Tuesday, 2018-09-25

*** zigo has quit IRC00:05
*** mvkr has quit IRC00:27
*** mvkr has joined #openstack-swift00:38
*** sorrison has joined #openstack-swift00:52
*** two_tired2 has joined #openstack-swift02:24
openstackgerritFatema Khalid Sherif proposed openstack/swift master: Enabling direct_client users to overwrite X-Timestamp  https://review.openstack.org/60326102:32
*** psachin has joined #openstack-swift02:43
zaitcevAnyone has an idea why a review would be stuck after +A, and if "reverify" is the right approach to restart it?03:09
zaitcevhttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/599042/03:09
patchbotpatch 599042 - swift - py3: Port listing_formats middleware - 4 patch sets03:09
zaitcevOHHH03:09
zaitcevIt depends on a bunch, I see03:09
openstackgerritPete Zaitcev proposed openstack/swift master: py3: Adapt db.py  https://review.openstack.org/58190503:23
*** fatema_ has joined #openstack-swift03:56
fatema_Good Morning03:57
fatema_Is there something up with Zuul? all tests for my patch are queued for more than an hour now.03:58
kota_good afternoon04:02
notmynamegood evening04:07
notmynamefatema_: yeah, from http://zuul.openstack.org it seems like the jobs are taking a long time04:08
fatema_ok cool it's nothing with my patch but I hoped I could have it tested before going to college.04:12
fatema_notmyname, Thank you04:12
notmynamefatema_: can you link your patch again?04:13
fatema_patch 60326104:14
patchbothttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/603261/ - swift - Enabling direct_client users to overwrite X-Timestamp - 5 patch sets04:14
fatema_notmyname, ^^04:14
*** rcernin has quit IRC04:24
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-swift04:28
*** rcernin has joined #openstack-swift04:38
fatema_well my patch almost done with testing. Out of curiosity, you pushed Zuul to do my testing job first, notmyname ?04:47
notmynamenope. I don't have that power04:47
notmynamein the check queue, each patch is tested by itself. in the gate queue, it's tested pretty much in the order it was approved, along with approved patches from a bunch of other projects04:48
notmynamein all cases, the jobs are run when VMs are available to run them04:48
*** e0ne has quit IRC04:51
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-swift05:09
*** e0ne has quit IRC05:10
fatema_notmyname, ok makes sense05:13
fatema_and the patch 603261 is waiting for the reviews :D05:15
patchbothttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/603261/ - swift - Enabling direct_client users to overwrite X-Timestamp - 5 patch sets05:15
*** fatema_ has quit IRC05:16
*** rcernin_ has joined #openstack-swift05:17
*** rcernin has quit IRC05:19
zaitcevNoobs are kinda impatient, le sigh05:26
*** two_tired2 has quit IRC05:40
*** pcaruana has joined #openstack-swift05:41
*** rcernin_ has quit IRC07:05
*** hseipp has joined #openstack-swift07:12
*** psachin has quit IRC07:41
*** psachin has joined #openstack-swift07:49
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-swift07:52
*** e0ne has quit IRC07:53
*** silor has joined #openstack-swift08:05
*** mikecmpbll has joined #openstack-swift08:23
*** mikecmpbll has quit IRC08:58
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-swift08:59
*** mikecmpbll has joined #openstack-swift08:59
*** e0ne has quit IRC10:12
*** rcernin_ has joined #openstack-swift10:43
*** rcernin_ has quit IRC10:52
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-swift10:59
*** mark-mcardle has quit IRC11:00
*** joeljwright has quit IRC11:01
*** joeljwright has joined #openstack-swift11:01
*** ChanServ sets mode: +v joeljwright11:01
*** pcaruana has quit IRC11:15
*** e0ne_ has joined #openstack-swift11:22
*** e0ne has quit IRC11:25
*** psachin has quit IRC12:07
*** ujjain- has joined #openstack-swift13:06
*** ujjain- is now known as ujjain13:09
*** ujjain has left #openstack-swift13:10
*** mikecmpbll has quit IRC13:11
*** mikecmpbll has joined #openstack-swift13:13
*** e0ne_ has quit IRC14:10
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-swift14:10
*** two_tired2 has joined #openstack-swift14:15
*** two_tired2 has quit IRC14:30
*** silor has quit IRC14:54
*** silor has joined #openstack-swift15:12
*** e0ne has quit IRC15:37
*** silor has quit IRC15:40
*** silor has joined #openstack-swift15:44
*** mikecmpbll has quit IRC15:54
*** mikecmpbll has joined #openstack-swift15:56
*** _d34dh0r53_ is now known as d34dh0r5316:05
*** pcaruana has joined #openstack-swift16:07
*** silor has quit IRC16:10
notmynamegood morning16:10
*** hseipp has quit IRC16:26
*** mikecmpbll has quit IRC16:44
timburkezaitcev: yeah, i was gonna mention :-)16:45
timburkereally, it just depends on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/578958/ -- the other two in Related Changes require the listing_formats patch16:46
patchbotpatch 578958 - swift - py3: get proxy-server willing and able to respond ... - 6 patch sets16:46
timburkealso, even relatively old hats like me are impatient :P16:47
*** tdasilva has joined #openstack-swift16:52
*** ChanServ sets mode: +v tdasilva16:52
zaitcevOh really. I thought 578958 on top of the chain...16:57
zaitcevDidn't even look at it. I'll take a look now.16:58
timburkeyeah, chains read bottom-up17:04
*** zaitcev has quit IRC17:14
*** zaitcev has joined #openstack-swift17:29
*** ChanServ sets mode: +v zaitcev17:29
notmynamezaitcev: feel free to +A if you think these are ready to land: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/602822/ and https://review.openstack.org/#/c/602821/17:53
patchbotpatch 602822 - swift - py3: port direct_client - 2 patch sets17:53
patchbotpatch 602821 - swift - py3: port request_helpers - 1 patch set17:53
notmynamemattoliverau: you left a +2 and a comment saying you'd let it sit a bit then you'd come back and +A on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/569884/17:54
patchbotpatch 569884 - swift - Clean up direct_client's gen_headers - 2 patch sets17:54
notmynamehttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/447129/ has a +2 from both clayg and kota_. are we waiting for anything else, or do we need more than those two to review before landing it?17:54
patchbotpatch 447129 - swift - Configure diskfile per storage policy - 20 patch sets17:54
claygyes, tdasilva was going to something something gluster?17:55
claygi was all ready to merge!17:55
notmynameclayg: ah! that's right. ok, tdasilva, it's waiting on you then :-)17:55
notmynameclayg: you've got a +2 on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/569837/ but no +A17:56
patchbotpatch 569837 - swift - Fix-up signal handling - 1 patch set17:56
timburkenotmyname: oh! no *wonder* i already had so many opinions about p 603261!17:56
patchbothttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/603261/ - swift - Enabling direct_client users to overwrite X-Timestamp - 5 patch sets17:56
timburkei shoulda put a Closes-Bug on p 56988417:57
patchbothttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/569884/ - swift - Clean up direct_client's gen_headers - 2 patch sets17:57
notmynametimburke: I rechecked https://review.openstack.org/#/c/535981/ since last time it was run was january. if it still passes, looks like an easy one to click +A on17:59
patchbotpatch 535981 - swift - Clean up comment about 404s leaking out during COPYs - 1 patch set17:59
timburkelook at you, cleaning up old patches!17:59
notmynamezaitcev: I found one more with your +2 and no +A and no comment implying some follow-up.. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/490730/17:59
patchbotpatch 490730 - swift - Replacing six.iter/dict.iter usages - 4 patch sets17:59
zaitcevnotmyname: give me a few18:00
notmynameno worries. despite this being IRC, I'm throwing this stuff into the channel as more of a "oh by the way...". handle it as async as needed. it's not like the patch from 6 months ago is going to get too much worse with another few hours of sitting there ;-)18:01
notmynameok, that's most of the patches that could land according to existing votes and also look perhaps simple enough to actually go ahead and land18:02
notmynamethere's a few more that are either extra old or perhaps needing a bit more examination before making them rise from the dead18:03
tdasilvanotmyname, clayg: re p 447129 i'm still waiting to hear back from gluster guys18:04
patchbothttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/447129/ - swift - Configure diskfile per storage policy - 20 patch sets18:04
notmynameFWIW the ones that are more complicated are https://review.openstack.org/#/c/463849/ and https://review.openstack.org/#/c/437196/18:05
patchbotpatch 463849 - swift - Delete a non-SLO object with ?multipart-manifest. - 2 patch sets18:05
patchbotpatch 437196 - swift - Add X-Backend-Versioning-Mode-Override - 2 patch sets18:05
claygjust start merging stuff until someone tells you to stop18:05
timburkezaitcev: don't worry about p 490730 -- lgtm18:06
patchbothttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/490730/ - swift - Replacing six.iter/dict.iter usages - 4 patch sets18:06
timburkeyeah, the SLO one... people seemed on the fence about it for sure18:07
timburkeon the versioning override, i've got an interest in that getting in so we can revisit some swift3 patches (and apply them to s3api): p 436568, p 436569, p 436570, p 43657118:10
patchbothttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/436568/ - swift3 - Implement versioning status API - 4 patch sets18:10
patchbothttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/436569/ - swift3 - Listing of versioned objects - 2 patch sets18:10
patchbothttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/436570/ - swift3 - Modify obj GETorHEAD to support versions (ABANDONED) - 3 patch sets18:10
patchbothttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/436571/ - swift3 - Delete versioned objects - 2 patch sets18:10
timburkeoh! and p 437523! gotta look at that again...18:11
patchbothttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/437523/ - swift - Store version id when copying object to archive - 8 patch sets18:11
zaitcevOh yeah, good job, Tim. Less for me to approve :-)18:16
timburkeanything i can do to keep your attention on the py3 chains ;-)18:17
*** f0o has quit IRC18:20
*** f0o has joined #openstack-swift18:29
*** mikecmpbll has joined #openstack-swift18:43
*** guimaluf has joined #openstack-swift18:52
zaitcevtimburke: do you have a py35 somewhere ready18:53
claygis p 604937 going to recheck?19:10
patchbothttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/604937/ - swift - Allow kmip_keymaster to be configured in proxy-ser... - 1 patch set19:10
timburkezaitcev: i do19:12
zaitcevtimburke, sorry, but mine went down and it's a long story19:12
zaitcevdoes this work   json.loads(b'[]')19:13
zaitcevworks on py36 but...19:13
zaitcevhttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/578958/6/swift/common/middleware/symlink.py19:13
patchbotpatch 578958 - swift - py3: get proxy-server willing and able to respond ... - 6 patch sets19:13
timburkezaitcev: nope :( TypeError: the JSON object must be str, not 'bytes'19:14
zaitcevI see, thanks a lot19:14
zaitcevSadly, some wise guy decided that we're stuck with py35 for the next 10 years19:14
zaitcevBecause RHEL 819:14
timburke(at least, on 3.5.5)19:14
zaitcevAs if having py26 was not bad enough19:14
timburkefwiw, they apparently viewed https://bugs.python.org/issue17909 as an enhancement; i woulda called it a bug...19:17
timburkeoh yeah, and i wonder if i oughta bug someone about https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/7932 ...19:22
timburkeour func tests totally fall under the "previously working (if misbehaving) clients" that will start getting HTTP/0.9 errors19:24
zaitcevBTW19:25
zaitcevn/m19:26
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-swift19:42
timburkeclayg: looks like it's ~80th in line? gate's backed-up19:43
claygneat19:43
openstackgerritMerged openstack/swift master: py3: port request_helpers  https://review.openstack.org/60282120:01
*** e0ne has quit IRC20:05
openstackgerritMerged openstack/swift master: py3: get proxy-server willing and able to respond to some API requests  https://review.openstack.org/57895820:13
openstackgerritMerged openstack/swift master: py3: Port listing_formats middleware  https://review.openstack.org/59904220:13
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-swift20:19
*** pcaruana has quit IRC20:43
*** e0ne has quit IRC20:43
openstackgerritTim Burke proposed openstack/swift master: py3: port direct_client  https://review.openstack.org/60282220:47
openstackgerritTim Burke proposed openstack/swift master: py3: port internal_client  https://review.openstack.org/60282320:47
*** mcape has joined #openstack-swift21:14
timburkehi mcape!21:14
mcapehi! i see another error message in logs21:15
mcapehttp://paste.openstack.org/show/730907/21:15
timburkelet's look at your proxy-server logs. in particular, i'm looking for something like 'HTTP connection exception' or 'Error on keystone reply'... ah, good, there it is :-)21:16
timburkethat's quite the port number21:16
mcapewow21:16
timburkei think you maybe meant 35357 instead of 353573?21:17
timburke;-)21:17
mcapeit happened when i removed '/v3' in vi21:18
mcapeit works now21:18
mcapeHURRAY!21:19
timburkeyay!21:19
* mcape jumps around21:19
timburkeglad it was relatively easy21:19
mcapethank you very much for your help21:19
timburkefwiw i wrote up https://bugs.launchpad.net/swift/+bug/1794374 -- that client error was pretty terrible21:19
openstackLaunchpad bug 1794374 in OpenStack Object Storage (swift) "s3token's _deny_request is busted" [Undecided,New]21:19
timburkei suppose we could also try for some validation on port numbers? i'm on the fence about the value of that...21:20
mcapeperhaps rocky's proxy-server.conf should contain auth_version variable with some comments21:21
mcapeor release notes... i read them, but this information was not there (the need to have auth_version set in proxy-server.conf)21:24
mcapeanyway thank you very much! probably i'd just downgraded tomorrow early morning without your help21:24
* mcape is very happy and grateful21:38
*** mcape has quit IRC21:38
openstackgerritSam Morrison proposed openstack/swift master: s3 secret caching  https://review.openstack.org/60352922:15
timburkethanks sorrison!22:17
sorrisontimburke: kinda feel slightly dirty doing a catch all but I think that is best?22:17
*** mvkr has quit IRC22:22
*** mvkr has joined #openstack-swift22:35
*** rcernin has joined #openstack-swift23:07
mattoliveraumorning23:19
notmynamemattoliverau: hello23:20

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.15.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!