Friday, 2017-09-29

*** mat128 has joined #openstack-swift00:01
*** catintheroof has quit IRC00:06
*** mingyu has quit IRC00:11
mattoliverautimburke: when the scanner ran and finds ranges, it writes them and then replicates itself. So the other nodes should get it's extra objects.. well not in your patch, but pre it would. But I don't think cleaving replicates the cleaving contianer, so the scanner wont get updated.  but I not sure where the others got each others info.00:13
mattoliverauUnless someone misplaced objects did something, because there is calls to _replicate in there.00:13
timburkemattoliverau: the trouble i was seeing was just the scanner sending its extra objects to the other dbs. it felt weird since we're expecting them to be pretty large themselves00:14
*** mingyu has joined #openstack-swift00:14
mattoliverauyeah00:14
mattoliverauits a good thought.00:15
mattoliverauif the others are in sharding state it should be ok to send, as only the shard_db table would be updated00:15
mattoliveraubut in unsharded it could be a bad move.00:15
mattoliverauthis is ofcourse only on large container. so how much do we cater for them.00:16
timburkealso, i'm really in favor of getting those shard ranges out there as fast as we can, and my gut says that waiting for max_diff object rows might take a bit...00:16
mattoliverauI hope 99% of the time the containers are small and continuing the shard as required. But on _very_ large containers, we could be in a sharding state for a long time, so no usyncing could be a problem as they get more and more out of date?00:16
mattoliverauyeah, large containers so we don't want to slow it down any more, but if we are going to be sharding for say 1 week, do we still want to replicate objects so we don't have a chance of loosing anything thats missing??00:18
mattoliveraupros and cons :)00:19
mattoliveraumaybe it does make sense to always send the ranges over first, so things can get redirected.00:19
timburkeyeah, it's that last bit that i'm torn about. how long can we risk it?00:20
timburkemaybe we can have that initial exchange of metadata trigger the receiver to create the shard db?00:20
timburkemoving from unsharded to sharding00:20
mattoliverauI think <sharding, sharded> -> unsharded means no moving data (only pivots).. but <sharding, sharded> -> sharding means only usync.. that would be ok.00:21
mattoliverauso a trigger might work. Send the shard ranges first if I'm dealing with an unsharded replica. the replica broker could trigger on recieving ranges if it's unsharded00:23
mattoliverauwe can't go backwards, sharded to unsharded, and if I'm getting shards, then I have to cleave.00:24
mattoliverauso I do need to move in to sharding state.00:24
timburkei kinda like the idea of the replicator being able to change remote state, particularly as part of the metadata exchange. db state becomes like another piece of metadata (just tracked on the filesystem instead of the normal way)00:25
mattoliverauyeah00:25
mattoliverauyeah I like it too. and we'll still replicate objects, so we're doing our best at keeping containers durable.. and at least always attempting to move in the right direction. (keeping as insync as possible).00:28
*** rcernin has quit IRC00:29
mattoliverauThat would mean the replicate RPC on the other replica would need some more smarts, or at least the broker.00:29
mattoliverauyeah the broker, that's ok :)00:30
mattoliverausorry thinking out loud :P00:30
timburkethat's perfect :-) thanks mattoliverau!00:30
mattoliveraunps, thank you00:32
timburkemight mean a little more traffic as a result of sharded -> sharded movement, but that should be a rapidly-diminishing set of differences00:32
timburkeok, i oughta head home. and hope for a happier gate when i come in tomorrow ;-)00:33
*** mat128 has quit IRC00:34
*** itlinux has joined #openstack-swift00:38
mattoliverautimburke: o/00:46
*** tovin07_ has joined #openstack-swift00:51
*** wes_dillingham has quit IRC00:56
*** wes_dillingham has joined #openstack-swift01:10
*** Sukhdev has quit IRC01:31
*** mat128 has joined #openstack-swift01:36
*** itlinux has quit IRC01:39
*** gyee has quit IRC02:09
*** mat128 has quit IRC02:09
*** rcernin has joined #openstack-swift02:21
*** itlinux has joined #openstack-swift02:24
*** wes_dillingham has quit IRC02:27
*** spotz has quit IRC02:29
*** spotz has joined #openstack-swift02:37
*** mingyu has quit IRC02:44
*** mingyu has joined #openstack-swift02:47
*** itlinux has quit IRC02:50
*** gkadam has joined #openstack-swift03:26
*** links has joined #openstack-swift04:02
*** mat128 has joined #openstack-swift04:07
*** abhitechie has quit IRC04:19
*** tovin07_ has quit IRC04:27
*** tovin07_ has joined #openstack-swift04:28
*** mat128 has quit IRC04:40
*** Sukhdev has joined #openstack-swift04:43
*** abhitechie has joined #openstack-swift04:44
*** psachin has joined #openstack-swift04:56
*** ianychoi has quit IRC05:11
*** ianychoi has joined #openstack-swift05:12
*** rcernin has quit IRC05:15
*** chsc has joined #openstack-swift05:18
*** chsc has joined #openstack-swift05:18
*** pcaruana has joined #openstack-swift05:24
*** pcaruana has quit IRC05:29
*** chsc has quit IRC05:29
*** Sukhdev has quit IRC05:37
*** cbartz has joined #openstack-swift05:40
*** skudlik has joined #openstack-swift05:48
*** skudlik has left #openstack-swift05:48
*** ChubYann has quit IRC05:50
*** rcernin has joined #openstack-swift05:52
*** SkyRocknRoll has quit IRC06:08
*** silor has joined #openstack-swift06:18
*** kei_yama has quit IRC06:30
*** kei_yama has joined #openstack-swift06:35
*** mat128 has joined #openstack-swift06:38
*** pcaruana has joined #openstack-swift07:04
*** mat128 has quit IRC07:10
*** hseipp has joined #openstack-swift07:14
*** tovin07_ has quit IRC08:03
*** tovin07_ has joined #openstack-swift08:04
*** geaaru has joined #openstack-swift08:11
*** mabrams has quit IRC08:30
*** Dw_Sn has joined #openstack-swift08:47
Dw_SnHello I have a question, I added the two new luns to my current storage node, did the rebalance and eveyrhing but the partitions on those two new luns are not the same... any idea why ?08:49
*** gkadam has quit IRC08:51
*** gkadam has joined #openstack-swift08:55
*** gkadam has quit IRC09:00
*** gkadam has joined #openstack-swift09:01
*** kei_yama has quit IRC09:04
*** mat128 has joined #openstack-swift09:08
*** gkadam_ has joined #openstack-swift09:21
*** gkadam has quit IRC09:24
*** mingyu_ has joined #openstack-swift09:29
*** mingyu has quit IRC09:32
*** mingyu has joined #openstack-swift09:32
*** mingyu_ has quit IRC09:36
*** mingyu_ has joined #openstack-swift09:38
*** mat128 has quit IRC09:41
*** mingyu has quit IRC09:42
*** mingyu_ has quit IRC09:45
*** mingyu has joined #openstack-swift09:58
*** abhinavtechie has joined #openstack-swift10:02
*** abhitechie has quit IRC10:02
*** abhinavtechie has quit IRC10:18
*** abhinavtechie has joined #openstack-swift10:18
*** aagrawal has joined #openstack-swift10:20
*** aagrawal has quit IRC10:22
*** abhinavtechie has quit IRC10:22
*** abhitechie has joined #openstack-swift10:22
*** mingyu has quit IRC10:24
*** mingyu has joined #openstack-swift10:29
*** abhinavtechie has joined #openstack-swift10:30
*** abhitechie has quit IRC10:32
*** mingyu has quit IRC10:34
*** mingyu has joined #openstack-swift10:34
*** abhitechie has joined #openstack-swift10:35
*** abhinavtechie has quit IRC10:35
*** mingyu has quit IRC10:38
*** mingyu has joined #openstack-swift10:38
*** mingyu has quit IRC10:40
*** mingyu has joined #openstack-swift10:42
*** abhitechie has quit IRC10:42
*** abhitechie has joined #openstack-swift10:43
*** tovin07_ has quit IRC10:45
*** abhinavtechie has joined #openstack-swift10:46
*** mingyu has quit IRC10:46
*** mingyu has joined #openstack-swift10:46
*** abhitechie has quit IRC10:47
*** mingyu_ has joined #openstack-swift10:48
*** abhinavtechie has quit IRC10:49
*** aagrawal has joined #openstack-swift10:49
*** mingyu has quit IRC10:51
*** aagrawal has quit IRC10:51
*** aagrawal has joined #openstack-swift10:51
*** mjseger has quit IRC10:52
*** aagrawal has quit IRC10:59
*** abhitechie has joined #openstack-swift11:00
*** mingyu_ has quit IRC11:03
*** mingyu has joined #openstack-swift11:40
*** mat128 has joined #openstack-swift11:40
*** vint_bra has joined #openstack-swift11:56
*** mingyu has quit IRC11:57
*** vint_bra1 has joined #openstack-swift11:58
*** abhitechie has quit IRC12:00
*** vint_bra has quit IRC12:01
*** vint_bra1 has quit IRC12:04
*** mat128 has quit IRC12:12
*** mat128 has joined #openstack-swift12:18
*** MVenesio has joined #openstack-swift12:20
*** wes_dillingham has joined #openstack-swift12:24
*** mingyu has joined #openstack-swift12:27
*** 07IAA8DSW has joined #openstack-swift12:29
*** 5EXAACMRJ has joined #openstack-swift12:29
*** 07IAA8DSW has quit IRC12:33
*** 5EXAACMRJ has quit IRC12:34
*** hoonetorg has joined #openstack-swift12:35
*** MVenesio has quit IRC12:55
*** smira has joined #openstack-swift12:59
*** catintheroof has joined #openstack-swift13:03
*** smira has quit IRC13:04
*** cbartz has quit IRC13:14
*** mat128 has quit IRC13:22
*** mat128 has joined #openstack-swift13:22
*** vint_bra has joined #openstack-swift13:34
*** Dw_Sn has quit IRC13:34
*** psachin has quit IRC13:36
*** links has quit IRC13:39
*** Dinesh_Bhor has quit IRC13:48
*** vint_bra has quit IRC14:14
*** vint_bra has joined #openstack-swift14:18
*** SkyRocknRoll has joined #openstack-swift14:50
*** saint_ has joined #openstack-swift14:56
*** rcernin has quit IRC15:01
*** SkyRocknRoll has quit IRC15:01
*** chsc has joined #openstack-swift15:15
*** chsc has joined #openstack-swift15:15
*** mingyu has quit IRC15:21
*** mingyu has joined #openstack-swift15:22
*** d0ugal has joined #openstack-swift15:31
*** chlong has quit IRC15:35
*** mingyu has quit IRC16:08
*** zaitcev has quit IRC16:09
*** mingyu has joined #openstack-swift16:11
*** saint_ has quit IRC16:18
clayg1) using SAN arrays to provision swift capacity is not common, I've seen it done and it didn't go that great 2) each individual storage device in the swift ring gets assigned unique replicas of unique partitions, i wouldn't expect them to be the same literal partition numbers - but their should be roughly the same # of partitions on the same sized devices16:18
*** zaitcev has joined #openstack-swift16:22
*** ChanServ sets mode: +v zaitcev16:22
*** itlinux has joined #openstack-swift16:23
*** hseipp has quit IRC16:25
*** pcaruana has quit IRC16:26
*** SkyRocknRoll has joined #openstack-swift16:44
*** itlinux has quit IRC16:44
*** gyee has joined #openstack-swift16:45
*** lnxnut_ has joined #openstack-swift16:46
*** itlinux has joined #openstack-swift16:47
*** zaitcev has quit IRC16:52
*** zaitcev has joined #openstack-swift16:54
*** ChanServ sets mode: +v zaitcev16:54
*** shaner has quit IRC16:54
*** itlinux has quit IRC17:02
*** mingyu_ has joined #openstack-swift17:03
*** mingyu_ has quit IRC17:03
*** mingyu_ has joined #openstack-swift17:04
*** mingyu has quit IRC17:04
*** hseipp has joined #openstack-swift17:07
*** zaitcev has quit IRC17:11
timburkegood morning17:12
*** hseipp has quit IRC17:13
*** mingyu_ has quit IRC17:21
*** mingyu has joined #openstack-swift17:21
*** MooingLe1ur is now known as MooingLemur17:26
*** NM has joined #openstack-swift17:35
*** mingyu_ has joined #openstack-swift17:40
*** dhellmann has quit IRC17:41
*** mingyu has quit IRC17:44
*** dhellmann has joined #openstack-swift17:46
*** geaaru has quit IRC17:57
*** NM has quit IRC18:04
*** hoonetorg has quit IRC18:06
*** NM has joined #openstack-swift18:15
*** vint_bra has quit IRC19:04
*** vint_bra has joined #openstack-swift19:08
*** catintheroof has quit IRC19:20
*** catintheroof has joined #openstack-swift19:20
*** catintheroof has quit IRC19:24
*** ChubYann has joined #openstack-swift19:34
*** mat128 has quit IRC19:46
*** silor has quit IRC19:55
*** wes_dillingham has quit IRC19:57
*** SkyRocknRoll has quit IRC19:57
*** mingyu_ has quit IRC19:58
*** mingyu has joined #openstack-swift19:58
*** stewie925 has quit IRC20:22
*** Sukhdev has joined #openstack-swift20:49
*** mingyu has quit IRC21:09
clarkbtimburke: re https://review.openstack.org/#/c/508589/1 looking at the old config it looks like the job wasn't voting? I take it that means you are ready to make it voting now or am I missing a case where our conversion of zuul configs broke (mostly want to make sure I'm not missing a fialure in the conversion process)21:13
patchbotpatch 508589 - openstack-infra/project-config - Make legacy-swift-tox-xfs-tmp-func-ec voting21:13
*** wes_dillingham has joined #openstack-swift21:13
timburkeclarkb: yeah, i'm wanting to turn it into a voting job now, since it had been running happily as a non-voting job for some 6 months21:14
timburkei maybe should have made that more clear in the commit message :-)21:14
*** mwheckmann has quit IRC21:26
*** hoonetorg has joined #openstack-swift21:50
*** mat128 has joined #openstack-swift21:51
*** shaner has joined #openstack-swift21:58
*** NM has quit IRC22:17
*** mat128 has quit IRC22:21
*** d0ugal has quit IRC22:23
*** mat128 has joined #openstack-swift22:57
*** mat128 has quit IRC22:58
*** vint_bra has quit IRC23:33
*** chsc has quit IRC23:48
*** gyee has quit IRC23:53
*** Sukhdev has quit IRC23:59

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.15.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!