag manage-shard-ranges subcommand as required https://review.openstack.org/638477 | 18:21 |
| *** mikecmpbll has joined #openstack-swift | 18:22 | |
| openstackgerrit | Clay Gerrard proposed openstack/swift master: Simplify empty suffix handling https://review.openstack.org/637662 | 18:26 |
| clayg | I considered that I might try to put a probe test together to demonstrate the failure condition in the current suffix handling | 18:32 |
| clayg | but it requires setting reclaim age to something small... which might be useful in a probetest for a few reasons - but I don't think we currently do it | 18:33 |
| notmyname | FYI https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/418210/how-i-can-improve-openstack-swift-replication-speed?atw=1 | 18:51 |
| *** mvkr has joined #openstack-swift | 18:59 | |
| *** mrjk_ has quit IRC | 19:00 | |
| *** mrjk has joined #openstack-swift | 19:02 | |
| *** ccamacho has joined #openstack-swift | 19:31 | |
| *** e0ne has joined #openstack-swift | 20:14 | |
| *** e0ne has quit IRC | 20:37 | |
| timburke | those log lines tests are getting on my nerves... http://logs.openstack.org/10/638010/1/check/swift-tox-py36/dcee7c7/job-output.txt.gz#_2019-02-21_20_31_26_455854 | 20:45 |
| *** rcernin has joined #openstack-swift | 21:11 | |
| openstackgerrit | Tim Burke proposed openstack/swift master: Clean up account-reaper a bit https://review.openstack.org/611686 | 21:37 |
| zaitcev | notmyname: "My container has ~100 million small objects." Time to back up slowly | 21:42 |
| notmyname | oh my! | 21:42 |
| zaitcev | I mean back away | 21:43 |
| notmyname | have you heard the good news of our savior container sharding? | 21:43 |
| notmyname | :-) | 21:43 |
| zaitcev | He may mean the whole cluster, but ugh. | 21:45 |
| zaitcev | I don't have the privilege points to comment and ask. | 21:52 |
| mattoliverau | morning | 22:10 |
| openstackgerrit | Tim Burke proposed openstack/swift master: py3: display help if no subcommand provided to manage-shard-ranges https://review.openstack.org/638477 | 22:36 |
| openstackgerrit | Tim Burke proposed openstack/swift master: manage-shard-ranges: nicer message if we can't get_info() https://review.openstack.org/638524 | 22:36 |
| timburke | man, i'm really starting to see the value in us sticking with py27 for so long... idk that i want to have to go chasing the latest version all the time | 22:46 |
| timburke | then discovering that the thing i want to use, the thing that's in the latest docs, isn't available on all the versions we "want" to support... | 22:46 |
| *** tkajinam has joined #openstack-swift | 23:01 | |
| DHE | ZFS (prerelease version) has this feature where metadata can be put on a distinct disk from file payloads. so put the bulk of the file contents on spinning disks and metadata on an SSD. and I'm looking for something else that can provide that same feature because replication would just laugh off anything built like this | 23:19 |
| DHE | I assume nothing like this exists in other filesystems without a generic disk cache like bcache... :( | 23:19 |
| *** gyee has quit IRC | 23:38 | |
| *** gyee has joined #openstack-swift | 23:52 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.15.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!