Friday, 2017-08-04

tonybOh rats, prometheanfire are you around at all?  If so can you drop your prodedrual -2's so I can do the blocking?01:17
prometheanfireya01:17
prometheanfiream now01:17
prometheanfireJUST logged on01:17
prometheanfirewhich review?01:17
tonybmonascaclient is the one that *might* get a FFE but I'm still not convinced.01:18
prometheanfireya, I'm not sure on that one01:19
tonybhttps://review.openstack.org/48917301:19
prometheanfirek, need gertty to sync01:19
tonybhttps://review.openstack.org/49015101:19
tonybhttps://review.openstack.org/48922601:20
tonybThat's all of them01:21
tonybhttps://review.openstack.org/#/q/is:open+label:Code-Review%253C%253D-2%252Cprometheanfire+project:openstack/requirements+branch:master01:21
openstackgerritOpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/requirements master: update constraint for glance_store to new release 0.22.0  https://review.openstack.org/49069601:25
prometheanfiretonyb: was the FFE for the min bump for reno approved?01:26
tonybprometheanfire: No but while we're doing one we shoudl just switch them all01:27
prometheanfiregood point01:28
prometheanfireif we rib the bandaid off all at once01:28
tonybsomethign like that ;D01:29
prometheanfires/rib/rip01:29
prometheanfirehttps://review.openstack.org/489173 is still blocked by you01:30
tonybprometheanfire: Sorry I didn't mean for you to +2 them the monsaca thing is still a debate it's likely I'll grant the FFE but I'm deeply confused.  I just wanted it to be an option, given you're out for the w/e and early next week01:32
prometheanfireoh01:34
prometheanfirethat's what I get for not finishing my email01:34
tonyb:)  You're s'psed to be relaxing aren't you?01:34
prometheanfiresomething like that, but if my emails build up it becomes hell, so I do that at least once a day01:36
prometheanfirealso, lol https://github.com/eventlet/eventlet/issues/42801:37
prometheanfireshould I remove my +2s then?01:38
tonybprometheanfire: You shoudl vote on them how you feel is best.  I'd guess that a 0 vote is most appropriate but only you know what level of review you've done.01:40
prometheanfireI've been watching them both, and the +2 between the two is linked for me, each one on it's own isn't worth it01:42
prometheanfireunless something changed today01:42
tonybprometheanfire: which 2 are linked, sorry I'm lost01:44
tonybprometheanfire: juggling the monasca, barbicanclient, and paucnh updates01:45
tonybOh there are 2 paucnh updates one block and one not doing basically the same thing01:46
* tonyb will add comments and then abanond the blocked one.01:46
prometheanfirelinked on impact, my update to the reno bump explains it01:46
prometheanfireeach one alone isn't worth it (though monascaclient is kinda rough, so maybe)01:48
tonybprometheanfire: Oh okay.  I disagree.  Subscribing 220 projects to a g-r bump and then $some_number of them to go throught a late re-release which will possibly subscribe more projects the a g-r bump lather, rinse, repeat01:48
tonybThe monasca thing is limited to projects that don't have pike branches so we're saved by the RC1 deadline next week01:49
tonybprometheanfire: it'll potentially slow those projects down by other than that has no impact on the reales and requirements teams01:50
prometheanfireya...  I'm just going to remove my votes since I'm afk (basically)01:51
prometheanfireand now I am really afk for a bit01:53
tonybprometheanfire: cool.  Sorry to have bugged you late.  I'm gald you were arund though01:54
openstackgerritTony Breeds proposed openstack/requirements master: WiP: [tools]  Add a tool to make a no-op change  https://review.openstack.org/49033502:05
openstackgerritTony Breeds proposed openstack/requirements master: update constraint for glance_store to new release 0.22.0  https://review.openstack.org/49069602:14
openstackgerritTony Breeds proposed openstack/requirements master: Update glance store and client minimums  https://review.openstack.org/48820902:15
openstackgerritTony Breeds proposed openstack/requirements master: Update glance store and client minimums  https://review.openstack.org/48820902:15
openstackgerritTony Breeds proposed openstack/requirements master: Update glance store and client minimums  https://review.openstack.org/48820902:16
openstackgerritTony Breeds proposed openstack/requirements master: Raise paunch upper-contraints to 1.5.0  https://review.openstack.org/49028702:21
*** http_GK1wmSU has joined #openstack-requirements02:36
openstackgerritMerged openstack/requirements master: update constraint for python-glanceclient to new release 2.8.0  https://review.openstack.org/48825802:37
*** http_GK1wmSU has left #openstack-requirements02:38
prometheanfireya, back02:38
prometheanfirehad to make a run to the drug store02:38
tonybMan this monascaclient thing is confusing.02:39
prometheanfireit looks like the consumers of it are fine with it though02:40
*** udesale has joined #openstack-requirements02:51
openstackgerritTony Breeds proposed openstack/requirements master: update constraint for python-barbicanclient to new release 4.5.2  https://review.openstack.org/49060003:25
openstackgerritTony Breeds proposed openstack/requirements master: Block python-barbicanclient 4.5.1  https://review.openstack.org/49072803:25
tonybok I think I've done all I can: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/starredby:tonyb+is:open+project:openstack/requirements+branch:master03:28
*** coolsvap has joined #openstack-requirements03:41
openstackgerritTony Breeds proposed openstack/requirements master: WiP: [tools]  Add a tool to make a no-op change  https://review.openstack.org/49033504:19
openstackgerritTony Breeds proposed openstack/requirements master: Raise paunch upper-contraints to 1.5.0  https://review.openstack.org/49028704:24
openstackgerritMerged openstack/requirements master: Bump constraint for monascaclient  https://review.openstack.org/48917304:29
*** hoangcx has left #openstack-requirements04:37
openstackgerritDirk Mueller proposed openstack/requirements master: DNM: Running tests with upper-constraints.txt set to the g-r minimum  https://review.openstack.org/49008705:06
openstackgerritSteve Baker proposed openstack/requirements master: Raise paunch upper-contraints to 1.5.0  https://review.openstack.org/49028705:28
openstackgerritMerged openstack/requirements master: update constraint for python-barbicanclient to new release 4.5.2  https://review.openstack.org/49060006:15
tonybwe might just finish all the FFEs yet!06:17
openstackgerritTony Breeds proposed openstack/requirements master: Raise paunch upper-contraints to 1.5.0  https://review.openstack.org/49028706:18
tonybdirk: we don't need to bump the g-r for paunch as the only OpenStack Hosted consumer is unaffected by the bug06:20
tonybthey only reason we're even bumping u-c is because of RDO which which needs it in u-c.  It could wait until we thaw but that'd block RDO's pike release06:21
openstackgerritDirk Mueller proposed openstack/requirements master: DNM: Running tests with upper-constraints.txt set to the g-r minimum  https://review.openstack.org/49008706:43
dirktonyb: so with other words it could be done now if it doesn't affect anyone else06:49
dirktonyb: we shouldn't "allow" versions that have known bugs that degrade openstack imho.. it's been pretty difficult to find meaningfull lower bounds, and playing with the review for testing them indicates that we pretty much have completely meaningless lower bounds06:51
dirkI mean, if not even swift is passing with them.. ;-)06:51
tonybdirk: No those not equivielent statements.07:33
tonybdirk: I get that th elower bounds stuff is hard and a mess but this isn't that.07:34
openstackgerritMerged openstack/requirements master: Block python-barbicanclient 4.5.1  https://review.openstack.org/49072807:39
*** http_GK1wmSU has joined #openstack-requirements08:06
*** http_GK1wmSU has left #openstack-requirements08:07
*** aarefiev_afk is now known as aarefiev08:10
*** witek has quit IRC09:12
*** witek has joined #openstack-requirements09:16
*** sdague has joined #openstack-requirements09:42
*** openstackgerrit has quit IRC10:18
*** openstackgerrit has joined #openstack-requirements10:23
openstackgerritOpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/requirements master: Updated from generate-constraints  https://review.openstack.org/48837310:23
*** udesale has quit IRC10:48
openstackgerritMerged openstack/requirements master: Raise paunch upper-contraints to 1.5.0  https://review.openstack.org/49028711:08
*** aarefiev is now known as aarefiev_afk13:07
openstackgerritMadhuri Kumari proposed openstack/requirements master: Require docker-py to be 2.4.2  https://review.openstack.org/49087013:43
*** Dinesh_Bhor has quit IRC13:47
openstackgerritMerged openstack/requirements master: update constraint for glance_store to new release 0.22.0  https://review.openstack.org/49069616:34
*** openstackstatus has quit IRC17:27
*** openstack has joined #openstack-requirements17:29
*** openstackstatus has joined #openstack-requirements17:29
*** ChanServ sets mode: +v openstackstatus17:29
*** Guest46292 is now known as amrith17:35
*** markmcclain has quit IRC18:24
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-requirements18:24
*** openstackstatus has quit IRC18:26
*** openstack has joined #openstack-requirements18:28
*** openstackstatus has joined #openstack-requirements18:28
*** ChanServ sets mode: +v openstackstatus18:28
smcginnistonyb: Not sure if you're still around. The question came up as to whether glance_store needs a new release now that those last patches made it through.19:06
prometheanfiresmcginnis: which patch?19:34
openstackgerritMatthew Treinish proposed openstack/requirements master: Add stestr to global requirements  https://review.openstack.org/49107519:46
-openstackstatus- NOTICE: Gerrit is being restarted to pick up CSS changes and should be back momentarily20:36
*** sdague has quit IRC21:08
tonybsmcginnis, prometheanfire: We did it yesterday (0.22.0)21:45
prometheanfireya, we noticed a bit later21:46
tonybprometheanfire: cool.  just catching up on my IRC scrollback21:47
smcginnistonyb: Took us a while but we figured it out. ;)21:48
smcginnistonyb: Shouldn't you be anniversarying or something?21:48
prometheanfireoh? ya, don't be here21:49
prometheanfireno reason21:49
tonybsmcginnis: I shoudl but right now it's make the kids breakfast time21:50
prometheanfiremake kids eat breakfast :P21:51
tonybprometheanfire: Done.  one's a ballet and the other is either watching pokemon or playing playstation #best_dad :(23:28

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.15.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!