| *** asalkeld is now known as asalkeld_afk | 06:26 | |
| ttx | dhellmann; sorry was away all weekend + Easter Monday | 06:54 |
|---|---|---|
| ttx | dhellmann: you have to be on oslo.policy (so loading https://bugs.launchpad.net/oslo.policy/+bug/1437992) and then click "Target to Series". If you don't have the "Target to Series" link while on the oslo.policy bug, means there is a rights issue we need to fix (like Adam Young is the only driver there) | 06:57 |
| openstack | Launchpad bug 1437992 in oslo-incubator "policy file in policy.d will be reloaded every rest api call" [Critical,In progress] - Assigned to Eli Qiao (taget-9) | 06:57 |
| *** asalkeld_afk is now known as asalkeld | 07:21 | |
| *** zz_johnthetubagu is now known as johnthetubaguy | 08:00 | |
| asalkeld | ttx: here when you need me | 08:00 |
| ttx | asalkeld: I do! | 08:00 |
| ttx | #startmeeting ptl_sync | 08:00 |
| openstack | Meeting started Tue Apr 7 08:00:36 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is ttx. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 08:00 |
| openstack | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 08:00 |
| openstack | The meeting name has been set to 'ptl_sync' | 08:00 |
| ttx | #topic Heat | 08:00 |
| asalkeld | all looks green | 08:00 |
| asalkeld | and ready for rc1 | 08:01 |
| ttx | asalkeld: Alright, if you don't have any bugfix in the queue, now is as good as anytime | 08:01 |
| asalkeld | cool, let's do it | 08:01 |
| * ttx warms up his scripts | 08:01 | |
| ttx | let me seee if we can merge translations or requirements | 08:02 |
| asalkeld | ttx: both done | 08:03 |
| ttx | good! | 08:03 |
| asalkeld | https://github.com/openstack/heat/commits/master | 08:03 |
| asalkeld | within the last ~10 commits | 08:03 |
| ttx | It's my first one for kilo so I have to remember how to do it | 08:04 |
| asalkeld | :-) | 08:04 |
| ttx | OK, we need to push the version bump on master, let me propose that | 08:05 |
| asalkeld | ok | 08:05 |
| ttx | https://review.openstack.org/171075 | 08:07 |
| ttx | Approve if you're happy. | 08:07 |
| ttx | I'll cut the Kilo proposed branch from the commit just before that one | 08:07 |
| asalkeld | ok | 08:07 |
| ttx | (and then tag RC1 on the created proposed branch) | 08:08 |
| asalkeld | ttx: we are suddenlly getting heaps of this: http://logs.openstack.org/14/170814/2/check/check-tempest-dsvm-full/86acaad/logs/devstacklog.txt.gz#_2015-04-07_06_14_46_464 | 08:08 |
| asalkeld | AttributeError: 'InstallRequirement' object has no attribute 'url' | 08:09 |
| asalkeld | i hope that review of yours is ok | 08:09 |
| ttx | asalkeld: well, we'll see... | 08:09 |
| ttx | suddenly = since when ? | 08:09 |
| asalkeld | last hour? | 08:10 |
| ttx | hm, ok, will keep an eye on it | 08:10 |
| asalkeld | yeah | 08:10 |
| asalkeld | https://bugs.launchpad.net/tempest/+bug/1440984 | 08:11 |
| openstack | Launchpad bug 1440984 in tempest "AttributeError: 'InstallRequirement' when running update.py" [Undecided,New] | 08:11 |
| ttx | asalkeld: if you approve the bump I can babysit the fix in the queue and tag when ready | 08:11 |
| ttx | asalkeld: once we cut RC1 we'll use the kilo-rc-potential tag as a list of bugs that may or may not trigger a RC2 window | 08:12 |
| ttx | so you can refine the list of potential show-stoppers there | 08:12 |
| ttx | and we'll evaluate it regularly | 08:12 |
| stevebaker | asalkeld: were you going to be on leave this week? | 08:12 |
| asalkeld | ttx: done | 08:12 |
| asalkeld | stevebaker: next week | 08:12 |
| asalkeld | stevebaker: you off this week or next? | 08:13 |
| stevebaker | ok, cool | 08:13 |
| stevebaker | this Friday and Monday | 08:13 |
| asalkeld | ttx: i am taking a holiday next week | 08:13 |
| ttx | asalkeld: we'll let the RC1 be used un-troubled for a few days anyway, to encourage testing | 08:13 |
| stevebaker | my monday, so should be no problem for this ptl_sync | 08:13 |
| asalkeld | ttx: stevebaker has agreed to cover for next week | 08:13 |
| ttx | asalkeld: I'll sync with stevebaker to see if we need a RC2 next week | 08:13 |
| asalkeld | thanks | 08:14 |
| ttx | in the mean time if you discover critical issues, just get them fixed on master | 08:14 |
| asalkeld | stevebaker: thanks again for covering | 08:14 |
| stevebaker | np. | 08:14 |
| ttx | so that we can fast-track backports if we need to | 08:14 |
| asalkeld | ttx: ok, thanks | 08:14 |
| ttx | asalkeld: That's all I had. Will cut RC1 in the next hours, time for that bump patch to land | 08:15 |
| ttx | asalkeld: thx, and congrats ! | 08:15 |
| asalkeld | ok, thanks | 08:15 |
| ttx | Nice work by the Heat team. | 08:15 |
| * asalkeld heads off to enjoy a beer | 08:15 | |
| ttx | johnthetubaguy: around? | 08:16 |
| johnthetubaguy | ttx: good morning | 08:16 |
| ttx | #info Heat RC1 to be cut asap | 08:16 |
| ttx | #topic Nova | 08:16 |
| ttx | #link https://launchpad.net/nova/+milestone/kilo-rc1 | 08:16 |
| ttx | #info 7 release-critical bugs on the list, all assigned and in progress | 08:17 |
| ttx | Checking that they are all actually in progress | 08:17 |
| johnthetubaguy | yeah, there are a few dubious ones I just pushed out, I suspect there are more | 08:18 |
| ttx | https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1438183 -- some fix merged there, is the bug still needing more ? | 08:18 |
| openstack | Launchpad bug 1438183 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "Graceful shutdown of nova-compute service fails" [Medium,In progress] - Assigned to Dan Smith (danms) | 08:18 |
| ttx | Oh, https://review.openstack.org/#/c/169057/ probably | 08:18 |
| johnthetubaguy | ah, yes | 08:19 |
| ttx | Same for https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1313573 | 08:19 |
| openstack | Launchpad bug 1313573 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "nova backup fails to backup an instance with attached volume (libvirt, LVM backed)" [Medium,In progress] - Assigned to Fei Long Wang (flwang) | 08:19 |
| ttx | https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1430239 looks a bit stale | 08:19 |
| openstack | Launchpad bug 1430239 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "Hyper-V: *DataRoot paths are not set for instances" [High,In progress] - Assigned to Dorin Paslaru (dpaslaru) | 08:19 |
| johnthetubaguy | yeah, some of these look at lot like the super critical bit for kilo is done | 08:20 |
| johnthetubaguy | I am thinking we tag them as potential and add a note, I can do that after the meeting | 08:20 |
| ttx | yes, but all in all, looks like the RC1 could benefit from a few more days of fixes | 08:20 |
| ttx | and target end of week | 08:20 |
| ttx | at the earliest | 08:21 |
| ttx | johnthetubaguy: so let's give it a few more days, and reevaluate the criticality of the leftovers by the end of the week | 08:21 |
| johnthetubaguy | yeah, I think thats a good assessment | 08:21 |
| johnthetubaguy | maybe a quick catch up on thursday? | 08:22 |
| ttx | If nothing critical is left in the pipe, we'll tag. Then if those fixes merge in master and we have enough to justify a RC2, we'll do one | 08:22 |
| ttx | johnthetubaguy: works for me | 08:22 |
| johnthetubaguy | cool | 08:22 |
| johnthetubaguy | quick general question, I am wondering what you take is on "federating" the code review more in Nova? | 08:23 |
| ttx | johnthetubaguy: While you're around, let me push a open-liberty patch so that you can -2 it | 08:23 |
| johnthetubaguy | ttx: ah, cool, thats a good plan | 08:23 |
| ttx | johnthetubaguy: I think it's really necessary to split nova reviewing along smaller domains of expertise. It's the only way to scale development and avoid critical resources burning out | 08:24 |
| johnthetubaguy | yeah, at this point we have little choice | 08:24 |
| johnthetubaguy | I just worry about loosing consistency across the code base | 08:24 |
| johnthetubaguy | but that not totally worth the cost of slowing everything down | 08:24 |
| ttx | so we kind of had the same problem in stable | 08:25 |
| ttx | johnthetubaguy: please -2 : https://review.openstack.org/171078 | 08:25 |
| johnthetubaguy | I am kinda thinking of a way sub groups can prove themselves worthy, etc, and graduate to have some level of merge ability | 08:25 |
| johnthetubaguy | yeah, thats true, I hadn't thought of stable like that | 08:25 |
| ttx | In the stable team we could not review everythijng and were lacking local expertise | 08:26 |
| ttx | What we put in place is the following | 08:26 |
| ttx | We have local review teams (per project) | 08:26 |
| ttx | But we vet the members there to make sure they have the basics rules | 08:26 |
| ttx | We ask them to ask around when unsure | 08:27 |
| ttx | (escalate to the "core" stable maint) | 08:27 |
| ttx | and then we try to keep an eye on them and check they don't do crazy stuff | 08:27 |
| johnthetubaguy | right, that makes sense | 08:27 |
| ttx | So stable-maint-core became the guardians of the stable policy, more than reviewers | 08:27 |
| ttx | transposed to nova, you could have a core group that maintains consistency and quality standards | 08:28 |
| johnthetubaguy | I am just thinking we need a way for a subteam to gain the trust of the core team, like a graduation flow | 08:28 |
| ttx | but still let subteams go wild | 08:28 |
| ttx | It's tricky, because you have to fiond a way to communicate the "standards" | 08:28 |
| johnthetubaguy | thats true | 08:28 |
| ttx | for stable policy it's relatively simple | 08:29 |
| ttx | since you have a few rules and you can call them out when they fail to apply them | 08:29 |
| ttx | For "consistency" and "quality" it's a bit harder | 08:29 |
| johnthetubaguy | yeah, less subjective | 08:29 |
| johnthetubaguy | right | 08:29 |
| ttx | but I still think it's the only way to scale | 08:29 |
| ttx | letting go of a bit of control to gain a bit of sanity | 08:30 |
| johnthetubaguy | I mean the other approach is splitting more out of nova, but I think we need both at this point | 08:30 |
| ttx | But yes, ideally each subteam would grow around a strong nucleus that has the consistency/quality mindset already | 08:30 |
| johnthetubaguy | mostly as there is only so much you can sanely split out, and it takes years to do it properly | 08:30 |
| johnthetubaguy | luckily, I think some of that is already happening | 08:30 |
| ttx | so that the subteam doesn't grow it's own culture | 08:31 |
| johnthetubaguy | yeah, thats the worry, subteam X don't do unit tests, they hate those, etc | 08:31 |
| ttx | johnthetubaguy: yes we won't split out enough and fast enough to avoid losing our sanity | 08:31 |
| ttx | and splitting should make sense technically too | 08:31 |
| johnthetubaguy | ttx: thats totally true, well, we have proven that quite well the last 12 months | 08:32 |
| johnthetubaguy | ttx: if you do it wrong, you get two competing network stacks… | 08:32 |
| ttx | the only reason we split is because it's the most convenient way to make Gerrit support the case | 08:32 |
| johnthetubaguy | yeah, there is some truth in that | 08:32 |
| ttx | If you had magic ways to split reviews across subteams in a single repo, we would do that more often than splitting | 08:32 |
| johnthetubaguy | yeah, not sure we can wait for tooling, but agreed | 08:33 |
| ttx | (splitting still makes sense in a lot of cases, but it's a trade-off with consistency/quality as said above) | 08:33 |
| johnthetubaguy | yeah | 08:33 |
| johnthetubaguy | we were struggling with, if we split it off, they do crazy things, nova dies because the scheduler is broken, boom | 08:33 |
| johnthetubaguy | but you totally captured that above | 08:33 |
| ttx | Even if tooling doesn't support it, you can add a bit of procedures. Like reviews by default are for the core team, but can be tagged so that they are a subteams decision | 08:34 |
| ttx | and at that point subteam +2ers can just go with it | 08:34 |
| johnthetubaguy | ttx: agreed, thats my current preference actually | 08:34 |
| johnthetubaguy | well, something like that | 08:34 |
| ttx | and if someone abuses their rights, just revoke the privs | 08:34 |
| johnthetubaguy | right | 08:34 |
| ttx | and backtrack | 08:34 |
| ttx | we shoudln't limit ourselves to what Gerrit lets us do | 08:35 |
| johnthetubaguy | so the problem we have with nova-core, is its very political to drop people, so it just doesn't happen, we need to be more fluid, then the right things just happen | 08:35 |
| johnthetubaguy | anyways, I think there is enough for me to chew on there, really appreciate your thoughts on that | 08:35 |
| ttx | right -- which is why I don't want to pile up more rights/duties around core reviewing | 08:35 |
| ttx | will make it harder to drop people | 08:36 |
| johnthetubaguy | ah, I get you now | 08:36 |
| ttx | the core review group should just be the ones with +2, not the "project maintainers" | 08:36 |
| johnthetubaguy | yeah, the current people who have time for +2, etc | 08:36 |
| ttx | because removing people from the latter is harder than removing people from the former | 08:36 |
| ttx | since it implies "you're someone in Nova" | 08:37 |
| johnthetubaguy | yeah, fluidity is important here | 08:37 |
| johnthetubaguy | I think we fail to add people as its hard to remove them | 08:37 |
| ttx | Not opposed in having the latter, just opposed to tie +2 Gerrit rights to it :) | 08:37 |
| johnthetubaguy | right | 08:37 |
| ttx | I want people with +2 be the ones that spens all their time reviewing, basically | 08:37 |
| ttx | devananda had an interesting strawman: what if you gave Workflow+1 to a separate group from Review+2 | 08:38 |
| johnthetubaguy | ah, not read that bit, I should take a look | 08:38 |
| ttx | I don't think he publicly suggested that | 08:38 |
| ttx | yet | 08:38 |
| ttx | I haven't read the thread you're talking about fwiw, just came back from holiday :) | 08:39 |
| johnthetubaguy | yeah, similar, well a long weekend anyways | 08:39 |
| ttx | that way you could give review rights to a subgroup, but still quick-vet for change sanity | 08:39 |
| johnthetubaguy | yeah, thats very attractive | 08:40 |
| ttx | (his suggestion was to only let PTL Workflow+1, which might not scale well, but the concept of separating code review from change desirability is interesting) | 08:40 |
| ttx | Also serves as checks & balances | 08:41 |
| johnthetubaguy | yeah, some small group | 08:41 |
| johnthetubaguy | I think you would want at least one person in each timezone, and bigger projects, two or more, but yes, I like that | 08:41 |
| ttx | might create botlenecks at the Workflow+1 and merge conflicts, but still worth considering | 08:41 |
| johnthetubaguy | yeah | 08:41 |
| johnthetubaguy | well, even a loose, policy, where you can +W only for merge conflicts, could work | 08:42 |
| ttx | The fear in giving +2/aprv to subgroups is to lose touch with what theu are doing and discover insanity too late | 08:42 |
| ttx | deva's strawman kind of addresses that fear | 08:42 |
| johnthetubaguy | yeah, its a nice touch | 08:42 |
| johnthetubaguy | not considered splitting those before, fancy | 08:43 |
| ttx | right, correctness and desirability are actually 2 different things | 08:43 |
| johnthetubaguy | its similar to the adding a +3 that owns +W, but its less… crazy | 08:43 |
| ttx | except you don't give +2 to the people who do Workflow+1 | 08:44 |
| johnthetubaguy | ttx: totally true, its a battle we have reguarly | 08:44 |
| ttx | (they can still +1 alright) | 08:44 |
| ttx | but it takes into accoutn that the pTl is often too busy to maintain crazy review levels | 08:44 |
| johnthetubaguy | ttx: yeah, true, or at least, if they have +2, thats independent and not assumed | 08:44 |
| johnthetubaguy | good point, not thought about it that way | 08:45 |
| ttx | You basically have two groups -- domain experts who vet the code makes sense and is correct | 08:45 |
| ttx | andd rivers who decide that the change is welcome at this time in the cycle | 08:45 |
| ttx | drivers* | 08:45 |
| * anteaya likes rivers | 08:45 | |
| ttx | frankly when I review I only ever do the latter, since I'm not an expert anywhere anymore | 08:46 |
| ttx | but I can still judge the impact of a change and the rationale | 08:46 |
| johnthetubaguy | ttx: yeah, I am liking that idea, it has great promise | 08:47 |
| ttx | anyway, i'll let you run. Will comment on that thread when I get to there | 08:47 |
| * ttx has a lot of ML reading to do | 08:47 | |
| johnthetubaguy | ttx: cool, thanks for your time, appreciate that | 08:47 |
| *** eglynn has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 11:57 | |
| eglynn | ttx: knock, knock, ready when you are ... | 12:00 |
| ttx | eglynn: hi! | 12:00 |
| ttx | #topic Ceilometer | 12:00 |
| eglynn | #link https://launchpad.net/ceilometer/+milestone/kilo-rc1 | 12:00 |
| eglynn | a few things came up mid/late- last week | 12:00 |
| ttx | #info 3 RC bugs, all in progress and assigned | 12:00 |
| ttx | looking how far they are | 12:01 |
| eglynn | nothing major, patches for all under review | 12:01 |
| eglynn | the main one was https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1435855 discussed on the ML etc. | 12:01 |
| openstack | Launchpad bug 1435855 in Ceilometer "Default rule does not work in ceilometer policy.json" [High,In progress] - Assigned to Divya K Konoor (dikonoor) | 12:01 |
| eglynn | the approach to resolving while keeping the desired backward compat is agreed | 12:01 |
| eglynn | just some style issues in the review and we're good to go | 12:02 |
| ttx | rechecking those that were stuck with gate state this morning | 12:02 |
| eglynn | cool | 12:02 |
| ttx | OK, looks like we could have a RC1 tomorrow or Thursday | 12:02 |
| eglynn | so no major red flags or alarms | 12:02 |
| eglynn | yep, let's chat again thurs | 12:03 |
| ttx | Did you merge recent requirements and translations ? | 12:03 |
| eglynn | lemme check that | 12:03 |
| ttx | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/170388/ could use a +2 | 12:03 |
| eglynn | cool | 12:04 |
| ttx | ys, translations were merged | 12:05 |
| ttx | So let me propose the version bump -- you can -2 it temporarily and approve it when you're happy with things | 12:06 |
| eglynn | sounds like a plan | 12:06 |
| ttx | https://review.openstack.org/171152 -- please -2 for the moment to avoid errors | 12:07 |
| * eglynn looks | 12:08 | |
| eglynn | -2'd while we close out the rc1 queue | 12:09 |
| eglynn | cool, thanks | 12:09 |
| ttx | so when ready, just approve it and ping me | 12:09 |
| ttx | I'll make things happen from the commit just before that one | 12:09 |
| eglynn | will do, thanks! | 12:09 |
| ttx | Questions ? Urgent matters ? | 12:10 |
| eglynn | nope, all good otherwise | 12:10 |
| ttx | alright, let's do this! | 12:10 |
| * SergeyLukjanov ready | 12:10 | |
| ttx | SergeyLukjanov: hi! | 12:10 |
| eglynn | ttx: thanks for your time! :) | 12:10 |
| SergeyLukjanov | ttx, hey! | 12:10 |
| ttx | #topic Sahara | 12:10 |
| ttx | #link https://launchpad.net/sahara/+milestone/kilo-rc1 | 12:10 |
| ttx | #info 3 RC bugs, all in progress and assigned | 12:11 |
| ttx | checking how far and active they are | 12:11 |
| SergeyLukjanov | we have two issues on board + bunch of doc CR that are nice to have | 12:11 |
| SergeyLukjanov | MapR related just uploaded to review, but it's simple | 12:11 |
| ttx | OK, so you seem pretty close too | 12:12 |
| * ttx runs a couple checks | 12:12 | |
| SergeyLukjanov | yeah, I think tomorrow we'll be fully ready for tag | 12:12 |
| ttx | Translations & requirements are in | 12:12 |
| SergeyLukjanov | yup | 12:13 |
| ttx | SergeyLukjanov: so I'll propose the version bump so that it's ready for your approval when ready | 12:13 |
| SergeyLukjanov | ack | 12:13 |
| SergeyLukjanov | so, I will ensure all needed CRs merged (till the end of tomorrow), than merge version bump and notify you | 12:14 |
| ttx | https://review.openstack.org/171155 -- please -2 for the time being | 12:14 |
| SergeyLukjanov | ttx, done, thx | 12:15 |
| SergeyLukjanov | no urgent questions or issues | 12:15 |
| ttx | Alright! Have a nice day then | 12:16 |
| SergeyLukjanov | ttx, thank you! have a nice day too! | 12:16 |
| ttx | dhellmann: ready when you are | 12:16 |
| dhellmann | ttx: here | 12:16 |
| ttx | #topic Oslo | 12:16 |
| SergeyLukjanov | ttx, btw how is the RC-1 going for projects? | 12:16 |
| ttx | SergeyLukjanov: pretty good so far | 12:16 |
| SergeyLukjanov | ttx, awesome! | 12:16 |
| ttx | http://old-wiki.openstack.org/rc/ | 12:17 |
| ttx | Most projects under 10 bugs | 12:17 |
| ttx | which makes them likely to hit target sometimes this week | 12:17 |
| ttx | There will be the occasional straggler although I can't predict who that will be | 12:17 |
| ttx | dhellmann: Not sure we have anything to discuss | 12:17 |
| dhellmann | ttx: I can't think of anything either :-) | 12:18 |
| ttx | dhellmann: Do we have anything left to d release-wide as far as Oslo is concerned ? | 12:18 |
| ttx | I mean "release-wise" | 12:18 |
| dhellmann | we need a stable branch in the incubator repository, but that's it | 12:18 |
| * ttx checks | 12:18 | |
| ttx | yes, and a final tag | 12:19 |
| *** fesp has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 12:19 | |
| *** fesp has quit IRC | 12:19 | |
| ttx | Maybe when all the RC1s are cut, just before we branch requirements ? | 12:19 |
| dhellmann | I found a few issues with some of the library release tools that weren't prepared to work with stable branches, but I've made notes and will be working on fixes | 12:19 |
| dhellmann | yeah, that sounds about right | 12:19 |
| ttx | ok then, that should happen early next week | 12:20 |
| dhellmann | sounds good | 12:20 |
| dhellmann | I'm going to pycon this week, so I'll be online but only sporadically | 12:20 |
| ttx | ack | 12:20 |
| * ttx hopes to get most RC1s in before everyone bumps libs | 12:20 | |
| dhellmann | oh, and the TC meeting today will be during my flight, so I *think* I'll be there, but that depends on how the wifi holds out | 12:21 |
| dhellmann | do you mean the clients? | 12:21 |
| ttx | dhellmann: ok, you might want to make sure you voted on stuff before then | 12:21 |
| dhellmann | yeah, I'll do that this morning | 12:21 |
| ttx | dhellmann: no, genera py libs | 12:21 |
| ttx | Pycon usually is when people randomly bump their libs | 12:21 |
| ttx | and break the world | 12:21 |
| dhellmann | oh, I see | 12:21 |
| ttx | the pip bump this morning was just the first sign | 12:22 |
| dhellmann | oh, I missed that | 12:22 |
| ttx | gate all stuck because pip changed API | 12:22 |
| ttx | which is according to pip authors not a public API | 12:22 |
| ttx | (only the CLI is public API) | 12:22 |
| ttx | anyway, fun | 12:23 |
| ttx | dhellmann: have a good day and travel! | 12:23 |
| dhellmann | nice | 12:23 |
| dhellmann | thanks, ttyl! | 12:23 |
| Kiall | gate is fixed BTW - Just got a change to pass | 12:23 |
| ttx | yes, We ninjafixed it | 12:24 |
| *** asalkeld has quit IRC | 12:40 | |
| dhellmann | ttx: I can't remember how to make launchpad let me associate a bug with more than one release of a project. For example, https://bugs.launchpad.net/oslo.messaging/+bug/1440755 needs to be backported | 13:10 |
| openstack | Launchpad bug 1440755 in oslo.messaging "NoneType 'retry' parameter causes TypeError in impl_rabbit" [High,Fix committed] - Assigned to Dan Prince (dan-prince) | 13:11 |
| ttx | dhellmann: do you see "target to series" there ? | 13:11 |
| dhellmann | ttx: no | 13:11 |
| ttx | ok, that is probably what needs fixing | 13:11 |
| dhellmann | oh, hmm, I do on that one | 13:11 |
| dhellmann | I had one on the policy lib the other day and didn't see it there | 13:12 |
| dhellmann | is that a permission setting? | 13:12 |
| ttx | *yeah,; looks like ayoung is the only driver there | 13:12 |
| ttx | yes, need to be a driver I think | 13:12 |
| dhellmann | oh, right | 13:12 |
| ttx | oh, so there is another issue on oslo.messaging | 13:12 |
| ttx | resulting oin the "status tracked in" mess | 13:13 |
| dhellmann | ? | 13:13 |
| ttx | problem is, liberty should be the "active development" series | 13:13 |
| ttx | that's something you need to switch to match what "master" means | 13:13 |
| ttx | https://launchpad.net/oslo.messaging -- see "development focus" there | 13:14 |
| ttx | that needs to be liberty, if master switched to liberty | 13:14 |
| ttx | otherwise you can't backport to kilo, since master = kilo | 13:14 |
| ttx | let me fix that | 13:14 |
| ttx | here | 13:15 |
| ttx | so you should check that all libs that had their kilo branch cut also switched "dev focus" in LP | 13:16 |
| ttx | otherwise you won't be able to create kilo backport tasks there | 13:16 |
| dhellmann | I did a bunch of them, but I guess I missed a few. I'll double-check | 13:16 |
| ttx | I do that as part of the proposed/$SERIES branching process | 13:16 |
| dhellmann | is that scripted, then? | 13:16 |
| ttx | https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/ReleaseTeam/How_To_Release#proposed.2F.24SERIES_branch_cut_.28switch_master_to_next_version.29 | 13:16 |
| ttx | no, I do it manually | 13:17 |
| dhellmann | ah, ok | 13:17 |
| ttx | not sure there ius even an API for that. Checking | 13:17 |
| ttx | yes there is, so I could script it in theory | 13:17 |
| ttx | Never had the need for it because doing it for 10 projects is not that painful | 13:18 |
| ttx | but with oslo libs in mix, might make sense | 13:18 |
| dhellmann | yeah, I have more than that just in oslo now | 13:18 |
| dhellmann | ttx: now for https://bugs.launchpad.net/oslo.policy/+bug/1437992 I can see the "target to series" link but it only shows me the liberty series, no kilo | 13:21 |
| openstack | Launchpad bug 1437992 in oslo-incubator "policy file in policy.d will be reloaded every rest api call" [Critical,In progress] - Assigned to Eli Qiao (taget-9) | 13:21 |
| ttx | It's because I already added kilo ? | 13:21 |
| ttx | hmm, weird though | 13:22 |
| ttx | no, that must be the reason | 13:22 |
| dhellmann | oh, duh, I didn't notice that | 13:38 |
| mestery | ttx: Here when you're ready! | 13:45 |
| ttx | mestery: hi! | 13:45 |
| ttx | #topic Neutron | 13:45 |
| ttx | #link https://launchpad.net/neutron/+milestone/kilo-rc1 | 13:46 |
| ttx | #info 6 in-progress bugs, all assigned | 13:46 |
| mestery | 6 left, but one of those is in the merge queue | 13:46 |
| ttx | checking that they are all actively worked on | 13:46 |
| mestery | https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1439817 | 13:46 |
| openstack | Launchpad bug 1439817 in neutron "IP set full error in kernel log" [High,In progress] - Assigned to Brian Haley (brian-haley) | 13:46 |
| mestery | That's the one in the merge queue | 13:46 |
| mestery | Ack, they should be, I just looked myself this morning | 13:46 |
| mestery | I had hoped we would have been down to 3 or so this morning, but some of them saw issues during review last night and one needed a unit test written which turned out to be challenging :) | 13:47 |
| ttx | ack confirmed | 13:47 |
| ttx | runnign a few checks | 13:47 |
| mestery | cool | 13:48 |
| ttx | ok, requirements & translations all merged | 13:48 |
| mestery | Excellent! | 13:48 |
| ttx | checking for missing files in tarballs... | 13:49 |
| ttx | looks like you are a couple of days away from your rc1 tag(s) | 13:49 |
| mestery | Yes sir, we're getting close! | 13:49 |
| ttx | I propose to upload the reviews for the version bumps, so that they are ready for your approval when all is ready | 13:49 |
| mestery | Ack, sounds good, please proceed with that. | 13:50 |
| ttx | ok, I'll ping you with review numbers in a sec, so that you can temporarily -2 them | 13:50 |
| mestery | Perfect! | 13:50 |
| ttx | neutron -> https://review.openstack.org/171200 | 13:51 |
| mestery | -2 :) | 13:52 |
| ttx | excellent. | 13:52 |
| mestery | I think we just need to close out these last bugs and then we're good! | 13:52 |
| ttx | neutron-fwaas -> https://review.openstack.org/171202 | 13:53 |
| mestery | -2 :) | 13:53 |
| ttx | neutron-lbaas -> https://review.openstack.org/171205 | 13:54 |
| mestery | -2 :) | 13:55 |
| ttx | neutron-vpnaas -> https://review.openstack.org/171206 | 13:56 |
| mestery | Also -2 :) | 13:56 |
| mestery | Thanks for those! | 13:56 |
| ttx | Let's target around Thursday to tag | 13:56 |
| ttx | Questions ? | 13:57 |
| mestery | Nope, I think we're good, thanks for all the help as usual, you make doing these releases a pain free experience :) | 13:57 |
| ttx | np, business as usual :) | 13:58 |
| mestery | :) | 13:58 |
| mestery | Thanks ttx, we'll sync thursday then! | 13:58 |
| mestery | Now, time to run the Neutron meeting :) | 13:58 |
| ttx | cheers | 13:59 |
| *** thingee has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 14:14 | |
| ttx | nikhil_k: ready when you are | 14:21 |
| nikhil_k | ttx: hey, another meeting carried over | 14:26 |
| nikhil_k | sorry about that | 14:26 |
| ttx | np | 14:26 |
| ttx | #topic Glance | 14:26 |
| ttx | #link https://launchpad.net/glance/+milestone/kilo-rc1 | 14:27 |
| ttx | I see 3 bugs on the RC list | 14:27 |
| ttx | #info 3 RC bugs, all assigned and in progress | 14:27 |
| nikhil_k | ttx: yeah, waiting on gate | 14:27 |
| nikhil_k | this, https://launchpad.net/bugs/1434237 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/166909/ | 14:28 |
| openstack | Launchpad bug 1434237 in Glance "glance-manage db_export_metadefs fails with NoSuchColumnError" [High,In progress] - Assigned to Ashish (ashish-jain14) | 14:28 |
| ttx | ack | 14:28 |
| nikhil_k | I think it has some discussion going | 14:28 |
| ttx | So it looks like you're pretty close | 14:28 |
| nikhil_k | we can mark k2 to give it some time | 14:28 |
| nikhil_k | yes | 14:28 |
| nikhil_k | we should be good | 14:28 |
| nikhil_k | one question though | 14:28 |
| * ttx runs a few tests | 14:28 | |
| nikhil_k | do we need a stable branch for store and client before RC1? | 14:29 |
| nikhil_k | we don't have one last time I checked | 14:29 |
| ttx | not before, but certainly not far after | 14:29 |
| ttx | dhellmann: ^ ? | 14:29 |
| nikhil_k | sure | 14:29 |
| nikhil_k | sometime close to RC2 , or beginning or RC3 | 14:29 |
| nikhil_k | s/or/of/ | 14:30 |
| ttx | well in theory you won't have a RC2 :) | 14:30 |
| nikhil_k | ttx: please do not say that | 14:30 |
| nikhil_k | one sec | 14:30 |
| nikhil_k | https://bugs.launchpad.net/glance/+bugs?field.tag=kilo-rc-potential | 14:30 |
| nikhil_k | that's why I say ^ | 14:31 |
| ttx | nikhil_k: if you have things you can't release without fixing them, we should delay RC1 a bit | 14:31 |
| ttx | no point in making a release candidate we already know is broken | 14:31 |
| nikhil_k | How long can we wait? | 14:31 |
| ttx | I'd say one more week | 14:32 |
| nikhil_k | That would be better | 14:32 |
| ttx | if you have show stoppers they should be on the RC list | 14:32 |
| nikhil_k | I feel we should have stable branch for store and client | 14:32 |
| nikhil_k | yes, all show stoppers are on the list | 14:32 |
| nikhil_k | But I feel that better to have small bugs fixed too | 14:32 |
| ttx | nikhil_k: master uses capped dependencies anyway, so the stable branch is noly needed if you have to backport stuff there | 14:32 |
| ttx | but yeah, we should have stable branches cut from the last releases | 14:33 |
| ttx | I'll come back to you on that | 14:33 |
| nikhil_k | yeah, so I'm okay with moving on RC1 for now | 14:33 |
| ttx | We might want to do that in a more..; systematic way | 14:33 |
| nikhil_k | so that people do some testing and find any more bugs if applicable | 14:33 |
| nikhil_k | and then get RC2 in a better shape | 14:34 |
| nikhil_k | but either works for me, waiting for RC1 one week too | 14:34 |
| ttx | ok, let's target later this week then | 14:34 |
| ttx | and we'll decide | 14:34 |
| nikhil_k | sure | 14:34 |
| ttx | in the mean time let's get the ones on the list in | 14:34 |
| nikhil_k | Yeah, today hopefully | 14:34 |
| ttx | alright, let me propose a version bump that will open master to liberty | 14:35 |
| ttx | you can -2 it until you are happy with your RC1 | 14:35 |
| nikhil_k | ttx: sounds like a plan | 14:36 |
| nikhil_k | thanks | 14:36 |
| ttx | nikhil_k: please -2 temporarily: https://review.openstack.org/171227 | 14:36 |
| ttx | approve when you're happy with state of things | 14:37 |
| ttx | Ideally when all showstopper fixes are in | 14:37 |
| nikhil_k | done | 14:37 |
| nikhil_k | thanks | 14:37 |
| ttx | I'll talk to you tomorrow, probably, or when that merged | 14:37 |
| ttx | thingee: around? | 14:37 |
| thingee | ttx: o/ | 14:37 |
| ttx | #topic Cinder | 14:38 |
| thingee | what I can't live without https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/cinder-kilo-rc-priorities | 14:38 |
| ttx | #link https://launchpad.net/cinder/+milestone/kilo-rc1 | 14:38 |
| thingee | unfortunately a bunch of these would've merged earlier, but we're hitting some jenkins issues. | 14:38 |
| thingee | rechecks are in place | 14:38 |
| ttx | #info status at https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/cinder-kilo-rc-priorities | 14:38 |
| ttx | yep, things need rechecks if they hit the pip issues earlier today | 14:39 |
| ttx | Looks like you could hit the RC1 target.. Thursday ? | 14:39 |
| thingee | seems more than enough time to me, but I won't complain :) | 14:39 |
| * ttx runs a few checks | 14:39 | |
| ttx | well, I'll upload the liberty version bump for you to merge when happy | 14:40 |
| thingee | sure | 14:40 |
| ttx | please -2 temporarily: https://review.openstack.org/171229 | 14:40 |
| thingee | done | 14:41 |
| ttx | So just approve it when you're happy and I'll make stuff happen | 14:41 |
| thingee | are we fine with continuing with Kilo once that merges? | 14:42 |
| ttx | then you should pile up bugs that may be interesting to fix in kilo-rc-potential, fix them in master... and when we have a bunch, we could respin | 14:42 |
| thingee | errr | 14:42 |
| thingee | liberty | 14:42 |
| ttx | yes, once that merges, master switches to liberty | 14:42 |
| ttx | so no more freezes | 14:43 |
| thingee | ok! | 14:43 |
| ttx | I cut the kilo release branch from the previous commit | 14:43 |
| ttx | OK then, I'll talk to you later | 14:43 |
| thingee | one last question, cinderclient. | 14:43 |
| ttx | yes? | 14:43 |
| thingee | is it too late to do a cut from there? | 14:43 |
| thingee | I know that depends on me | 14:43 |
| ttx | It's too late to bump requirements for sure | 14:44 |
| thingee | ok | 14:44 |
| thingee | That's all | 14:44 |
| ttx | I'm not totally clear on the effect of cutting a release there now | 14:44 |
| ttx | I need to speak with dhellmann on that | 14:44 |
| ttx | I'll get back to you | 14:45 |
| thingee | well the pin for cinderclient would just ignore it | 14:45 |
| thingee | python-cinderclient>=1.1.0 | 14:45 |
| ttx | right | 14:45 |
| ttx | david-lyle: ready when you are | 14:45 |
| thingee | ttx: thanks | 14:45 |
| david-lyle | ttx: ready | 14:48 |
| ttx | #topic Horizon | 14:49 |
| ttx | #link https://launchpad.net/horizon/+milestone/kilo-rc1 | 14:49 |
| ttx | I see 6 bugs on the list, one of them unassigned and one of them not up for review yet | 14:49 |
| ttx | checking how active they are | 14:49 |
| ttx | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/165800/ is a bit stale | 14:50 |
| ttx | https://bugs.launchpad.net/horizon/+bug/1435869 looks partially fixed, no idea where the second half of the fix (if any) is | 14:50 |
| openstack | Launchpad bug 1435869 in OpenStack Dashboard (Horizon) "[Launch Instance Fix] Establish Baseline Unit Tests" [High,In progress] - Assigned to Matt Borland (palecrow) | 14:50 |
| david-lyle | hhttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/165800/ I'll move out of RC-1 | 14:51 |
| ttx | https://bugs.launchpad.net/horizon/+bug/1436903 slightly unclear state as well | 14:51 |
| openstack | Launchpad bug 1436903 in OpenStack Dashboard (Horizon) "integration tests failing blocking gate" [Critical,Confirmed] - Assigned to David Lyle (david-lyle) | 14:51 |
| ttx | same for https://bugs.launchpad.net/horizon/+bug/1438822 | 14:51 |
| openstack | Launchpad bug 1438822 in OpenStack Dashboard (Horizon) "Table widget should show a default message when filtering yields no items" [Medium,New] | 14:52 |
| david-lyle | integration tests are still failing and I've yet to find a fix | 14:52 |
| ttx | ok, so that one is a blocker | 14:52 |
| david-lyle | we can ship without it fixed, but would like to work on it until we cut RC-1 | 14:52 |
| ttx | oh ok | 14:52 |
| david-lyle | all of these are individually not truly a blocker | 14:53 |
| ttx | so yes, you might want to push a few non-critical out of RC1 if they can't get a fix in the next few days | 14:53 |
| ttx | maybe we should reconvene on Thursday and see if we should just tag | 14:53 |
| ttx | since none of those sounds critical nor close | 14:54 |
| ttx | but a few more days shaking it wouldn't hurt | 14:54 |
| david-lyle | yeah, if these aren't complete by thursday we can cut RC-1 | 14:54 |
| ttx | let's do that | 14:54 |
| david-lyle | I think a couple of these will have commits by then | 14:54 |
| ttx | Let me propose a liberty bump that you can -2 | 14:54 |
| ttx | temporarily | 14:54 |
| ttx | until RC1 is ready for you | 14:54 |
| david-lyle | ok, sounds good | 14:55 |
| ttx | questions? | 14:55 |
| david-lyle | just approve that patch when ready and you'll branch from the last commit | 14:55 |
| david-lyle | ? | 14:55 |
| ttx | yes | 14:55 |
| ttx | and -2 it in the mean time | 14:55 |
| david-lyle | ok, that works | 14:55 |
| ttx | to make sure nobody gets triggerhappy | 14:55 |
| david-lyle | yeah we had one of those yesterday we reverted | 14:55 |
| ttx | Please -2 https://review.openstack.org/171241 | 14:56 |
| david-lyle | done | 14:56 |
| ttx | OK, that is all. I'll talk to you again on Thursday! | 14:56 |
| david-lyle | sounds great | 14:57 |
| david-lyle | thanks | 14:57 |
| ttx | have a great day | 14:57 |
| *** thingee has quit IRC | 15:01 | |
| ttx | morganfainberg: ready when you are | 15:49 |
| morganfainberg | o/ | 15:50 |
| ttx | #topic Keystone | 15:50 |
| ttx | #link https://launchpad.net/keystone/+milestone/kilo-rc1 | 15:50 |
| ttx | #info 1 RC bug, assigned and in progress | 15:50 |
| morganfainberg | Refresh | 15:50 |
| morganfainberg | Just punted that to l1 | 15:51 |
| ttx | ah-ah. | 15:51 |
| * morganfainberg gave up on the argument to keep it in kilo. | 15:51 | |
| ttx | Does that mean you're comfortable with a RC1 tag now ? | 15:51 |
| morganfainberg | Sure | 15:51 |
| ttx | OK, let me propose the version bump | 15:51 |
| morganfainberg | Going to wait for the one patch that is dating (will run through and make sure all fix committed bugs are tagged to rc) | 15:52 |
| ttx | ok, so when https://review.openstack.org/171260 merges, I cut proposed/kilo from the previous commit | 15:52 |
| morganfainberg | And I'll approve. | 15:52 |
| ttx | maybe -2 it until that other patch lands | 15:52 |
| ttx | Or I can mark it as depending if you want | 15:52 |
| * ttx runs a few checks first | 15:52 | |
| morganfainberg | Nah ill wip yours | 15:52 |
| morganfainberg | Done. Marked wip. Will make sure no outstanding translations etc are ready and will approve today hopefully. | 15:53 |
| ttx | ok, so just approve it and ping me, and i'll branch/tag from there | 15:53 |
| ttx | anything that merges after the version bump is liberty-only | 15:54 |
| morganfainberg | ++ | 15:54 |
| morganfainberg | the critical security bug we can rc2 if needed | 15:54 |
| ttx | alright | 15:55 |
| morganfainberg | I moved it off rc blocking due to ossa/OSSN discussion. | 15:55 |
| ttx | yeah, we need to run that in parallel, too hard to sync | 15:55 |
| morganfainberg | Exactly. | 15:55 |
| ttx | Questions? | 15:55 |
| morganfainberg | Nope. Besides asking myself if it was a good idea to run for PTL again :P | 15:56 |
| ttx | heh | 15:56 |
| morganfainberg | ttx: thanks! :) | 15:56 |
| ttx | let me know when you approved the bump and I'll keep an eye on it | 15:57 |
| morganfainberg | ack | 15:59 |
| ttx | notmyname: ready when you are | 15:59 |
| notmyname | Yo | 16:00 |
| ttx | #topic Swift | 16:00 |
| ttx | #link https://launchpad.net/swift/+milestone/2.3.0-rc1 | 16:00 |
| ttx | notmyname: how are things going with your megamerge ? | 16:00 |
| notmyname | Well. That's the focus for this week | 16:01 |
| notmyname | Still targeting Friday for landing it | 16:01 |
| notmyname | And I'm working on release notes, etc for the rc | 16:01 |
| notmyname | I'll be sending some stuff the to ml about it | 16:02 |
| ttx | notmyname: ok | 16:02 |
| notmyname | This feature has been a huge collaboration from global devs. It's been really cool to see and be a part of | 16:02 |
| ttx | Not sure we have much to discuss until the merge is completed | 16:03 |
| ttx | so I'll let you go back to it | 16:03 |
| ttx | unless you have questions | 16:03 |
| notmyname | :) | 16:04 |
| ttx | #info Still targeting Friday for landing the feature branch | 16:04 |
| ttx | #info Open source is kinda cool | 16:04 |
| notmyname | Summit scheduling will kick off this week for us | 16:04 |
| notmyname | Lol | 16:04 |
| ttx | notmyname: yes, should be able to confirm your allocation by April 10 | 16:04 |
| notmyname | Great. Thanks | 16:05 |
| ttx | The 6 fishbowl sessions are very likely. The 12 work sessions slightly less (depend on what projects we need to include) | 16:05 |
| notmyname | Ok | 16:05 |
| notmyname | We'll take all we can get :) | 16:06 |
| ttx | could be 6/8 or 6/10 instead of 6/12, but not really lower | 16:06 |
| ttx | so you can count on 6/8 already | 16:06 |
| notmyname | Ok | 16:06 |
| notmyname | Plus Friday sessions? | 16:07 |
| ttx | yes | 16:07 |
| notmyname | Ack | 16:07 |
| ttx | Other questions or announcements ? | 16:07 |
| notmyname | I'm good. Thanks | 16:07 |
| ttx | alright, have a great week! | 16:08 |
| ttx | devananda: ready when you are | 16:08 |
| *** SlickNik has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 16:12 | |
| devananda | ttx: o/ | 16:14 |
| devananda | roofers are making so much noise i can't hear my notification s... | 16:14 |
| ttx | #topic Ironic | 16:14 |
| ttx | #link https://launchpad.net/ironic/+milestone/kilo-rc1 | 16:15 |
| ttx | That RC1 list is a bit confusing to me... how current is it with your own tracking tools ? | 16:15 |
| devananda | fairly current | 16:15 |
| devananda | though i'm about to bump the not-in-progress ones | 16:16 |
| ttx | #info 10 RC bugs, 4 unassigned and 3 in progress | 16:16 |
| ttx | yeah, unless they are showstoppers, sounds like a good tradeoff | 16:16 |
| devananda | I raised them in the meeting yesterday morning, and apparently no one took them on | 16:16 |
| devananda | the 4 in progress should be landed soon | 16:16 |
| devananda | we've also just found a backwards-incompatible change in the client lib, so I plan to fix that before tomorrow as well | 16:18 |
| ttx | ok, let me push a liberty version bump for you to approve when all is ready | 16:18 |
| devananda | ack | 16:18 |
| devananda | I will be on vacation thursday and friday, btw | 16:18 |
| ttx | please -2 temporarily: https://review.openstack.org/171274 | 16:19 |
| ttx | ok, so let's cut RC1 before then | 16:19 |
| ttx | Let's target tomorrow | 16:19 |
| devananda | indeed | 16:19 |
| ttx | running a few checks | 16:19 |
| ttx | Could we get that one merged as well: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/169184/ | 16:20 |
| ttx | so that we include relatively recent ones in RC1 ? They are likely to be dropped in future RCs fwiw | 16:20 |
| ttx | if they don't reach the % | 16:21 |
| devananda | nothing is above 15% translated yet, iirc | 16:21 |
| ttx | yeah, so that is probably a useless merge, but still good so that we can judge on current adta | 16:21 |
| devananda | k k | 16:22 |
| ttx | ok, so when all your bockers merge, just approve that version bump and ping me | 16:22 |
| ttx | and I'll make stuff happen | 16:23 |
| ttx | questions ? | 16:23 |
| * devananda grumbles about slow network | 16:24 | |
| devananda | we have a couple related projects (ipa, discoverd, dib) which aren't being release-managed at this time | 16:25 |
| devananda | so folks will be doing those releases independently | 16:25 |
| devananda | any thing they should know about that? | 16:25 |
| devananda | or just follow the same approach that I am with python-ironicclent | 16:25 |
| ttx | I'd say just follow the same approach. We want to cut stable branches for those asap though, so that we can cap | 16:26 |
| * ttx is still e bit fuzzy on that part and needs to sync with dhellmann | 16:27 | |
| devananda | yea... i am fuzzy on that too | 16:27 |
| devananda | i thnk discoverd plans to tag a stable point around April 30 | 16:27 |
| ttx | basically we need to follow that recent spec | 16:27 |
| devananda | because it will be based on what is in RC of ironic | 16:27 |
| devananda | not the other way around | 16:27 |
| devananda | mmm. have a link handy? I'll make sure it gets to the right people in ironic | 16:28 |
| devananda | also, launchpad tracking page has now been updated | 16:28 |
| ttx | http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/openstack-specs/specs/library-stable-branches.html | 16:28 |
| ttx | I'll clarify and get back to you on that | 16:28 |
| devananda | cheers | 16:28 |
| ttx | SlickNik: around? | 16:29 |
| SlickNik | ttx: here | 16:29 |
| ttx | #topic Trove | 16:29 |
| ttx | #link https://launchpad.net/trove/+milestone/kilo-rc1 | 16:29 |
| ttx | #info 3 RC bugs left, all assigned and in progress | 16:30 |
| ttx | checking that they are all active | 16:30 |
| ttx | No patch yet for https://bugs.launchpad.net/trove/+bug/1430586 ? | 16:30 |
| openstack | Launchpad bug 1430586 in Trove "Trove fails to send notification event using oslo.messaging" [High,In progress] - Assigned to Nikhil Manchanda (slicknik) | 16:30 |
| SlickNik | ttx: 2 of them have patchsets up already. | 16:30 |
| SlickNik | I'm working on https://bugs.launchpad.net/trove/+bug/1430586 so I should be able to push up a patchset today. | 16:30 |
| ttx | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/155555/ looks a bit stale | 16:31 |
| * ttx doesn't like to depend on stale patches | 16:31 | |
| SlickNik | Actually, that one isn't super important — so I think we can punt that one to liberty in case it doesn't land in the next couple of days. | 16:32 |
| ttx | ok | 16:33 |
| ttx | Let me upload a review that you can approve when all is ready from your pov | 16:33 |
| ttx | Please -2 it temporarily: https://review.openstack.org/171282 | 16:33 |
| ttx | Merging this one will open master for Liberty development, so only merge when you're ready for RC1 | 16:33 |
| ttx | Ping me when you approve it and i'll make magic happen | 16:34 |
| SlickNik | ttx: awesome. Just -2'ed it. Will ping you once ready and approved. | 16:34 |
| ttx | Alright looks like you're all set. We could cut RC1 on Wed/Thu | 16:35 |
| ttx | Questions ? | 16:35 |
| SlickNik | Nope, sounds good to me. | 16:35 |
| ttx | Alright, that concludes our syncs for today | 16:36 |
| ttx | Thanks ! | 16:36 |
| ttx | #endmeeting | 16:36 |
| SlickNik | As always, thanks for your help! | 16:36 |
| openstack | Meeting ended Tue Apr 7 16:36:15 2015 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 16:36 |
| openstack | Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/ptl_sync/2015/ptl_sync.2015-04-07-08.00.html | 16:36 |
| openstack | Minutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/ptl_sync/2015/ptl_sync.2015-04-07-08.00.txt | 16:36 |
| openstack | Log: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/ptl_sync/2015/ptl_sync.2015-04-07-08.00.log.html | 16:36 |
| SlickNik | Talk to you later. | 16:36 |
| ttx | cheers! | 16:36 |
| morganfainberg | ttx, updated the RC1 list to cover all "fixed released" patches for keystone and the in-flight [actively gating] ones | 16:51 |
| morganfainberg | ttx, so we have a few more that are added. but i wont hold up if something bounces out of gate. | 16:52 |
| devananda | ttx: question -- i'll be on vacation thu - sun. at the moment, no other cores can approve changes to stable or proposed branches of ironic. | 18:04 |
| devananda | ttx: that is currently shared by our maintenance team (me + adam_g) | 18:04 |
| devananda | ttx: is there a potentially negative impact on other projects during that window? Eg, if some issue is found in ironic proposed/kilo and neither of us are around to approve it before monday | 18:05 |
| *** johnthetubaguy is now known as zz_johnthetubagu | 18:08 | |
| *** eglynn has quit IRC | 18:52 | |
| ttx | devananda: I can approve backports | 21:20 |
| ttx | devananda: as long as they are approved by the core team on master and merged there | 21:20 |
| devananda | ttx: oh. cool. I forget about your superpowers :) | 21:20 |
| ttx | That is my proposed/* superpowers | 21:21 |
| ttx | morganfainberg: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/171260/ almost there | 21:21 |
| morganfainberg | ttx, yep | 21:21 |
| morganfainberg | ttx, we will need an RC2, minor things and something up in the air still | 21:21 |
| morganfainberg | ttx, but i didn't want to reset the gate and make lots of people angry | 21:22 |
| morganfainberg | rc2 seems likely anyway | 21:22 |
| morganfainberg | just based on past history | 21:22 |
| ttx | morganfainberg: we'll keep RC1 up for a few days before opening up a RC2 window | 21:22 |
| ttx | don't want to discourage testersd | 21:22 |
| morganfainberg | ttx, the only thing confirmed for RC2 will be man page update, possibly sample config | 21:22 |
| ttx | so just pile up fixes on master, ready to be backported | 21:23 |
| morganfainberg | ttx, so +100 | 21:23 |
| morganfainberg | on holding a couple days | 21:23 |
| ttx | and we'll open a RC2 window next week | 21:23 |
| * ttx gives that Neutron thing 2 more minutes to clear the queue | 21:23 | |
| ttx | or else I'll go to bed | 21:24 |
| ttx | ah, completed | 21:24 |
| ttx | I'll stay up then | 21:24 |
| * ttx nudges zuul | 21:27 | |
| ttx | branch cutting in progress | 21:37 |
| nikhil_k | ttx: no meeting today, wanna make sure I did not miss it :) (I realize that I'm very late) | 21:47 |
| nikhil_k | ? | 21:48 |
| ttx | right, skipped it | 21:48 |
| nikhil_k | thanks | 21:48 |
| ttx | morganfainberg: ok, it's in | 21:58 |
| morganfainberg | yep :) | 21:58 |
| ttx | Going to bed | 21:58 |
| ttx | cheers! | 21:58 |
| *** mestery has quit IRC | 22:11 | |
| *** mestery has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 22:12 | |
| *** asalkeld has joined #openstack-relmgr-office | 22:53 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!