Friday, 2015-02-06

*** nellysmitt has quit IRC00:00
*** ho has joined #openstack-swift00:04
*** IRTermite has joined #openstack-swift00:04
hogood morining guys!00:04
*** Nadeem has quit IRC00:06
openstackgerritOpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/swift: Updated from global requirements  https://review.openstack.org/8873600:08
*** reed has quit IRC00:08
*** abhirc has joined #openstack-swift00:16
notmynamehondak: hi!00:21
notmynameho: hi!00:21
notmynametab complete fail00:21
*** annegent_ has joined #openstack-swift00:22
*** annegent_ has quit IRC00:24
*** lcurtis has quit IRC00:24
*** lcurtis has joined #openstack-swift00:25
mattoliverauho: morning00:32
honotmyname: mattoliverau: hi!00:38
honotmyname: How about the weather in SFO?00:38
notmynameho: mattoliverau: when do you leave? I'm guessing pretty soon00:39
notmynameho: http://forecast.io/#/f/37.7771,-122.419600:39
honotmyname: I will leave tomorrow.00:39
mattoliveraunotmyname: I'm on a 11:45 flight out tomorrow (Saturday) and arrive at 10:55 in SFO on saturday :)00:39
notmynamelooks like rain this weekend and then pretty normal otherwise. cool00:39
notmynamemattoliverau: what will you do with the extra hour?!00:40
mattoliverauwell it's 36 degrees today, then down to 17ish in SFO, so that will be a shock00:40
mattoliverauI don't know, 16 hours of flying (18 hours of transit) and still get an extra hour :P00:41
honotmyname: thanks for the info. need to have an umbrella00:43
*** imkarrer has quit IRC00:43
*** lcurtis has quit IRC00:43
*** dmorita has joined #openstack-swift00:45
notmynameho: it normally doesn't rain very hard here.00:45
hoho: people don't use umbrellas?00:46
occupantyeah, this is supposed to be another superstorm like the one we got in december00:57
occupantI'd bought rain boots just before that happened. Perfect timing.00:57
*** zul has quit IRC01:03
*** rmcall has quit IRC01:09
*** abhirc has quit IRC01:13
*** tellesnobrega_ has joined #openstack-swift01:25
*** openstack has joined #openstack-swift01:34
*** abhirc has joined #openstack-swift01:44
*** nellysmitt has joined #openstack-swift01:56
*** nellysmitt has quit IRC02:00
*** fandi has quit IRC02:11
*** lcurtis has joined #openstack-swift02:48
*** nellysmitt has joined #openstack-swift03:02
*** nellysmitt has quit IRC03:06
*** panbalag has quit IRC03:13
*** bill_az_ has quit IRC03:34
*** redbo has quit IRC03:55
*** early has quit IRC04:04
*** tellesnobrega_ has quit IRC04:07
*** ppai has joined #openstack-swift04:09
*** redbo has joined #openstack-swift04:14
*** ChanServ sets mode: +v redbo04:14
*** ppai has quit IRC04:19
*** kota_ has joined #openstack-swift04:22
*** early has joined #openstack-swift04:25
*** SkyRocknRoll has joined #openstack-swift04:26
*** early has quit IRC04:43
*** EmilienM|afk has quit IRC04:45
*** EmilienM has joined #openstack-swift04:46
*** nellysmitt has joined #openstack-swift05:06
*** nellysmitt has quit IRC05:11
openstackgerritDaisuke Morita proposed openstack/swift: Improvement of logging for PolicyError  https://review.openstack.org/14123805:34
*** echevemaster has quit IRC05:42
*** jasondotstar has quit IRC05:43
*** early has joined #openstack-swift05:47
*** early has quit IRC05:50
*** lcurtis has quit IRC05:51
*** anticw has quit IRC06:01
*** anticw has joined #openstack-swift06:02
*** early has joined #openstack-swift06:06
openstackgerritOpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/swift: Imported Translations from Transifex  https://review.openstack.org/15347706:10
*** early has quit IRC06:12
*** early has joined #openstack-swift06:23
*** zaitcev has quit IRC06:31
*** openstackgerrit has quit IRC06:35
*** openstackgerrit has joined #openstack-swift06:35
*** early has quit IRC06:43
*** early has joined #openstack-swift06:49
*** nellysmitt has joined #openstack-swift07:07
*** chlong has quit IRC07:12
*** nellysmitt has quit IRC07:12
*** chlong has joined #openstack-swift07:13
*** kota_ has quit IRC07:16
*** nshaikh has joined #openstack-swift07:39
openstackgerritKota Tsuyuzaki proposed openstack/swift: Efficient Replication for Distributed Regions  https://review.openstack.org/9982407:52
*** TobiasE has quit IRC07:58
*** TobiasE has joined #openstack-swift08:00
*** rledisez has joined #openstack-swift08:02
*** nellysmitt has joined #openstack-swift08:15
*** tdasilva has joined #openstack-swift08:39
openstackgerritThiago da Silva proposed openstack/swift: WIP: single-process  https://review.openstack.org/14932908:40
tdasilvaeikke: hi, just uploaded your changes ^^^08:41
*** tdasilva has quit IRC08:43
*** foexle has joined #openstack-swift08:44
*** mmcardle has joined #openstack-swift08:45
*** acoles_away is now known as acoles08:46
*** chlong has quit IRC08:53
acolescschwede: morning! this may be a quick review if you have chance https://review.openstack.org/#/c/152903/08:56
*** jordanP has joined #openstack-swift08:58
*** TobiasE has quit IRC09:00
acolesnotmyname: good move adding that comment around delay_auth_decision. frustrates me that we are maintaining that sample config when the defaults don't even work, and cannot link to a keystonemiddleware doc for the other options, last time i looked it was out of date :(09:01
acolesnotmyname: but its friday so i'm not grumpy09:01
*** ho has quit IRC09:22
*** silor has joined #openstack-swift09:31
*** joeljwright has joined #openstack-swift09:37
openstackgerritMerged openstack/swift: Imported Translations from Transifex  https://review.openstack.org/15347709:39
*** early has quit IRC09:51
*** bus-104 has joined #openstack-swift10:05
*** chlong has joined #openstack-swift10:08
*** aix has joined #openstack-swift10:16
*** tellesnobrega_ has joined #openstack-swift10:18
*** tellesnobrega_ has quit IRC10:28
*** tellesnobrega_ has joined #openstack-swift10:37
*** dmorita has quit IRC10:39
*** tellesnobrega_ has quit IRC10:45
*** silor1 has joined #openstack-swift10:48
*** silor has quit IRC10:50
*** silor has joined #openstack-swift10:53
*** silor1 has quit IRC10:54
*** silor has quit IRC11:07
*** reed has joined #openstack-swift11:21
*** zigo has quit IRC11:42
*** TobiasE has joined #openstack-swift11:54
*** torgomatic has quit IRC11:59
*** zul has joined #openstack-swift11:59
*** zul has quit IRC12:01
*** zul has joined #openstack-swift12:01
*** torgomatic has joined #openstack-swift12:01
*** ChanServ sets mode: +v torgomatic12:01
*** nellysmi_ has joined #openstack-swift12:04
*** TobiasE has left #openstack-swift12:05
*** nellysmitt has quit IRC12:06
*** jroll has quit IRC12:06
*** sileht_ has joined #openstack-swift12:10
*** panbalag has joined #openstack-swift12:17
*** geaaru has joined #openstack-swift12:18
*** zul has quit IRC12:19
*** esmute has quit IRC12:19
*** yuanz has quit IRC12:19
*** ipolyzos has quit IRC12:19
*** dmsimard_away has quit IRC12:19
*** anderstj has quit IRC12:19
*** CrackerJackMack has quit IRC12:19
*** glange has quit IRC12:19
*** sileht has quit IRC12:19
*** chrisnelson has quit IRC12:19
*** cppforlife_ has quit IRC12:19
*** sileht_ is now known as sileht12:19
*** jroll has joined #openstack-swift12:21
*** zul has joined #openstack-swift12:21
*** esmute has joined #openstack-swift12:21
*** yuanz has joined #openstack-swift12:21
*** ipolyzos has joined #openstack-swift12:21
*** dmsimard_away has joined #openstack-swift12:21
*** anderstj has joined #openstack-swift12:21
*** CrackerJackMack has joined #openstack-swift12:21
*** glange has joined #openstack-swift12:21
*** chrisnelson has joined #openstack-swift12:21
*** cppforlife_ has joined #openstack-swift12:21
*** sendak.freenode.net sets mode: +v glange12:21
*** nexusz99 has joined #openstack-swift12:21
*** nexusz99 has quit IRC12:22
openstackgerritOpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/swift: Updated from global requirements  https://review.openstack.org/8873612:24
*** diurchenko has joined #openstack-swift12:24
diurchenkoHey. http://docs.openstack.org/api/openstack-object-storage/1.0/content/serialized-response-formats.html Says I can use one way or another. But what if I supply both format query arg and Accept http header. Which is primary?12:26
*** sileht has quit IRC12:28
*** sileht has joined #openstack-swift12:29
*** early has joined #openstack-swift13:01
*** nshaikh has left #openstack-swift13:08
*** early has quit IRC13:08
*** joeljwright1 has joined #openstack-swift13:30
*** joeljwright has quit IRC13:32
*** silor has joined #openstack-swift13:32
*** silor has quit IRC13:37
*** mahatic has joined #openstack-swift13:46
*** silor has joined #openstack-swift13:59
*** jroll has quit IRC14:03
*** jroll has joined #openstack-swift14:03
*** silor has quit IRC14:06
*** ppai has joined #openstack-swift14:08
*** ppai has quit IRC14:08
*** bill_az_ has joined #openstack-swift14:10
*** mahatic has quit IRC14:16
*** annegent_ has joined #openstack-swift14:24
*** mahatic has joined #openstack-swift14:29
*** geaaru_ has joined #openstack-swift14:35
*** annegent_ has quit IRC14:55
*** jrichli has joined #openstack-swift14:56
*** annegent_ has joined #openstack-swift15:09
*** dmsimard_away is now known as dmsimard15:25
*** rdaly2 has joined #openstack-swift15:28
*** geaaru_ has quit IRC15:30
*** lnxnut has joined #openstack-swift15:54
*** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-swift15:55
hurricanerix_Anybody have any objections to the idea of modifying TempURL to allow keys on a per container basis?  If not, I may try to throw something together for/at the hackathon.16:04
cschwedeacoles: thx, review done :)16:05
cschwedehurricanerix_: i like the idea, and i already wrote a small POC for this to try different ideas. i think this could be extended to formpost as well: https://github.com/cschwede/swift-formpost216:06
hurricanerix_cschwede: oh nice!  I'll take a look.16:07
*** david-lyle_afk is now known as david-lyle16:07
acolescschwede: great! joeljwright1 (the author) will be pleased to see that fix land16:08
openstackgerritMahati proposed openstack/swift: Ring checker in swift-recon  https://review.openstack.org/15361716:09
*** heroanxiaobo has joined #openstack-swift16:09
*** heroanxiaobo has left #openstack-swift16:10
*** heroanxiaobo has joined #openstack-swift16:21
*** openstackgerrit has quit IRC16:21
*** openstackgerrit has joined #openstack-swift16:22
hurricanerix_cschwede: So do you think it would be acceptable to move this to the TempURL & FormPOST middleware?  If so, I would be happy to work on it.16:22
*** SkyRocknRoll has quit IRC16:23
cschwedehurricanerix_: i think we should discuss this next week (you’re in SFO, right?), but yes, from my pov it would be great to see a container-based temp-url-key upstream16:23
*** heroanxiaobo has left #openstack-swift16:24
hurricanerix_cschwede: Yup, I will be there.  Sounds good to me, looking forward to discussing it.16:24
*** annegent_ has quit IRC16:26
*** rmcall has joined #openstack-swift16:26
joeljwright1acoles: cschwede: Thanks so much for reviewing that patch so quickly16:30
cschwedejoeljwright1: you’re welcome!16:30
*** rmcall has quit IRC16:33
*** rmcall has joined #openstack-swift16:34
*** silor has joined #openstack-swift16:36
*** dencaval has joined #openstack-swift16:40
torgomatichurricanerix_: if you mean the ability to set tempurl keys on a container and use them to GET/PUT/etc. *objects* in that container, then that sounds good16:44
torgomaticif you mean the ability to use tempurls to *manipulate* containers, that's not so good16:44
torgomaticIMO16:44
egontorgomatic: A tempurl to manipulate a container might be useful, for some sort of "one-time permissions" or "remote support" use cases...16:51
*** IRTermite has quit IRC16:51
hurricanerix_torgomatic: yes, I was thinking GET/PUT/... objects in the container.16:52
torgomaticegon: yeah, but given that containers have ACLs and stuff, the security implications would need lots of careful thought16:52
torgomaticotherwise your "temporary" access might end up being permanent :|16:52
torgomatichurricanerix_: cool. ship it!16:52
hurricanerix_hlol16:53
hurricanerix_*lol16:53
*** annegent_ has joined #openstack-swift16:57
*** BAKfr has quit IRC16:58
notmynamegood morning16:58
mahaticgood morning!16:58
notmynamehurricanerix_: yup, I like tempurls/container (with the caveat torgomatic said)16:58
mahaticnotmyname, how does that look? -> https://review.openstack.org/153617 , Is that right?17:00
*** BAKfr has joined #openstack-swift17:01
notmynamecschwede: got a sec to talk about the summit proposal?17:01
*** diurchenko has quit IRC17:01
notmynamemahatic: in general, yes.17:03
notmynamemahatic: but...17:03
*** annegent_ has quit IRC17:04
*** IRTermite has joined #openstack-swift17:04
notmynamemahatic: swift doesn't have a requirement on requests right now. I'd prefer not to add it. there's plenty of examples elsewhere in the codebase to pull from17:05
mahaticissue with requests being backward compatible?17:05
notmynamealso,t here should probably be some eror handling (eg what if the header doesn't exist)17:06
*** AllMessedUp has joined #openstack-swift17:06
notmynamebut that one is minor17:06
notmynamemahatic: for the time being, if you wanted to work with requests so that you have something and can move on to the reporting part, that's ok17:06
notmynamemahatic: but know that it won't land with the dependency on requests17:06
*** annegent_ has joined #openstack-swift17:07
notmynamedoes that make sense?17:07
mahaticyup, but I think I'd make that change and then move to the reporting part17:08
notmynameok17:08
AllMessedUpQuestion guys:  I have a grizzly cluster that's doing a TON of replication.  I see the "REPLICATE" messages in the originating machine's syslog but there is no activity in the rsync log and the partition isn't copied to the destination storage node.  Does the "REPLICATE" message indicate an attempted replication via rsync?17:08
mahaticnotmyname, but a general question - requests is not used so far because of the compatibility issue?17:08
*** swiftishard has joined #openstack-swift17:09
notmynamemahatic: more because if we don't need the dependency, we don't add it. and most of those parts of swift were written before requests was a serious option17:09
mahaticnotmyname, oh okay. I was guessing the latter17:10
notmynameAllMessedUp: (I hope your nick isn't related to your question ;-) if you look in the sample configs (https://github.com/openstack/swift/blob/master/etc/object-server.conf-sample#L149) you can slow down some of the replication with run_pause and concurrency17:11
*** annegent_ has quit IRC17:12
notmynamehmm..rereading your question, maybe there's something else17:12
notmynameAllMessedUp: the REPLICATE verb is used by the storage servers to check that the data is properly in sync17:12
notmynameAllMessedUp: if something is not in sync, then rsync is used to transfer data17:12
cschwedenotmyname: sure17:12
notmynameAllMessedUp: but you're seeing a partition that isn't being copied?17:12
notmynamecschwede: do you have to have all of the speakers on the submission?17:13
AllMessedUpnotmyname:  correct - the partition doesn't exist on the "destination" storage node17:13
cschwedenotmyname: from my pov not, but it might raise more interest if there are more people?17:13
AllMessedUpwe have a ton (~200k) of time_waits and I was thinking replication may be causing it based on all the REPLICATE entries in the log17:14
notmynamecschwede: I think you should add clayg and kota and mattoliverau and acoles. and we can validate next week if they can't/won't do it17:14
notmynamecschwede: in addition to you me and peluse17:14
AllMessedUpnotmyname:  seeing virtually no activity in the rsync log17:14
notmynameAllMessedUp: are you using a separate replicaton network (I don't recall if that's in grizzly or not)17:15
cschwedenotmyname: ok, good idea. i already talked to acoles earlier, and i hope we can edit it until monday evening17:15
AllMessedUpnotmyname:  no replication network - single vlan17:16
AllMessedUpnotmyname:  looking at samples17:16
notmynameok17:17
*** abhirc has quit IRC17:17
AllMessedUpTY17:17
cschwedenotmyname: done17:19
AllMessedUpnotmyname:  reduced concurrency to 217:22
AllMessedUpnotmyname: just to confirm, this log entry means the partition was checked and not replicated?17:22
AllMessedUpFeb  6 11:21:45 xxxxxxxx object-server x.x.x.x - - [06/Feb/2015:17:21:45 +0000] "REPLICATE /sds/94051" 200 1506 "-" "-" "-" 0.000617:22
*** early has joined #openstack-swift17:23
*** dc has joined #openstack-swift17:23
panbalagHi, I'm trying to run the functional tests against a devstack setup I have. I created a test.conf on the server where I have the functional tests. Still not all parameters (like auth_version) are getting populated and tests are not running. Has anyone executed the functional tests recently?17:25
*** mahatic has quit IRC17:25
*** mahatic has joined #openstack-swift17:26
*** silor has quit IRC17:27
*** rledisez has quit IRC17:29
notmynameAllMessedUp: sorry, got pulled away here at the office (such is life)17:30
notmynamecschwede: thanks17:31
notmynamepanbalag: you can run functional tests against any routable swift endpoint (ie everything from your saio to public cloud providers)17:31
notmynameAllMessedUp: let me look about that log line. ie what does a 200 response to a REPLICATE mean17:32
openstackgerritDonagh McCabe proposed openstack/swift: Add multiple reseller prefixes and composite tokens  https://review.openstack.org/13708617:32
AllMessedUpnotmyname:  so I reduced replicator concurrency from 20 to 2 and I've got about 100k less time_waits -- sound expected/feasible?17:34
notmynameAllMessedUp: so that log line doesn't tell you that kind of info. it does tell you that the mount point and partition are there. otherwise it would have returned 507. but it returns in the body the serialized hashes that are then compared to see if anything needs to be transferred17:35
notmynameAllMessedUp: yes. I'd completely expect less requests to happen with lower concurrency17:35
notmynameAllMessedUp: so what you're seeing is no rsync connections, but the partition should be on both servers. right?17:39
AllMessedUpnotmyname: yes, think so -- I'm going to use swift-get-nodes to check the existence of all the objects17:41
AllMessedUpnotmyname:  not seeing any connections to rsync(873) - check via "netstat -nat | grep :873"17:43
notmynameAllMessedUp: have you checked that the rings are the same as you expect on all your nodes? you can do that for your whole cluster with`swift-recon --md5`. or you can check by hand17:46
*** annegent_ has joined #openstack-swift17:47
AllMessedUpnotmyname: yes sir - got a external test that checks the ring files md5sums17:47
notmynamegreat17:47
notmynameAllMessedUp: one thing you can do is stop replication on one node and then run it in once mode to see if things are wokring are expected17:48
*** jordanP has quit IRC17:51
notmynamecschwede: please let me know asap the link for that proposal so we can add it to our "list of stuff to promote"17:54
notmynameAllMessedUp: you can also tell the replicator to specifically replicate certain partitions or drives. so that may also help in your testing17:55
cschwedenotmyname: there is no preview link available yet18:00
*** early has quit IRC18:00
*** gyee has joined #openstack-swift18:03
*** early has joined #openstack-swift18:06
*** geaaru has quit IRC18:13
openstackgerritMahati proposed openstack/swift: Ring checker in swift-recon  https://review.openstack.org/15361718:15
*** tab___ has joined #openstack-swift18:17
*** early has quit IRC18:20
mahaticnotmyname, I modified it. Regarding the report, I can probably show for a request like this "swift-recon object --<command>" , if they are all object servers and if not, show what they are (container/account)18:21
*** acoles is now known as acoles_away18:27
notmynamemahatic: yup, exactly. any ideas on what the command should be?18:27
mahaticnotmyname, I don't know, validateringservers?18:28
notmynamemahatic: --validate-ring might be more clear and easy to read18:29
notmynameor --validate-servers18:29
notmynameya, I like that one better18:29
mahaticnotmyname, okay, cool18:29
mahaticnotmyname, how about the current modification of OPTIONS support?18:29
mahaticcan you review that?18:30
notmynamenot now. engineering meeting time now. at a glance, it looks better (no requests dependency), but maybe not quite right. still, shouldn't be a blocker for doing the other stuff for now18:30
notmynamemahatic: thanks for working on it18:31
mahaticnotmyname, okay. thanks for the review. Please do post any further comments on gerrit when you're free18:31
*** Nadeem has joined #openstack-swift18:32
*** mmcardle has quit IRC18:36
*** early has joined #openstack-swift18:38
*** silor has joined #openstack-swift18:46
*** abhirc has joined #openstack-swift18:52
*** early has quit IRC18:53
*** rdaly2 has quit IRC18:58
*** dc has quit IRC19:08
AllMessedUpnotmyname:  can you give me a ballpark on the number of connections a object-replicator would make in any given replication run?19:13
*** annegent_ has quit IRC19:15
*** silor1 has joined #openstack-swift19:22
AllMessedUpnotmyname:  I've dropped storage server swift services to concurrency = 2.  wondering why I still have >100k TIME_WAITs19:22
*** silor has quit IRC19:24
*** mariusleu has quit IRC19:36
AllMessedUpnotmyname:  from one of the storage node logs:  object-replicator 11344998 suffixes checked   -- does that mean than many network connections were done in the cluster to check replicas?19:46
*** early has joined #openstack-swift19:50
*** mariusleu has joined #openstack-swift19:53
*** early has quit IRC19:53
*** mahatic has quit IRC19:55
*** early has joined #openstack-swift19:58
*** joeljwright has joined #openstack-swift20:00
*** annegent_ has joined #openstack-swift20:01
*** joeljwright1 has quit IRC20:02
*** early has quit IRC20:03
*** early has joined #openstack-swift20:07
*** bill_az_ has quit IRC20:09
*** dencaval has quit IRC20:09
*** mahatic has joined #openstack-swift20:11
*** early has quit IRC20:14
*** AllMessedUp has quit IRC20:15
*** mariusleu has quit IRC20:18
*** early has joined #openstack-swift20:24
*** nellysmi_ has quit IRC20:27
*** annegentle has quit IRC20:29
openstackgerritMerged openstack/python-swiftclient: Fix deleting SLO segments on overwrite  https://review.openstack.org/15290320:34
*** silor1 has quit IRC20:38
*** bill_az_ has joined #openstack-swift20:38
*** jordanP has joined #openstack-swift20:47
*** early has quit IRC20:49
*** haomaiw__ has joined #openstack-swift20:58
*** jordanP has quit IRC21:01
*** haomaiwang has quit IRC21:01
*** tab___ has quit IRC21:01
*** imkarrer has joined #openstack-swift21:04
*** fbo has quit IRC21:14
*** fbo_ has joined #openstack-swift21:14
*** zaitcev has joined #openstack-swift21:22
*** ChanServ sets mode: +v zaitcev21:22
imkarrerGood afternoon. I understand that the container reconciler will move objects in the wrong storage policy and that the container replicator detects these misplaced objects, but how do objects get assigned to the wrong storage policy in the first place?  Is it a naming collision between the hash rings?21:23
notmynameimkarrer: through a combination of concurrent requests, failures, and network partitions21:24
notmynamemaybe add in some rebalancing in there too for good measure21:24
notmynamebasically, anything that would result in all replicas of a container not being available (but still durably in the cluster) at the time of the subsequent request21:25
notmynamewhich is really hard to make happen21:26
imkarrernotmyname: thank you.21:27
*** BaconIsK_ has joined #openstack-swift21:27
zaitcevnotmyname: If yinyin never comes back -- and hopefuly you forgive this unpleasant hypothesis -- at what point is it appropriate for me to take over and re-submit his patch with some small touch-ups?21:30
notmynamezaitcev: which patch?21:31
zaitcevhttps://review.openstack.org/13485521:31
*** rdaly2 has joined #openstack-swift21:32
*** BaconIsK_ has quit IRC21:32
zaitcevI am concerned that he may feel robbed21:32
zaitcevAnd it's his 1st patch.21:32
zaitcevIf you know his identity and can contact him, it would be helpful.21:33
notmynamezaitcev: you could resubmit the content with you as the author. you could keep him as the author and you as the commiter. you could resubmit as your patch and then add a "co-authored-by" in the commit message21:33
zaitcevMy investigation established that his patch actually fixed a problem and right away I cleared 10,000 tombstones on one node.21:33
notmynamenope, I don't know him/her or have any contact except for the email on the patch21:34
zaitcevOh, right. Git magic.21:34
notmynamezaitcev: but it's been around a _long_ tiime (the patch). I think you should feel free to take it over21:34
zaitcevoh, it was? okay21:34
notmynamethe last comment by the author was in november21:35
zaitcevI'll get back to it when I'm done with SO_REUSEPORT21:36
notmynamecool, thanks21:36
*** dmsimard is now known as dmsimard_away21:47
mattoliverauLeaving for airport now.. The flying and waiting begins! Cya all soon!21:58
*** annegent_ has quit IRC22:00
*** zacksh has quit IRC22:04
*** zacksh has joined #openstack-swift22:04
*** zacksh has quit IRC22:04
*** abhirc has quit IRC22:05
*** zacksh has joined #openstack-swift22:05
notmynamemattoliverau: safe travels :-)22:07
*** zigo has joined #openstack-swift22:11
*** mahatic has quit IRC22:12
*** jrichli has quit IRC22:13
*** erlon has quit IRC22:26
*** nellysmitt has joined #openstack-swift22:27
*** annegentle has joined #openstack-swift22:30
*** nellysmitt has quit IRC22:32
*** lnxnut has quit IRC22:35
*** abhirc has joined #openstack-swift22:39
*** swiftishard has quit IRC22:46
*** rdaly2 has quit IRC22:52
*** tellesnobrega_ has joined #openstack-swift22:54
*** annegentle has quit IRC22:57
*** annegentle has joined #openstack-swift22:57
*** BaconIsKing has joined #openstack-swift23:08
*** reed has quit IRC23:11
*** BaconIsKing has quit IRC23:15
*** abhirc has quit IRC23:15
*** annegentle has quit IRC23:18
*** IRTermite has quit IRC23:21
*** dmsimard_away is now known as dmsimard23:24
*** dmsimard is now known as dmsimard_away23:25
*** IRTermite has joined #openstack-swift23:37
*** abhirc has joined #openstack-swift23:37
*** Nadeem has quit IRC23:38
*** imkarrer has quit IRC23:41
*** annegentle has joined #openstack-swift23:49
*** abhirc has quit IRC23:56
*** annegentle has quit IRC23:58

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!