Wednesday, 2017-06-14

*** vinsh has joined #openstack-swift00:05
*** vinsh has quit IRC00:05
*** briancli1e has quit IRC00:12
*** briancline has joined #openstack-swift00:13
*** vinsh has joined #openstack-swift00:32
*** vinsh has quit IRC00:43
*** zhurong has joined #openstack-swift00:45
*** vinsh has joined #openstack-swift00:50
*** vinsh has quit IRC00:52
*** zhengyin has joined #openstack-swift00:55
*** vinsh has joined #openstack-swift00:55
*** vinsh has quit IRC00:56
*** tovin07_ has joined #openstack-swift00:59
*** lucasxu has joined #openstack-swift01:00
*** lucasxu has quit IRC01:01
*** vinsh has joined #openstack-swift01:09
*** ianychoi has joined #openstack-swift01:14
*** vinsh has quit IRC01:15
*** zhurong has quit IRC01:33
mattoliverautdasilva:  I know your sleeping, but while playing with patch 289664 on a centos based SAIO (ansible-saio) I have problems with servers_per_port which i don't have on Ubuntu. Do you have problems with server_per_port on centos/redhat, or am I doing something stupid (which I probably am)?01:34
patchbothttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/289664/ - swift - Make eventlet.tpool's thread count configurable in...01:34
mattoliverauMaybe something isn't working on my centos vbox'ed saio.01:35
*** zhurong has joined #openstack-swift01:35
clarkbmattoliverau: are multipl servers listening on the aame port using SO_REUSEPORT?01:37
clarkbthats in newer kernels and may not be available on centos01:38
mattoliverauclarkb: ahh that could be it :)01:38
mattoliverauI shall go look at the kernel version :)01:38
mattoliverauits ok for now, as I have an Ubuntu SAIO I can use to actually test some wierdness I'm finding in the patch. Just wanted to check with centos support.01:40
mattoliverautho that does make sense to what I'm seeing01:40
*** mingyu has joined #openstack-swift01:46
kota_morning02:06
kota_clayg: I'll be on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/473673/  today02:06
patchbotpatch 473673 - swift - More Global EC doc updates (MERGED)02:06
kota_oh02:06
kota_it has been merged02:07
kota_thanks patchbot02:07
clayglol, yeah wtg patchbot!02:07
claygkota_: you should look for your own patches that might have slipped through the crack that you have pending/open related to EC/reconstructor and see if there's anything you need to dust off and get folks to review02:08
claygkota_: unless acoles and rledisez come online and tell us all the important reconstructor fixes are already to merge :P02:08
kota_clayg: i see, thanks for poking me02:09
*** SkyRocknRoll has quit IRC02:21
*** mingyu has quit IRC02:39
*** zhengyin has quit IRC02:50
*** zhengyin has joined #openstack-swift02:50
openstackgerritMerged openstack/swift master: Ring doc cleanups  https://review.openstack.org/46518402:54
openstackgerritMerged openstack/swift master: Follow up for affinity config per policy  https://review.openstack.org/46792002:54
*** links has joined #openstack-swift03:14
*** mingyu has joined #openstack-swift03:18
*** vinsh has joined #openstack-swift03:34
*** vinsh has quit IRC03:34
*** itlinux_ has joined #openstack-swift03:42
*** abhitechie has joined #openstack-swift03:47
*** klrmn has quit IRC03:55
openstackgerritLingxian Kong proposed openstack/swift master: Write-affinity aware object deletion  https://review.openstack.org/47015804:03
openstackgerritLingxian Kong proposed openstack/swift master: Write-affinity aware object deletion  https://review.openstack.org/47015804:04
*** winggundamth has joined #openstack-swift04:08
*** gkadam has joined #openstack-swift04:08
*** hoonetorg has quit IRC04:11
*** psachin has joined #openstack-swift04:14
*** abhinavtechie has joined #openstack-swift04:20
*** hoonetorg has joined #openstack-swift04:21
*** abhitechie has quit IRC04:24
*** zhurong has quit IRC04:28
*** alecuyer has quit IRC04:28
*** alecuyer has joined #openstack-swift04:28
notmynamethanks mattoliverau for the reviews04:29
*** EmilienM has quit IRC04:30
*** EmilienM has joined #openstack-swift04:35
*** zhurong has joined #openstack-swift04:39
*** mingyu has quit IRC04:46
*** qwertyco has joined #openstack-swift04:58
*** abhinavtechie has quit IRC04:59
*** abhinavtechie has joined #openstack-swift04:59
*** bkopilov has quit IRC04:59
*** ChubYann has quit IRC05:01
*** zhengyin has quit IRC05:06
*** zhengyin has joined #openstack-swift05:07
*** itlinux_ has quit IRC05:12
*** zhurong has quit IRC05:17
*** zhurong has joined #openstack-swift05:21
*** ghs39ghsggf has joined #openstack-swift05:25
*** ghs39ghsggf has left #openstack-swift05:25
*** skudlik has joined #openstack-swift05:32
mattoliveraunotmyname: nps :)05:35
*** mingyu has joined #openstack-swift05:48
mahaticnotmyname: mattoliverau o/05:48
mattoliveraumahatic: morning05:48
mahaticnotmyname: are you gonna be up until our meeting time? :)05:48
*** abhinavtechie has quit IRC05:50
*** abhitechie has joined #openstack-swift05:50
*** aselius has quit IRC05:54
*** abhitechie has quit IRC05:54
mattoliveraunotmyname: yeah, you still have another hour :)05:59
*** zhengyin has quit IRC05:59
*** zhengyin has joined #openstack-swift05:59
*** jeffli has joined #openstack-swift06:07
*** rcernin has joined #openstack-swift06:08
*** bkopilov has joined #openstack-swift06:10
*** silor has joined #openstack-swift06:13
*** winggundamth has quit IRC06:18
*** abhitechie has joined #openstack-swift06:21
*** cshastri has joined #openstack-swift06:42
*** hseipp has joined #openstack-swift06:44
*** m_kazuhiro has joined #openstack-swift06:46
m_kazuhirogood morning06:46
*** jaosorior has joined #openstack-swift06:49
acolesmeeting in #openstack-meeting in 2 minutes06:58
mattoliverau\o/06:59
mattoliveraum_kazuhiro:  o/06:59
*** silor has quit IRC07:11
*** silor has joined #openstack-swift07:11
*** d0ugal has joined #openstack-swift07:11
*** tesseract has joined #openstack-swift07:16
m_kazuhiromattoliverau: o/07:17
*** gyee has quit IRC07:22
*** mingyu has quit IRC07:30
*** mingyu has joined #openstack-swift07:30
*** mingyu has quit IRC07:39
*** mingyu has joined #openstack-swift07:41
*** mingyu has quit IRC07:55
*** m_kazuhiro has quit IRC08:00
acolesand now, to use mattoliverau's usual words, I am off to get some breakfast :)08:00
mattoliverau:)08:01
mattoliverauk, I gotta go bath the troublesome toddler o/08:01
mahaticacoles: :D enjoy your breakfast!08:01
acolesmattoliverau: have fun08:01
mahaticmattoliverau: enjoy too08:01
mahatic"I'll go get some lunch" :)08:02
*** hseipp has quit IRC08:02
acolesmahatic: enjoy08:03
* kota_ and dinner for me08:03
*** oshritf_ has joined #openstack-swift08:08
*** cbartz has joined #openstack-swift08:14
*** tovin07_ has quit IRC08:14
*** geaaru has joined #openstack-swift08:17
*** jeffli has quit IRC08:18
*** tovin07_ has joined #openstack-swift08:24
*** winggundamth has joined #openstack-swift08:28
*** ianychoi has quit IRC08:43
*** hseipp has joined #openstack-swift08:43
*** SkyRocknRoll has joined #openstack-swift08:56
*** kei_yama has quit IRC09:01
*** sanchitmalhotra has quit IRC09:07
*** sanchitmalhotra has joined #openstack-swift09:07
*** gkadam is now known as gkadam-afk09:20
*** zhurong has quit IRC09:40
*** ianychoi has joined #openstack-swift09:49
*** mathiasb has quit IRC09:58
*** tovin07_ has quit IRC10:02
*** mvk has quit IRC10:15
*** mvk has joined #openstack-swift10:26
openstackgerritHieu LE proposed openstack/swift master: OSprofiler in OpenStack Swift  https://review.openstack.org/46831610:26
*** winggundamth has quit IRC10:48
*** hseipp has quit IRC11:06
*** zhengyin has quit IRC11:09
*** qwertyco has quit IRC11:25
*** jaosorior has quit IRC11:29
*** gkadam-afk is now known as gkadam11:45
*** abhitechie has quit IRC11:46
*** abhitechie has joined #openstack-swift11:53
*** zhengyin has joined #openstack-swift11:58
*** qwertyco has joined #openstack-swift12:01
*** zhengyin has quit IRC12:17
*** chlong has quit IRC12:20
*** links has quit IRC12:46
tdasilvagood morning12:47
acolestdasilva: o/12:48
* tdasilva goes to catch up on this morning's meeting...12:48
tdasilvaacoles: o/12:48
*** catintheroof has joined #openstack-swift12:52
*** mwheckmann has quit IRC12:55
*** cnf has joined #openstack-swift12:59
tdasilvaacoles: good job chairing the meeting...13:03
acolestdasilva: thanks13:03
acolestdasilva: your turn next time ;)13:03
tdasilvamattoliverau: any luck with patch 289664?13:03
patchbothttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/289664/ - swift - Make eventlet.tpool's thread count configurable in...13:03
tdasilvaacoles: lol13:04
tdasilvaacoles: really cool to see folks that don't typically join the 2100 meeting joining there13:05
acolestdasilva: yes13:05
*** mingyu has joined #openstack-swift13:06
openstackgerritOpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/swift master: Updated from global requirements  https://review.openstack.org/8873613:09
*** skudlik has quit IRC13:09
rledisezhey, does anyone already though of an auto-throttle feature in the proxy? when the proxy feels it is getting overflowed, it starts returning an error like 429 Too Many Requests. I don't know how to do it, but that would be awesome…13:12
*** lucasxu has joined #openstack-swift13:15
*** klamath has joined #openstack-swift13:16
*** klamath has quit IRC13:16
*** gkadam has quit IRC13:17
*** klamath has joined #openstack-swift13:17
*** openstackgerrit has quit IRC13:18
claygOverloaded in what way?13:20
rledisezclayg: getting a huge amount of requests (bulk-delete, but i'm not sure it's relevant), starting to get terrible ttfb, timeout connecting to memcache, and increasing number of errors13:22
*** dmsimard has joined #openstack-swift13:27
*** zhurong has joined #openstack-swift13:42
*** ^andrea^ has quit IRC13:57
*** chlong has joined #openstack-swift14:01
*** chlong has quit IRC14:06
*** ^andrea^ has joined #openstack-swift14:10
*** dmsimard has quit IRC14:10
*** qwertyco has quit IRC14:13
*** qwertyco has joined #openstack-swift14:13
*** links has joined #openstack-swift14:19
*** qwertyco has quit IRC14:22
*** qwertyco has joined #openstack-swift14:22
*** jaosorior has joined #openstack-swift14:28
*** chlong has joined #openstack-swift14:34
*** chlong has quit IRC14:35
*** links has quit IRC14:36
*** chlong has joined #openstack-swift14:38
*** cshastri has quit IRC14:38
*** skudlik has joined #openstack-swift14:44
*** psachin has quit IRC14:45
*** zhurong has quit IRC14:49
*** mingyu has quit IRC14:52
*** vinsh has joined #openstack-swift14:53
*** aselius has joined #openstack-swift14:56
*** mingyu has joined #openstack-swift14:57
*** abhitechie has quit IRC14:57
*** ujjain has joined #openstack-swift15:02
*** ujjain has joined #openstack-swift15:02
*** qwertyco has quit IRC15:03
*** qwertyco has joined #openstack-swift15:04
*** mingyu has quit IRC15:07
*** oshritf_ has quit IRC15:07
*** hseipp has joined #openstack-swift15:08
*** openstackgerrit has joined #openstack-swift15:09
openstackgerritJanie Richling proposed openstack/swift master: Validate the object key when decrypting  https://review.openstack.org/47314915:09
*** qwertyco has quit IRC15:12
*** mingyu has joined #openstack-swift15:13
*** vinsh has quit IRC15:16
*** mingyu has quit IRC15:18
*** mingyu has joined #openstack-swift15:22
*** mingyu has quit IRC15:25
*** klrmn has joined #openstack-swift15:25
*** gyee has joined #openstack-swift15:32
*** chsc has joined #openstack-swift15:38
*** chsc has joined #openstack-swift15:38
claygBulk requests definitely have a dos risk because of amplification15:44
claygI think bulk delete in particular offers some concurrency - which could make matters worse15:45
*** mvk has quit IRC15:45
claygRatelimiting mw (which is per a/c) should be the typical goto answer but it's probably not affecting sub requests15:47
claygI think unless the 429 response is tied to what appears to be a bad actor it has an equally likely chance to make things worse... and client support could take awhile15:49
rledisezyeah, i'm thinking maybe of just playing with max_clients as a first step. i'll just need a way to detect when I hit the limit15:50
clayg... which might be a reason to get basic support in now?  What does RL respond now?  Does swiftclient like it?15:50
claygIs it just one proxy that sucks?  Like when it's eating a request with a lot of amplification?15:51
*** oshritf_ has joined #openstack-swift15:51
rledisezthere were so many request, the whole cluster when down :/15:51
*** mathiasb has joined #openstack-swift15:52
rledisezi just put the cluster up as fast as i could. i'll take some time to re-play that on a dev cluster15:52
claygOk. So under extreme duress - how to degrade more gracefully. Gotcha.15:54
rledisezyeah, exactly :)15:55
claygThe eventlet wsgi server has some concept tunable about backlog.. or yeah max_clients. I wonder if we could dig it out and put something on statsd...15:56
openstackgerritJanie Richling proposed openstack/swift master: Validate the object key when decrypting  https://review.openstack.org/47314915:57
*** mingyu has joined #openstack-swift15:57
*** chsc has quit IRC15:57
*** itlinux_ has joined #openstack-swift16:00
*** klrmn has quit IRC16:01
notmynamegood morning16:11
*** Sukhdev_ has joined #openstack-swift16:12
*** vinsh has joined #openstack-swift16:21
*** vinsh has quit IRC16:28
timburkegood morning16:29
*** vinsh has joined #openstack-swift16:31
*** oshritf_ has quit IRC16:34
*** ChubYann has joined #openstack-swift16:38
*** lucasxu has quit IRC16:43
*** abhitechie has joined #openstack-swift16:48
*** rcernin has quit IRC16:49
notmynameacoles: sorry about patchbot not being in the meeting. -infra hates it aparantly, and they have the ability to kick/ban it from channels. so when patchbot is in channel and says something in an -infra meeting, it gets kickbanned16:50
acolesnotmyname: it wasn't a problem16:51
notmynamealso, for everyone, AFAIK, the "UpgradeImpact" word in a commit message does precisely nothing. it's *only* for a human to notice if they happen to read the full commit message16:53
notmynameand yes, that's what acoles said in the meeting :-)16:54
timburkehandy for doing things like `git log --grep UpgradeImpact 2.10.0..2.14.0`16:55
notmynamesure. *I've* never run that command before though ;-)16:55
*** tesseract has quit IRC16:56
*** silor has quit IRC16:56
*** hseipp has quit IRC16:57
notmynametimburke: but I totally should :-)16:58
*** mvk has joined #openstack-swift16:59
timburkeof course, it's only as good as our ability to remember to include it16:59
acolestimburke: but you are very good at remembering :)17:00
timburkei try to be :-)17:00
acolesso it's only as good as our ability to get timburke to review *everything*17:00
*** catintheroof has quit IRC17:02
*** klrmn has joined #openstack-swift17:02
timburkelike i said, i try to :P17:02
*** catintheroof has joined #openstack-swift17:03
*** klrmn has quit IRC17:03
*** klrmn has joined #openstack-swift17:06
claygI'm getting* really* close to spiking on "building a replica2part2dev table from {d: os.listdir(path_for_disk(d)) for d in all_devices_on_all_nodes}" - it's a significantly more io intensive problem on EC - but even still it might be worth it to read all the hashes.pkl and regroup - compared with marching forward and then having to change placement again.17:08
*** chsc has joined #openstack-swift17:14
*** oshritf_ has joined #openstack-swift17:16
*** pcaruana has quit IRC17:29
*** oshritf_ has quit IRC17:30
*** lucasxu has joined #openstack-swift17:39
*** itlinux_ has quit IRC17:41
*** Sukhdev_ has quit IRC17:47
*** itlinux_ has joined #openstack-swift17:57
*** geaaru has quit IRC18:03
*** silor has joined #openstack-swift18:11
*** itlinux_ has quit IRC18:14
*** qwertyco has joined #openstack-swift18:16
*** itlinux has joined #openstack-swift18:16
*** SkyRocknRoll has quit IRC18:32
*** hseipp has joined #openstack-swift18:36
*** ujjain has quit IRC18:38
*** Sukhdev_ has joined #openstack-swift18:46
*** qwertyco has quit IRC18:47
*** mingyu has quit IRC18:49
*** silor has quit IRC19:03
*** rcernin has joined #openstack-swift19:10
openstackgerritMerged openstack/swift master: Make mount_check option usable in containerized environments  https://review.openstack.org/46625519:49
openstackgerritOpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/swift master: Updated from global requirements  https://review.openstack.org/8873620:00
tdasilvamattoliverau: I'm also seeing those issues you mentioned on my ansible-saio env with centos running...not sure yet what's going on yet. My understanding is that SO_REUSEPORT is supported since Centos 6.5 should I'm not sure that's the reason...20:03
tdasilvaanybody else runs server_per_port on centos and has run into problems before?20:03
*** abhitechie has quit IRC20:07
*** itlinux has quit IRC20:13
mattoliverautdasilva: I'll try on my Fedora desktop, that at least has a newer kernel. But still a Redhat based system, so might tell us if it is a kernel issue or Redhat system problem.20:16
mattoliverauI was setting it on a ansible-saio as well so I guess could be something there. But it's really just saio20:17
notmynamewhat was the issue?20:17
mattoliveraus/setting/seeing20:17
mattoliveraunotmyname: starting services, get connection refused and seemed to start just a bunch of 1 server. But this is from memory and too early :p is need to go find my laptop20:18
mattoliverauApparently my English also doesnt work 'p20:19
*** skudlik has quit IRC20:22
*** tonanhngo has joined #openstack-swift20:23
*** tonanhngo has quit IRC20:34
*** hseipp has quit IRC20:40
*** itlinux has joined #openstack-swift20:45
*** itlinux has quit IRC20:46
notmynamethe 2100 swift team meeting is in about 10 minutes in #openstack-meeting20:47
*** joeljwright has joined #openstack-swift20:51
*** ChanServ sets mode: +v joeljwright20:51
notmynamehello joeljwright20:51
joeljwrightevening20:52
joeljwright(or afternoon I guess)20:52
notmynamegreetings appropriate in your own timezone are entirely ok :-)20:53
*** m_kazuhiro has joined #openstack-swift20:53
joeljwright:)20:53
tdasilvamattoliverau: notmyname: this is what I see http://paste.openstack.org/show/612595/20:55
tdasilvaI changed the settings to use server_per_port = 120:56
notmynameand it's only on centos?20:56
tdasilvamattoliverau: I haven't tried to run ansible-saio on Fedora for a while, maybe I should try that...I think zaitcev goes through a lot of effort to make sure swift runs on Fedora20:57
kota_good morning20:57
tdasilvanotmyname: correct20:57
notmynamehello kota_20:57
kota_notmyname: o/20:57
mattoliveraukota_: o/20:57
kota_mattoliverau: o/20:58
mattoliverautdasilva: yup same. Then I looked at ps to see what servers where running.20:58
* notmyname goes to #openstack-meeting21:00
mattoliverautdasilva: I'll try and find time to do some debugging. However cannot bind does sound very SO_REUSEPORT.. but yeah if the kernel is new enough then it could definitely be something else.21:02
*** itlinux_ has joined #openstack-swift21:04
*** lucasxu has quit IRC21:06
*** mingyu has joined #openstack-swift21:31
*** hoonetorg has quit IRC21:34
claygtdasilva: along with that gist can I see that ring?21:35
claygtdasilva: swift-init all stop; pkill -f swift is a thing sometimes if you loose some pids fwiw?21:35
claygin prod sometimes I have to use a swift-orphans like21:35
notmynameacoles: who's the next 0700 chair?21:36
acolesnotmyname: cschwede was next on list I believe21:37
notmynamekk21:37
notmynamecschwede: then in about a week, I'll start trying to hunt you down to talk about the agenda (assuming you're ok with being chair)21:38
acoleshe's off changing his name to zak ;)21:38
claygI'm going to look at patch 45547021:41
patchbothttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/455470/ - python-swiftclient - Stop sending X-Static-Large-Object headers21:41
tdasilvaclayg: http://paste.openstack.org/show/612598/21:42
claygtdasilva: so.... in each of those 1.conf, 2.conf, 3.conf, 4.conf - I think they *all* think those devices in the ring with "127.0.0.1" are "for me!"21:44
claygtdasilva: on vsaio when you turn on servers_per_port it configures the rings with 127.0.0.1, 127.0.0.2, 127.0.0.3, etc.21:44
tdasilvaclayg: ahhh! cool, i should go checkout vsaio21:45
claygwell, i mean it's not centos21:45
tdasilvaclayg: no, i get it21:45
tdasilvai meant checkout vsaio to see exactly how you are setting up vsaio21:46
tdasilvafor servers_per_port21:46
mattoliverauclayg: I thought it looked at the server and port to identify different servers per port. Though I chould be wrong.21:48
claygtdasilva: I think this is the skinny -> https://gist.github.com/clayg/8d4196c332f802c9856898b0eeee167821:48
mattoliverauI initially tried just setting servers_per_port manually on a vsaio and seemed to work.21:48
mattoliverauwithout changing the ips21:49
mattoliverauunless you have already changed ips21:49
claygmattoliverau: yeah... no21:49
claygmattoliverau: so... if you use servers_per_port the wsgi strategy BindPortCache guy basically does is_local_device with port=None21:49
mattoliverauoh ok21:50
*** joeljwright has quit IRC21:50
mattoliveraucool, so maybe that's all it is.. that'll be cool21:50
claygbecause typically you're setting each device to it's own port - because you want to have X wsgi server workers for each device21:50
tdasilvaclayg: can you share your object-2 ring?21:50
tdasilvai'm assuming that's EC? what do you with the ports there?21:50
claygon your newish kernal you're mis-configured - each object-server is spinning up a process for each device on the four ports listed - but because eventlet started to SO_REUSE_PORT by default it's all crazy21:51
*** m_kazuhiro has quit IRC21:51
claygI mean.. if it works at all in dev... it's crazy... i mean saio's are crazy to begin with - you can't have real rings with 127.0.0.1 in them - proxy isn't not going to find any object servers on local host ;)21:52
tdasilvawhich reminds me, mattoliverau we should continue with swift-ansible ;)21:53
mattoliverautdasilva: yup ;)21:53
claygno it's all about the runway now -> https://github.com/swiftstack/runway21:53
mattoliverauanyway, thanks clayg, I'll look a little closer at servers_per_port. I'm off to find some breakfast now :)21:53
claygwhy is that repo 62% shell - notmyname what are you doing!?21:53
tdasilva"A project to help you take flight with a storage system"21:54
claygand there's like 10 top level python scripts21:54
acoleshe's winging it21:56
claygNOICE21:56
*** mingyu has quit IRC21:57
*** klamath has quit IRC21:57
tdasilvaclayg: thanks for the tips21:58
timburkeit's really like 6.2% shell 3.7% python, but github doesn't know how to count YAML21:58
tdasilvagotta run21:58
timburke(without introducing some arbitrary-code-execution bug)21:58
claygtimburke: I think for lp bug #1680083 I should also file a swiftclient bug that will cause --use-slo to .... error?   ... if the /info check doesn't have SLO?  Is that a thing?22:12
openstackLaunchpad bug 1680083 in OpenStack Object Storage (swift) "SLO missing in pipeline because pipeline is confusing" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/168008322:13
timburkemaybe? or just fall back to dlo? see also p 25880022:14
patchbothttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/258800/ - python-swiftclient - Add validation of -S option for SLO upload22:14
timburkeseems like doing a xLO upload *probably* gives us enough context that doing a /info check is worth it?22:15
timburkei *so* want some form of caching!22:15
claygdidn't we discuss a --use-dlo option with the intention of making --use-slo the default when neither is specified?22:16
claygtimburke: a'ight, i'm cool with dat22:20
timburkei'd love to switch to a --use-dlo option. haven't gotten around to it. having some try-slo-but-fall-back-to-dlo logic will surely ease the transition22:21
*** ^andrea^ has quit IRC22:32
*** chlong has quit IRC22:37
*** itlinux_ has quit IRC22:59
*** mvk has quit IRC23:07
*** mvk has joined #openstack-swift23:07
*** catintheroof has quit IRC23:09
*** Sukhdev_ has quit IRC23:10
openstackgerritLingxian Kong proposed openstack/swift master: Write-affinity aware object deletion  https://review.openstack.org/47015823:21
*** kei_yama has joined #openstack-swift23:25
*** chsc has quit IRC23:34
openstackgerritMerged openstack/python-swiftclient master: Stop sending X-Static-Large-Object headers  https://review.openstack.org/45547023:35

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.15.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!