Wednesday, 2015-08-26

*** dims_ has joined #openstack-relmgr-office00:06
*** dims has quit IRC00:07
*** dims has joined #openstack-relmgr-office00:12
*** dims_ has quit IRC00:15
*** openstack has joined #openstack-relmgr-office00:34
*** sigmavirus24 is now known as sigmavirus24_awa00:46
*** armax has quit IRC00:59
*** bnemec has quit IRC01:26
*** dims has quit IRC02:46
*** armax has joined #openstack-relmgr-office04:07
*** dims has joined #openstack-relmgr-office05:36
*** armax has quit IRC05:38
*** dims has quit IRC05:42
*** armax has joined #openstack-relmgr-office05:42
*** armax has quit IRC06:20
*** dims has joined #openstack-relmgr-office07:24
*** dims has quit IRC07:29
ttxlifeless, dhellmann: I think it would be great to get them into tarballs. Primary goal is to continuously produce release notes so that consumers of any state of the branch can get them. But shipping them in code tarballs is definitely the most convenient way to make them accessible08:22
lifelessok08:23
lifelessso I suggest thats a phase 208:23
ttxsure, currently it's a wiki so it's not as if we were losing anything08:23
openstackgerritAndreas Jaeger proposed openstack/releases: Release openstack-doc-tools 0.30.1  https://review.openstack.org/21702808:28
*** dims has joined #openstack-relmgr-office09:48
*** dims_ has joined #openstack-relmgr-office11:48
*** dims has quit IRC11:52
*** AJaeger has joined #openstack-relmgr-office12:42
*** gordc has joined #openstack-relmgr-office13:49
johnthetubaguyttx: so we are thinking about a python-novaclient release, would tuesday be pushing it?13:57
ttxjohnthetubaguy: no, should be fine13:58
AJaegerRelease managers, could you release openstack-doc-tools again, please? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/217028/ is the change13:58
johnthetubaguyttx: OK, cool, that gives us time to line things up13:58
*** sigmavirus24_awa is now known as sigmavirus2414:05
*** lifeless1 has joined #openstack-relmgr-office14:23
*** lifeless has quit IRC14:24
*** armax has joined #openstack-relmgr-office15:08
*** bnemec has joined #openstack-relmgr-office15:17
-openstackstatus- NOTICE: restarting gerrit due to a slow memory leak15:45
ttxdhellmann: around ? Could you walk me through an openstack/releases release process, I could do openstack-doc-tools15:48
devanandadhellmann: any further thoughts on how you'd like to do release notes for ironic? I have a bit of time today to poke things if needed15:48
AJaegerttx, cool!15:48
ttxI happily ignored it until now but I should probably do my share15:48
*** armax has quit IRC15:53
ttxsounds like a run of release_postversion and sending an email, but would like to doublecheck I'm not missing anything15:54
*** dims_ has quit IRC16:00
*** dims has joined #openstack-relmgr-office16:01
*** AJaeger has quit IRC16:04
dhellmannttx: I'm back online16:07
dhellmanndevananda: there's an email thread going in which we describe a tool, but for now if you just write a text file we'll be able to cope with that16:07
ttxdhellmann: I'm wrapping the day up, so mabe I'll take the lesson another day16:08
dhellmannttx: ok, sure16:08
dhellmannI'll do that doc tool release now16:08
devanandadhellmann: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/216843/116:08
ttxdhellmann: if the process is documented please let me know where, I'll take it from there and test the docs that way16:08
ttxopenstack/releases readme is more for PTLs, and release-tools readme is not very process-oriented16:09
dhellmannttx: you have the 2 steps right. The email it generates is written to relnotes/$project-$version16:09
ttx(and the wiki is very outdated16:09
ttx)16:09
dhellmannyeah, I thought we'd have more of this automated by now, and the 2-3 people doing it so far just knew how, so we didn't write it down :-/16:09
dhellmannttx: why don't I do the doc tools release, and use it as an example to document what to do?16:10
ttxsure! and I'll test the doc with another release16:11
dhellmanndevananda: ironic is the first project to need to do this, so you're setting the standard. The tooling is going to come later, and we'll retrofit the ironic stuff to include it. FWIW, we've decided that including the release notes inside the tarball is phase 2 of the tooling.16:11
dhellmanndevananda: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-August/072943.html is the most current email in the thread16:11
dhellmannttx: sounds good16:11
devanandadhellmann: I see. in that case, yea, I agree with dmitry's comment -- having this in rst format and rendered on the docs site would be good addition16:12
devanandathanks, i'll give it a read16:12
dhellmanndevananda: that's going to be part of what we support, yes16:12
devanandacoolness16:14
dhellmanndevananda: if you make a file doc/source/releasenotes/liberty.rst and put your notes in that, we should be able to make that work with what I'm planning16:14
openstackgerritMerged openstack-infra/release-tools: correct where stable branch script looks for repo  https://review.openstack.org/21571816:14
devanandagreat, i'll update that patch now16:14
devanandawell16:14
devanandashould it be liberty.rst or 4.0.0.rst ?16:15
dhellmanndevananda: of course we're still working out the details, so things may change16:15
devanandabecause this may not (and I hope it is not) the final release we do for liberty16:15
dhellmanndevananda: oh, right16:15
dhellmannwell, we will have the notes for an entire series in one file16:15
dhellmannmultiple versions16:15
devanandawhy not one file with a history of all releases16:15
devanandathat indicates which ones were which coordinated names?16:15
dhellmannwe may end up doing that, too16:15
devanandathat is what swift does, fwiw16:15
dhellmannyeah, I have to look at their notes16:16
dhellmanndevananda: ok, do one big file in doc/source/releasenotes/index.rst (we may have other, non-rst files in that directory eventually, so you don't want to call it doc/source/releasenotes.rst)16:18
devanandak16:18
dhellmanndevananda: and if anyone on the ironic team wants to chime in on that email thread, that's a better place to discuss the design than the review for one project16:19
ttxdhellmann: trying to unblock a few reviews... you pointed me to an out-of-date setuptools, that's definitely possible. I thought tox would pull updated things from pip for me, but i guess that doesn't work for setuptools. How should I fix that ?16:19
ttxI'm probably using Ubuntu's system one16:20
ttx12.2-116:20
dhellmannttx: This is a bit cargo-culty, but what I do is globally, "sudo pip install -U setuptools" then the same for virtualenv then the same for tox.16:20
dhellmannoh, you probably want pip, too, so put that after setuptools16:20
dhellmannoh, and don't use any of those tools from system packages16:21
dhellmannat least not on a development system16:21
ttxI bet that was imported for me at some point.16:21
openstackgerritMerged openstack/releases: add 'most recent' table to each page  https://review.openstack.org/21529616:33
openstackgerritMerged openstack/releases: show version history from most new to old  https://review.openstack.org/21529716:38
openstackgerritMerged openstack/releases: clean up 'most recent' table  https://review.openstack.org/21529816:38
openstackgerritMerged openstack/releases: tighten up the tables within each deliverable section  https://review.openstack.org/21529916:38
openstackgerritMerged openstack/releases: tighten up the tables within each deliverable section  https://review.openstack.org/21529916:38
openstackgerritMerged openstack/releases: update copyright  https://review.openstack.org/21575316:38
openstackgerritMerged openstack/releases: Release openstack-doc-tools 0.30.1  https://review.openstack.org/21702816:38
devanandadhellmann: new patch uploaded to https://review.openstack.org/#/c/216843/16:50
openstackgerritDoug Hellmann proposed openstack-infra/release-tools: Document library release process  https://review.openstack.org/21730716:59
dhellmanndevananda: +117:01
*** armax has joined #openstack-relmgr-office17:34
*** dims_ has joined #openstack-relmgr-office17:41
*** dims has quit IRC17:42
*** openstackgerrit has quit IRC18:17
*** openstackgerrit has joined #openstack-relmgr-office18:17
*** armax has quit IRC18:18
*** armax has joined #openstack-relmgr-office18:20
*** lifeless1 is now known as lifeless18:39
*** dims_ has quit IRC18:53
*** dims has joined #openstack-relmgr-office18:54
openstackgerritMerged openstack/releases: Add doc requirements to venv  https://review.openstack.org/21723019:24
*** spzala has joined #openstack-relmgr-office19:27
dhellmannhi, spzala19:27
spzaladhellmann: Hi Doug!19:28
dhellmannso, first question, some of the other heat projects are managed -- does the heat team want the tosca-parser repo to be managed, too, or do you want to do your own releases?19:28
spzalaHmm... can you please tell me the difference? managed vs. own release? Sorry, newbie question.19:29
dhellmannno problem19:30
dhellmannas a managed project, we would do the releases for you19:30
dhellmannthere's a process for requesting them, but we take care of the tagging and we help you make sure the bug tracker is updated, etc.19:30
dhellmannas an independent project, you do that stuff without as much guidance from us19:30
dhellmannwe'll help, but we're less hands-on19:30
dhellmannheat and heat-client are managed right now19:31
dhellmannthis may be a question for the full heat team to answer together, so we could treat it as independent right now, and change it to managed later19:31
dhellmannthat way you won't be blocked19:31
spzalaOK, yup that' what I was thinking and you answered it - that sounds perfect.19:32
dhellmannok19:32
dhellmannso then the next question is whether you want to use the release tools yourself, or do things by hand19:32
dhellmanntagging the release is easy by itself, but the tools do some work for you in launchpad to track release history19:33
dhellmannthey also generate the release announcement emails19:33
dhellmannall of that is in the openstack-infra/release-tools repo, and the readme file there explains a bit about what each tool does19:33
dhellmannyou want to look at release_postversion.sh for creating this release19:34
spzalaOK, I see, that's nice. Well, for the first one let me go with by hand. and then I would start using release tool.19:34
dhellmannok, does the project have its own launchpad page? I think https://launchpad.net/tosca-parser looks like it's the thing?19:34
dhellmann*same thing19:34
spzalasure, I think once first release is out that will give me more time to learn release tool.19:34
spzalaYes, that's true19:34
dhellmannok19:34
spzalaI will be modifying the launchpad to add OpenStack log and association but since release is priority I pushed that little.19:35
spzalas/log/logo19:35
dhellmannthe basic steps for creating the release are to create a *GPG signed* tag using "git tag -s" and to push that to the gerrit repo using something like "git push gerrit $VERSION"19:35
dhellmannlet's make sure your project is set up with the right jobs to handle the release...19:36
spzalaPerfect, thanks!19:36
dhellmannhmm, no, I don't see them, so you'll need to set that up first19:36
spzalaI was actually looking at http://docs.openstack.org/infra/manual/creators.html#tagging-a-release and then ran gpg --gen-key and tried gpg --list-keys to make sure I have the key19:37
spzalahmmm.. OK, did I miss something? I followed http://docs.openstack.org/infra/manual/creators.html#give-openstack-permission-to-publish-releases19:37
dhellmannyou should go through that whole document and make sure the relevant steps are done before you actually tag a release, otherwise you'll end up with a tag but no tarball19:37
spzalasetting the permission for openstackci etc.19:38
dhellmannyou need "pypi-jobs" as described in http://docs.openstack.org/infra/manual/creators.html#add-basic-jenkins-jobs19:38
dhellmannoh, wait, you have those19:38
dhellmannwhat was I looking at?!19:38
spzala:-)19:38
spzalayes, I set up pypi under  https://review.openstack.org/#/c/211204/19:38
dhellmannyep, I see that now, I think I noticed that you didn't have openstack-publish-jobs and got confused19:39
dhellmannok, I think with that and the ACLs cleared up you're all set to release by hand19:39
spzalaOK,  I see. :)19:40
spzalawell, so the problem I ran into is this http://paste.openstack.org/show/428601/19:40
dhellmannfwiw, here's the semver doc on picking versions: http://docs.openstack.org/developer/pbr/semver.html19:40
spzalaNice19:41
dhellmannis the email you have set up in git and the email in the gpg tag the same?19:41
spzalaYes they are19:41
spzalagpg: skipped "spzala <spzala@us.ibm.com>": secret key not available19:41
spzalauid                  spzala (Sahdev Zala) <spzala@us.ibm.com>19:41
dhellmannI have http://paste.openstack.org/show/428645/ at the top of my ~/.gitconfig to set which key to use19:42
dhellmanndo you have something like that?19:42
dhellmannI think you would use C1705103 as the key id19:42
spzalaopenstack@ubuntu:~/toscapypi/tosca-parser$ sudo cat ~/.gitconfig19:43
spzala[user]19:43
spzalaemail = spzala@us.ibm.com19:43
spzalaname = spzala19:43
spzalahmmm19:43
spzalaI do not see key in my  ~/.gitconfig as you have19:44
spzalamine only has email and name19:44
spzalaoh so I should set it up?19:44
dhellmannthat may make it work19:45
dhellmannsince the uid doesn't match exactly what git is searching for19:45
spzalaI see, so19:45
spzalagit config key.id = C170510319:45
spzalais that right command?19:45
dhellmannI'm not sure, I just edited the file directly19:46
spzalaOK, sure, that works19:46
dhellmannindent it the same way as the name field and it should be fine19:46
dhellmannI think you'd need a --global on the git config command otherwise19:46
spzalaOK, sure, let me try it out quickly19:46
*** armax has quit IRC19:48
spzalaYAY, that worked like champ :-) :-)19:50
dhellmanngood19:50
spzalaI am going to run "git push gerrit 0.1.0" now19:50
dhellmannspzala: sounds good19:51
spzaladhellman: OK, I ran into an error http://paste.openstack.org/show/428646/  Should I replace gerrit with something?19:54
dhellmannoh, do you have the gerrit remote set up?19:54
dhellmanntry "git review -s"19:54
dhellmannI have a call starting shortly, so I'm going to be disappearing in a few minutes19:55
spzalaOh, no :(19:55
spzalahow come? I was able to publish patches etc. for review so thought I have it19:55
dhellmanndid you check out a clean repository?19:55
spzalaYes I did19:56
dhellmannwhat does "git remote" show you?19:56
spzalaOh so that's why19:56
dhellmannyeah19:56
*** armax has joined #openstack-relmgr-office19:56
spzaladhellman: OK, I fixed it,  THANK yo so much!!! It went well this time.19:57
dhellmannspzala: good!19:57
spzaladhellman:  s/yo/you19:57
dhellmannspzala: your tag is there, but zuul looks pretty busy, so I haven't seen it start the release job, yet19:58
spzaladhellman: cool, thanks for confirming!! I will wait on it. Sorry but after your meeting when you get chance - to use the 'release' tool in future, if you can point me to a doc I will check it out.20:00
*** TravT_ has joined #openstack-relmgr-office20:00
dhellmanncheck the README in the openstack-infra/release-tools repository20:01
spzaladhellman: Prefect. Thanks again! This was big help! :)20:01
*** TravT has quit IRC20:02
dhellmannspzala: it's queued now20:03
spzaladhellman: Nice20:03
*** TravT_ is now known as TravT20:11
*** TravT_ has joined #openstack-relmgr-office20:23
*** TravT has quit IRC20:26
*** TravT_ is now known as TravT20:41
*** gordc has quit IRC20:43
*** fesp has joined #openstack-relmgr-office20:51
*** openstackgerrit has quit IRC21:01
*** openstackgerrit has joined #openstack-relmgr-office21:02
*** armax has quit IRC21:41
*** fesp has quit IRC21:45
*** armax has joined #openstack-relmgr-office21:47
*** TravT_ has joined #openstack-relmgr-office21:51
*** TravT has quit IRC21:54
*** dims_ has joined #openstack-relmgr-office21:56
*** dims has quit IRC21:59
*** dims_ has quit IRC22:24
*** dims has joined #openstack-relmgr-office22:24
*** dims has quit IRC22:34
*** TravT has joined #openstack-relmgr-office22:48
*** TravT_ has quit IRC22:51
*** armax has quit IRC22:51
*** armax has joined #openstack-relmgr-office23:14
openstackgerritMorgan Fainberg proposed openstack/releases: keystoneauth 0.4.0  https://review.openstack.org/21357323:18
morgandhellmann: ^ that should be good for 0.4.023:18
morganand we should be able to look at 1.x once we've verified 0.4.0 is solid and doesn't need massive further work23:18
SergeyLukjanovdhellmann, ttx, hi, do we probably have dates for the liberty stable branches creation for clients?23:36

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!