Wednesday, 2017-06-28

*** tonanhngo has quit IRC00:18
*** tonanhngo has joined #openstack-swift00:18
*** tonanhngo has quit IRC00:18
*** tovin07_ has joined #openstack-swift00:50
claygrledisez: I think it would be really helpful to me if I could see your handoff/sync_only and override_devices plumbing... you just did everything from the commandline right?  you only have a single .conf for all reconstructors?00:55
*** pdardeau has joined #openstack-swift00:58
kota_good morning01:01
kota_clayg: patch 459023 ?01:02
patchbothttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/459023/ - liberasurecode - Consistently use zlib for crc3201:02
claygdo you have any idea about that change?  tdasilva was asking and timburke is out?01:03
kota_looking01:03
claygtimburke says "it's really bad but it should be impossible to cause a problem" "tdasilva says - yeah i think this would break me"01:04
kota_i'm not entierly sure but the second topic on the commit message seemed to effect timburke's activity IIRC01:05
kota_saying "load timing of zlib"01:05
kota_and the order of load timing (strictly which lib is used, zlib or hard corded in the liberasurecode) affects to the result of crc checksum, maybe?01:07
kota_and he hit the different crc with same data in... maybe his mac os01:07
* kota_ is moving to bug report description to understand what is the bad problem01:09
* kota_ is on https://bugs.launchpad.net/liberasurecode/+bug/166632001:09
openstackLaunchpad bug 1666320 in liberasurecode "crc32 implementation is schizophrenic" [Undecided,In progress] - Assigned to Tim Burke (1-tim-z)01:09
kota_probably the bad case is as Bad news: Despite comments declaring that these are using the same polynomials [3], they're not! The first implements CRC32C [4], while the table-based implementation seems to be based off of zlib [5].01:10
openstackgerritliuyamin proposed openstack/swift master: Fix the reST field raises in docstrings  https://review.openstack.org/45114301:11
*** itlinux has joined #openstack-swift01:13
tdasilvakota_: clayg I mean, i'm not even sure i was testing things correctly really, but basically I put an object into a ec storage policy and then pointed timburke's script at one of the fragments and got a mismatch01:14
tdasilvafrom what I understood, timburke expected that never to happen01:14
claygyeah same here  - it WOMM then I tried it on another node after you called shenanigans01:15
kota_tdasilva: check_crc.py in lp?01:15
claygyeah, so we disproved that - so hopefully he can come back with some better plan?01:15
tdasilvakota_: yeah01:15
claygkota_: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/307221898/check_crc.py01:15
kota_alright, I will look at the patch with priority01:16
claygok, so that settles that - it's every bit as scary as it looks01:16
claygkota_: I don't think that patch can merge as is - let's wait for more info from timburke next week01:16
claygtdasilva: you're wanting to do a pyeclib/libec release - yeah?01:16
tdasilvaclayg: kota_ mean while, i'd like to do a release of libec, but maybe we can wait until next week when timburke is back01:16
claygtdasilva: don't hold up for this patch - it's not ready01:16
tdasilvaclayg: yeah!01:17
kota_i think, what I can tell right now is we should add zlib in dindep.txt if we want to use it always.01:17
kota_timburke: ok01:17
tdasilvakota_: but i did check that my system has zlib installed, so I think it's not a matter of zlib being on the system, but whether it is getting loaded or not???01:18
claygkota_: timburke was trying to explain that somehow that if you start not-using zlib then it dynamically changes to start using zlib all hell breaks loose?  It's possible the nodes tdasilva and I found where check_crc returns "mismatch" are at dire risk of one misplaced package install quarantineing the entire datadir01:19
claygtdasilva: good point - i'm getting the mismatch on a node with zlib and zlib-dev installed01:19
claygtdasilva: so maybe it *is* somehow build time?  i wonder why timburke says it's run time...01:20
tdasilvamaybe zaitcev has some clues on this??? ^^^01:21
kota_clayg: IIRC, we could have a chance to create the situation in running time01:21
kota_maybe... pre-loading for .so files...01:21
tdasilvameanwhile i'm going to update https://review.openstack.org/#/c/471084/ and hopefully we can get that merged ??01:21
patchbotpatch 471084 - liberasurecode - Release 1.5.001:21
kota_I forget how to set but basically it can be by sort of environment variable01:22
kota_it looks like https://stackoverflow.com/questions/426230/what-is-the-ld-preload-trick01:22
claygoh right, not if it's installed, more like when it's loaded01:22
kota_something like `LD_PRELOAD=/path/to/my/zlib.so ` or liberasurecode or both...01:23
kota_I'll try it01:23
*** JimCheung has quit IRC01:24
*** JimCheung has joined #openstack-swift01:25
claygLD_PRELOAD=/usr/local/lib/liberasurecode.so.1.4.0 ./check_crc.py /srv/node3/sdb3/objects-1/589/c2b/93464008f434853ad9b74c8c5381ac2b/1498598728.24878#2#d.data01:25
clayg^ says mismatch on a node that previously said OK01:25
kota_oh yeah01:26
claygbut that's bullshit... shouldn't the check script not be effected by runtime bullshit in the same way!?01:26
clayglike it doesn't even load pyeclib?01:26
kota_i think, if NOT preload liberasurecode will use zlib because python requires zlib.so loaded01:26
claygbut where does check_crc load liberasurecode?  some throwing the damn .so into the mix replace something in zlib's brain!?01:28
* kota_ is looking at check_crc.py01:28
*** cshastri has joined #openstack-swift01:29
kota_ah, it doesn't use liberasurecode, ok.01:29
* kota_ is thinking01:29
*** JimCheung has quit IRC01:29
kota_hmm... no idea, right now. need deep dive into the change and the problem01:32
*** davidchu has joined #openstack-swift01:36
*** davidchu has left #openstack-swift01:37
claygi hate that bug report01:44
kota_:/01:44
*** gyee has quit IRC01:53
kota_LD_PRELOAD="/usr/local/lib/liberasurecode.so /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libz.so" python check_crc.py 1478688450.50122#2#d.data -> mismatch02:01
*** itlinux has quit IRC02:01
kota_LD_PRELOAD="/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libz.so /usr/local/lib/liberasurecode.so" python check_crc.py 1478688450.50122#2#d.data -> match02:01
kota_so it looks like libz should be loaded before liberasurecode.so02:02
* kota_ is going to dive into liberasurecode liking02:02
kota_linking02:02
*** mat128 has quit IRC02:27
kota_clayg: it looks like symbol search problem, if i understand correctly02:31
claygsymbol search problem!?  Can we use ML to train it to better recognize the symbols?02:32
kota_clayg: maybe zlib and liberasurecode have conflict function name as crc32 and then, when calling crc302:32
claygsymbolism is hard for computers IME02:32
kota_crc32 in liberasurecod.so is used02:33
kota_LD_DEBUG=symbols,bindings python check_crc.py 1478688450.50122#2#d.data02:33
claygso liberasurecode monkey patches zlib - LAME02:33
kota_this find zlib crc32 symbol02:33
kota_but02:33
kota_LD_PRELOAD="/usr/local/lib/liberasurecode.so" LD_DEBUG=symbols,bindings python check_crc.py 1478688450.50122#2#d.data02:33
kota_shows only liberasurecode's crc3202:34
*** htruta` has quit IRC02:34
*** raginbajin has quit IRC02:34
* kota_ is trying to rename the liberasurecode's crc32...02:34
*** htruta has joined #openstack-swift02:35
kota_clayg: https://gist.github.com/bloodeagle40234/011251d8377d6a53c6dffab203400b5502:39
*** aselius has quit IRC02:40
*** tonyb_ is now known as tonyb02:40
kota_clayg: it's interesting. that small change save the preloaded liberasurecode problem.02:40
*** raginbajin has joined #openstack-swift02:40
*** lucasxu has joined #openstack-swift02:40
* kota_ means LD_PRELOAD="/usr/local/lib/liberasurecode.so" LD_DEBUG=symbols,bindings python check_crc.py 1478688450.50122#2#d.data becomes OK02:40
claygin that it always uses the zlib crc32 implementation - which I think is what timburkes change accomplishes02:41
kota_yeah02:41
claygbut... if we ship that - and new libec encounters some frag written down the crc32_l it will check against zlib crc32 and conclude things don't match02:42
kota_good point02:42
kota_if the libec's crc32 was used in some ec fragments, they could be handled as broken :/02:43
kota_that sounds problematci02:44
kota_tic02:44
kota_but... no way to find the used lib for crc32?02:45
kota_a couple of ways to handle the case...02:48
kota_1. ignore, if mismatch crc found but the frags created by older libec version02:49
kota_2. keepking current crc32 imple with renaming and then, try both impl against to check crc02:50
kota_against to a fragment02:50
claygI'd love to compare a hexdump of my bad frags with a hexdump from tdasilva's bad frags02:50
claygI can't find anywhere in this metadata where the crc32_l checksum is written down - and yet i'm not quarantining frags left and right - so I don't really know what's going on?02:51
claygisn't there a pyeclib thing to get the metadata - does it check the checksum?02:52
kota_clayg: in usual case, python requires zlib at first so the crc32 symbol should be find at zlib IIRC02:52
kota_if you're using pyeclib02:52
kota_I'm not sure if we can find the case liberasurecode loaded first02:53
claygyeah except I have a frag on a node in my lab - and it definitely doesn't have the zlib crc written down where the check_crc script is expecting it02:53
kota_timburke may know though02:53
claygtimburke said nope, and me and tdasilva both found existence proofs02:53
kota_hmm... interesting02:55
* kota_ goes to lunch02:55
*** lucasxu has quit IRC02:56
*** JimCheung has joined #openstack-swift02:57
*** lucasxu has joined #openstack-swift03:07
*** gkadam has joined #openstack-swift03:18
mattoliverauHey all, fyi, I'm currently driving between beach house and Melbourne.. about 1/3 - 1/2 way.. don't think I'll make the 007 meeting, but I I'll try :)03:19
kota_mattoliverau: enjoy!03:19
mattoliverau(noting it's an 8 - 9 hour drive without breaks)03:20
kota_wow03:20
claygis that tonite?  I wonder if I'll be up...03:28
*** JimCheung has quit IRC03:33
*** itlinux has joined #openstack-swift03:38
*** noark9 has joined #openstack-swift03:45
*** links has joined #openstack-swift04:00
*** lucasxu has quit IRC04:06
*** JimCheung has joined #openstack-swift04:07
*** psachin has joined #openstack-swift04:09
*** klrmn has quit IRC04:09
*** JimCheung has quit IRC04:11
*** qwertyco has joined #openstack-swift04:47
*** itlinux has quit IRC05:15
*** ChubYann has quit IRC05:42
*** pdardeau has quit IRC05:49
*** pdardeau has joined #openstack-swift05:59
mahatic_clayg: yup, in an hour from now06:00
*** rcernin has joined #openstack-swift06:02
*** cschwede has joined #openstack-swift06:12
*** ChanServ sets mode: +v cschwede06:12
*** skudlik has joined #openstack-swift06:15
openstackgerritVan Hung Pham proposed openstack/swift master: Switch from oslosphinx to openstackdocstheme  https://review.openstack.org/47840206:39
*** hseipp has joined #openstack-swift06:52
cschwedeHi! Note: Swift meeting starting in 4 minutes in #openstack-swift06:56
acolesgood morning06:57
mathiasbgood morning!07:01
cschwedehmm, is the meetbot on #openstack-meetings dead?07:01
mahatic_cschwede: fwiw, I don't see your nick on #openstack-meeting07:01
tovin07_cschwede, #openstack-meeting not #openstack-meetings07:02
tovin07_without `s` :D07:02
acolesI'm in #openstack-meeting and see no activity, did we start yet?07:03
mahatic_acoles: it started now07:03
acolesmahatic_: k :)07:03
cschwedebummer, yes. i have a new bouncer, epic fail :/07:03
*** m_kazuhiro has joined #openstack-swift07:04
*** tesseract has joined #openstack-swift07:08
*** oshritf_ has joined #openstack-swift07:41
rledisezclayg: here is my reconstructor revert/sync only patch + init script + relevant conf https://gist.github.com/rledisez/f905dcca6be565da04ee12efdae8ad5207:42
*** m_kazuhiro_ has joined #openstack-swift07:45
openstackgerritClay Gerrard proposed openstack/swift master: WIP: Add multiple worker processes strategy to reconstructor  https://review.openstack.org/47841607:47
*** m_kazuhiro has quit IRC07:48
claygrledisez: ^ I think this patch could potentially simply some of that then07:49
claygrledisez: i'd love some feedback before getting too deep into testing07:50
claygI think after merging https://review.openstack.org/#/c/428408/07:51
patchbotpatch 428408 - swift - Don't rehash primaries in reconstructor handoffs_o...07:51
claygit will be easier to add the -r and -s options - the sync_group_size and revert_group_size is going to be a little different ... I expect to just set workers = X in the .conf07:52
*** gkadam is now known as gkadam-afk07:53
*** cbartz has joined #openstack-swift07:59
acolescschwede: thank you for chairing the meeting08:00
claygcschwede: did you name the next chair?08:00
mahatic_cschwede: thank you08:00
rledisezcschwede: good job! thx08:01
cschwedeno problem, you're welcome! surprised by how fast time went by08:01
clayg👉 👃08:01
cschwedeclayg: no, i didn't :/08:01
acolescschwede: I just realised that clayg precedes you alphabetically so he should have chaired today!! :P08:01
cschwedeclayg: are you volunteering? ;)08:01
clayghttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nose_goes08:01
acoleshehee08:01
mahatic_hehe08:03
* acoles away for breakfast08:03
mahatic_acoles: enjoy08:03
*** m_kazuhiro_ has quit IRC08:06
*** joeljwright has joined #openstack-swift08:23
*** ChanServ sets mode: +v joeljwright08:23
openstackgerritVan Hung Pham proposed openstack/swift master: Switch from oslosphinx to openstackdocstheme  https://review.openstack.org/47840209:08
*** pcaruana has joined #openstack-swift09:28
acolesrledisez: I'm just working on some tests for patch 47265909:30
patchbothttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/472659/ - swift - Allow to rebuild a fragment of an expired object09:30
rledisezacoles: thx! you also mentioned a probe test that could be easily modified?09:39
*** mvk has quit IRC09:46
*** yiorgos_272 has joined #openstack-swift09:52
acolesrledisez: yes we can probably adapt this https://review.openstack.org/#/c/460073/09:53
patchbotpatch 460073 - swift - Add probe test for ssync of unexpired metadata to ...09:53
openstackgerritVan Hung Pham proposed openstack/swift master: Switch from oslosphinx to openstackdocstheme  https://review.openstack.org/47840209:53
*** yiorgos_272 has left #openstack-swift09:54
*** rcernin has quit IRC09:55
*** mat128 has joined #openstack-swift09:58
*** gkadam-afk is now known as gkadam09:59
*** tovin07_ has quit IRC10:02
*** rcernin has joined #openstack-swift10:03
*** rcernin has quit IRC10:09
*** rcernin has joined #openstack-swift10:11
*** mvk has joined #openstack-swift10:13
*** joeljwright has quit IRC10:13
*** noark9 has quit IRC10:49
*** qwertyco has quit IRC10:51
*** amit213 has quit IRC11:02
*** pdardeau has quit IRC11:05
*** cshastri has quit IRC11:10
*** pdardeau has joined #openstack-swift11:15
*** pcaruana has quit IRC12:02
*** pcaruana has joined #openstack-swift12:02
*** geaaru has joined #openstack-swift12:03
notmynamegood morning12:11
notmynamecschwede: thanks for running the meeting. I'll read over the logs later12:13
cschwedenotmyname: no problem, you're welcome! next time i need to shrink the agenda a bit... run out of time12:15
notmynameheh12:15
notmynameI have *no* idea what you mean ;-)12:15
*** chlong_ has quit IRC12:15
cschwedenotmyname: i'm sure that never happened to you ;)12:16
*** pcaruana has quit IRC12:16
cschwedenotmyname: biggest topics: i set up an etherpad for queens ptg (https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/swift-ptg-queens) based on our pike etherpad, hope that's ok. also two action items for myself until next week12:17
notmynamewonderful12:17
notmynamethank you12:17
*** noark9 has joined #openstack-swift12:19
notmynameI'm at a "partner training" today and tomorrow in boston. I'm not sure yet how busy it will be (wrt being online and following up on swift things)12:19
*** pcaruana has joined #openstack-swift12:23
*** pcaruana has quit IRC12:23
*** pcaruana has joined #openstack-swift12:23
*** pcaruana has quit IRC12:29
*** pcaruana has joined #openstack-swift12:37
*** pcaruana has quit IRC12:43
*** pcaruana has joined #openstack-swift12:44
*** MVenesio has joined #openstack-swift12:44
*** gkadam has quit IRC12:51
*** hseipp has quit IRC12:53
*** pcaruana has quit IRC12:53
*** saint_ has joined #openstack-swift13:01
*** hseipp has joined #openstack-swift13:04
*** pcaruana has joined #openstack-swift13:05
*** saint__ has joined #openstack-swift13:12
*** pcaruana has quit IRC13:13
*** lucasxu has joined #openstack-swift13:14
*** pcaruana has joined #openstack-swift13:14
*** links has quit IRC13:16
*** saint_ has quit IRC13:16
*** saint__ has quit IRC13:25
*** klamath has joined #openstack-swift13:26
*** klamath has quit IRC13:26
*** klamath has joined #openstack-swift13:27
*** saint_ has joined #openstack-swift13:28
*** links has joined #openstack-swift13:32
*** chlong_ has joined #openstack-swift13:34
openstackgerritAlistair Coles proposed openstack/swift master: Allow to rebuild a fragment of an expired object  https://review.openstack.org/47265913:34
openstackgerritAlistair Coles proposed openstack/swift master: Allow to rebuild a fragment of an expired object  https://review.openstack.org/47265913:38
acolesrledisez: ^^ added unit and probe tests13:38
*** zhurong_ has joined #openstack-swift13:38
*** pcaruana has quit IRC13:40
*** pcaruana has joined #openstack-swift13:46
*** links has quit IRC13:56
*** saint_ has quit IRC14:03
*** saint_ has joined #openstack-swift14:04
*** jaosorior has quit IRC14:05
*** jaosorior has joined #openstack-swift14:08
*** ouchkernel has joined #openstack-swift14:08
tdasilvainteresting discussion this morning about bug triaging. One point to make is that maybe we need to change our processes a bit (or maybe I need to change my own process) where we (I) focus more on the patches in gerrit on what TODO and instead we should change focus to bugs (launchpad or future storyboard)14:08
tdasilvaFor example, we have the Swift Priortity patches on the wiki, but maybe the priority list should be the list of bugs and how they get prioritized there.14:09
*** ouchkernel has quit IRC14:09
*** ouchkernel has joined #openstack-swift14:10
*** saint_ has quit IRC14:32
acolestdasilva: good point - it's too easy to not see the gaps (bugs that are not being worked on)14:48
tdasilvaacoles: yeah, i think if we do a good job of focusing on the bugs we can make the list there be a good point for knowing what to review, what to fix and also the priorities14:56
*** vinsh has joined #openstack-swift14:56
*** hseipp has quit IRC15:00
*** hseipp has joined #openstack-swift15:00
*** zhurong_ has quit IRC15:03
*** geaaru has quit IRC15:06
*** rcernin has quit IRC15:06
*** links has joined #openstack-swift15:07
*** klamath has quit IRC15:07
*** gyee has joined #openstack-swift15:07
*** klamath has joined #openstack-swift15:07
*** hseipp has quit IRC15:15
*** hseipp has joined #openstack-swift15:16
*** geaaru has joined #openstack-swift15:17
*** klamath has quit IRC15:18
*** klamath has joined #openstack-swift15:19
*** aselius has joined #openstack-swift15:29
*** ouchkern_ has joined #openstack-swift15:29
*** ouchkernel has quit IRC15:30
*** skudlik has quit IRC15:32
*** ouchkern_ has quit IRC15:34
*** links has quit IRC15:36
*** geaaru has quit IRC15:38
*** vinsh has quit IRC15:42
*** klrmn has joined #openstack-swift15:42
*** ouchkernel has joined #openstack-swift15:50
*** ouchkern_ has joined #openstack-swift15:55
*** ouchkernel has quit IRC15:58
*** Sukhdev_ has joined #openstack-swift15:58
*** ouchkern_ has quit IRC15:59
*** itlinux has joined #openstack-swift16:01
*** klrmn has quit IRC16:08
*** ouchkernel has joined #openstack-swift16:09
*** psachin has quit IRC16:10
*** ouchkern_ has joined #openstack-swift16:14
*** ouchkernel has quit IRC16:16
*** cschwede has quit IRC16:21
*** klamath has quit IRC16:24
*** Sukhdev_ has quit IRC16:25
*** cbartz has quit IRC16:25
*** ouchkernel has joined #openstack-swift16:26
*** ouchkern_ has quit IRC16:27
*** ouchkernel has quit IRC16:28
*** ouchkernel has joined #openstack-swift16:28
*** ouchkern_ has joined #openstack-swift16:32
*** ouchkernel has quit IRC16:35
*** JimCheung has joined #openstack-swift16:39
*** noark9 has quit IRC16:49
*** oshritf_ has quit IRC16:50
clayg@acoles whoot!16:50
claygacoles: no new version of patch 477000 today?16:50
patchbothttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/477000/ - swift - WIP: Ring rebalance respects co-builders' last_par...16:50
claygkota_: ^ did you look at this? torgomatic ^16:51
claygtdasilva: what's going on with cschwede 's bounder situation?  he's never around async anymore?16:52
zaitcevwow, this still exists - http://etherpad.openstack.org/swift316:55
zaitcev201116:56
acolesclayg: not yet but there are hours left ;) (you told me to write some tests for rledisez so I did that)16:58
*** ouchkern_ has quit IRC16:58
*** ujjain has quit IRC16:59
*** ujjain has joined #openstack-swift17:00
*** ujjain has joined #openstack-swift17:00
*** klrmn has joined #openstack-swift17:04
*** ouchkernel has joined #openstack-swift17:07
*** hseipp has quit IRC17:10
*** ouchkern_ has joined #openstack-swift17:11
*** ouchkernel has quit IRC17:13
tdasilvaclayg: hi, not sure about cschwede's bouncer?? he mentioned this morning he was on a new bouncer, so maybe he is still adjusting that...17:18
claygI don't really know how to reply to lp bug #1700585 anymore17:20
openstackLaunchpad bug 1700585 in OpenStack Object Storage (swift) "Slow replication with lack of visibility can cause availability problems (esp. in multi-region)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/170058517:20
claygI want to say: https://gist.github.com/clayg/e87e2b9c69abbe25f45cc09d570687ec (but only for therapy, I don't think it acctually adds anything to the bug report)17:22
claygjrichli: any ideas?17:22
*** ouchkern_ has quit IRC17:22
*** silor has joined #openstack-swift17:23
*** aselius has left #openstack-swift17:23
*** tonanhngo has joined #openstack-swift17:23
*** ouchkernel has joined #openstack-swift17:24
*** tonanhngo has quit IRC17:28
*** ouchkern_ has joined #openstack-swift17:39
tdasilvaclayg: fwiw, I do like the idea of maybe incorporating the partition handoff counts somewhere (e.g., recon) but as you said, then it really becomes up to operators how to tune their environment based on that data17:39
*** ouchkernel has quit IRC17:42
*** tonanhngo has joined #openstack-swift17:42
*** links has joined #openstack-swift17:46
*** tonanhngo has quit IRC17:47
*** tonanhngo has joined #openstack-swift17:53
claygdoing the thing with get_more_nodes to classify handoff/mis-placed is a fairly new thing - i haven't even plummbed that idea in swiftstack telemetry yet17:53
claygbut it was extremely relevant last time I looked at replication issues on a multi-region cluster!17:54
*** klamath has joined #openstack-swift17:54
*** tonanhngo has quit IRC17:58
*** tonanhngo has joined #openstack-swift17:59
*** tonanhngo has quit IRC18:03
*** tonanhngo has joined #openstack-swift18:05
*** tonanhngo has quit IRC18:10
*** Sukhdev_ has joined #openstack-swift18:20
*** mvk has quit IRC18:22
*** links has quit IRC18:30
*** Sukhdev_ has quit IRC18:38
*** ChubYann has joined #openstack-swift18:42
*** chsc has joined #openstack-swift18:47
*** klamath has quit IRC18:50
*** klamath has joined #openstack-swift18:52
*** ouchkern_ has quit IRC18:56
openstackgerritTimur Alperovich proposed openstack/python-swiftclient master: Turn stdin uploads in SLO above 10MB.  https://review.openstack.org/47861119:05
openstackgerritTimur Alperovich proposed openstack/python-swiftclient master: Turn stdin uploads into SLO above 10MB.  https://review.openstack.org/47861119:05
*** peterlisak has quit IRC19:11
*** onovy has quit IRC19:11
*** tonanhngo has joined #openstack-swift19:12
*** tesseract has quit IRC19:13
*** tonanhngo has quit IRC19:16
*** Guest28796 is now known as mgagne19:19
*** mgagne has quit IRC19:19
*** mgagne has joined #openstack-swift19:19
*** tonanhngo has joined #openstack-swift19:24
*** tonanhngo has quit IRC19:29
*** tonanhngo has joined #openstack-swift19:33
*** hseipp has joined #openstack-swift19:46
openstackgerritAlistair Coles proposed openstack/swift master: WIP: Ring rebalance respects co-builders' last_part_moves  https://review.openstack.org/47700020:04
acolesclayg: ^^ still work to do but progress20:04
*** peterlisak has joined #openstack-swift20:08
*** onovy has joined #openstack-swift20:09
*** silor has quit IRC20:14
*** lucasxu has quit IRC20:30
*** ouchkernel has joined #openstack-swift20:36
*** JimCheung has quit IRC20:43
*** JimCheung has joined #openstack-swift20:43
*** hseipp has quit IRC20:46
*** MVenesio has quit IRC20:48
*** pcaruana has quit IRC21:01
*** ouchkernel has quit IRC21:06
*** caiobrentano has joined #openstack-swift21:17
claygtorgomatic: https://bugs.launchpad.net/swift/+bug/169754321:22
openstackLaunchpad bug 1697543 in OpenStack Object Storage (swift) "Ring refuses to save even when 100% parts move" [Medium,Confirmed]21:22
*** klamath has quit IRC21:25
*** klamath has joined #openstack-swift21:26
*** mat128 has quit IRC21:26
*** itlinux has quit IRC21:35
jrichliclayg: sorry i wasn't online earlier.  I haven't followed the exchange, but ill ramp up if you think i could be helpful21:53
openstackgerritSamuel Merritt proposed openstack/swift master: Improve debug logging from ring builder.  https://review.openstack.org/47865721:56
torgomaticclayg ^^21:56
openstackgerritSamuel Merritt proposed openstack/swift master: Improve debug logging from ring builder.  https://review.openstack.org/47865722:09
*** klamath has quit IRC22:10
*** klamath has joined #openstack-swift22:11
*** tonanhngo has quit IRC22:16
*** mvk has joined #openstack-swift22:17
*** chlong_ has quit IRC22:18
*** tonanhngo has joined #openstack-swift22:21
*** tonanhngo has quit IRC22:25
*** caiobrentano has quit IRC22:28
*** caiobrentano has joined #openstack-swift22:29
*** caiobrentano has quit IRC22:29
*** klamath has quit IRC22:35
*** JimCheung has quit IRC22:37
*** vint_bra has quit IRC22:40
openstackgerritClay Gerrard proposed openstack/swift master: Extend device tier pretty print normalization  https://review.openstack.org/47866722:41
claygtorgomatic: ^22:41
torgomaticclayg: LGTM. You want to squash those together?22:46
claygsure atomic commits are good thing right?22:47
torgomaticbeats a dependency chain22:47
claygwho else wants to welcome torgomatic back into channel / apologize he has to look at rings!?22:48
timur_whoo! torgomatic is back22:48
*** timur_ is now known as timur22:49
*** JimCheung has joined #openstack-swift22:53
*** JimCheung has quit IRC22:58
*** ukaynar has joined #openstack-swift22:58
*** klrmn1 has joined #openstack-swift23:08
*** klrmn has quit IRC23:08
*** JimCheung has joined #openstack-swift23:09
*** caiobrentano has joined #openstack-swift23:10
caiobrentanoHi all! Simple question... Is Swift fully ready for IPv6?23:12
claygFULLY23:13
claygexcept maybe keystone23:13
*** JimCheung has quit IRC23:13
clarkbclayg: keystone should be fine with it too23:13
claygwhoo!23:13
clarkbpuppet-openstack modules test ipv6'd services23:14
openstackgerritClay Gerrard proposed openstack/swift master: Try out a different interface  https://review.openstack.org/47867623:15
caiobrentanoclag Nice! Thanks23:21
*** caiobrentano has quit IRC23:23
*** kei_yama has joined #openstack-swift23:31
*** chsc has quit IRC23:34
*** JimCheung has joined #openstack-swift23:35
*** JimCheung has quit IRC23:46
*** JimCheung has joined #openstack-swift23:47

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.15.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!