| * hberaud dentist appointment be back in a while | 08:29 | |
| opendevreview | mbu proposed openstack/releases master: Push Validation Framework release to 1.5.0 and create bugfix branch https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/823394 | 10:32 |
|---|---|---|
| *** amoralej is now known as amoralej|lunch | 12:58 | |
| hberaud | ttx: o/ Do you remember if is it possible to branch an independent deliverable? Apparently no (https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/2c738c2dac8a449d8c84a1167c767d5f) (related to https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/823394) | 13:14 |
| hberaud | ttx: our validation expect a naming branch based on our official stable branches names, might adding `stable-branch-type: std-with-versions` could fit well to their use case https://opendev.org/openstack/releases/src/branch/master/deliverables/yoga/ironic-inspector.yaml#L4 | 13:18 |
| hberaud | my main concern is if they want to create tags from from these branches after creating this branch | 13:19 |
| hberaud | that's won't fit the independent model | 13:20 |
| hberaud | in any case I didn't find similar use case in the other independent deliverables | 13:21 |
| *** amoralej|lunch is now known as amoralej | 13:59 | |
| *** whoami-rajat__ is now known as whoami-rajat | 13:59 | |
| elodilles | hberaud: i see something thath might be similar: https://opendev.org/openstack/releases/src/branch/master/deliverables/_independent/puppet-pacemaker.yaml#L6 | 14:03 |
| elodilles | not 'bugfix/' branch, but the intention is the same if i'm not mistaken | 14:04 |
| hberaud | indeed | 14:04 |
| hberaud | https://opendev.org/openstack/releases/commit/b96b216f50c10983c9d4b7623a3f7c1fcd025cab | 14:05 |
| hberaud | however I wonder if replacing "bugfix" by "stable" will throw away the error | 14:06 |
| hberaud | apparently yes | 14:07 |
| elodilles | \o/ | 14:07 |
| hberaud | (not yet tested) | 14:07 |
| elodilles | :S | 14:07 |
| hberaud | I'll do a test locally | 14:07 |
| elodilles | thanks | 14:08 |
| hberaud | anyway good catch! | 14:08 |
| elodilles | it could happen that the validator did not check this 5 years ago :S | 14:08 |
| elodilles | :] | 14:08 |
| hberaud | elodilles: that failed... | 14:13 |
| hberaud | again | 14:13 |
| hberaud | with the same error | 14:13 |
| hberaud | - - name: bugfix/1.5 | 14:13 |
| hberaud | + - name: stable/1.5.x | 14:13 |
| hberaud | my changes ^ | 14:13 |
| hberaud | (applied on the both files) | 14:14 |
| opendevreview | mbu proposed openstack/releases master: Push Validation Framework release to 1.5.0 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/823394 | 14:22 |
| elodilles | so that means the validation was extended meanwhile | 14:29 |
| elodilles | this might need validator change then :/ | 14:30 |
| ttx | yeah, generally independent things are mono-branch | 14:30 |
| ttx | the solution might be to create it outside of our automation | 14:31 |
| ttx | since we won;t support releasing out of those anyway | 14:31 |
| ttx | or, said another way: "Release management team supports (through openstack/releases) single-channel releasing or openstack-series-driven releasing. You can do things outside of release management though" | 14:32 |
| ttx | single-channel = only master branch ("independent") | 14:33 |
| ttx | openstack-series-driven = following openstack common stable branches (with-rc, with-intermediary) | 14:33 |
| elodilles | ok, that means the validator change is not needed | 15:14 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: New neutron-lib release https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/823253 | 15:34 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Propose to EOL Kuryr stable branches https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/820144 | 15:35 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Release ovsdbapp 1.14.0 for yoga https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/820264 | 15:48 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Stable releases for neutron-dynamic-routing https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/822257 | 15:54 |
| *** amoralej is now known as amoralej|off | 18:03 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!