Friday, 2024-03-08

tkajinamI wonder if we can merge https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/907955 or do you want me to make any change ?06:22
tkajinamsorry for the late notice about the release removal, but tbvh we have been affected by decisions about inactive projects which happened relatively late during this cycle. we have a few more modules we aim to retire, so I'll push a few more similar changes (puppet-murano, sahara, and ec2api)06:23
opendevreviewRiccardo Pittau proposed openstack/releases master: Release networking-baremetal 6.3.0 for caracal  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/91208908:09
opendevreviewHervĂ© Beraud proposed openstack/releases master: [blazar] Create 2024.1 branch for client and non-client libs  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/91095109:05
opendevreviewMerged openstack/releases master: [zaqar] Create 2024.1 branch for client and non-client libs  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/91092909:14
elodillestkajinam: i don't know what frickler meant by that patch needs an update: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/907955/1#message-9bb1c53b6fe447b3415884ac2751a905ae4d7ef210:27
elodillestkajinam: at least the governance patch has merged, so i guess we are good to go, but i can drop this in during the relmgt meeting to agree on it with the team10:28
elodillesrelease team cores: i've +2'd & PTL-Approved+1'd the branch cutting patches where we can proceed, if any of you have time: https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:caracal-stable-branches+is:open11:01
elodilles(and added some comment for some patches)11:01
*** ralonsoh__ is now known as ralonsoh12:25
opendevreviewElod Illes proposed openstack/releases master: [process] Add section about zuul job cleanup to countdown mail  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/91211012:46
*** carloss_ is now known as carloss13:15
opendevreviewHervĂ© Beraud proposed openstack/releases master: [watcher] Create 2024.1 branch for client and non-client libs  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/91093213:45
elodillesreminder: weekly meeting in ~10 mins13:49
opendevreviewMerged openstack/releases master: [cinder] Create 2024.1 branch for client and non-client libs  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/91094313:50
opendevreviewMerged openstack/releases master: [blazar] Create 2024.1 branch for client and non-client libs  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/91095113:50
opendevreviewMerged openstack/releases master: [tacker] Create 2024.1 branch for client and non-client libs  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/91093513:51
hberaudo\13:51
opendevreviewMerged openstack/releases master: [keystone] Create 2024.1 branch for client and non-client libs  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/91092613:52
opendevreviewMerged openstack/releases master: [OpenStackSDK] Create 2024.1 branch for client and non-client libs  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/91094513:52
opendevreviewMerged openstack/releases master: [kuryr] Create 2024.1 branch for client and non-client libs  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/91094813:52
opendevreviewMerged openstack/releases master: [barbican] Create 2024.1 branch for client and non-client libs  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/91095013:52
opendevreviewMerged openstack/releases master: [murano] Create 2024.1 branch for client and non-client libs  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/91095713:52
opendevreviewMerged openstack/releases master: [magnum] Create 2024.1 branch for client and non-client libs  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/91092313:52
opendevreviewMerged openstack/releases master: [masakari] Create 2024.1 branch for client and non-client libs  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/91095613:52
opendevreviewMerged openstack/releases master: [designate] Create 2024.1 branch for client and non-client libs  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/91092713:52
opendevreviewMerged openstack/releases master: [vitrage] Create 2024.1 branch for client and non-client libs  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/91093313:52
ttxo/14:00
elodilles#startmeeting releaseteam14:01
opendevmeetMeeting started Fri Mar  8 14:01:08 2024 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is elodilles. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.14:01
opendevmeetUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.14:01
opendevmeetThe meeting name has been set to 'releaseteam'14:01
hberaudo/14:01
elodillesPing list: elod frickler armstrong14:01
frickler\o14:01
elodilles#link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/caracal-relmgt-tracking14:01
elodilleshello everyone o/14:01
elodilleswe are waaay down at line 33614:02
elodilleslet's start!14:02
elodilles#topic Review task completion14:02
elodilles1st task: 'Process any remaining client library freeze exception (all)'14:03
opendevreviewMerged openstack/releases master: [mistral] Create 2024.1 branch for client and non-client libs  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/91092514:03
opendevreviewMerged openstack/releases master: [zun] Create 2024.1 branch for client and non-client libs  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/91092814:03
opendevreviewMerged openstack/releases master: [venus] Create 2024.1 branch for client and non-client libs  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/91093014:03
opendevreviewMerged openstack/releases master: [adjutant] Create 2024.1 branch for client and non-client libs  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/91094914:03
elodillesnothing remained here, so this is done14:03
ttx\o/14:03
elodilles2nd task: 'Early in the week, email openstack-discuss list to remind PTLs that cycle-highlights are due this week so that they can be included in release marketing preparations (hberaud)'14:03
elodillesmail has been sent: https://lists.openstack.org/archives/list/openstack-discuss@lists.openstack.org/thread/BK4PSIMFEFVTTQXJC7EIEDH4NC25UOAK/14:04
elodillesand lots of cycle highlights patches have arrived during the week14:04
fungilooks like we've got cycle highlights published so far for designate, glance, horizon, neutron, octavia, openstackansible14:04
elodillesyepp14:05
elodillesand this is waiting for a 2nd review: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/91186814:05
elodilles(trove)14:05
elodillesso, as fungi's summary shows we still can expect some cycle highlights to arrive14:07
elodilles:/14:07
opendevreviewMerged openstack/releases master: [trove] Create 2024.1 branch for client and non-client libs  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/91093414:08
fungithis week was the deadline though, right?14:08
elodillesanyway, we have a reminder in our countdown mail, hopefully PTLs will notice there14:08
fungithanks!14:08
elodillesi'll try to keep an eye on the highlights14:09
elodillesanything to add to this task?14:09
elodillesif nothing, then let's move on14:10
elodilles3rd task: 'release castellan to 5.0.0 (hberaud)'14:10
hberaudthanks to tkajinam 14:10
elodilleshttps://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/91088314:10
elodilles\o/14:10
frickleralso merged to reqs14:11
hberaud\o/14:11
elodillesnice, thanks o/14:11
elodilles4th task: 'Freeze all cycle-based library releases except for release-critical bugs. Independently-released libraries may still be released, but constraint or requirement changes will be held until after the freeze period (all)'14:11
elodillesthis is mostly a reminder14:12
elodillesbut maybe we can mention here:14:12
elodillesthis: new release of aodhclient? https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/91170614:12
elodillesso meanwhile frickler commented that this is needed14:12
fricklertooz has also proposed a new release https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/91171114:12
elodillesoh, thx frickler 14:13
fricklerand we will need to add it into reqs since the current version is breaking kolla14:13
elodillesACK14:14
hberauda RFE have been made for tooz https://lists.openstack.org/archives/list/openstack-discuss@lists.openstack.org/thread/LM7O4WMGDRDBDSTGAFT2U5VTVPWDLYEI/14:14
hberaudso looks ok14:15
elodillesyepp, justified release + RFE. in this case tooz is +2 from me14:16
elodillesany objection?14:16
hberaudnope14:16
elodillesthanks hberaud14:17
elodillesback to aodhclient then14:17
elodillesmeanwhile Erno also answered on the patch14:17
elodillesi haven't seen an RFE for this one14:18
opendevreviewMerged openstack/releases master: [oslo] Create 2024.1 branch for client and non-client libs  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/91092114:18
elodillesanyway, this also looks OK to me based on the responses14:19
elodillesopinions?14:19
ttxsounds good to me14:19
hberaudyeah according the Erno's comment, this patch lgtm14:19
hberauds/the/to14:19
hberaudthe branch should be updated accordingly14:20
hberaud*cut14:21
elodillesACK, i've +2'd it14:21
elodillesa 2nd core review is needed there o:)14:22
hberauddone14:22
elodillesthx o/14:22
elodillesmove on then!14:22
elodilles5th task: 'Propose stable/$series branch creation for all client and non-client libraries that had not requested it at freeze time (hberaud)'14:22
elodilles#link https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22caracal-stable-branches%2214:23
elodillesthanks hberaud for this one, too14:23
hberaudnp14:23
elodilleswe have 3 remaining patch14:23
hberaudwill update telemetry once aodhclient is merged14:24
elodilleswell, aodh one is as discussed14:24
elodillesso i'll update the patch when the aodh release patch merged14:25
hberaudok14:25
fricklerthe change mentioned for nova was merged today14:25
fricklerso that could get updated and should be ready then14:26
hberaudIMO the watcher one can be merged14:26
elodillesfrickler: and that means it's another RFE + new release if i'm not mistaken14:26
elodillesbut at least the patch has merged :)14:27
elodillesOK, so watcher is tricky14:28
opendevreviewElod Illes proposed openstack/releases master: [watcher] Create 2024.1 branch for client and non-client libs  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/91093214:28
hberaudminor version lgtm14:29
elodillesas it has py310 & py311 classifiers added, i've updated the version bump ^^^14:29
hberaudindeed14:30
elodillesso i was a bit hesitant with this whether it's worth a release or let's just leave it as it is14:30
opendevreviewMerged openstack/releases master: Create new tooz release for 2024.1  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/91171114:30
elodillesbut hberaud suggested to release it anyway14:30
fricklerwatcher has no new ptl candidacy, so I'm doubtful we will get a response from the current one14:30
elodillesfrickler: plus we are over the deadline14:31
fricklerbut yes, make a release and target for inactivity after that14:31
elodillesso it's really depends on us for now o:)14:31
elodillesis the release is acceptable for you?14:32
hberaudyes14:32
ttxyes14:32
elodillesOK, then let's merge it14:33
fricklerexcept you missed to change the branch tag14:33
elodillesah, good catch14:33
elodilleslet me fix that14:33
hberaudgood catch14:33
opendevreviewElod Illes proposed openstack/releases master: [watcher] Create 2024.1 branch for client and non-client libs  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/91093214:34
elodillesreview now again please ^^^14:34
hberaudeagle eyes!14:34
elodillesi guess we will need an RFE anyway, to make this formal and let requirements team know about the upper version bump can be merged14:34
elodilles:)14:34
ttx+2a14:35
elodillesACK, thanks o/14:35
elodilleswe can follow up on the rest during next week as we have a task for that14:36
elodillesso let's move on14:36
elodilles6th task: 'List cycle-with-intermediary deliverables that have not been refreshed in the last 2 months and send a separate email targeted to teams with such old deliverables to remind them to release (if needed) otherwise a probably outdated version will be used for the final release (ttx)'14:36
ttxDone / All cycle-with-intermediary deliverables that were previously released in caracal have been refreshed in the last 2 months, so no warning was needed14:36
elodilles+114:36
elodillescool, thx!14:37
hberaudgood14:37
elodilles7th task: 'propose a patch against RC1 week's mail about zuul cleanup (elod)'14:37
elodilles#link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/91211014:37
elodillesthere it is ^^^14:37
elodilleswhen you'll have time please review14:37
elodillesand that's all for the tasks of this week14:38
elodillesnext topic!14:38
elodilles#topic Assign next week tasks14:38
elodillesall taken14:38
elodilles#topic Review countdown email14:39
elodilles#link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/relmgmt-weekly-emails14:39
elodillesplease review ^^^14:39
ttxLGTM14:41
frickler+114:41
hberaud+114:41
elodilles\o/14:41
elodillesthanks, i'll send it later on today14:42
hberaudthx14:42
elodilles#topic Open Discussion14:42
elodilles- PTG session booked14:42
ttxyes so I booked a session during PTg at our normal time14:42
elodillessounds perfect! thanks!14:43
hberaudFYI I'm on PTO and traveling during the PTG period, so I won't join you14:43
ttxhmm, now doubting my tz math14:43
ttxI booked it on 13utc14:43
elodillesACK and /me sad14:43
ttxyeah, should be 14utc14:44
fungiare there any special steps that need to be covered for leaving murano out of 2024.1 (i understand python-muranoclient is still going to be included since it already got a release forced, mainly concerned about the api service)14:44
elodillesttx: yepp, the meeting is 1400UTC, but 1300UTC also good to me14:44
ttxWill fix14:44
opendevreviewMerged openstack/releases master: python-aodhclient 3.5.1  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/91170614:44
ttxnow let's keep it over the normal meeting time14:44
elodillesttx: +114:44
ttxFixed14:45
elodillesfungi: good question. i think we usually don't have any special steps, but that is because the original deadline is milestone-2 for removal 14:46
ttxI think it's ok14:46
elodillesother than that, i think python-muranoclient will be just listed on releases.o.o, and that's it :/14:47
fungijust wondering what might break in automation or the release process, any release configs that need updating before release day...14:47
ttxwith the deliverable files removed, it should all fall in place14:47
elodillesyepp ^^^14:47
fungii guess you simply omit murano in the omnibus release patch and it works as expected14:47
ttxAll the release tooling is based on the body of deliverable files14:48
elodillesfungi: since it's generated from the existing yamls, it shouldn't be a problem.14:48
ttxso it will be automatically ommited14:48
elodillesfungi: or you mean python-muranoclient as well?14:48
fungino, just the one that hasn't been tagged already (openstack/murano)14:48
ttxmuranoclient will be in the final releasee but I also think that is ~fine14:48
elodilles+114:49
opendevreviewYasufumi Ogawa proposed openstack/releases master: Add Tacker Caracal cycle highlights  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/91226614:49
elodillesyepp, it should be fine14:49
fungiyeah, at least from a vmt perspective i don't have current concerns for python-muranoclient anyway14:49
elodillesfungi: ACK, +114:49
fungiooh, more highlights!14:50
elodillesyepp, it's still R-4 :]14:50
fungii nudged nova and ironic a few minutes ago14:50
elodillescooool, thanks fungi o/14:50
fungiwill check with openinfra marketing folks to see who else they desperately want highlights from and do a little last-minute targeted outreach14:51
elodilles+114:51
elodillesone more topic from me:14:51
elodilles(elod) Can we merge 'retire puppet-qdr' patch? https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/907955/1#message-9bb1c53b6fe447b3415884ac2751a905ae4d7ef214:51
ttxjust +2ed it14:52
hberaudjust removed my +2 to allow the discussion :)14:52
fungii merged the last project-config change for that a few minutes ago14:52
fricklerno objection from me either14:52
hberaudlgtm14:53
elodillesfrickler: you mentioned some 'needed update' on the patch14:53
elodillesbut i don't see what needs to be updated o:)14:54
fricklerthat was about your comment that it was too late to remove from caracal14:54
elodillesotherwise the removal is OK to me, despite we have passed Caracal-2 (and even Caracal-3)14:54
fricklerthen that file would have needed to be kept14:55
fricklerbut I'm fine either way14:55
elodillesoh, i see14:55
elodillesOK, then if no objection then i'm +2 it14:56
opendevreviewMerged openstack/releases master: [watcher] Create 2024.1 branch for client and non-client libs  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/91093214:56
elodillesi mean +W14:57
elodillesdone14:58
elodillesany other thing to discuss before we close the meeting?14:58
hberaudnope14:58
ttxnope14:59
elodillesthanks everyone then o/14:59
elodilleslet's end the meeting!14:59
elodilles#endmeeting14:59
opendevmeetMeeting ended Fri Mar  8 14:59:49 2024 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)14:59
opendevmeetMinutes:        https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/releaseteam/2024/releaseteam.2024-03-08-14.01.html14:59
opendevmeetMinutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/releaseteam/2024/releaseteam.2024-03-08-14.01.txt14:59
opendevmeetLog:            https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/releaseteam/2024/releaseteam.2024-03-08-14.01.log.html14:59
hberaudthx14:59
opendevreviewMerged openstack/releases master: Retire puppet-qdr: Mark the deliverables as retired  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/90795515:05
opendevreviewElod Illes proposed openstack/releases master: [Telemetry] Create 2024.1 branch for client and non-client libs  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/91094615:38
opendevreviewElod Illes proposed openstack/releases master: [nova] Release python-novaclient 18.6.0  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/91227515:46
mnasiadkaHello - any chance for https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/requirements/+/912265 to unblock some of Kolla-Ansible CI? ;-)15:47
opendevreviewElod Illes proposed openstack/releases master: [nova] Create 2024.1 branch for client and non-client libs  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/91094015:47
mnasiadkaelodilles: using the occasion - I know that probably not the best time in the cycle - but adding cross-magnum job (https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/requirements/+/910573) needs a second +2 ;-)15:51
elodillesmnasiadka: let's wait until the CI finishes and requirements cores approve it15:51
mnasiadkaah, requirements, release, wrong channel, sorry ;-)15:52
mnasiadkalet me go to the proper one15:52
opendevreviewMichal Nasiadka proposed openstack/releases master: magnum: add Caracal/2024.1 cycle highlights  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/91227916:05
opendevreviewMichal Nasiadka proposed openstack/releases master: magnum: add Caracal/2024.1 cycle highlights  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/91227916:06
opendevreviewBartosz Bezak proposed openstack/releases master: Add Kolla/Kolla-Ansible Caracal cycle highlights  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/91228216:30
opendevreviewMerged openstack/releases master: [Telemetry] Create 2024.1 branch for client and non-client libs  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/91094616:33
opendevreviewMichal Nasiadka proposed openstack/releases master: Add Kolla/Kolla-Ansible Caracal cycle highlights  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/91228216:34
opendevreviewBartosz Bezak proposed openstack/releases master: Add Kolla/Kolla-Ansible Caracal cycle highlights  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/91228216:36
elodillesfyi, i've sent the RFE mail, just to be formal and have them recorded on ML :)  https://lists.openstack.org/archives/list/openstack-discuss@lists.openstack.org/thread/AYJRY7BDFH64HYZLTCTXJ6GN4EOOSWKI/16:38
elodillesbauzas: ^^^16:38
bauzas++16:39
opendevreviewMerged openstack/releases master: [magnum] Transition python-magnumclient to EOL  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/91040617:12
opendevreviewWill Szumski proposed openstack/releases master: Add Kolla/Kolla-Ansible Caracal cycle highlights  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/91228217:21
opendevreviewWill Szumski proposed openstack/releases master: Add Kolla/Kolla-Ansible/Kayobe Caracal cycle highlights  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/91228217:22
opendevreviewWill Szumski proposed openstack/releases master: Add Kolla/Kolla-Ansible/Kayobe Caracal cycle highlights  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/91228217:28
opendevreviewWill Szumski proposed openstack/releases master: Add Kolla/Kolla-Ansible/Kayobe Caracal cycle highlights  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/91228217:29
opendevreviewRajat Dhasmana proposed openstack/releases master: Add 2024.1 (Caracal) cycle highlights for cinder  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/91195317:35
*** blarnath is now known as d34dh0r5318:09
opendevreviewCarlos Eduardo proposed openstack/releases master: Add Manila 2024.1 cycle highlights  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/91230118:53
opendevreviewPierre Riteau proposed openstack/releases master: Add Blazar cycle highlights (Caracal release)  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/91231221:41
opendevreviewJay Faulkner proposed openstack/releases master: Cycle highlights for Ironic  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/91231622:04

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!