| opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/releases master: Switch back Puppet OpenStack to cycle-with-intermediary https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/878730 | 02:16 |
|---|---|---|
| opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/releases master: Puppet OpenStack 2023.1 release https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/878731 | 02:16 |
| opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/releases master: Puppet OpenStack 2023.1 release https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/878731 | 02:17 |
| opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/releases master: Puppet OpenStack 2023.1 release https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/878731 | 02:18 |
| *** amoralej|off is now known as amoralej | 06:17 | |
| elodilles | fyi, i've sent a mail to ML related to x/networking-mlnx release job failures: https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2023-March/032996.html | 09:57 |
| elodilles | (deliverables are not under relmgmt managed deliverables, though) | 09:58 |
| *** amoralej is now known as amoralej|lunch | 12:18 | |
| *** gthiemon1e is now known as gthiemonge | 12:24 | |
| dhellmann | @hberaud @fungi @ttx Hi! I received an email from Jake Yip yesterday asking that I reconfigure PyPI for magnum so only the bot can publish releases. I'm fine with giving up access, but wanted to make sure the procedure was correct before I changed the settings. (https://docs.opendev.org/opendev/infra-manual/latest/creators.html#give-opendev-exclusive-permission-to-publish-releases) Is this part of an initiative you're | 12:43 |
| dhellmann | driving? | 12:43 |
| ttx | dhellmann: it's not really something we are driving, I think it's more the TC after there were some abuses on PyPI | 12:47 |
| elodilles | hi dhellmann , i think this is the related thread: https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2023-March/032780.html | 12:47 |
| ttx | ah, excellent pointer | 12:48 |
| dhellmann | ok, I mostly wanted to make sure this was real because I don't know Jake (I did look him up in the PTL list, but it still seemed better to double-check) | 12:49 |
| dhellmann | thanks, @elodilles , that email thread is exactly the sort of confirmation I wanted | 12:50 |
| gmann | dhellmann: you can find the details about PyPi cleanup in this etherpad https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/openstack-pypi-maintainers-cleanup | 12:53 |
| dhellmann | *sniff* removing myself from reno right now *sniff* | 12:54 |
| dhellmann | thanks, gmann, I'm going through the list of projects and removing myself from all of them. It's a surprisingly long list. | 12:54 |
| gmann | dhellmann: thanks a lot. yeah, you have setup many of them in pypi at initial time. | 12:55 |
| diablo_rojo | dhellmann: not surprising at all! You have been hugely influential :) | 12:56 |
| fungi | dhellmann: yes, you created many, many projects in openstack | 12:56 |
| fungi | fond memories, i hope! | 12:56 |
| dhellmann | indeed, so many of these are from setting up oslo libraries | 12:58 |
| dhellmann | @diablo_rojo, are you still maintaining openstack-summit-counter? | 12:58 |
| diablo_rojo | Heh not really. | 12:58 |
| diablo_rojo | I can honestly say I don't recall the last time I touched it. | 12:59 |
| *** amoralej|lunch is now known as amoralej | 13:00 | |
| dhellmann | aw, I'm a little sad about that, if I'm honest | 13:01 |
| dhellmann | ok, I've removed myself from all the obvious ones | 13:01 |
| diablo_rojo | It probably would need a lot of updates since we don't have two summits a year anymore. | 13:01 |
| dhellmann | true, and the alphabet has rolled over so it's more complex | 13:02 |
| diablo_rojo | Ahhh yes thats a really good point. | 13:02 |
| diablo_rojo | Might be an interesting weekend project at some point. | 13:02 |
| diablo_rojo | The problem is I keep travelling and not having time lol. | 13:02 |
| dhellmann | travel is a much better use of your time :-) | 13:04 |
| diablo_rojo | I kinda think so. | 13:04 |
| opendevreview | mbu proposed openstack/releases master: Bump validation framework to 1.9.0 version https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/878774 | 13:50 |
| opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/releases master: Switch back Puppet OpenStack to cycle-with-intermediary https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/878730 | 14:01 |
| opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/releases master: Puppet OpenStack 2023.1 release https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/878731 | 14:01 |
| frickler | elodilles: ttx: as discussed in #-tc, the submodule list in the openstack/openstack repo seems severly outdated. last update was 3 years ago by ajaeger. from the gerrit ACL this seems to be a release manager task, maybe you can check this? | 14:03 |
| frickler | from a manual run there would seem to be about 50 repos missing and 20 to be removed | 14:03 |
| elodilles | wow. i did not even know this kind of repo exists | 14:19 |
| ttx | does that repo have any usefulness at this point? Updating it was never really a release management thing | 14:47 |
| ttx | historically it was an OpenStack Infra thing | 14:47 |
| clarkb | ttx: I was asking a similar thing in #openstack-tc whee it originally came up | 14:53 |
| clarkb | ttx: fungi says the cncf landscape tool relies on that repo because in addition to requiring a github repo they don't know how to aggregate multiple repos? | 14:53 |
| ttx | it's what we point the CNCF landscape too, but not sure that helps :) | 15:00 |
| ttx | to* | 15:00 |
| fungi | looks like smcginnis and hberaud were the ones reviewing/approving changes to the project list | 15:04 |
| gmann | frickler: ttx clarkb fungi what I saw in CNCF landscape is only this not repo wise things. is there any other view there and fetching things from openstack/openstack ? https://landscape.cncf.io/card-mode?organization=open-infrastructure-foundation&selected=open-stack | 15:56 |
| fungi | gmann: it's how they get the "commits" graph | 15:57 |
| clarkb | gmann: in that card it lists a repository. That repository is openstack/openstack. You can only list yourself on the cncf landscape if you have a repository in github when you are an open source project | 15:57 |
| clarkb | if you are not an open source project then you can list on the landscape and they don't care where your source code is. Its a bit backwards | 15:58 |
| gmann | ohk i see | 15:58 |
| fungi | that's also why zuul isn't listed, it's open source and doesn't have a mirror on github | 15:58 |
| gmann | humm | 15:59 |
| fungi | cncf will only add projects that are at least mirrored to github because they designed the landscape generator dependent on github's api | 15:59 |
| fungi | (unless the software is proprietary, in which case the restriction doesn't apply) | 16:00 |
| opendevreview | Rodolfo Alonso proposed openstack/releases master: [neutron] Transition Train release to EOL https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/878202 | 16:03 |
| frickler | I'm not against dropping the openstack repo if it is no longer considered useful, I just want to avoid it showing a stale state | 16:30 |
| *** amoralej is now known as amoralej|off | 16:49 | |
| *** sfinucan is now known as stephenfin | 17:20 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!