| *** itlinux_ has joined #openstack-swift | 00:21 | |
| *** itlinux has quit IRC | 00:23 | |
| *** Anticimex has quit IRC | 00:41 | |
| *** mikecmpbll has quit IRC | 00:44 | |
| *** Anticimex has joined #openstack-swift | 00:46 | |
| *** itlinux_ has quit IRC | 00:49 | |
| *** itlinux has joined #openstack-swift | 01:17 | |
| *** mahatic has quit IRC | 01:38 | |
| *** mahatic has joined #openstack-swift | 01:41 | |
| *** mathiasb has quit IRC | 01:44 | |
| *** itlinux has quit IRC | 02:19 | |
| *** psachin` has joined #openstack-swift | 02:36 | |
| *** zhongjun__ has quit IRC | 03:44 | |
| *** links has joined #openstack-swift | 04:08 | |
| *** ccamacho has quit IRC | 04:21 | |
| *** pcaruana has joined #openstack-swift | 04:23 | |
| *** pcaruana has quit IRC | 04:34 | |
| *** hoonetorg has quit IRC | 05:20 | |
| *** ccamacho has joined #openstack-swift | 05:25 | |
| *** beisner has quit IRC | 05:29 | |
| *** DuncanT_ has joined #openstack-swift | 05:30 | |
| *** beisner_ has joined #openstack-swift | 05:30 | |
| *** serverascode_ has joined #openstack-swift | 05:30 | |
| *** serverascode has quit IRC | 05:30 | |
| *** portdirect has quit IRC | 05:30 | |
| *** lxkong_ has joined #openstack-swift | 05:30 | |
| *** portdirect_ has joined #openstack-swift | 05:30 | |
| *** portdirect_ is now known as portdirect | 05:30 | |
| *** DHE has quit IRC | 05:31 | |
| *** lxkong has quit IRC | 05:31 | |
| *** DuncanT has quit IRC | 05:31 | |
| *** lxkong_ is now known as lxkong | 05:31 | |
| *** portdirect is now known as Guest72952 | 05:32 | |
| *** hoonetorg has joined #openstack-swift | 05:36 | |
| *** DHE has joined #openstack-swift | 05:44 | |
| *** threestrands has quit IRC | 05:49 | |
| *** cshastri has joined #openstack-swift | 05:50 | |
| *** threestrands has joined #openstack-swift | 06:09 | |
| *** threestrands has quit IRC | 06:09 | |
| *** threestrands has joined #openstack-swift | 06:09 | |
| *** nguyenhai has joined #openstack-swift | 06:13 | |
| *** nguyenhai_ has quit IRC | 06:17 | |
| *** gkadam has joined #openstack-swift | 06:26 | |
| *** threestrands has quit IRC | 06:36 | |
| *** pcaruana has joined #openstack-swift | 06:37 | |
| *** gkadam has quit IRC | 06:38 | |
| *** openstackgerrit has quit IRC | 07:04 | |
| *** rcernin has quit IRC | 07:29 | |
| *** mikecmpbll has joined #openstack-swift | 07:39 | |
| *** mikecmpbll has quit IRC | 07:41 | |
| *** gkadam has joined #openstack-swift | 08:11 | |
| *** gkadam is now known as gkadam-brb | 08:12 | |
| *** mikecmpbll has joined #openstack-swift | 08:36 | |
| *** tesseract has joined #openstack-swift | 08:41 | |
| *** viks_ has joined #openstack-swift | 08:50 | |
| *** beisner_ is now known as beisner | 09:34 | |
| *** afazekas|pto is now known as afazekas | 09:39 | |
| *** links has quit IRC | 10:49 | |
| *** links has joined #openstack-swift | 11:12 | |
| *** tommylikehu has joined #openstack-swift | 11:24 | |
| tommylikehu | hey guys, how can I know what features or big changes have been made in swift during this cycle? other projects have specs, but I found nothing in the swift-specs repo. | 11:26 |
|---|---|---|
| *** mikecmpbll has quit IRC | 11:38 | |
| mattoliverau | tommylikehu: yeah, we dont use specs, we found they were just a place to put down ideas, we release so often we don't choose 1 or 2 things to work on just release when ready. So ideas of what we want and what people are working on can be found at our ideas page: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Swift/ideas. Priority reviews are where we track things that need to be looked at and are important, especially leading up to | 11:41 |
| mattoliverau | a release: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Swift/PriorityReviews. But most importantly the changelog. Because unlike other OpenStack projects we cut a release 3 - 4 times a cycle. When things get done. We do try and align a release with the rest of OpenStack however. For example, here are our release map. Which shows all our leases mapping to the OpenStack ones: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Swift/version_map | 11:41 |
| tommylikehu | thanks! mattoliverau, so according to the link you shared: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Swift/version_map, the changes in 2.18.0 includes all of the landed features during Rocky? | 11:49 |
| mattoliverau | tommylikehu: The rocky release should be around the end of Aug so we'll try and fit one more release before then.. but yeah. the Changelogs for 2.16-2.18 will be in the rocky release as will probably a 2.19 (or something). | 12:02 |
| mattoliverau | if your going to go only by openstack realeases that is. if your going to upgrade swift for regularly then you could already be running some of the features ;) | 12:03 |
| mattoliverau | s/for/more/ | 12:03 |
| *** mikecmpbll has joined #openstack-swift | 12:09 | |
| DHE | yeah, swift actually stands fairly well on its own away from the rest of openstack (well, maybe keep keystone for authentication) | 12:23 |
| DHE | so it tends to be a bit different in that regard | 12:23 |
| tdasilva | mattoliverau, tommylikehu: I just updated the version_map, according to the changelog 2.17.0 was the Queens release | 12:39 |
| tdasilva | mattoliverau, tommylikehu: so Rocky will be 2.18-2.19 (most likely) | 12:40 |
| *** Guest72952 is now known as portdirect | 12:41 | |
| -openstackstatus- NOTICE: logs.openstack.org is offline, causing POST_FAILURE results from Zuul. Cause and resolution timeframe currently unknown. | 12:58 | |
| *** ChanServ changes topic to "logs.openstack.org is offline, causing POST_FAILURE results from Zuul. Cause and resolution timeframe currently unknown." | 12:58 | |
| *** ChanServ changes topic to "OpenStack Swift object storage | Logs: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23openstack-swift/ | Meetings: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Swift | Review Dashboard: http://not.mn/reviews.html" | 13:41 | |
| -openstackstatus- NOTICE: logs.openstack.org is back on-line. Changes with "POST_FAILURE" job results should be rechecked. | 13:41 | |
| tommylikehu | tdasilva: thanks:) | 13:48 |
| *** ccamacho has quit IRC | 13:49 | |
| *** ccamacho1 has joined #openstack-swift | 13:49 | |
| *** bkopilov has quit IRC | 14:10 | |
| *** cshastri has quit IRC | 14:12 | |
| rledisez | hi. i heard (longtime ago) that authtoken middleware not having request id in the logs was fixed, but i still have the issue. did I miss something? | 14:48 |
| rledisez | Jul 19 16:39:21 127.0.0.1 proxy-server: Authorization failed for token | 14:48 |
| rledisez | Jul 19 16:39:21 127.0.0.1 proxy-server: Invalid user token | 14:48 |
| rledisez | (swift 2.15, keystoneauth1 3.3, keystonemiddleware 4.21) | 14:48 |
| *** zhongjun__ has joined #openstack-swift | 14:50 | |
| *** ccamacho1 has quit IRC | 15:10 | |
| *** pcaruana has quit IRC | 15:12 | |
| *** gkadam-brb is now known as gkadam | 15:21 | |
| *** admin6_ has quit IRC | 15:53 | |
| notmyname | good morning | 15:59 |
| notmyname | rledisez: we'd changed somethng to fill the last gaps in swift's code so that messages have the transid on them. but auth_token is a different thing, since it's not using the same log configuration as swift (not in swift's codebase) | 16:09 |
| notmyname | would be somewhat interesting to figure out where the breakdown is and make it set one. I'm not sure how possible that is | 16:09 |
| rledisez | ok, so i misunderstood, i though it was fixed for auth_token. i'll try to have a look into it eventualy | 16:13 |
| *** mikecmpbll has quit IRC | 16:53 | |
| *** tesseract has quit IRC | 16:56 | |
| *** links has quit IRC | 17:03 | |
| *** gkadam has quit IRC | 17:09 | |
| *** psachin` has quit IRC | 17:13 | |
| *** armaan has joined #openstack-swift | 18:07 | |
| *** mathiasb has joined #openstack-swift | 19:01 | |
| *** itlinux has joined #openstack-swift | 19:06 | |
| *** armaan has quit IRC | 19:19 | |
| cwright_ | Hi, I have a Pike installation of Swift with Keystone v3 for auth. | 19:25 |
| cwright_ | I want to loop through the list of project names and run `swift stat` on each of them. | 19:25 |
| cwright_ | I'm a little unclear on what combination of admin creds I need to provide, and which param to use to provide the customer project. | 19:25 |
| cwright_ | Can anyone help clarify this for me? | 19:25 |
| *** cwright_ is now known as cwright | 19:26 | |
| notmyname | cwright: swift has the concept of a "reseller admin" that is a token with read/write permission for everything (technically not, but it's simpler to describe this way) | 19:29 |
| notmyname | IIRC there's a keystone middleware config setting for setting the keystone role that's marked as a super user | 19:30 |
| notmyname | yeah. there it is. https://github.com/openstack/swift/blob/master/etc/proxy-server.conf-sample#L422 | 19:31 |
| notmyname | so you set that setting in the swift proxy config according to whatever admin/root/whatever role you have in keystone | 19:32 |
| notmyname | then you auth against keystone to get a token with that role | 19:32 |
| notmyname | then you can use that token id do do any requests to swift (ie HEAD every account). when you make the request (in your case, `swift stat`) you need to pass in the storage url to use | 19:33 |
| notmyname | if you have the token already, you can pass that in. or you can just use the keystone creds to get a token each time | 19:33 |
| cwright | notmyname: hey there :) | 19:34 |
| cwright | Thanks, that helps a lot. I remember this now, had forgotten that the original admin user didn't have ResellerAdmin role added | 19:34 |
| *** openstackgerrit has joined #openstack-swift | 19:40 | |
| openstackgerrit | John Dickinson proposed openstack/python-swiftclient master: authors/changelog update for next release https://review.openstack.org/584081 | 19:40 |
| notmyname | authors/changelog proposal for swiftclient release ^ tdasilva, mattoliverau, timburke_ | 19:41 |
| openstackgerrit | John Dickinson proposed openstack/python-swiftclient master: authors/changelog update for next release https://review.openstack.org/584081 | 19:57 |
| corvus | notmyname: where is the current location for this docs content? https://docs.openstack.org/mitaka/user-guide/cli_swift_static_website.html#static-website | 20:12 |
| notmyname | corvus: good question. it's not exactly the same as what's on https://docs.openstack.org/swift/latest/middleware.html#staticweb but it's close. are you looking for something specific? | 20:15 |
| corvus | notmyname: yeah -- specifically i was trying to determine what a "pseudo-directory" is. the mitaka docs have a sentence that says: "If you create sub-directories for your site by creating pseudo-directories in your container, the index page for each sub-directory is displayed by default. If your pseudo-directory does not have a file with the same name as your index file, visits to the | 20:19 |
| corvus | sub-directory return a 404 error." | 20:19 |
| corvus | notmyname: i wondered if that means that you must upload a directory marker (0 byte application/directory object) at /foo, or if merely foo/index.html existing was enough to say that there is a "pseudo-directory" | 20:20 |
| notmyname | corvus: let me check on that in the context of staticweb. | 20:24 |
| corvus | notmyname: (also, just as doc reader feedback -- if the directory marker objects aren't required for this, it's not clear to me from the staticweb doc what they would be for) | 20:29 |
| notmyname | corvus: yeah, it doesn't look like they are required. and if they exist, then staticweb will "do the right thing" instead of return the contents of the empty directory marker object. | 20:30 |
| notmyname | corvus: a long long time ago, swift did this thing called "path" listings that was a pseudo-directory structure sort of thing. in order to have stuff roll up under a pseudo directory, you had to have directory marker object | 20:31 |
| notmyname | merely a long time ago, we added prefix/delimiter listing functionality. it is slightly different, but mostly an overlapping superset of pseudo directories. | 20:32 |
| notmyname | so that's what people should use now | 20:32 |
| notmyname | however, we intentionally did not remove the "path" listing thing. and it is seen in a few places like staticweb | 20:32 |
| notmyname | (also note that staticweb allows you to set a container header to set the directory marker content type, if you don't want it to be application/directory) | 20:33 |
| notmyname | so .... no. no need to use a directory marker of "foo/" in order to make staticweb listings and index files work properly for content at "foo/index.html" | 20:34 |
| notmyname | (it's better without directory markers) | 20:34 |
| corvus | notmyname: thanks! | 20:34 |
| notmyname | this is good reading https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-bcp56bis-06 | 20:49 |
| *** lifeless has quit IRC | 21:01 | |
| *** armaan has joined #openstack-swift | 21:02 | |
| *** lifeless has joined #openstack-swift | 21:06 | |
| *** armaan has quit IRC | 21:14 | |
| *** geaaru has joined #openstack-swift | 21:20 | |
| *** geaaru has quit IRC | 21:30 | |
| *** macsun has joined #openstack-swift | 21:47 | |
| *** acoles has quit IRC | 21:47 | |
| *** rcernin has joined #openstack-swift | 21:58 | |
| *** acoles has joined #openstack-swift | 22:03 | |
| *** ChanServ sets mode: +v acoles | 22:03 | |
| *** itlinux has quit IRC | 22:22 | |
| *** itlinux has joined #openstack-swift | 22:42 | |
| *** rcernin_ has joined #openstack-swift | 22:47 | |
| *** rcernin has quit IRC | 22:49 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.15.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!