Thursday, 2014-06-12

notmynamemattoliverau: Tristan Goode <tristan@aptira.com>00:01
*** dmorita has joined #openstack-swift00:21
*** zhiyan_ is now known as zhiyan00:27
*** matsuhashi has joined #openstack-swift00:27
*** nosnos has joined #openstack-swift00:32
notmynameI'm packing up for the night. talk to ya later00:39
zaitcevGood luck with your surgery.00:41
mattoliveraunotmyname: night, good luck tomorrow!00:42
*** shri has quit IRC00:44
*** dmsimard is now known as dmsimard_away01:08
*** haomaiwang has quit IRC01:09
*** kashyapk has joined #openstack-swift01:15
*** kashyapk has quit IRC01:20
*** gyee has quit IRC01:28
*** nsquare has quit IRC02:23
*** bkopilov_ has quit IRC02:48
*** zhiyan is now known as zhiyan_03:30
*** zhiyan_ is now known as zhiyan03:41
*** sombrafam has joined #openstack-swift03:42
*** nosnos has quit IRC03:44
*** madhuri has joined #openstack-swift03:46
*** matsuhashi has quit IRC04:11
*** haomaiwa_ has joined #openstack-swift04:18
*** haomaiw__ has joined #openstack-swift04:20
*** haoma____ has joined #openstack-swift04:21
*** haomaiwa_ has quit IRC04:21
*** haomaiw__ has quit IRC04:23
*** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-swift04:24
*** haoma____ has quit IRC04:27
*** bkopilov_ has joined #openstack-swift04:32
*** matsuhashi has joined #openstack-swift04:48
*** nosnos has joined #openstack-swift04:48
*** kashyapk has joined #openstack-swift04:55
*** psharma has joined #openstack-swift04:57
*** haomaiwang has quit IRC05:02
*** haomaiwa_ has joined #openstack-swift05:03
*** gvernik has joined #openstack-swift05:03
*** gvernik has quit IRC05:04
*** Longgeek_ has joined #openstack-swift05:21
*** ppai has joined #openstack-swift05:25
*** deep_ has joined #openstack-swift05:34
deep_ Hello, I have configured swift with keystone(Active Directory), while creating container i am getting error in syslog "Jun 11 22:52:36 node1 proxy-server: Unexpected response from keystone service: {u'error': {u'message': u'Could not find role, swift.', u'code': 404, u'title': u'Not Found'}} Jun 11 22:52:36 node1 proxy-server: Authorization failed for token 9ece2e7637704563fc61eff8d53e0508 Jun 11 22:52:36 node1 proxy-server:05:34
deep_any idea what is missing ?05:34
*** zaitcev has quit IRC05:52
mattoliveraudeep_: I'm no expert, so don't know if I can help, but the error seems to state that keystone couldn't find the role 'swift'. Does it exist in keystone?05:59
*** haomaiwa_ has quit IRC06:00
*** sombrafam has quit IRC06:19
hugokuohole06:20
hugokuohola06:20
*** pberis has quit IRC06:26
*** pberis has joined #openstack-swift06:27
*** mmcardle has joined #openstack-swift06:43
*** jamiehannaford has joined #openstack-swift06:46
*** pconstantine has joined #openstack-swift06:55
mattoliverauhugokuo: hola!06:57
*** pconstantine has quit IRC07:01
*** kashyapk has quit IRC07:02
*** pconstantine has joined #openstack-swift07:02
*** kashyapk has joined #openstack-swift07:02
*** kashyapk has quit IRC07:07
*** pconstantine has quit IRC07:07
*** pconstantine has joined #openstack-swift07:08
*** haomaiwa_ has joined #openstack-swift07:13
*** 5EXABFP2R has joined #openstack-swift07:21
*** haomaiwa_ has quit IRC07:25
mattoliverauWell I'm calling it a day, night all.07:33
*** kashyapk has joined #openstack-swift07:36
*** pconstantine has quit IRC07:39
*** pconstantine has joined #openstack-swift07:39
*** mlipchuk has joined #openstack-swift07:43
openstackgerritTakashi Kajinami proposed a change to openstack/swift: Make container PUT and DELETE to allow asynchronous updating to account  https://review.openstack.org/8788207:45
openstackgerritYuan Zhou proposed a change to openstack/python-swiftclient: Allow to specify storage policy when uploading objects  https://review.openstack.org/7392007:47
*** StevenK has quit IRC07:50
*** StevenK has joined #openstack-swift07:51
*** pconstantine has quit IRC08:02
*** fbo_away is now known as fbo08:14
openstackgerritTakashi Kajinami proposed a change to openstack/swift: Ensure update of the container by object-udater  https://review.openstack.org/9959808:18
openstackgerritTakashi Kajinami proposed a change to openstack/swift: Ensure update of the container by object-updater  https://review.openstack.org/9959808:20
*** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-swift08:22
*** 5EXABFP2R has quit IRC08:23
*** foexle has joined #openstack-swift08:35
*** kashyapk has quit IRC09:20
*** kashyapk has joined #openstack-swift09:21
*** zhiyan is now known as zhiyan_09:23
*** kashyapk has quit IRC09:25
*** kashyapk has joined #openstack-swift09:42
*** dmorita has quit IRC09:46
*** kashyapk has quit IRC10:13
*** kashyapk has joined #openstack-swift10:14
*** kashyapk has quit IRC10:18
*** matsuhashi has quit IRC10:20
*** matsuhashi has joined #openstack-swift10:20
*** NM has joined #openstack-swift10:24
*** flowouffff has joined #openstack-swift10:25
*** matsuhashi has quit IRC10:25
*** haomaiwang has quit IRC10:25
*** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-swift10:26
deep_mattoliverau : I added the swift role under OU=Roles now error changed to "Jun 12 03:18:42 node1 proxy-server: Authorization failed for token e2e6e8b09916ac22dd714e3dbc155902 Jun 12 03:18:42 node1 proxy-server: Invalid user token - deferring reject downstream"10:34
*** NM has quit IRC10:41
openstackgerritAlistair Coles proposed a change to openstack/python-swiftclient: Fix py33 gate issue with setuptools  https://review.openstack.org/9962410:47
*** ppai has quit IRC10:51
*** mkollaro has joined #openstack-swift10:52
*** haomaiwang has quit IRC10:56
*** NM has joined #openstack-swift10:59
*** NM has quit IRC10:59
*** kashyapk has joined #openstack-swift11:01
*** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-swift11:03
*** nosnos has quit IRC11:13
*** kashyapk has quit IRC11:23
*** kashyapk has joined #openstack-swift11:23
*** dmsimard_away is now known as dmsimard11:23
*** shakayumi has joined #openstack-swift11:24
*** ppai has joined #openstack-swift11:34
openstackgerritChmouel Boudjnah proposed a change to openstack/python-swiftclient: Mask token in debug output  https://review.openstack.org/9963211:38
*** jamiehan_ has joined #openstack-swift11:39
*** jamiehannaford has quit IRC11:41
*** jamiehan_ is now known as jamiehannaford11:45
*** shakayumi has quit IRC11:50
*** mmcardle has quit IRC11:51
*** nsquare has joined #openstack-swift11:52
*** mlipchuk has left #openstack-swift11:56
*** mlipchuk has joined #openstack-swift11:59
*** tdasilva has joined #openstack-swift12:01
*** jamiehannaford has quit IRC12:14
*** jamiehannaford has joined #openstack-swift12:15
*** kashyapk has quit IRC12:20
*** kashyapk has joined #openstack-swift12:21
*** deep_ has quit IRC12:23
*** jamiehan_ has joined #openstack-swift12:23
*** jamiehannaford has quit IRC12:24
*** lpabon has joined #openstack-swift12:28
*** kashyapk has quit IRC12:29
*** ppai has quit IRC12:33
*** mmcardle has joined #openstack-swift12:38
*** psharma has quit IRC12:41
*** chandan_kumar has joined #openstack-swift12:41
*** chandan_kumar has quit IRC12:44
*** omame has quit IRC12:46
*** openstackgerrit has quit IRC12:46
*** openstackgerrit has joined #openstack-swift12:47
*** NM has joined #openstack-swift12:47
*** CaioBrentano has joined #openstack-swift12:51
*** chandankumar has joined #openstack-swift12:52
*** bkopilov_ has quit IRC12:56
*** haomaiwang has quit IRC12:57
*** haomaiwa_ has joined #openstack-swift12:58
*** haomaiw__ has joined #openstack-swift12:59
*** haomaiwa_ has quit IRC13:02
*** jamiehannaford has joined #openstack-swift13:03
*** jamiehan_ has quit IRC13:06
chmouelI don't think that benchmark is fair http://blog.zhaw.ch/icclab/evaluating-the-performance-of-ceph-and-swift-for-object-storage-on-small-clusters/ (but obv I and most of us here are biased)13:15
*** mkollaro has quit IRC13:22
tdasilvawhat is swift 2.0.3?13:22
chmoueli am not sure maybe he talks about the client13:23
*** kashyapk has joined #openstack-swift13:23
tdasilvaok13:24
*** jergerber has joined #openstack-swift13:32
*** mkollaro has joined #openstack-swift13:40
portantechmouel: it seems like comparing the librados layer which has different semantics than the Swift API layer does not make much sense13:40
chmouelportante: yeah that's what i commented in that blog post13:41
portanteyou can't do large objects with librados, if I understand correctly, the client has to handle all that13:41
portantechmouel: yes, thanks for pointing that out13:41
portanteI personally believe this kind of comparisons are healthy ways to get different technology strengths and weaknesses exposed, so that folks know where to position them, and improve them13:42
*** sileht has quit IRC13:43
chmouelportante: indeed, this is what glance is doing https://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/glance/tree/glance/store/rbd.py#n34713:44
*** haomaiw__ has quit IRC13:48
*** haomaiwa_ has joined #openstack-swift13:56
*** Longgeek_ has quit IRC13:57
*** sileht has joined #openstack-swift14:02
portantechmouel: not sure I understand what they are doing there, don't know the rados code well enough14:09
portantethe paper above talks about swift 2.0.3, does anybody know what that might mean?14:09
chmoueli think it's the swiftclient14:10
portantethen we don't even know what version of swift they are comparing against?14:10
portanteand it brings up the apparent bias towards ceph in how they consider the system14:11
portantechmouel: and this appears to show ceph is good for small files on a small cluster14:13
chmouelportante: i don't think the benchmarker knows very well swift14:16
portanteagreed14:16
chmouelportante: yeah but either way if writing to the ods (object server in ceph) straight from the client, it would be better for small files, right?14:17
*** haomaiwa_ has quit IRC14:22
*** haomaiwa_ has joined #openstack-swift14:23
*** haomaiwa_ has quit IRC14:29
*** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-swift14:30
*** bkopilov_ has joined #openstack-swift14:34
*** kashyapk_ has joined #openstack-swift14:39
*** kashyapk has quit IRC14:39
*** mkerrin has quit IRC14:44
*** kashyapk has joined #openstack-swift14:47
*** kashyapk_ has quit IRC14:47
*** byeager has joined #openstack-swift14:51
*** elmiko has joined #openstack-swift14:59
elmikohey all, is it possible to revoke, or force early expiration of, a TempURL?15:00
*** kashyapk has quit IRC15:01
*** kevinc_ has joined #openstack-swift15:05
ahaleonly by changing the key on the account, but that revokes all created with that key15:05
elmikoahale: ok, thanks15:06
elmikosounds like not a good option lol15:06
*** foexle has quit IRC15:17
*** byeager has quit IRC15:28
*** byeager has joined #openstack-swift15:28
*** gyee has joined #openstack-swift15:30
creihtchmouel, portante: heh yeah, I'm working on a response this morning15:30
creihtportante: and I agree that it is a good data point, I just want to make sure they are comparing apples to apples :)15:32
creihtwell it is a data point, perhaps not a *good* data point :)15:32
*** byeager has quit IRC15:33
creihtI'm also not a fan of how he mis-characterizes how some of the things work in swift15:34
*** jamiehannaford has quit IRC15:36
*** jamiehannaford has joined #openstack-swift15:37
*** jamiehannaford has quit IRC15:38
*** jamiehannaford has joined #openstack-swift15:40
creihthe also optimizes the ceph workload a bit by puting the journal on a separate disk15:40
creihtwhich is also going to specifically boost small write speeds15:41
creihtIt also doesn't make sense to me why the 1 container 4kb reads performed differently than the 20 container 4kb reads15:45
creihtI'm also curious how a crush look up could be more efficient than a ring lookup15:49
creihtI wonder how much he is seeing is http overhead15:50
glangeelmiko: you could move or delete the file?15:51
elmikoglange: thanks, that's another option15:52
*** sombrafam has joined #openstack-swift15:52
creihtelmiko: you can change the secret key15:52
creihtfor the account15:53
glangecreiht: ahale said that :)15:53
elmikocreiht: thanks15:53
creihtahh15:53
creihthehe15:53
creihtsorry15:53
elmikoi was hoping there was a call or something to just revoke a TempURL15:53
*** CaioBrentano has quit IRC15:54
elmikoi'm investigating a use case where we might not know the exact expiration time needed, TempURL was suggested as something to look into. i'm trying to understand all the factors that might affect what we want to do.15:54
creihtahh, yeah usually tempurls are generated with very short expiration times15:55
elmikothat's what it's looking like, but i want to make sure i've done the due dilligence :)15:55
creihtelmiko: can you describe the use case a bit more, and maybe we can give you a better way?15:55
creihtcertainly :)15:55
elmikowell the main problem has to do with a security issue we are working on. we need access to swift objects and we want to become more secure about how we handle credentials. TempURL was suggested as a possible workaround.15:56
creihtahh15:56
*** pconstantine has joined #openstack-swift15:57
elmikoso, i'm trying to workup a matrix of all our options.15:57
*** NM has quit IRC15:57
*** byeager has joined #openstack-swift15:58
creihtelmiko: well be sure to let us know any ways that we can help16:00
elmikocreiht: definitely, i will most likely have more questions :)16:01
portantecreiht: agreed, it does not appear that they really worked towards an apples-to-apples comparison, but are trying to justify a position they hold16:03
*** byeager has quit IRC16:04
creihtyeah16:04
portantethere are those that embrace the challenge of performance analysis meeting a level of open and objectivity (as much as possible) and those that don't16:04
portanteopenness16:04
*** byeager has joined #openstack-swift16:04
creihtwell it is hard to be totally objective always16:04
portanteyes, that is the challenge16:04
creihtI'm beginning to wonder if it is worth rebuting, or just leave as is16:08
portanteyour points above might be good as questions to get clarified16:09
*** pconstantine has quit IRC16:10
creihtI wonder if something was misconfigured16:12
creihtthere is no way the same write workload for 1 container would be faster than for 20 containers16:12
creihtor why reads would be any different for either16:12
creihtheh16:14
creihtand the one point where swift out-performs, he calls swift more greedy16:14
*** elmiko is now known as _elmiko16:17
*** kevinc_ has quit IRC16:35
*** openstackgerrit has quit IRC16:38
*** byeager has quit IRC16:40
*** byeager has joined #openstack-swift16:41
*** byeager has quit IRC16:45
*** nsquare has quit IRC16:47
*** byeager has joined #openstack-swift16:49
*** mkerrin has joined #openstack-swift16:53
*** kevinc_ has joined #openstack-swift16:54
*** kashyapk has joined #openstack-swift16:59
*** byeager has quit IRC17:01
*** shri has joined #openstack-swift17:02
*** zaitcev has joined #openstack-swift17:12
*** ChanServ sets mode: +v zaitcev17:12
*** _elmiko is now known as elmiko17:14
*** kevinc_ has quit IRC17:17
*** haomaiwang has quit IRC17:22
*** gyee has quit IRC17:23
*** kevinc_ has joined #openstack-swift17:24
*** nsquare has joined #openstack-swift17:30
*** mmcardle has quit IRC17:41
*** mkollaro has quit IRC17:47
*** ujjain has quit IRC17:48
*** kashyapk has quit IRC17:48
*** kashyapk_ has joined #openstack-swift17:48
goodesgood morning all17:50
*** kashyapk_ has quit IRC17:53
*** mkollaro has joined #openstack-swift17:54
*** shri1 has joined #openstack-swift18:01
*** shri1 has quit IRC18:01
*** shri has quit IRC18:03
*** zul has quit IRC18:03
*** zul has joined #openstack-swift18:03
*** nsquare has quit IRC18:08
*** nsquare has joined #openstack-swift18:11
*** openstackgerrit has joined #openstack-swift18:12
*** tdasilva has left #openstack-swift18:18
openstackgerritAlex Gaynor proposed a change to openstack/swift: Changed several files to be Python3 friendly  https://review.openstack.org/9419718:19
*** byeager has joined #openstack-swift18:20
*** mmcardle has joined #openstack-swift18:22
openstackgerritA change was merged to openstack/swift: Container sync no longer sending swift_bytes value  https://review.openstack.org/9446518:31
*** shri has joined #openstack-swift18:36
openstackgerritA change was merged to openstack/swift: replace string format arguments with function parameters  https://review.openstack.org/9433118:52
*** judd7 has joined #openstack-swift18:59
*** sombrafam has quit IRC19:02
*** ahale has quit IRC19:02
*** zz_wasmum has quit IRC19:02
*** ahale has joined #openstack-swift19:03
*** sombrafam has joined #openstack-swift19:03
*** zz_wasmum has joined #openstack-swift19:07
*** nsquare has quit IRC19:08
*** mlipchuk1 has joined #openstack-swift19:10
*** mlipchuk has quit IRC19:12
*** mmcardle has quit IRC19:29
*** mlipchuk1 has quit IRC19:39
*** byeager has quit IRC19:40
*** byeager has joined #openstack-swift19:41
portantecreiht: got read this in more detail myself19:43
*** byeager has quit IRC19:45
creihtportante: did you see my reply?19:45
peluse_creiht:  I did, it was very good19:46
creihtcool, thx19:46
creihtthere certainly seems to be something wrong with his config19:46
*** IRTermite1 has joined #openstack-swift19:47
portantecreiht: looking now ...19:50
creihtif you look at his other blog posts, they were about ceph, so he certainly is swaying that way a bit19:51
portanteyes19:51
peluse_creiht:  you should post to his blog as well (same thing you put in your email)19:52
creihtpeluse_: ahh good point19:52
glangeit's on now19:52
creihtlol19:52
portantewhat mailing list is this on?19:52
portanteI was looking at the replies on the blog site19:53
peluse_portante: openstack@lists.openstack.org19:54
portantek thx19:54
*** byeager has joined #openstack-swift19:55
creihtleft a comment on the blog as well20:01
creihtbut it is awaiting moderation20:01
portantecreiht: great, nice response20:05
creihtthx20:05
*** shri1 has joined #openstack-swift20:11
peluse_anyone from SwiftStack hear how the shoulder-bolting is going/went?20:13
*** shri has quit IRC20:13
creihtpeluse_: his wife tweeted that the doc came out to report it went well about 2 hours ago20:14
torgomaticpeluse_: all I know, I learned from Twitter https://twitter.com/notmyname/status/47714995121909760020:14
peluse_cool, thanks!20:14
*** shri1 has quit IRC20:15
peluse_creiht:  your reply post was 'accepted' and is part of the blog now :)20:16
creihtcool20:17
openstackgerritA change was merged to openstack/swift: xLO bug with auth tokens expiring during download.  https://review.openstack.org/9216520:19
openstackgerritA change was merged to openstack/swift: Fix file uploads > 2 GiB in formpost middleware  https://review.openstack.org/9782820:23
*** pandemicsyn has quit IRC20:28
*** pandemicsyn has joined #openstack-swift20:29
zaitcevhttps://twitter.com/notmyname/status/477184608002273281 "I am wolverine"20:34
*** openstackgerrit has quit IRC20:35
*** openstackgerrit has joined #openstack-swift20:35
*** byeager has quit IRC20:36
*** nsquare has joined #openstack-swift20:36
*** byeager has joined #openstack-swift20:36
*** lpabon has quit IRC20:39
creihtheh... don't let the metal plates get to his head :)20:39
glangedo they use standard anesthesia in California or is it more "natural" and "plant-like"?20:40
*** gyee has joined #openstack-swift20:42
torgomaticthat's just like, your opinion, man20:44
creihthah20:45
*** jamiehannaford has quit IRC20:53
*** byeager has quit IRC20:54
portanteclayg: so the state of the probetests with 99315, should I expect them to pass OOTB?20:58
portanteon one of my SAIOs, 4 errors and 2 failures20:59
portanteit was complaining about my python-swiftclient, so rechecking that I have my install correct21:02
*** byeager has joined #openstack-swift21:02
openstackgerritOpenStack Proposal Bot proposed a change to openstack/swift: Updated from global requirements  https://review.openstack.org/8873621:08
*** byeager has quit IRC21:08
torgomaticyes, bot, please keep proposing the same damn -2'ed thing over and over again. :|21:09
portanteif we did not just -2 it, but left it unanswered, would it then stop talking?21:13
torgomaticI don't think it's set up for people to not just automatically approve changes to their dependencies21:18
portanteperhaps we could reprogram it ... ;)21:19
*** fifieldt_ has quit IRC21:19
*** judd7 has quit IRC21:25
*** judd7 has joined #openstack-swift21:26
claygportante: eah probetests pass ootb on storage policies, run python swift/test/probe/common.py to do a quick config check21:27
claygportante: except they don't pass with ssync, known but with ssync uncovered with probetests that use an slo manifest and hit replication -> https://bugs.launchpad.net/swift/+bug/132909321:27
portanteclayg: "object ERROR (silver): /etc/swift/object-1.ring.gz has 2 replicas instead of 3"21:31
portanteand the stack trace I am seeing in the object server is:21:32
portantehttps://gist.github.com/portante/5b63128e54b57d8974da21:32
portanteI gotta run, online a bit later21:33
*** fifieldt_ has joined #openstack-swift21:36
*** judd7 has quit IRC21:39
*** IRTermite has quit IRC21:39
*** judd7 has joined #openstack-swift21:40
claygportante: what "ssync docs"?21:41
claygportante: I think both of the sp I have configured on my saio have 3 replicas - none of the current probetests really work with 2 replicas - hell lots of swift doesn't work with 2 replicas when theres failures... i guess pauls "setting up policies on a saio" suggest the second policy to be two replicas?21:45
peluse_clayg:  yes and the SAIO script for making the 2nd ring on the PS branch sets up 2 replicas21:46
*** judd7 has quit IRC21:46
claygportante: that traceback looks like an earlier bug that popped up when gholt had peluse_ add the per-policy tmp and quarantine dirs - like the async update didn't know to use per-policy tmp dirs or something?  but I thought that was fixed, so I'll try to look into that.21:46
*** jamiehannaford has joined #openstack-swift21:46
claygpeluse_: can you confirm if that setup works with probetests for you?21:47
peluse_running now...21:47
*** judd7 has joined #openstack-swift21:47
peluse_will swift to rsync first though... one min21:47
claygfunny muscle memory21:47
peluse_heh, just noticed that I typed that :)21:48
peluse_hmmm... 3 err 2 fail.  will rerun with no 2nd policy and again with 2nd policy at 3x instead of 2x and see how it does...21:54
claygpeluse_: thanks21:54
*** judd7 has quit IRC21:59
*** kashyapk has joined #openstack-swift22:03
*** judd7 has joined #openstack-swift22:03
*** dmsimard is now known as dmsimard_away22:05
*** judd7 has quit IRC22:07
*** kashyapk has quit IRC22:09
*** jergerber has quit IRC22:12
peluse_both at 3x: ......FFEES.....22:12
peluse_2nd at 2x or 3x: ......FFEES..E...22:12
peluse_only pol (0): ......SSSSS..S...22:12
peluse_clayg: (2nd one is 2x, 'not 2x or 3x') so clearly there is one that fails w/2x but still the other fail w/any 2nd policy22:13
peluse_clayg:  I can debug if you like but have to take of soon to teach people how to beat other people up.  Have time tomorrow morn though22:14
claygpeluse_: well they all pass for me (and last I heard from creiht and gholt) for them as well?  I've got torgomatic near by - I'll see if he has some failures we can look at.22:17
*** elmiko has left #openstack-swift22:17
claygpeluse_: I can also confirm that they fail for 2x policies (I expect they will) and then we'll have to figure out if it's feasable to have a probetests that will pass on 2x replica swift or if we should update the docs to recommend 3x for the second ring.22:17
peluse_clayg:  OK, if 3x though its docs as well as remakerings that need to be tweaked22:18
claygpeluse_: i'm currently still wading through doc comments, and I'd like to spend more time looking at acoles suggestions on the two vector time and writing more tests there22:18
peluse_clayg:  either way, I'll dig into my failures and see whats up22:18
claygpeluse_: noted22:18
claygpeluse_: np, thanks22:18
peluse_clayg:  let me know if you'd rather have me look at something else so you can focus on the 2d time deal22:19
*** cutforth has quit IRC22:27
peluse_clayg:  my failures were because I was missing /etc/swift/container-reconciler.conf.  Pass now22:32
peluse_well, pass with both rings at 3x.  Believe one failure still there if 2nd ring is 2x... double checking now22:32
peluse_peluse_:  Yup, A_OK with both at 3x, One failure when 2nd ring is 2x (otherwise no issues)22:37
peluse_talking to myself I guess...22:37
mattoliverauMorning all22:42
peluse_good morning!22:42
*** kevinc_ has quit IRC22:42
mattoliveraupeluse_: looks like your having a great conversation with your self.. sounds interesting tho :P22:49
*** IRTermite1 has quit IRC22:59
*** kevinc_ has joined #openstack-swift23:05
claygpeluse_: hehe sorry23:16
claygpeluse_: torgomatic just hit the same thing, and come to think of it creiht did his first round as well - I think maybe folks are setting up based on 96026 and doing the reconciler stuff which is added to the docs in 96038 "Add container-reconciler daemon"23:18
claygnext time i rebase I'll stop at 96038 and pull the doc changes up the chain abit23:18
torgomaticI'm running on patch 99315, which is the last one in the chain (I think)23:18
claygAlso considering moving docs to the end of the rebase change so people can commit over it w/o messing up the rebase line?23:18
torgomaticpatchbot: patch 9931523:19
patchbottorgomatic: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/99315/23:19
torgomaticclayg: I have no problem with that. Write the code, then the docs, right?23:19
*** jamiehannaford has quit IRC23:35
*** kevinc_ has quit IRC23:43
portanteclayg: I am running 9931523:55
portantewhat I see in the code from the stack trace is that the async_update() call in delete at update has a hard-coded 0 for the policy indx23:56
portanteand my guess is that some how /tmp is not created if only an object from the other storage policy is created23:57
portantebut just guessing23:57
portantehave to dig in more23:57

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!