Wednesday, 2014-02-26

*** vito-ordaz has quit IRC00:16
*** matsuhashi has joined #openstack-swift00:30
*** keving has left #openstack-swift00:32
*** mkollaro has quit IRC01:09
*** fifieldt has joined #openstack-swift01:21
*** zul has quit IRC01:31
*** davidhun has quit IRC01:32
*** lnxnut has quit IRC01:33
*** jergerber has quit IRC01:35
*** nosnos has joined #openstack-swift01:41
*** rongze has joined #openstack-swift02:00
*** gyee has quit IRC02:00
*** gyee has joined #openstack-swift02:03
*** gyee has quit IRC02:04
*** gyee has joined #openstack-swift02:05
*** kun_huang has joined #openstack-swift02:23
*** mkollaro has joined #openstack-swift02:58
*** hurricanerix has quit IRC03:16
*** matsuhashi has quit IRC03:37
*** mkollaro has quit IRC03:39
*** gyee has quit IRC03:52
*** byeager has joined #openstack-swift03:54
*** byeager has quit IRC04:02
*** Anju5 has joined #openstack-swift04:15
*** justIn___ has joined #openstack-swift04:16
justIn___notmyname:  when container upadter run ?04:16
*** kun_huang has quit IRC04:23
*** matsuhashi has joined #openstack-swift04:32
*** Dharmit has joined #openstack-swift04:44
*** rongze has quit IRC04:44
*** rongze has joined #openstack-swift04:44
*** rongze has quit IRC04:49
*** dharmit_ has joined #openstack-swift05:04
*** chandan_kumar has joined #openstack-swift05:07
*** Dharmit has quit IRC05:08
*** madhuri has joined #openstack-swift05:09
madhuriHi, anyone there?05:09
madhurinotmyname: I have some questions regarding db files..05:10
*** rongze has joined #openstack-swift05:15
*** rongze_ has joined #openstack-swift05:16
*** rongze has quit IRC05:17
*** rongze_ has quit IRC05:21
*** dharmit_ has quit IRC05:23
*** kun_huang has joined #openstack-swift05:36
*** rongze has joined #openstack-swift06:15
*** rongze has quit IRC06:19
*** rongze has joined #openstack-swift06:21
*** saju_m has joined #openstack-swift06:50
*** haomaiwang has quit IRC07:16
*** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-swift07:16
*** kun_huang has quit IRC07:28
*** haomaiw__ has joined #openstack-swift07:30
*** kun_huang has joined #openstack-swift07:31
*** haomaiwang has quit IRC07:33
*** zaitcev has quit IRC07:42
*** foexle has joined #openstack-swift07:43
*** bvandenh has joined #openstack-swift07:44
openstackgerritEiichi Aikawa proposed a change to openstack/python-swiftclient: Fix the parameter order of assertEqual in swiftclient test  https://review.openstack.org/7646108:15
*** Dharmit has joined #openstack-swift08:34
*** rongze has quit IRC08:34
*** mlipchuk has joined #openstack-swift08:40
*** nacim has joined #openstack-swift08:43
openstackgerritChristian Schwede proposed a change to openstack/python-swiftclient: Add functional tests for python-swiftclient  https://review.openstack.org/7635508:52
*** tane-away is now known as tane08:52
*** tane is now known as tanee08:53
*** kris_h has quit IRC08:59
*** Trixboxer has joined #openstack-swift08:59
openstackgerritChristian Schwede proposed a change to openstack/swift: account to account copy implementation  https://review.openstack.org/7215709:03
*** miurahr has joined #openstack-swift09:07
*** miurahr has quit IRC09:15
*** fbo_away is now known as fbo09:26
*** kun_huang has quit IRC09:31
*** kun_huang has joined #openstack-swift09:32
*** justIn___ has quit IRC09:33
openstackgerritHou Ming Wang proposed a change to openstack/swift: assertEquals is deprecated, use assertEqual  https://review.openstack.org/7647209:34
openstackgerritHou Ming Wang proposed a change to openstack/swift: AssertEquals is deprecated, use assertEqual partI  https://review.openstack.org/7647209:49
*** mkollaro has joined #openstack-swift09:53
*** gvernik has joined #openstack-swift09:53
*** kris_h has joined #openstack-swift10:02
*** davidhadas has quit IRC10:06
*** tanee is now known as tane-away10:15
*** tane-away is now known as tane10:22
*** tane is now known as tanee-away10:30
*** tanee-away is now known as tanee10:30
*** davidhadas has joined #openstack-swift10:41
openstackgerritHou Ming Wang proposed a change to openstack/swift: AssertEquals is deprecated, use assertEqual partI  https://review.openstack.org/7647210:50
openstackgerritChristian Schwede proposed a change to openstack/python-swiftclient: Make bin/swift testable part 1  https://review.openstack.org/7648710:57
openstackgerritChristian Schwede proposed a change to openstack/python-swiftclient: Make bin/swift testable part 2  https://review.openstack.org/7648911:03
openstackgerritChangBo Guo(gcb) proposed a change to openstack/swift: Add common units constants  https://review.openstack.org/7649011:04
*** bvandenh has quit IRC11:08
openstackgerritChristian Schwede proposed a change to openstack/python-swiftclient: Add tests for bin/swift  https://review.openstack.org/7371011:09
*** tanee is now known as tanee-away11:17
*** kun_huang has quit IRC11:22
*** matsuhashi has quit IRC11:46
*** dmsimard has joined #openstack-swift11:52
*** gabia has joined #openstack-swift11:55
gabiahi all.11:55
gabiai have some problum.11:56
gabiawhat is process [loop1] [loop2] [loo3] ??11:56
gabiathese process are occupy huge disk io11:57
*** ppai has joined #openstack-swift12:02
*** miurahr has joined #openstack-swift12:03
gabiaa12:05
*** gabia has quit IRC12:05
*** bvandenh has joined #openstack-swift12:09
*** Midnightmyth has joined #openstack-swift12:09
*** tanee-away is now known as tanee12:19
*** bvandenh has quit IRC12:19
*** miurahr has quit IRC12:20
*** zul has joined #openstack-swift12:32
openstackgerritChangBo Guo(gcb) proposed a change to openstack/swift: Add common units constants  https://review.openstack.org/7649012:36
openstackgerritChangBo Guo(gcb) proposed a change to openstack/swift: Add common units constants  https://review.openstack.org/7649012:41
Dieterbenotmyname! you're speaking tonight in nyc and didn't tell me!12:44
openstackgerritChristian Schwede proposed a change to openstack/python-swiftclient: Make bin/swift testable part 1  https://review.openstack.org/7648712:44
openstackgerritChristian Schwede proposed a change to openstack/python-swiftclient: Make bin/swift testable part 2  https://review.openstack.org/7648912:44
openstackgerritChangBo Guo(gcb) proposed a change to openstack/swift: Replace mumeric expression with units constants  https://review.openstack.org/7652312:45
openstackgerritChristian Schwede proposed a change to openstack/python-swiftclient: Add tests for bin/swift  https://review.openstack.org/7371012:45
*** miurahr has joined #openstack-swift12:49
Dieterbelinkie for new yorkers http://www.meetup.com/OpenStack-New-York-Meetup/events/157768932/12:54
openstackgerritHou Ming Wang proposed a change to openstack/swift: Remove blank space after print  https://review.openstack.org/7652612:55
*** bvandenh has joined #openstack-swift12:57
openstackgerritChangBo Guo(gcb) proposed a change to openstack/swift: Replace mumeric expression with units constants  https://review.openstack.org/7652313:10
*** bvandenh has quit IRC13:12
*** ppai has quit IRC13:15
*** nacim has quit IRC13:35
*** nacim has joined #openstack-swift13:40
*** nosnos has quit IRC13:41
*** zul has quit IRC13:42
*** mlipchuk has quit IRC13:43
*** zul has joined #openstack-swift13:44
*** mlipchuk has joined #openstack-swift14:04
openstackgerritChangBo Guo(gcb) proposed a change to openstack/swift: Add common units constants  https://review.openstack.org/7649014:08
openstackgerritChangBo Guo(gcb) proposed a change to openstack/swift: Replace mumeric expression with units constants  https://review.openstack.org/7652314:14
notmynameDieterbe: yup (just got online for a few minutes). are you coming tonight?14:16
Dieterbenotmyname: TBH not sure. i wanted to ask you, this looks more like an introduction / pretty high-level, it doesn't look that useful for somebody already familiar with swift like me14:18
Dieterbenotmyname: maybe i could stop by after the talk for a chat. what do you think14:19
dmsimardI asked the guys in #openstack-horizon but did not get a definitive answer.. does Horizon support Swift's CORS at all ? Havana ?14:19
*** mvenesio has joined #openstack-swift14:23
*** judd7 has joined #openstack-swift14:24
Dieterbenotmyname: leaving for work now, be back online in an houre. please lemme know thx14:30
notmynameDieterbe: love to have you there tonight14:31
notmynamereminder: swift team meeting today in about 4.5 hours (ie at 1900UTC)14:32
notmynameI'll be busy most of the day in a swift workshop (yay new swift users!), but I'll be online for the meeting14:33
Dieterbenotmyname: but the talk itself will be more of an introduction right? are you guys going to a bar or something afterwards?14:34
*** judd7 has quit IRC14:34
*** pberis has quit IRC14:41
notmynameDieterbe: ya, it will probably be more of an intro (from your perspective).14:45
notmynameDieterbe: I'm not sure what we'll be doing after. I'm not doing the logistics for it14:45
*** gvernik has quit IRC14:51
*** byeager has joined #openstack-swift14:52
openstackgerritChristian Schwede proposed a change to openstack/python-swiftclient: Add tests for bin/swift  https://review.openstack.org/7371014:56
*** mvenesio has quit IRC14:57
openstackgerritChristian Schwede proposed a change to openstack/python-swiftclient: Add tests for bin/swift  https://review.openstack.org/7371014:58
*** saju_m has quit IRC15:02
*** Midnightmyth has quit IRC15:06
*** mlipchuk1 has joined #openstack-swift15:09
*** mlipchuk has quit IRC15:13
*** chuck__ has joined #openstack-swift15:24
*** byeager has quit IRC15:30
*** SkyRocknRoll__ has joined #openstack-swift15:34
*** miurahr has quit IRC15:36
Dieterbenotmyname: aight15:37
*** lnxnut has joined #openstack-swift15:44
luisbgnotmyname, ping15:45
*** chuck__ has quit IRC15:45
*** chandan_kumar has quit IRC15:52
*** pberis has joined #openstack-swift15:53
*** bvandenh has joined #openstack-swift15:54
*** chandan_kumar has joined #openstack-swift15:56
*** cropalato has joined #openstack-swift16:01
cropalatoHi guys, I just realized that swift command return 0 even if the object that i'm checking do not exist.16:03
cropalatoIs there a way to know if the command fail, without process stdout?16:04
Dieterbecropalato: which version of swift?16:04
Dieterbei thought most of those cases were fixed16:05
*** asselin_ has joined #openstack-swift16:05
*** tongli has joined #openstack-swift16:05
*** asselin_ has left #openstack-swift16:05
cropalatoDieterbe: I'm using python-swift 1.4.8-2+deb7u1.16:06
cropalatoswift --version swift 1.016:06
luisbgcropalato, that is old, update! :)16:06
*** dtalton has joined #openstack-swift16:06
luisbg~ $ swift --version16:06
luisbgswift 2.0.2.7.gdefe19f16:06
*** dtalton has left #openstack-swift16:07
cropalatoluisbg: tanks16:07
cropalato*thanks16:07
luisbgcropalato, no problem16:07
*** mkollaro has quit IRC16:12
dmsimardThis might be a bit basic but it's driving me nut.. Let's pretend I configured devices to be mounted in /srv/node (<daemon>-server.conf), so i'll have /srv/node/sdb, /srv/node/sdc.. etc. I have disks xfs formatted and mounted in /srv/node. Why would the daemons create folders "1" and "2" at the root of /srv/node instead of inside /srv/node/sdb ?16:13
*** zaitcev has joined #openstack-swift16:21
*** ChanServ sets mode: +v zaitcev16:21
*** mlipchuk has joined #openstack-swift16:30
*** mlipchuk1 has quit IRC16:30
*** jairo has joined #openstack-swift16:33
openstackgerritKris Haralambiev proposed a change to openstack/swift: Add proxy middleware for server-side encryption  https://review.openstack.org/7657816:37
*** chuck__ has joined #openstack-swift16:43
*** chuck__ has quit IRC16:44
*** byeager has joined #openstack-swift16:50
*** kris_h has quit IRC16:52
*** gyee has joined #openstack-swift17:04
*** saju_m has joined #openstack-swift17:06
*** Dharmit has quit IRC17:07
*** Dharmit has joined #openstack-swift17:07
*** Dharmit has quit IRC17:08
*** gvernik has joined #openstack-swift17:15
*** mvenesio has joined #openstack-swift17:18
gvernikhello. Hope someone can answer this.17:18
gvernikI have a middleware that runs on the object server. This MW need to retrieve a content of an object, that doesn't exists on the same object server. For example user send GET /a/c/o and an object server middleware will need to perform GET /a1/c1/o1.17:18
gvernikWhat is the best way to achieve it? Does it means that my MW need to read location of o1 from object ring, create HTTP request and send it directly to other object server?17:18
glangegvernik: take a look at the internal client in swift/common/internal_client.py, consider using that17:20
gvernikthanks. will look into it.17:21
*** Trixboxer has quit IRC17:21
*** nacim has quit IRC17:28
*** mlipchuk has quit IRC17:28
gvernikglange: but if i will use internal_client to send request from one object server to another, it will bypass through proxy server. right?17:38
*** minnear_ is now known as minnear17:43
*** SkyRocknRoll__ has quit IRC17:47
glangegvernik: true, but it still goes through a local proxy server object with a sripped down pipeline17:57
glangewe use the internal client to process and deliver logs and it works pretty well17:59
*** byeager has quit IRC18:00
gvernikglange: the problem that object servers usually in the internal network, while proxy is outside. Communication between proxy and object server is by internal network. But internal_client will access proxy through it's external IP which usually not allowed.18:03
*** kris_h has joined #openstack-swift18:05
gholt? I thought "internal" mean, well, internal?18:07
gholtSorry, I jumped in an already in progress conversation. Ignore me. :)18:08
gvernikno,no, please proceed.. i am wrong? internal client that is used to access proxy server from object sever will use internal network?18:08
*** tanee is now known as tanee-away18:20
gholtgvernik: As far as I recall, internal_client was made for internal requests where working through a proxy server wasn't desired or possible. It should make its own instance of the proxy server code and therefore talk directly to the backend servers.18:26
gvernikgholt, glange: thanks a lot for this information. I was completely not aware of it.18:29
*** saju_m has quit IRC18:35
*** davidhadas has quit IRC18:44
*** chandan_kumar has quit IRC18:46
*** zaba_ has joined #openstack-swift18:47
*** zaba_ is now known as Guest4923318:47
pelusedmsimard:  I'm not aware of any code that creates those dirs, are you by chance talking about an all in one isntallation where the instuctions have you manually creating those dirs as mnt points for the 4 'disks' that are used within the AIO installation?18:51
dmsimardpeluse: Thanks for getting back to me, I ended up figuring it out - had to do with the ring device creations.. I named them 1 and 2 instead of the actual folder corresponding to the devices18:52
pelusedmsimard:  cool18:53
*** acoles- has joined #openstack-swift18:58
notmynameswift team meeting momentarily18:58
*** Guest49233 has quit IRC18:59
notmynameswift meeting time in #openstack-meeting19:00
wernotmyname: can anyone lurk?19:00
notmynameof course!19:00
wercool ty :)19:01
*** tdasilva has joined #openstack-swift19:01
*** fbo is now known as fbo_away19:03
portantenotmyname: what is the wiki page for meeting topics?19:04
notmynameportante: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Swift19:06
portantenotmyname: thanks19:06
*** davidhadas has joined #openstack-swift19:21
glangegvernik: no prblem19:29
openstackgerritLuis de Bethencourt proposed a change to openstack/python-swiftclient: Help string format persistent  https://review.openstack.org/7663019:31
openstackgerritLuis de Bethencourt proposed a change to openstack/python-swiftclient: Make the help strings constant  https://review.openstack.org/7457819:31
luisbgI split the previous approved patch into two as portante suggested :)19:35
cschwede_luisbg: and i just wanted to ask why you didn't merge them into one ;-)19:36
portantecschwede_: I saw that there was a lot of reformatting19:36
luisbgcschwede_, hahaha, you can see in the second one listed there, that they were originally one19:36
luisbgI agree with portante19:36
portanteso it was easier to see one patch with just reformatting19:36
portanteand then the other with the substantive chagnes19:36
portantein my mind at leaset19:37
portanteleast19:37
luisbgI did two things at the same time, I should've split "formatting" and "strings being constant"19:37
cschwede_portante: luisbg: thanks, makes sense to me!19:37
luisbgportante, I see one line where the split is wrong, do you care? should I re-split and re-submit, or for one it isn't too bad19:37
luisbgI mean, there is one change in the formatting patch that belongs in the string persistency19:38
*** tong_ has joined #openstack-swift19:38
*** mvenesio_ has joined #openstack-swift19:38
luisbgcschwede_, thanks to you for checking it19:40
luisbgcschwede_, why no review though? :P19:40
cschwede_luisbg: i'm following a meeting ;-)19:41
*** bobf has joined #openstack-swift19:41
luisbgcschwede_, oooh right, that meeting :P19:41
*** tsg has joined #openstack-swift19:42
*** bobf has quit IRC19:43
*** bvandenh_ has joined #openstack-swift19:43
*** kris_ha has joined #openstack-swift19:44
*** kris_h has quit IRC19:47
*** mvenesio has quit IRC19:47
*** gyee has quit IRC19:47
*** tongli has quit IRC19:47
*** bvandenh has quit IRC19:47
*** erlon has quit IRC19:47
*** tanee-away has quit IRC19:47
*** wkelly has quit IRC19:47
*** akscram has quit IRC19:47
*** tanee-away has joined #openstack-swift19:48
*** tanee-away is now known as tanee19:48
*** gyee has joined #openstack-swift19:53
*** gvernik has quit IRC19:57
*** otoolee has left #openstack-swift19:58
*** erlon has joined #openstack-swift19:58
*** wkelly has joined #openstack-swift19:58
*** akscram has joined #openstack-swift19:58
notmynameluisbg: didn't mean o cut you off. we're out of time, and I'm getting bugged in person here :-)19:58
*** otoolee has joined #openstack-swift19:58
luisbgI am happy to edit the wiki, but that is why I asked what is the policy19:59
*** erlon has quit IRC19:59
*** wkelly has quit IRC19:59
*** akscram has quit IRC19:59
notmyname:-)19:59
luisbgI need to know before I can state it in the wiki :P19:59
* notmyname out19:59
luisbgnotmyname, no problem, attend your workshop19:59
*** cropalato has quit IRC20:01
*** foexle has quit IRC20:01
*** cropalat1 has joined #openstack-swift20:01
*** erlon has joined #openstack-swift20:05
*** wkelly has joined #openstack-swift20:05
*** akscram has joined #openstack-swift20:05
*** foexle has joined #openstack-swift20:05
openstackgerritLuis de Bethencourt proposed a change to openstack/python-swiftclient: Make the help strings constant  https://review.openstack.org/7457820:06
*** bobf has joined #openstack-swift20:06
luisbgcschwede_ saw one typo and a few things to improve20:07
luisbgso did that20:07
*** bobf has quit IRC20:08
*** lincolnt has joined #openstack-swift20:09
*** foexle_ has joined #openstack-swift20:11
openstackgerritLuis de Bethencourt proposed a change to openstack/python-swiftclient: Help string format persistent  https://review.openstack.org/7663020:14
*** dmsimard has quit IRC20:14
luisbgupdated the second patch to be applicable after the changes to the first20:16
*** foexle has quit IRC20:18
*** Kim-Chi-San has quit IRC20:18
*** gholt has quit IRC20:18
*** Kim-Chi-San has joined #openstack-swift20:19
*** gholt has joined #openstack-swift20:19
*** ChanServ sets mode: +v gholt20:20
*** lincolnt has quit IRC20:27
*** jokke__ is now known as jokke_20:48
openstackgerritLuis de Bethencourt proposed a change to openstack/python-swiftclient: Make the help strings constant  https://review.openstack.org/7457820:53
openstackgerritLuis de Bethencourt proposed a change to openstack/python-swiftclient: Help string format persistent  https://review.openstack.org/7663020:53
*** Midnightmyth has joined #openstack-swift21:00
*** mvenesio_ has quit IRC21:06
*** mkollaro has joined #openstack-swift21:07
*** foexle has joined #openstack-swift21:20
*** openstackgerrit has quit IRC21:20
*** foexle_ has quit IRC21:20
*** jokke_ has quit IRC21:20
*** davidhun has joined #openstack-swift21:21
*** jokke_ has joined #openstack-swift21:21
*** openstackgerrit has joined #openstack-swift21:21
*** davidhadas_ has joined #openstack-swift21:24
*** judd7 has joined #openstack-swift21:26
*** jokke__ has joined #openstack-swift21:28
*** jokke_ has quit IRC21:28
*** davidhadas has quit IRC21:35
*** cschwede- has joined #openstack-swift21:35
*** joearnold_ has joined #openstack-swift21:35
*** joearnold has quit IRC21:35
*** cschwede_ has quit IRC21:35
*** joearnold_ is now known as joearnold21:35
*** shri has joined #openstack-swift21:48
shriI want to verify the replication count of a swift installation. Is there a way I can do that?21:48
shriobject replication21:48
*** Midnightmyth has quit IRC21:50
*** tong_ has quit IRC21:50
pconstantineerr...who's bright idea was to do that in gatekeeper middleware?21:53
pconstantineresp = req.get_response(self.app)21:53
pconstantineyeah, right, let's remove all duplicate headers from response21:53
pconstantinewho needs them? :)21:53
pconstantinereally, guys, half day of pulling hairs on my ass21:54
portantepconstantine: you need duplicate headers?21:55
portantecan you say more?21:55
pconstantineyes, Set-Cookie21:55
portanteso you have middleware that sets cookie headers, okay21:55
pconstantineperfectly fine duplicate header, and also the one and only way to get multiple cookies set21:56
portanteso we need to fix gatekeeper then21:56
pconstantineyep21:56
portantelet's get a functional test that ensures this does not happen again21:56
pconstantineI think that @wsgify decorator cannot be used on "main path" middleware21:57
portantebtw, it sounds like that debugging process must-a really hurt! ;)21:57
pconstantineyep, this is the "required" middleware, and it gets inserted by itself, you know :)21:58
pconstantineso, if you don't know that it gets inserted, it's really a cool detective story21:58
pconstantineover https, when you have no tcpdump for packets21:58
portantethere is command that dumps your final middleware pipeline21:58
portanteswift-config something21:59
pconstantineup until today I was oblivious to "required" middleware thingy21:59
portantepconstantine: don't be afraid to say something earlier, might save your rear-end in the future. :)21:59
portantepconstantine: relatively new change for system metadata and account acls, I believe22:00
pconstantineportante: a really nasty stuff anyway, will try to fix it asap22:02
portantethanks22:03
torgomaticpconstantine: you might also wanna go look at other middlewares, esp. slo and dlo, for the same sort of thing22:18
torgomaticI think they're pretty good at not touching the response if it's not for a large object, but they probably flatten repeated headers for large-object responses22:20
pconstantineI think they not, as far as I have checked today alreay22:23
pconstantinealready22:23
pconstantinedouble checked and they are good, they do not touch response headers22:24
pconstantinethey do the mangling in a smarter way, i.e. install callbacks that change data in app context itself22:26
acoles-pconstantine: apologies for the hassle that has caused you. i had not foreseen duplicate headers and that subtlety of the wsgify decorator22:29
pconstantinedo you want me to submit a patch already? I have changed the behavior of gatekeeper22:31
pconstantinehmm, we need a test to prevent this one, this may be harder to invent22:31
acoles-pconstantine: sure, i was going to work on fixing it tomorrow (it is night where i am) but if you have a fix please go ahead.22:32
pconstantineacoles-: 12:32 AM here22:32
pconstantine:)22:32
acoles-pconstantine: ;)22:32
acoles-pconstantine: just taking a look at the existing tests...22:35
*** csd has joined #openstack-swift22:41
pconstantineno easy way to do it, we need to inject a new thing in the "required" middlewares before functional environment starts22:45
acoles-pconstantine: hmm, functional test will be hard, as you say. there are unit tests that generate outbound header sets and verify headers passing out through gatekeeper.22:47
pconstantineyep, units are not that hard, but functional should catch any future middleware that breaks things22:47
acoles-pconstantine: it may be they could be extended to cover this case22:48
portantepconstantine: I have a patch that allows one to run functional tests locally22:48
portanteand with that you could run such a test more easily22:48
* portante goes a looks for it22:49
portantehttps://review.openstack.org/6610822:49
portanteI have not had time to shape this up, but it is a start to make that kind of work easier22:50
portanteand it plops down on an existing tree since it does not modify the existing functional tests22:51
portantefwiw22:51
pconstantineportante: that's good, but Jenkings has some unknown config that all patches will be tested against...22:54
acoles-portante: thanks for that link22:54
*** miurahr has joined #openstack-swift22:55
*** lnxnut has quit IRC22:55
*** miurahr has left #openstack-swift22:56
portanteI'll rebase it22:58
openstackgerritPeter Portante proposed a change to openstack/swift: In-process swift server for functional tests  https://review.openstack.org/6610823:21
portanteacoles-, pconstantine: ^^^23:22
portanteat least in my tree (Fedora 19), tox -e pep8,py27,func passed23:22
portanteyou don't need the tox.ini mods to incorporate23:22
*** sungju_ has joined #openstack-swift23:31
*** sungju has joined #openstack-swift23:32
*** sungju_ has quit IRC23:33
openstackgerritConstantine Peresypkin proposed a change to openstack/swift: fix gatekeeper response headers behavior  https://review.openstack.org/7670923:41
*** judd7 has quit IRC23:52
*** mkollaro has quit IRC23:54

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!