Wednesday, 2018-01-24

*** zhurong has joined #openstack-swift00:03
*** zhurong has quit IRC00:20
*** YanWei has joined #openstack-swift00:34
*** YanWei has quit IRC00:34
*** tovin07_ has joined #openstack-swift00:44
*** mariusv__ has quit IRC00:51
*** mariusv has joined #openstack-swift00:53
*** mariusv has quit IRC00:53
*** mariusv has joined #openstack-swift00:53
*** early has quit IRC01:27
*** early has joined #openstack-swift01:30
openstackgerritOpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/swift master: Updated from global requirements  https://review.openstack.org/8873601:37
*** two_tired has joined #openstack-swift01:45
*** rickflare has joined #openstack-swift01:55
clayghrm... I'm starting to get more clusters with multiple EC policies and sorta worried about lp bug #167118002:07
openstackLaunchpad bug 1671180 in OpenStack Object Storage (swift) "Multiple EC policies can cause reconstructor to get wrong remote suffixes" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/167118002:07
notmynamemy swift talk at LCA is in about 15 minutes. livestream at https://timvideos.us/room/guthrie02:25
openstackgerritMerged openstack/swift master: Stop logging tracebacks when the replicator runs out of handoffs  https://review.openstack.org/52879202:27
*** gyee has quit IRC02:31
*** zaitcev has joined #openstack-swift02:38
*** ChanServ sets mode: +v zaitcev02:38
zaitcevDoes anyone know how to find Zuul configurations? I think there was a git repository with yaml files.02:47
zaitcevFor some reason swift-tox-func-ec fails and swift-tox-func succeeds with the PUT+POST. Which makes sense... except! the actual code should be disabled by option. It's no longer automatically enabled, so this should not be happening.02:48
claygtimburke: tdasilva: both know how the gate works - no one else does03:20
*** kei_yama has quit IRC03:35
notmynamezaitcev: most of it got moved into our repo03:38
notmynameused to be giant 20k line yaml files03:39
notmynamezaitcev: look at .zuul.yaml in the swift repo now03:39
zaitcevnotmyname: thanks03:39
openstackgerritMerged openstack/swift master: Internal Client should only retry server errors  https://review.openstack.org/53557503:49
*** psachin` has joined #openstack-swift03:52
*** psachin has joined #openstack-swift03:52
*** tovin07 has quit IRC04:00
*** tovin07_ has quit IRC04:00
*** tovin07 has joined #openstack-swift04:01
*** tovin07_ has joined #openstack-swift04:01
*** kei_yama has joined #openstack-swift04:01
*** sorrison has joined #openstack-swift04:09
*** tovin07_ has quit IRC04:33
*** tovin07 has quit IRC04:33
*** tovin07_ has joined #openstack-swift04:34
*** tovin07 has joined #openstack-swift04:34
timburkezaitcev: which part are you looking for? fwiw, the proxy-server configurations get built up from our won sample configs04:43
*** two_tired has quit IRC04:44
timburkethe exact manipulations from there happen around https://github.com/openstack/swift/blob/2.16.0/test/functional/__init__.py#L295-L38004:45
timburke(https://review.openstack.org/#/c/503262/ reminded me about how that's a thing, which then led me to try https://review.openstack.org/#/c/536658/ which i should really mark Workflow-1)04:47
patchbotpatch 503262 - swift - Functional tests for staticweb middleware04:47
patchbotpatch 536658 - swift - Add in-process cross-policy func tests04:47
*** links has joined #openstack-swift05:32
zaitcevtimburke: thanks a lot05:37
timburkeyay! i was helpful despite the s/won/own/ typo that i only just now noticed!05:37
zaitcevI was able to reproduce something, even isolate functional tests that fail by using SWIFT_TEST_IN_PROCESS_CONF_LOADER=ec. I clearly broke something, even though PUT+POST should be disabled.05:37
zaitcevbut the hint was that we've got a bunch of overrides in functional tests05:38
timburkecurious though... for the ec tests, (i thought) we mainly just touch swift.conf -- and your patch doesn't do anything with that...05:46
zaitcevwell right now the biggest problem is when we run functests, there's no log output from object servers anywhere.05:50
zaitcevso, I only get a bunch of useless "broken pipe in send_chunk()"05:51
zaitcevwell duh05:51
zaitcevI tracebacked somewhere, so05:51
*** armaan has quit IRC05:51
zaitcevBut our "except Exception" plugs it all and the logging disappears05:51
zaitcevI used to rage about this so much years ago.05:52
*** armaan has joined #openstack-swift05:59
*** rcernin_ has joined #openstack-swift06:03
*** rcernin has quit IRC06:03
*** threestrands has joined #openstack-swift06:39
*** SkyRocknRoll has joined #openstack-swift06:39
*** SkyRocknRoll has quit IRC06:44
*** threestrands has quit IRC06:49
*** SkyRocknRoll has joined #openstack-swift06:56
*** pcaruana has joined #openstack-swift07:10
*** rcernin has joined #openstack-swift07:12
*** rcernin_ has quit IRC07:12
*** pcaruana has quit IRC07:21
*** pcaruana has joined #openstack-swift07:22
*** yashmurty has joined #openstack-swift07:26
yashmurtyHello!07:34
yashmurtyIt's my first time in this channel. :)07:34
yashmurtyI would like to know if the *slogging* project has been abandoned?07:40
yashmurtyhttps://github.com/notmyname/slogging07:40
yashmurtySorry if this has already been discussed before.07:40
*** armaan has quit IRC07:41
*** armaan has joined #openstack-swift07:41
*** hseipp has joined #openstack-swift07:44
*** yashmurty has quit IRC07:48
*** yashmurty has joined #openstack-swift07:52
*** itlinux has joined #openstack-swift07:56
*** pcaruana has quit IRC08:01
*** itlinux has quit IRC08:24
*** geaaru has joined #openstack-swift08:25
openstackgerritMerged openstack/swift master: object-server can 409 in response to x-if-delete-at  https://review.openstack.org/53495908:27
*** tesseract has joined #openstack-swift08:27
*** cshastri has joined #openstack-swift08:30
*** yashmurty has quit IRC08:33
*** pcaruana has joined #openstack-swift08:39
*** rcernin has quit IRC08:44
*** tesseract has quit IRC08:54
*** tesseract has joined #openstack-swift09:03
*** gkadam has joined #openstack-swift09:10
*** itlinux has joined #openstack-swift09:12
*** cbartz has joined #openstack-swift09:12
*** psachin` has quit IRC09:24
*** psachin has quit IRC09:25
acolesgood morning09:28
acolesyashmurty the person best qualified to answer you (notmyname) is probably sleeping at this time09:29
acoleskota_: how is the snow in Tokyo?09:30
*** psachin has joined #openstack-swift09:32
acoles@notmyname: simple docs backport to land https://review.openstack.org/#/c/53422109:39
patchbotpatch 534221 - swift (stable/ocata) - Fix source repository url to ocata09:39
*** tovin07__ has joined #openstack-swift09:45
*** tovin07_ has quit IRC09:46
*** tovin07__ has quit IRC09:50
*** tovin07__ has joined #openstack-swift09:51
*** tovin07__ has quit IRC10:10
*** rcernin has joined #openstack-swift10:34
openstackgerritMerged openstack/swift master: Include policy in ran-out-of-handoffs log message  https://review.openstack.org/53692910:52
kota_acoles: that was terrible but did not become serious problems11:14
acoleskota_: fun for the kids?11:14
openstackgerritMerged openstack/swift master: Add pipeline modification test for previously-recommended pipelines  https://review.openstack.org/53236011:14
kota_many transportation stopped / delayed. now almost of them are recovered11:15
kota_yeah11:16
kota_they built 211:16
kota_snowmans11:16
kota_ah... snowmen? perhaps.11:17
acolesyeah snowmen :)11:18
kota_:)11:18
*** psachin has quit IRC11:19
*** itlinux has quit IRC11:23
*** armaan has quit IRC11:23
*** armaan has joined #openstack-swift11:24
*** YanWei has joined #openstack-swift11:26
*** itlinux has joined #openstack-swift11:38
openstackgerritKazuhiro MIYAHARA proposed openstack/swift master: Update object-expirer to use general task queue system  https://review.openstack.org/51738912:02
*** zhurong has joined #openstack-swift12:10
*** armaan has quit IRC12:13
*** mvk has quit IRC12:19
*** kei_yama has quit IRC12:25
*** mvk has joined #openstack-swift12:31
*** mvk has quit IRC12:56
*** rcernin has quit IRC13:47
*** mvk has joined #openstack-swift13:56
*** awelleck has joined #openstack-swift14:09
*** links has quit IRC14:15
*** zhurong has quit IRC14:18
*** SkyRocknRoll has quit IRC14:44
*** armaan has joined #openstack-swift14:47
*** SkyRocknRoll has joined #openstack-swift14:56
*** itlinux has quit IRC15:16
*** itlinux has joined #openstack-swift15:18
-openstackstatus- NOTICE: gerrit has been suffering from a full disk, some mails may have been lost in the last couple of hours. we will now restart gerrit to address ongoing slowness, too15:25
*** Guest28399 is now known as mgagne15:33
*** mgagne has joined #openstack-swift15:33
*** armaan has quit IRC15:34
*** itlinux has quit IRC15:40
openstackgerritAlistair Coles proposed openstack/swift feature/deep: enable single PUT of multiple shard ranges to container servers  https://review.openstack.org/53540715:51
openstackgerritAlistair Coles proposed openstack/swift feature/deep: Use backend header rather than param to GET shard record type  https://review.openstack.org/53546615:51
openstackgerritAlistair Coles proposed openstack/swift feature/deep: simplify shrinking  https://review.openstack.org/53677215:51
openstackgerritAlistair Coles proposed openstack/swift feature/deep: Don't lose objects when db is rsync replicated during sharding  https://review.openstack.org/53694315:51
*** awelleck has quit IRC16:15
*** awelleck has joined #openstack-swift16:30
*** pcaruana has quit IRC16:35
openstackgerritAlistair Coles proposed openstack/swift feature/deep: enable single PUT of multiple shard ranges to container servers  https://review.openstack.org/53540716:49
openstackgerritAlistair Coles proposed openstack/swift feature/deep: Use backend header rather than param to GET shard record type  https://review.openstack.org/53546616:49
openstackgerritAlistair Coles proposed openstack/swift feature/deep: simplify shrinking  https://review.openstack.org/53677216:49
openstackgerritAlistair Coles proposed openstack/swift feature/deep: Don't lose objects when db is rsync replicated during sharding  https://review.openstack.org/53694316:49
timburkegood morning16:51
*** gyee has joined #openstack-swift16:59
claygmorning17:11
*** silor has joined #openstack-swift17:12
*** gyee has quit IRC17:15
*** cbartz has quit IRC17:19
*** gkadam has quit IRC17:26
*** hseipp has quit IRC17:27
*** geaaru has quit IRC17:34
*** mvk has quit IRC17:35
*** cshastri has quit IRC17:41
*** SkyRocknRoll has quit IRC18:06
*** tesseract has quit IRC18:08
*** awelleck has quit IRC18:12
*** hseipp has joined #openstack-swift18:19
*** hseipp has quit IRC18:32
acolesno meeting this week - I just remembered - http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/swift/2018/swift.2018-01-17-21.00.log.html#l-20818:39
tdasilvathanks for the reminder18:40
acolesI hope kota_ remembered18:42
*** ukaynar has joined #openstack-swift19:03
openstackgerritSamuel Merritt proposed openstack/swift master: Use X-Timestamp when checking object expiration  https://review.openstack.org/53259519:19
*** silor has quit IRC19:23
*** muttley has joined #openstack-swift19:32
*** muttley has quit IRC19:48
openstackgerritAlistair Coles proposed openstack/swift feature/deep: Don't lose objects when db is rsync replicated during sharding  https://review.openstack.org/53694320:01
*** itlinux has joined #openstack-swift20:44
*** m_kazuhiro has joined #openstack-swift21:01
timburketorgomatic: so on p 532595, we're back to inserting current_time in the args to open? (as opposed to appending)21:05
patchbothttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/532595/ - swift - Use X-Timestamp when checking object expiration21:05
torgomatictimburke: not intentionally; is that what happened?21:05
torgomatichuh, it sure did... let me try that rebase again and see if I can get it right this time21:06
timburkeyeah -- i'd pushed up a patchset you probably didn't have when you rebased21:06
torgomaticoh, yeah, that's probably it21:06
m_kazuhiroThere is no meeting today?21:06
torgomaticm_kazuhiro: correct; there is no meeting today21:07
m_kazuhirotorgomatic: OK. Thank you.21:08
openstackgerritSamuel Merritt proposed openstack/swift master: Use X-Timestamp when checking object expiration  https://review.openstack.org/53259521:13
torgomatictimburke: ^^ there you go; that should be okay now21:13
timburkethanks21:14
*** m_kazuhiro has quit IRC21:27
*** threestrands has joined #openstack-swift21:41
*** threestrands_ has joined #openstack-swift21:44
*** threestrands_ has quit IRC21:44
*** threestrands_ has joined #openstack-swift21:44
*** threestrands has quit IRC21:47
*** rcernin has joined #openstack-swift22:14
*** rcernin has quit IRC22:29
*** rcernin has joined #openstack-swift22:31
*** itlinux has quit IRC22:51
*** ukaynar has quit IRC23:02
*** ukaynar has joined #openstack-swift23:02
*** itlinux has joined #openstack-swift23:02
*** ukaynar has quit IRC23:06
notmynameFWIW, and in case yashmurty comes back, I don't pay much attention to slogging any more. I assume it still works23:08
*** kei_yama has joined #openstack-swift23:20
*** itlinux has quit IRC23:23
timburkeoh man, https://bugs.launchpad.net/swift/+bug/1745245 sounds like a *wonderful* reason to always do the PUT-with-footer business... even if the *client* doesn't care to send an ETag header, we should almost certainly be sending one from proxy to object-server23:34
openstackLaunchpad bug 1745245 in OpenStack Object Storage (swift) "Objects stored on PUT even when etags don't match on object-servers" [Undecided,New]23:34

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.15.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!