| *** tonanhngo has joined #openstack-swift | 00:06 | |
| *** tonanhngo has quit IRC | 00:10 | |
| *** tonanhngo has joined #openstack-swift | 00:15 | |
| openstackgerrit | Tim Burke proposed openstack/swift master: functests: Only convert headers that should be ints to be ints https://review.openstack.org/485381 | 00:18 |
|---|---|---|
| *** tonanhngo has quit IRC | 00:20 | |
| *** lucasxu has joined #openstack-swift | 00:24 | |
| *** frank_young has joined #openstack-swift | 00:26 | |
| *** frank_young has quit IRC | 00:31 | |
| *** lucasxu has quit IRC | 00:39 | |
| *** frank_young has joined #openstack-swift | 00:40 | |
| *** frank_young has quit IRC | 00:40 | |
| *** lucasxu has joined #openstack-swift | 00:43 | |
| *** lucasxu has quit IRC | 00:53 | |
| *** lucasxu has joined #openstack-swift | 00:54 | |
| *** klrmn has quit IRC | 01:03 | |
| *** frank_young has joined #openstack-swift | 01:15 | |
| *** kiennt has joined #openstack-swift | 01:25 | |
| *** JimCheung has quit IRC | 01:30 | |
| *** lucasxu has quit IRC | 01:31 | |
| *** JimCheung has joined #openstack-swift | 01:35 | |
| *** vint_bra has joined #openstack-swift | 01:52 | |
| *** JimCheun_ has joined #openstack-swift | 02:05 | |
| *** JimCheung has quit IRC | 02:05 | |
| *** vint_bra has quit IRC | 02:12 | |
| *** bkopilov has quit IRC | 02:16 | |
| *** klrmn has joined #openstack-swift | 02:25 | |
| *** caiobrentano_ has joined #openstack-swift | 02:32 | |
| *** caiobrentano has quit IRC | 02:32 | |
| *** JimCheun_ has quit IRC | 02:52 | |
| *** ukaynar has joined #openstack-swift | 02:58 | |
| *** Sukhdev_ has joined #openstack-swift | 03:00 | |
| *** Sukhdev has quit IRC | 03:01 | |
| *** JimCheung has joined #openstack-swift | 03:15 | |
| *** gkadam has joined #openstack-swift | 03:36 | |
| *** JimCheung has quit IRC | 03:43 | |
| *** SkyRocknRoll has joined #openstack-swift | 03:47 | |
| *** caiobrentano_ has quit IRC | 03:58 | |
| *** JimCheung has joined #openstack-swift | 03:59 | |
| *** JimCheung has quit IRC | 04:03 | |
| *** klrmn has quit IRC | 04:06 | |
| *** JimCheung has joined #openstack-swift | 04:15 | |
| *** JimCheung has quit IRC | 04:19 | |
| *** chlong_ has joined #openstack-swift | 04:20 | |
| *** SkyRocknRoll has quit IRC | 04:20 | |
| *** frank_young has quit IRC | 04:21 | |
| *** gyee has quit IRC | 04:21 | |
| *** frank_young has joined #openstack-swift | 04:31 | |
| *** rcernin has joined #openstack-swift | 04:34 | |
| *** frank_young has quit IRC | 04:36 | |
| *** JimCheung has joined #openstack-swift | 04:54 | |
| *** JimCheung has quit IRC | 04:58 | |
| *** JimCheung has joined #openstack-swift | 04:58 | |
| *** JimCheung has quit IRC | 05:05 | |
| *** JimCheung has joined #openstack-swift | 05:06 | |
| *** JimCheung has quit IRC | 05:10 | |
| *** ukaynar has quit IRC | 05:23 | |
| *** chlong_ has quit IRC | 05:26 | |
| *** frank_young has joined #openstack-swift | 05:32 | |
| *** rcernin has quit IRC | 05:36 | |
| *** frank_young has quit IRC | 05:37 | |
| *** kiennt has quit IRC | 05:44 | |
| *** cshastri has joined #openstack-swift | 05:51 | |
| *** frank_young has joined #openstack-swift | 05:53 | |
| *** Sukhdev_ has quit IRC | 05:56 | |
| *** psachin has joined #openstack-swift | 05:57 | |
| *** frank_young has quit IRC | 05:58 | |
| *** kiennt has joined #openstack-swift | 05:58 | |
| *** rcernin has joined #openstack-swift | 05:59 | |
| *** frank_young has joined #openstack-swift | 06:14 | |
| *** winggundamth has joined #openstack-swift | 06:49 | |
| openstackgerrit | Kota Tsuyuzaki proposed openstack/swift master: Ring rebalance respects co-builders' last_part_moves https://review.openstack.org/477000 | 06:56 |
| openstackgerrit | Kota Tsuyuzaki proposed openstack/swift master: WIP: Consideration for avoiding RingBuilder change as possible https://review.openstack.org/485469 | 06:56 |
| kota_ | whooa? | 06:57 |
| kota_ | i updated patch 477000 too? | 06:57 |
| patchbot | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/477000/ - swift - Ring rebalance respects co-builders' last_part_moves | 06:57 |
| kota_ | ugh! It seems i rebased it to the master unintentionally | 07:00 |
| kota_ | sorry acoles | 07:02 |
| *** itlinux has quit IRC | 07:04 | |
| xrb | acoles: thx! | 07:12 |
| openstackgerrit | junbo.li proposed openstack/swift master: Update and optimize documentation links https://review.openstack.org/485474 | 07:14 |
| *** tesseract has joined #openstack-swift | 07:19 | |
| acoles | good morning | 07:26 |
| *** ChubYann has quit IRC | 07:29 | |
| *** cschwede_ has joined #openstack-swift | 07:33 | |
| kota_ | acoles: good morning | 07:33 |
| acoles | kota_: o/ | 07:33 |
| kota_ | acoles: i just pushed my comments | 07:34 |
| acoles | kota_: ok, looking... | 07:34 |
| kota_ | assuming I will not able to work too much on that today due to that I'm joining OpenStackDaysTokyo (summit like conference for OpenStack in Japan) | 07:35 |
| kota_ | acoles: basically your work looks awesome to me | 07:35 |
| kota_ | acoles: one point, I still want to keep current code on RingBuilder is just I'm messing around there in another patch. Though it needs more work to catch up current rebalance algorithms | 07:37 |
| acoles | kota_: I just looked at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/485469 - it works, but it would mean that there was a different behaviour for _can_part_move in the subclass w.r.t. the superclass i.e. one can be called before rebalance, the other cannot. Do you have a concern that the change int he subclass may break something? or just prefer to not have a change in RingBuilder? I think it just makes the method safe to call | 07:38 |
| acoles | when on master it may blow up if called before rebalance. | 07:38 |
| patchbot | patch 485469 - swift - WIP: Consideration for avoiding RingBuilder change... | 07:38 |
| acoles | kota_: thanks for working on this I hope you openstack day is good | 07:38 |
| kota_ | ah, i look at the behavior change found in your test case briefly | 07:40 |
| kota_ | basically, your test looks to hook the parent class call but my change at patch 485496 skips the parent call depends on the rebalance stat (i.e. non-rebalanced ring won't be called) so... | 07:41 |
| patchbot | No data found for patch 485496 | 07:41 |
| kota_ | patch 485469 | 07:42 |
| patchbot | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/485469/ - swift - WIP: Consideration for avoiding RingBuilder change... | 07:42 |
| kota_ | it seems safe??? | 07:42 |
| kota_ | ah | 07:42 |
| kota_ | wait, I probably miss read your comments at irc | 07:43 |
| kota_ | ah... super class CANNOT be called but child CAN be called. | 07:44 |
| kota_ | hmmm | 07:44 |
| *** oshritf has joined #openstack-swift | 07:45 | |
| acoles | kota_: yes, it is subtle but with your change 485469 it is ok to call the subclass method at any time but the superclass method can only be called after rebalance() inits the array | 07:46 |
| kota_ | acoles: fair point | 07:46 |
| kota_ | hmmm, i don't have clear answer, sorry. | 07:47 |
| acoles | obviously the subclass behaviour is also different because it calls cobuilders. Is there any time we would *want* the superclass method to blow up if called too early? I should take a look at you other patch 479223 | 07:49 |
| patchbot | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/479223/ - swift - Fix converging unbalance state at ring builder reb... | 07:49 |
| kota_ | n.b. not only directly related to your patch but... it tries to change rebalance behaivor | 07:50 |
| kota_ | s/only// | 07:51 |
| kota_ | perhaps, it may be orthogornal | 07:53 |
| acoles | 479223 doesn't seem to touch _can_part_move | 07:53 |
| *** geaaru has joined #openstack-swift | 07:56 | |
| *** caiobrentano has joined #openstack-swift | 07:59 | |
| acoles | kota_: I don't think my patch changes the result of _can_part_move other than avoiding a TypeError if called before rebalance - are you concerned that it *does* change the result? | 08:01 |
| kota_ | acoles: honestly not so much concerned but a little when starting to review your patch. | 08:02 |
| charz | kota_: just one question for swift3, when swift3 issue an account/container/SLO?multipart-manifest?delete request with internal client, does SLO able to handle that? | 08:02 |
| *** caiobrentano has quit IRC | 08:03 | |
| kota_ | charz: when using multi-upload? | 08:04 |
| *** clarkb has quit IRC | 08:04 | |
| kota_ | woops? swift3 with internal client? | 08:05 |
| *** clarkb has joined #openstack-swift | 08:05 | |
| charz | kota_: https://github.com/openstack/swift3/blob/master/swift3/controllers/multi_delete.py#L104-L108 | 08:10 |
| kota_ | charz: basically swift3 works just issuing the multipart-delete expecting slo middleware to delete all segments | 08:11 |
| charz | When client try to use POST (multiple object delete api) to delete a SLO object, it seems like I don't see the mulitpart-delete request in logs | 08:12 |
| kota_ | charz: not sure it works correctly in *INTERNAL CLIENT* pipeline. I don't think we had the test in swift3 repo | 08:12 |
| charz | kota_: okay, it works for normal object. | 08:13 |
| charz | kota_: I saw the multipart-delete request sent by swift3, but I don't see any proxy/object logs for that. | 08:15 |
| charz | kota_: let me create a bug and put some logs, hope that can help. | 08:16 |
| kota_ | er - | 08:18 |
| kota_ | charz: let me know if the delete request occurred but not loggedl right? | 08:19 |
| kota_ | s/loggdl/logged/ | 08:19 |
| charz | kota_: correct, I saw proxy into https://github.com/openstack/swift3/blob/master/swift3/controllers/multi_delete.py#L106 , but I don't see the request likes `DELETE account/conatiner/object?multipart-manifest?delete` to delete the SLO. | 08:22 |
| charz | kota_: And I can see the SLO(manifest/segment) still in there. | 08:23 |
| kota_ | oh, so it sounds the request not occurred? | 08:23 |
| charz | When I removed remove the `query=query` in https://github.com/openstack/swift3/blob/master/swift3/controllers/multi_delete.py#L106, | 08:24 |
| charz | The manifest just deleted, but still have segments, it makes sense. | 08:24 |
| charz | But I can't understand why add query (`multipart-manifest?delete`) won't work. | 08:25 |
| kota_ | so it sounds, it gets wrong query for slo? | 08:25 |
| * kota_ have to look at recent slo changes | 08:25 | |
| charz | kota_: maybe, but when I check the response code in the delete request, I got `200 ok` response form internal client. | 08:27 |
| charz | :q! | 08:28 |
| kota_ | charz: hmm... it seems the test for delete completed multi upload object was missing :/ | 08:35 |
| kota_ | https://github.com/openstack/swift3/blob/master/swift3/test/unit/test_multi_upload.py <- looking at this | 08:36 |
| kota_ | perhaps, adding the test there is a good starting point to know what happans. | 08:36 |
| charz | kota_: agreed! just created a bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/swift3/+bug/1705409 | 08:41 |
| openstack | Launchpad bug 1705409 in Swift3 "Delete Multiple Objects API won't able to delete multipart objects" [Undecided,New] | 08:41 |
| *** mathiasb has quit IRC | 08:41 | |
| kota_ | charz: thx! | 08:41 |
| kota_ | woops? my accidental rebasing broke something on patch 477000? | 08:42 |
| patchbot | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/477000/ - swift - Ring rebalance respects co-builders' last_part_moves | 08:42 |
| kota_ | the failure test looks not related to anything... :/ | 08:42 |
| *** mathiasb has joined #openstack-swift | 08:42 | |
| acoles | kota_: I'm looking | 08:53 |
| kota_ | acoles: thx | 08:53 |
| openstackgerrit | Kota Tsuyuzaki proposed openstack/swift master: WIP: Consideration for avoiding RingBuilder change as possible https://review.openstack.org/485469 | 08:54 |
| kota_ | the following my patch doesn't get failed at the py27 tox (i just had a fault on pep8, though) so it looks periodic failure or something? | 08:55 |
| acoles | kota_: I can't reproduce so recheck | 09:01 |
| * kota_ is being offline for openstack days tokyo booth crawling and an after event. will up to look at patch 477000 again with a fresh head tommorow morning | 09:02 | |
| patchbot | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/477000/ - swift - Ring rebalance respects co-builders' last_part_moves | 09:02 |
| kota_ | acoles: i had issued the recheck already :| | 09:02 |
| kota_ | acoles: but thanks for checking on your env too | 09:02 |
| acoles | kota_: have a good night | 09:05 |
| *** hoonetorg has joined #openstack-swift | 09:10 | |
| *** oshritf has quit IRC | 09:11 | |
| *** winggundamth has quit IRC | 09:15 | |
| *** oshritf has joined #openstack-swift | 09:25 | |
| *** cshastri has quit IRC | 09:34 | |
| *** oshritf has quit IRC | 09:34 | |
| *** oshritf has joined #openstack-swift | 09:41 | |
| *** mvk has quit IRC | 09:43 | |
| *** cshastri has joined #openstack-swift | 09:47 | |
| openstackgerrit | bhavani proposed openstack/swift master: Stop using deprecated 'message' attribute in Exception https://review.openstack.org/483300 | 10:04 |
| *** mvk has joined #openstack-swift | 10:10 | |
| *** kiennt has quit IRC | 10:30 | |
| *** frank_young has quit IRC | 10:32 | |
| *** cshastri has quit IRC | 10:33 | |
| *** frank_young has joined #openstack-swift | 10:42 | |
| *** frank_young has quit IRC | 10:48 | |
| *** hoonetorg has quit IRC | 10:52 | |
| *** oshritf has quit IRC | 11:02 | |
| *** frank_young has joined #openstack-swift | 11:03 | |
| *** oshritf has joined #openstack-swift | 11:05 | |
| *** oshritf has quit IRC | 11:12 | |
| *** oshritf has joined #openstack-swift | 11:26 | |
| *** hoonetorg has joined #openstack-swift | 11:29 | |
| *** oshritf has quit IRC | 11:29 | |
| *** caiobrentano has joined #openstack-swift | 11:33 | |
| openstackgerrit | bhavani proposed openstack/swift master: Stop using deprecated 'message' attribute in Exception https://review.openstack.org/483300 | 11:33 |
| *** oshritf has joined #openstack-swift | 11:35 | |
| openstackgerrit | Alistair Coles proposed openstack/swift master: Add reconstructor section to deployment guide https://review.openstack.org/485569 | 11:38 |
| openstackgerrit | Alistair Coles proposed openstack/swift master: Add more structure to the deployment guide https://review.openstack.org/485570 | 11:38 |
| *** oshritf has quit IRC | 11:43 | |
| *** caiobrentano has quit IRC | 11:45 | |
| *** oshritf has joined #openstack-swift | 11:49 | |
| *** hoonetorg has quit IRC | 12:03 | |
| *** MVenesio has joined #openstack-swift | 12:04 | |
| *** chlong_ has joined #openstack-swift | 12:16 | |
| *** gkadam has quit IRC | 12:28 | |
| *** caiobrentano has joined #openstack-swift | 12:32 | |
| *** catintheroof has joined #openstack-swift | 12:36 | |
| *** oshritf has quit IRC | 12:42 | |
| *** oshritf has joined #openstack-swift | 12:47 | |
| *** lucasxu has joined #openstack-swift | 13:19 | |
| *** frank_young has quit IRC | 13:35 | |
| *** chlong_ has quit IRC | 13:40 | |
| *** frank_young has joined #openstack-swift | 14:07 | |
| *** frank_young has quit IRC | 14:12 | |
| *** vint_bra has joined #openstack-swift | 14:21 | |
| *** oshritf has quit IRC | 14:32 | |
| *** lucasxu has quit IRC | 14:39 | |
| *** hoonetorg has joined #openstack-swift | 14:56 | |
| *** hoonetorg has quit IRC | 14:57 | |
| *** chlong_ has joined #openstack-swift | 14:57 | |
| *** hoonetorg has joined #openstack-swift | 14:57 | |
| *** caiobrentano has quit IRC | 15:01 | |
| *** caiobrentano has joined #openstack-swift | 15:02 | |
| *** caiobrentano has quit IRC | 15:04 | |
| *** caiobrentano has joined #openstack-swift | 15:04 | |
| *** frank_young has joined #openstack-swift | 15:05 | |
| *** caiobrentano has quit IRC | 15:08 | |
| *** frank_young has quit IRC | 15:09 | |
| *** lucasxu has joined #openstack-swift | 15:22 | |
| *** rcernin has quit IRC | 15:25 | |
| *** caiobrentano has joined #openstack-swift | 15:26 | |
| *** hoonetorg has quit IRC | 15:27 | |
| timburke | good morning | 15:29 |
| *** caiobrentano_ has joined #openstack-swift | 15:30 | |
| *** caiobrentano has quit IRC | 15:30 | |
| *** hoonetorg has joined #openstack-swift | 15:35 | |
| tdasilva | timburke: good morning | 15:38 |
| tdasilva | timur: around? | 15:39 |
| timburke | whooo! isa_l_rs_cauchy's verified clean! | 15:40 |
| *** psachin has quit IRC | 15:41 | |
| tdasilva | \o/ | 15:43 |
| *** Renich has joined #openstack-swift | 15:44 | |
| acoles | timburke: good to hear :) | 15:49 |
| acoles | timburke: I guess we'll both reviewing patch 478416 - I already have one diff that I think is necessary, maybe I'll leave it 24 hours and then if we have others I will apply them all and push a new version of the patch (in clayg's absence)? | 15:59 |
| patchbot | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/478416/ - swift - Add multiple worker processes strategy to reconstr... | 15:59 |
| acoles | notmyname: cc ^^ | 16:00 |
| openstackgerrit | Alistair Coles proposed openstack/swift master: Add more structure to the deployment guide https://review.openstack.org/485570 | 16:02 |
| *** itlinux has joined #openstack-swift | 16:19 | |
| *** chlong_ has quit IRC | 16:19 | |
| *** mvk has quit IRC | 16:21 | |
| *** itlinux has quit IRC | 16:21 | |
| *** itlinux has joined #openstack-swift | 16:22 | |
| *** saint_ has joined #openstack-swift | 16:23 | |
| notmyname | good morning | 16:24 |
| notmyname | that's great news on the cauchy matrix! | 16:25 |
| notmyname | tdasilva: timur isn't around yet, but I'll guess he'll be at his desk momentarily | 16:25 |
| tdasilva | notmyname: no worries, i started looking at this patch and just left him a quick question there | 16:26 |
| notmyname | ack | 16:26 |
| *** frank_young has joined #openstack-swift | 16:27 | |
| *** frank_young has quit IRC | 16:31 | |
| *** SkyRocknRoll has joined #openstack-swift | 16:32 | |
| *** tesseract has quit IRC | 16:32 | |
| *** rcernin has joined #openstack-swift | 16:33 | |
| *** kallenp has joined #openstack-swift | 16:38 | |
| *** kallenp has left #openstack-swift | 16:38 | |
| *** SkyRocknRoll has quit IRC | 16:44 | |
| *** lucasxu has quit IRC | 16:51 | |
| *** caiobrentano_ has quit IRC | 16:56 | |
| *** tonanhngo has joined #openstack-swift | 16:57 | |
| *** lucasxu has joined #openstack-swift | 16:58 | |
| *** klrmn has joined #openstack-swift | 17:07 | |
| *** SkyRocknRoll has joined #openstack-swift | 17:13 | |
| *** tesseract has joined #openstack-swift | 17:18 | |
| *** SkyRocknRoll has quit IRC | 17:22 | |
| *** chlong_ has joined #openstack-swift | 17:32 | |
| *** SkyRocknRoll has joined #openstack-swift | 17:32 | |
| tdasilva | mathiasb, jrichli, timburke: just fyi..the python-barbicanclient patch has merged... | 18:04 |
| jrichli | yay! thanks tdasilva | 18:05 |
| timburke | interesting... i wonder what all that plumbing will look like if there's ever a v2... i suppose the osc_plugin will probably just grow a `version='v' + version` kwarg | 18:08 |
| notmyname | tdasilva: nice | 18:10 |
| tdasilva | timburke: yeah, that's what I assumed...sort of just punted the problem for later | 18:13 |
| timur | tdasilva: hey! I left a pointer to one of your questions. The functional tests I'll try to get to today or tomorrow | 18:14 |
| timur | I have to finish fighting with an internal bug first :( | 18:14 |
| tdasilva | timur: yeah, saw that, I did some testing and will leave some comments | 18:14 |
| tdasilva | i think we are missing just tests and docs | 18:14 |
| *** frank_young has joined #openstack-swift | 18:15 | |
| tdasilva | do we also want to get slo patch in for this release? | 18:15 |
| timur | tdasilva: yes, I think both need to go in | 18:15 |
| timur | because with the first patch the failure mode when you submit a stream > maximum object size is not great | 18:15 |
| tdasilva | oh cool, yeah, i did not test that big of a file ;) | 18:16 |
| tdasilva | probably should have | 18:16 |
| timur | I was debating on squashing the two changes -- let me know if that would be easier to review or not | 18:16 |
| timur | tdasilva: well, you can probably change your cluster limits ;) | 18:16 |
| tdasilva | I probably should | 18:17 |
| tdasilva | timur: thinking very quickly (without looking at the slo patch) i'd imagine it makes sense to squash just so that for example documentation is all together, otherwise you would have to break them up | 18:18 |
| tdasilva | probably makes sense to write it all together...idk...or just keep the docs in the second patch | 18:18 |
| *** frank_young has quit IRC | 18:19 | |
| timur | tdasilva: I can see that argument. Or I can add documentation to each one or write a separate patch. I don't know what the "swift" way would be. My tendency is to try to make small incremental, self-contained changes, which is how this started | 18:20 |
| tdasilva | timur: either way is fine, small enough patch, i'm just we can make it work (and yes, i do like the idea of keeping patches small and self-contained) | 18:21 |
| *** geaaru has quit IRC | 18:25 | |
| *** Sukhdev has joined #openstack-swift | 18:28 | |
| *** hoonetorg has quit IRC | 18:49 | |
| *** SkyRocknRoll has quit IRC | 18:50 | |
| *** ChubYann has joined #openstack-swift | 18:53 | |
| *** frank_young has joined #openstack-swift | 18:54 | |
| *** frank_young has quit IRC | 18:58 | |
| *** itlinux has quit IRC | 19:38 | |
| *** openstack has joined #openstack-swift | 19:59 | |
| timur | tdasilva: about the --no-slo flag (or something like it), I've thought about that too. I think it'd be nice to add it, because otherwise there is no way to say "I know what I want and that is not an SLO. I promise my stream is < max object size" | 20:01 |
| timur | That's a new shell option, though, that's oddly specific to stdin uploads :\ | 20:02 |
| tdasilva | timur: yeah, that's honestly i'm a little worried about automating the --use-slo for *just* from stdin | 20:02 |
| tdasilva | I'm trying to weight in if it would make sense to keep it consistent with the current behavior that user must pass --use-slo | 20:03 |
| tdasilva | or maybe change behavior for both | 20:03 |
| tdasilva | do you know what S3 clients (e.g., s3cmd) does? | 20:04 |
| timur | what happens if a user tries to upload a file larger than max size today? | 20:04 |
| tdasilva | timur: I'd expect it would throw an error, but i haven't tried tbh - timburke ??? | 20:04 |
| tdasilva | i guess i really need to adjust my ansible-saio to build bigger drives :) | 20:05 |
| timburke | as i recall, we just error out on the 413 | 20:06 |
| timburke | tdasilva: you could also just crank down the max_object_size | 20:07 |
| tdasilva | timburke: duh | 20:07 |
| timburke | er, max_file_size, rather | 20:09 |
| *** openstackgerrit has quit IRC | 20:17 | |
| *** frank_young has joined #openstack-swift | 20:23 | |
| *** frank_young has quit IRC | 20:27 | |
| *** Sukhdev has quit IRC | 20:53 | |
| *** lucasxu has quit IRC | 21:02 | |
| *** catintheroof has quit IRC | 21:10 | |
| *** chlong_ has quit IRC | 21:16 | |
| *** itlinux has joined #openstack-swift | 21:19 | |
| *** mvk has joined #openstack-swift | 21:20 | |
| tdasilva | so...when using keystone middleware, if a user has the admin role, does that mean that has R/W permission for other projects rather than his own? | 21:27 |
| tdasilva | I thought only ResellerAdmin would have that | 21:27 |
| notmyname | yeah, that's the default (ResellerAdmin) | 21:28 |
| tdasilva | while running func test again master, i'm seeing errors here: https://github.com/openstack/swift/blob/master/test/functional/test_versioned_writes.py#L542 | 21:29 |
| tdasilva | i'm assuming this is an error in my configuration since we are not seeing failures on the gate | 21:29 |
| tdasilva | but can't figure out where | 21:29 |
| *** frank_young has joined #openstack-swift | 21:42 | |
| *** frank_young has quit IRC | 21:46 | |
| *** tonanhngo has quit IRC | 22:19 | |
| *** tonanhngo has joined #openstack-swift | 22:19 | |
| *** tonanhngo has joined #openstack-swift | 22:26 | |
| *** vint_bra has quit IRC | 22:26 | |
| *** tonanhngo has quit IRC | 22:30 | |
| *** tesseract has quit IRC | 22:37 | |
| *** openstackgerrit has joined #openstack-swift | 22:48 | |
| openstackgerrit | John Dickinson proposed openstack/swift master: 2.15.0 authors and changelog update https://review.openstack.org/485839 | 22:48 |
| *** frank_young has joined #openstack-swift | 23:00 | |
| *** frank_young has quit IRC | 23:05 | |
| *** Sukhdev has joined #openstack-swift | 23:15 | |
| *** Sukhdev has quit IRC | 23:15 | |
| *** Sukhdev has joined #openstack-swift | 23:16 | |
| *** Renich has quit IRC | 23:20 | |
| *** Sukhdev has quit IRC | 23:48 | |
| *** frank_young has joined #openstack-swift | 23:50 | |
| openstackgerrit | John Dickinson proposed openstack/python-swiftclient master: 3.4.0 authors/changelog update https://review.openstack.org/485859 | 23:50 |
| *** frank_young has quit IRC | 23:54 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.15.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!