Tuesday, 2014-11-18

*** joeljwright has quit IRC00:07
*** tellesnobrega has joined #openstack-swift00:07
*** david-lyle is now known as david-lyle_afk00:13
*** tellesnobrega has quit IRC00:17
*** kyles_ne has quit IRC00:25
*** kyles_ne has joined #openstack-swift00:25
*** tellesnobrega has joined #openstack-swift00:30
*** NM has joined #openstack-swift00:30
*** rdaly2 has joined #openstack-swift00:48
*** mkollaro has quit IRC00:49
*** rdaly2 has quit IRC00:52
*** sungju has joined #openstack-swift01:07
*** tkay has quit IRC01:09
*** kyles_ne has quit IRC01:12
*** NM has quit IRC01:18
*** nomad411 has joined #openstack-swift01:19
*** sungju has quit IRC01:19
*** sungju has joined #openstack-swift01:26
*** sungju has quit IRC01:32
*** sungju has joined #openstack-swift01:36
*** haomai___ has joined #openstack-swift01:54
*** haomaiwang has quit IRC01:56
*** nosnos has joined #openstack-swift01:59
*** tellesnobrega has quit IRC02:21
*** X019 has quit IRC02:32
*** Viswanath has joined #openstack-swift02:38
*** oomichi has joined #openstack-swift02:40
*** Viswanath has quit IRC02:41
openstackgerrityinyin proposed openstack/swift: remove old tombstone(.ts)  https://review.openstack.org/13485502:43
*** X019 has joined #openstack-swift02:43
*** rdaly2 has joined #openstack-swift02:49
*** rdaly2 has quit IRC02:53
*** nomad411 has quit IRC02:53
*** kota_ has joined #openstack-swift02:57
*** exploreshaifali has joined #openstack-swift03:04
*** haomai___ has quit IRC03:06
*** kota_ has quit IRC03:07
*** tellesnobrega has joined #openstack-swift03:17
*** sungju has quit IRC03:20
*** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-swift03:23
*** sungju has joined #openstack-swift03:24
*** exploreshaifali has quit IRC03:34
*** nosnos has quit IRC03:35
*** mahatic has quit IRC03:40
*** tellesnobrega has quit IRC03:52
*** sungju has quit IRC03:52
*** tellesnobrega has joined #openstack-swift03:53
*** sungju has joined #openstack-swift03:58
*** dkwon has joined #openstack-swift04:01
*** sungju has quit IRC04:05
*** sgowda has joined #openstack-swift04:05
*** kyles_ne has joined #openstack-swift04:13
*** kyles_ne has quit IRC04:17
*** dkwon is now known as sungju04:23
*** ppai has joined #openstack-swift04:33
*** tellesnobrega has quit IRC04:34
*** nosnos has joined #openstack-swift04:44
*** sungju has quit IRC04:50
*** rdaly2 has joined #openstack-swift04:50
*** rdaly2 has quit IRC04:55
*** sungju has joined #openstack-swift04:56
openstackgerritClay Gerrard proposed openstack/swift: Consistently apply node error limiting rules in proxy  https://review.openstack.org/13516705:04
*** bkopilov has joined #openstack-swift05:14
*** oomichi has quit IRC05:24
*** miqui has joined #openstack-swift05:38
*** zaitcev has quit IRC05:48
*** oomichi has joined #openstack-swift05:48
*** bkopilov has quit IRC05:50
*** oomichi has quit IRC06:02
*** oomichi has joined #openstack-swift06:08
*** bkopilov has joined #openstack-swift06:16
*** rdaly2 has joined #openstack-swift06:51
*** rdaly2 has quit IRC06:56
*** k4n0 has joined #openstack-swift06:57
*** nshaikh has joined #openstack-swift07:00
*** sungju has quit IRC07:18
*** miqui has quit IRC08:11
*** geaaru has joined #openstack-swift08:32
*** joeljwright has joined #openstack-swift08:36
*** matt_____ is now known as mattoliverau08:39
*** jordanP has joined #openstack-swift08:43
mattoliverauGood morning swift world from Fez :) I hope your all enjoying a few weeks with out my constant chatter on channel :p08:43
*** acoles_away is now known as acoles09:38
*** aix has joined #openstack-swift09:48
*** tellesnobrega has joined #openstack-swift10:05
openstackgerritAlistair Coles proposed openstack/swift: Always use FakeMemcache for in-process tests  https://review.openstack.org/13506910:13
*** joeljwright has quit IRC10:15
*** tellesnobrega has quit IRC10:16
*** joeljwright has joined #openstack-swift10:18
openstackgerritPrashanth Pai proposed openstack/swift: fsync() on directories  https://review.openstack.org/12692310:21
*** exploreshaifali has joined #openstack-swift10:25
*** nellysmitt has joined #openstack-swift10:27
*** tellesnobrega has joined #openstack-swift10:47
*** NM has joined #openstack-swift10:51
*** tellesnobrega has quit IRC11:10
*** dANO has joined #openstack-swift11:14
dANOI would like to use a web address (as http://openstack.com ) to access my server OpenStack rather than IP address (like http://99.99.99.99 )  when I use curl. Is that possible?11:19
dANOlike this : curl -X GET https://swift.example.com/v1/account/container/object11:21
*** aix has quit IRC11:23
*** haomaiwang has quit IRC11:24
ahaleyeah checkout the cname middleware dANO11:27
ahalehttps://github.com/openstack/swift/blob/master/swift/common/middleware/cname_lookup.py11:27
*** mahatic has joined #openstack-swift11:30
*** aix has joined #openstack-swift11:36
openstackgerritOpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/python-swiftclient: Updated from global requirements  https://review.openstack.org/8925011:37
openstackgerritOpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/swift: Updated from global requirements  https://review.openstack.org/8873611:37
*** sgowda has quit IRC11:38
*** evanjfraser has joined #openstack-swift11:43
*** evanjfraser_ has quit IRC11:43
*** ppai has quit IRC11:53
NMGood morning guys.12:00
NMdANO: did you make it?12:00
*** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-swift12:02
dANOI look at just some information on how to configure a web address12:08
*** ppai has joined #openstack-swift12:08
*** oomichi has quit IRC12:33
*** qualitystuff has joined #openstack-swift12:47
qualitystuffis der anyone to help12:48
qualitystuff?12:48
*** X019 has quit IRC12:51
qualitystuffi recently  developed interest in opensource thing .... can anyone help me to provide some easy  bug12:52
*** mkollaro has joined #openstack-swift12:53
*** k4n0 has quit IRC13:01
qualitystuffplease reply asap13:02
qualitystuffmy emailid - saxena.shubham241993@gmail.com13:03
qualitystuffthank you in advance13:04
*** qualitystuff has quit IRC13:08
*** tdasilva has joined #openstack-swift13:10
*** ppai has quit IRC13:17
*** mkollaro has quit IRC13:44
*** nosnos has quit IRC13:44
*** tongli has joined #openstack-swift13:47
*** zul has joined #openstack-swift13:58
*** nomad411 has joined #openstack-swift14:00
*** miqui has joined #openstack-swift14:01
*** exploreshaifali has quit IRC14:03
*** jistr has joined #openstack-swift14:08
*** jistr is now known as jistr|mtgs14:08
openstackgerritMerged openstack/swift: Make in process functional tests use sample proxy-server.conf  https://review.openstack.org/12760714:17
*** nshaikh has quit IRC14:18
*** dmsimard_away is now known as dmsimard14:24
*** joeljwright has quit IRC14:30
openstackgerritMerged openstack/swift: Always use FakeMemcache for in-process tests  https://review.openstack.org/13506914:34
openstackgerritMerged openstack/swift: move slo, dlo after tempauth in pipeline  https://review.openstack.org/13500814:34
*** X019 has joined #openstack-swift14:41
*** joeljwright has joined #openstack-swift14:42
*** david-lyle_afk is now known as david-lyle14:43
*** rdaly2 has joined #openstack-swift14:47
*** elambert has quit IRC14:52
*** NM has quit IRC15:02
*** openstackgerrit has quit IRC15:04
*** NM has joined #openstack-swift15:04
*** openstackgerrit has joined #openstack-swift15:04
openstackgerritNicolas Trangez proposed openstack/swift: Remove `off_in` and `off_out` arguments to `splice`  https://review.openstack.org/13531915:06
*** NM has quit IRC15:23
*** NM has joined #openstack-swift15:26
*** panbalag has joined #openstack-swift15:45
*** mahatic has quit IRC15:47
*** joeljwright has quit IRC15:48
*** NM has quit IRC15:50
*** NM has joined #openstack-swift15:52
*** zaitcev has joined #openstack-swift15:58
*** ChanServ sets mode: +v zaitcev15:58
*** mahatic has joined #openstack-swift16:00
*** nomad411 has quit IRC16:01
*** exploreshaifali has joined #openstack-swift16:05
*** joeljwright has joined #openstack-swift16:10
*** bkopilov has quit IRC16:13
*** esmute has quit IRC16:14
notmynamemattoliverau: nice!! I've always wanted to go to fez16:16
*** NM has quit IRC16:17
*** esmute has joined #openstack-swift16:17
*** NM has joined #openstack-swift16:20
notmynameso seagate ha contributed full chinese translation for swift. https://www.transifex.com/projects/p/swift/16:25
*** panbalag has quit IRC16:36
*** panbalag has joined #openstack-swift16:38
*** zul has quit IRC16:39
*** mahatic_ has joined #openstack-swift16:43
*** mahatic has quit IRC16:45
*** lihkin has joined #openstack-swift16:47
*** nomad411 has joined #openstack-swift17:02
*** zul has joined #openstack-swift17:03
*** tkay has joined #openstack-swift17:05
*** abnp has joined #openstack-swift17:06
abnpder?17:06
abnpanone to help17:07
abnpanyone*17:07
notmynameabnp: hello. what's up?17:09
abnpnotmyname :m a beginner17:10
abnpin opensource thing17:10
*** ChanServ changes topic to "Swift 2.2.0 https://launchpad.net/swift/juno/2.2.0 | Priority Reviews: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Swift/PriorityReviews | Ideas: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Swift/ideas | Review Dashboard: http://bit.ly/1iVBigF"17:11
NMnotmyname: let me try! let me try! I wanna help :D17:11
abnpso please suggest me any small bug17:11
abnpdat i cn solve17:11
notmynameNM: go for it :-)17:11
pberisI'm preparing to develop some middleware for a specific need that I'm not sure will translate to common use ...17:12
NMnotmyname: It's about the project code. I think you can choose better than me :(17:13
pberisHow do I handle configuration of the swift pipeline so changes pushed down from my management application don't remove my app from the pipeline?17:13
*** kyles_ne has joined #openstack-swift17:13
notmynamepberis: that's something you should talk to your management app about ;-)17:15
*** tamizh_geek has joined #openstack-swift17:15
notmynamepberis: seriously, though, open a ticket and let's figure out something that works for you :-)17:15
abnpi m not able to identify the starting point17:15
pberisOK ... thanks17:15
abnpso please17:15
notmynameabnp: are you a beginner to swift, or to programming in general?17:16
abnpbeginner to swift17:16
notmynameabnp: ok, let me gather a few links for you17:17
notmynameabnp: and, welcome!17:17
abnpthank bro ...17:17
*** geaaru has quit IRC17:18
abnpi hv deployed openstack on my laptop and not able to identify the next step to start development in openstack17:19
abnpbut*17:19
notmynameabnp: what are you interested in?17:19
abnpnotmyname: i am interested in cloud storage and its ssecurity  ...17:20
notmynamehttps://swiftstack.com/blog/2013/02/12/swift-for-new-contributors/ was written a while back for people just getting in to swift. https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Swift/ideas has some ideas of smaller things to work on. https://bugs.launchpad.net/swift is our bug tracker17:20
notmynamehttps://github.com/swiftstack/vagrant-swift-all-in-one is a fast way to set up a swift dev environment17:21
*** kyles_ne has quit IRC17:21
*** kyles_ne has joined #openstack-swift17:21
abnpnotmyname : i know c,c++,java and python ...  how to start coding ... where to code  ..17:23
*** tamizh_geek has quit IRC17:23
*** judd7 has joined #openstack-swift17:24
notmynameabnp: the CONTRIBUTING document in the source repo has some links on how to get started with the openstack dev process https://github.com/openstack/swift/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md17:24
abnpnotmyname: cn i help you in any projects dat u r workin on17:24
*** lihkin has quit IRC17:25
abnpnotmyname:i think these links are sufficient to start ...17:25
abnpnotmyname: cn you give me your email id17:25
*** lihkin has joined #openstack-swift17:25
notmynameabnp: while my email is not particularly hard to find (especially in the openstack world), IRC is the best way to work in the community. there are a lot of people here who can help and who have been working on Swift for a long time17:27
eikkeDoes Darrell Bishop frequent this channel?17:28
swifterdarrelleikke: yup17:28
notmynameeikke: meet swifterdarrell17:28
eikkeaha, thanks17:28
notmynameeikke: ah! you're the splice patch person :-)17:28
eikkeyes indeed17:28
eikkenotmyname: we met at the summit, I'm also one of the Scality guys17:28
notmynameah, ok!17:29
abnpnotmyname: thank for replying ... u r d first person who hv replied to my queries since i had started workin  on openstack...thank a lot :)17:29
notmynameabnp: glad to help17:30
eikkeswifterdarrell: just wanted to let you know I'm around here in case you'd want to discuss things on irc17:30
swifterdarrelleikke: cool!  were you able to cause trouble with the in/out_off parameter being non-zero (on something that's not a pipe)?17:35
*** abnp has quit IRC17:35
eikkeswifterdarrell: you made me doubt myself, so I went ahead and digged into the kernel + created some tests, see comments on the review17:36
*** tamizh_geek has joined #openstack-swift17:37
*** jordanP has quit IRC17:37
swifterdarrelleikke: (I see there are replies in the review now ;))17:37
*** zul has quit IRC17:38
tamizh_geekGuys, I was around here sometime back and I was told swift is not expected to work well in 32 bit systems. Even the unit tests are failing. I'm just thinking, if we should update this in the documentation somewhere17:39
notmynametamizh_geek: swift works on 32bit (I've run it on a raspberry pi), but the default constraints like the max object size have to be lowered to fit in 32 bits. and 32bit itsn't something we currently test on. IOW, yes, I think it would be good to say that in the docs17:41
swifterdarrelleikke: can't you use ctypes to construct a mutable uint64 initialized w/the python integer argument (e.g. off_in) and then pass in a pointer to that?17:42
tamizh_geekOr if people think if its even better to fix the tests to choose max object size according to the underlying architecture, I can help with that.17:43
swifterdarrelleikke: IOW, I guess I'd be more excited about a patch that made the system call's API work correctly vs. one that just narrows it17:43
tamizh_geekWhat's the right place to ask people opinion on this? dev mailing list?17:43
eikkeswifterdarrell: sure, see the github link17:43
eikkeI intended to basically contribute that code in another patchset17:44
tamizh_geek@notmyname Help?17:45
notmynametamizh_geek: in here is the right place. but my gut reaction is that I'm not a fan of dynamic constraints. I mean it sounds cool, but it also sounds like extra complexity and leads to harder diagnostics and troubleshooting. the alternative of adding a "# on 32-bit systems, set this to..." sounds a lot better17:46
*** dANO has quit IRC17:47
tamizh_geeknotmyname: makes sense.17:47
tamizh_geekthanks17:47
swifterdarrelleikke: ah, cool; so what does the errcheck function end up doing?  (not a ctypes expert by any stretch of the imagination; i've hacked together a mostly-working getdents(2) wrapper and a gettid(2) wrapper, and that's it)17:50
swifterdarrelleikke: does it make the splice(...) call actually return that 3-tuple? (result, off_in or None, off_out or None)?17:50
eikkeyes17:51
swifterdarrelleikke: cool17:51
swifterdarrelleikke: that sounds like the right way to go (IMO)17:51
notmynameswifterdarrell: acoles: chmouel: cschwede: clayg: let me know if my -2 on the "raise the default header size" patch (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/133967/) is something you disagree with17:53
*** aix has quit IRC17:53
*** kyles_ne has quit IRC17:57
swifterdarrelleikke: so that vfs function definitely mutates ppos, but where is the caller of that?  having trouble tracking that down... looks like there's the generic implementation, and filesystem-specific implementations...17:57
swifterdarrelleikke: but i can't find the source for the system call (the thing that has those in/out offset pointers in-hand)17:58
openstackgerritAlistair Coles proposed openstack/swift: Update container on fast-POST  https://review.openstack.org/13538017:58
swifterdarrelleikke: did you run it w/offsets, in your code that uses pointers to mutable state correctly, and observe the pointed to values change?17:58
eikkeswifterdarrell: I didnt find those immediately neither, which is why I wrote the test case17:58
eikkeswifterdarrell: the values change, yes, as demonstrated in the last test17:59
eikke'2' becomes '5'17:59
eikke(as expected)17:59
acolesclayg: this is WIP https://review.openstack.org/135380 but may illustrate where i am coming from w.r.t the spec17:59
swifterdarrelleikke: gah, my reading comprehension is at an all time low; sorry17:59
swifterdarrelleikke: "off_int is now c_int(5)"17:59
swifterdarrellsheesh17:59
eikkeyeah, I should've made that more clear18:00
eikkeanyway, it does mutate, which makes sense: why make it a pointer otherwise anyway?18:00
swifterdarrelleikke: okay, I'm 100% behind your implementation that makes those values actually work18:00
swifterdarrelleikke: *nod*18:00
swifterdarrelleikke: i'm just pissed the manpage doesn't actually mention that18:00
eikkehehe18:00
swifterdarrelleikke: ;)18:00
* swifterdarrell shrugs; but you got to the bottom of it and have a good memory!18:00
swifterdarrelleikke: when you updated the patch ping me in here (i'll get an alert) and also ping torgomatic, as I think he'll be interested in the bugfix18:01
swifterdarrelleikke: and thanks for catching this and working on it!18:02
*** elambert has joined #openstack-swift18:02
eikkey/w18:02
notmynameswifterdarrell: eikke: I put it on the priority reviews page too18:02
eikkeswifterdarrell: want me to include the code from my tee-n-splice repo all at once, and adjust callers to `splice` to handle the changes result type?18:04
tamizh_geeknotmyname: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/129364/ Why is this patch successfully merged, but the bug status isn't updated. Sorry for the ignorance, but I'm a newbie trying to get a hang of the project.18:05
swifterdarrelleikke: I think replacing swift.common.utils.splice() with your superior implementation and changing the callers to pass in None, would be best18:05
swifterdarrelleikke: IOW, make the splice tooling fully work, but make it clear that our current usage intends to use NULL offset pointer values18:06
swifterdarrelleikke: and the callers will need to expect that three-tuple return (and ignore the last 2)18:06
notmynametamizh_geek: could be several reasons: maybe bad parsing. maybe bad spelling. maybe the bot was down when it merged. I'll mark it manually18:06
swifterdarrelleikke: i'm not sure if splice() was unit-tested (not sure exactly how that'd make sense... but your functional testing of your implementation has satisfied me)18:07
*** zul has joined #openstack-swift18:07
*** joeljwright has quit IRC18:07
tamizh_geeknotmyname: Thanks! And, I assume this https://bugs.launchpad.net/swift/+bug/1229382 is up for claim, since the earlier fix was abandoned. Right?18:07
*** acoles is now known as acoles_away18:08
notmynametamizh_geek: yup. looks like it18:09
tamizh_geeknotmyname: Great.18:10
*** mmcardle has quit IRC18:15
*** annegent_ has joined #openstack-swift18:18
*** gyee has joined #openstack-swift18:22
*** bkopilov has joined #openstack-swift18:24
mattoliverauHey all, I'm suppoe to be on holidays, so don't tell my wife I'm here :P18:30
tdasilvalol18:30
*** tamizh_geek has quit IRC18:31
tdasilvamattoliverau: missed us too much?18:31
notmynamemattoliverau: salaam wa'alekum bin fez!18:32
notmynamemin. not bin18:32
notmynamemattoliverau: I hope your european/north african adventure is going well :-)18:32
notmynamemattoliverau: did you get to see the tanneries in fez?18:33
notmynamehttp://www.amusingplanet.com/2014/08/the-leather-tanneries-of-fez-morocco.html18:33
mattoliverautdasilva: yes, of course I did ;)18:33
mattoliveraunotmyname: lol, hey! Yeah I did actually, very foul smelling and crazy18:34
mattoliverauFez was crazy, the medina is huge and the wife and I got good and lost many times :P18:34
mattoliverauWe were there for the last 4 nights, just arrived in Barcelona, then well head back to Marakech :)18:35
*** joeljwright has joined #openstack-swift18:35
notmynamenice18:36
mattoliverauclayg: I was on a flight today and got board so wrote a braindump regarding a possible approach to baked in container sharding.. seeing as we talked about it at summit, I wondered if I could get your throughts... it is literally a braindump (with an ascii charts) which I'll turn into a spec later (maybe if its a good direction) https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/swift_container_sharding18:36
notmynamemattoliverau: http://www.restaurantpla.cat is a good place to eat. it was pretty easy for us to get a reservation there and the food is quite good18:37
*** zul has quit IRC18:37
mattoliveraunotmyname: awesome, well try and get there! I'll try and get a picture there in the sreaming frenzy shirt :P18:38
notmynamelol18:38
mattoliverau*we'll18:38
notmynamemattoliverau: better yet, the screaming frenzy shirt in the sagrada familia18:38
mattoliveraulol18:39
mattoliverauok I'd better get back to the wife, she's back from shopping.. just wanted to say hi and post a braindump for clay  :)18:40
mattoliverauHave fun all, and don't have too much fun without me :)18:40
*** annegent_ has quit IRC18:41
*** annegent_ has joined #openstack-swift18:42
notmynamemattoliverau: have fun!18:42
*** rdaly2 has quit IRC18:44
eikkeswifterdarrell: sorry, was in a call here. I'll work on this more tomorrow (or later, depending on some other stuff I got on my plate)18:47
notmynameI'm out for a while. I have an afternoon meeting in San Jose, so I'll only be in IRC off and on for the rest of the day18:50
mahatic_notmyname, oh, I was just about to ask a couple of questions regarding the OPTIONS support18:52
mahatic_notmyname, maybe you can reply when you get time. here they are,18:52
mahatic_notmyname, you've mentioned that swift's proxy server supports OPTIONS, does it return a 200 and the Allow header? (I'm not quite sure where in the code to verify this)18:54
tdasilvamahatic_: hey, not sure if this is what you are referring too, but you can see the definition for the OPTIONS handling in proxy/controllers/base.py19:05
mahatic_tdasilva, that should be it i guess, will check it out. Thanks so much!19:10
tdasilvamahatic_: welcome19:10
*** shri has joined #openstack-swift19:10
*** nshaikh has joined #openstack-swift19:16
*** nellysmitt has quit IRC19:21
*** annegent_ has quit IRC19:25
*** tamizh_geek has joined #openstack-swift19:31
*** tamizh_geek has quit IRC19:36
*** cbaesema has quit IRC19:39
openstackgerritOpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/swift: Updated from global requirements  https://review.openstack.org/8873619:45
*** nomad411 has quit IRC20:22
*** zul has joined #openstack-swift20:27
*** NM has quit IRC20:31
notmynamemahatic_: looks like tdasilva got you the right answer :-)20:37
*** panbalag has quit IRC20:38
*** panbalag has joined #openstack-swift20:39
*** exploreshaifali has quit IRC20:46
*** annegent_ has joined #openstack-swift20:58
*** jd__ has quit IRC21:03
*** annegent_ has quit IRC21:05
*** jd__ has joined #openstack-swift21:07
openstackgerritMerged openstack/swift: Prefer X-Backend-Timestamp for X-Newest  https://review.openstack.org/13386921:21
openstackgerritpaul luse proposed openstack/swift: Add concurrent reads option to proxy  https://review.openstack.org/11771021:30
peluseother cores, please take a look ^^^  been sitting for  while and is good for master and we need it for EC here pretty soon too21:35
pelusehey, not related to the last comment, anyone have some history on direct_client versus internal_client.  Seems to be clear enough use cases for both (when I want to route through proxy code or not) but want to make sure I'm not missing something as decide which to use when for some of the EC work21:39
glange_the difference is as you describe :)21:42
glange_I wrote the interal client initially based on something things that notmyname and gholt did before21:42
glange_some things21:43
peluseglange_, cool thanks.  so looks like I'm free to use wihichever suits my particular needs than.  gracias21:44
glange_probably21:44
*** miqui has quit IRC21:44
glange_we have something things that are not in the swift code base that depend on both, so don't break the world :)21:44
glange_some things, dang it21:44
*** mahatic_ has quit IRC21:44
peluseyup, no intention of altering either just wanted to make sure there wasn't something more to the story about having 2 options for going obj work between storage nodes21:46
*** nshaikh has left #openstack-swift21:53
*** abhirc has quit IRC21:59
*** btorch_ is now known as btorch22:01
*** shri1 has joined #openstack-swift22:01
*** shri1 has quit IRC22:01
*** shri has quit IRC22:03
*** mahatic_ has joined #openstack-swift22:13
*** tamizh_geek has joined #openstack-swift22:21
*** tamizh_geek has quit IRC22:25
*** tellesnobrega has joined #openstack-swift22:33
*** tongli has quit IRC22:42
*** jistr|mtgs has quit IRC22:59
*** lihkin has quit IRC23:00
*** tsg has joined #openstack-swift23:02
*** joeljwright has quit IRC23:06
*** ChanServ has quit IRC23:12
openstackgerritpaul luse proposed openstack/swift: Reconstructor helpers for handoff revert case (and other misc)  https://review.openstack.org/13187223:14
openstackgerritpaul luse proposed openstack/swift: Build up reconstructor with correct node selection  https://review.openstack.org/12936123:14
*** ChanServ has joined #openstack-swift23:15
*** sendak.freenode.net sets mode: +o ChanServ23:15
peluseclayg, the patch above ^^ for handoff revert stuff is marked as WIP but please take a look so we can maybe chat about it tomorrow, its loosely based (no pun intended) on the discussions from last Fri at the summit23:19
*** zul has quit IRC23:21
*** abhirc has joined #openstack-swift23:29
*** elambert has quit IRC23:32
*** zackmdavis has left #openstack-swift23:42
*** zackmdavis has joined #openstack-swift23:42

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!