| *** diablo_rojo is now known as Guest961 | 02:54 | |
| *** ykarel|away is now known as ykarel | 04:31 | |
| *** iurygregory_ is now known as iurygregory | 06:38 | |
| *** amoralej|away is now known as amoralej | 07:02 | |
| *** rpittau|afk is now known as rpittau | 07:31 | |
| *** ykarel is now known as ykarel|lunch | 09:06 | |
| opendevreview | Hervé Beraud proposed openstack/releases master: fix placeholder https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/801041 | 10:00 |
|---|---|---|
| hberaud | elodilles: o/ I think that this one could be merged => https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/796841 | 10:33 |
| hberaud | dtantsur, iurygregory, rpittau: o/ Please can you have a look to those patches => https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/800251 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/800234 thanks by advance | 10:36 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Create queens-eol tag for horizon project https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/799543 | 10:38 |
| elodilles | hberaud: hi, actually I'm not quite sure | 10:55 |
| hberaud | ok | 10:55 |
| hberaud | so I drop my +2 | 10:56 |
| elodilles | hberaud: i was checking some newton branches that are still open | 10:56 |
| elodilles | and I see that there are newton-eol tags | 10:56 |
| elodilles | just they are placed on weird commits | 10:56 |
| elodilles | :S | 10:56 |
| hberaud | ah | 10:56 |
| gibi | prometheanfire: ack, thanks. | 10:57 |
| dtantsur | hberaud: lgtm, sorry for the delay | 10:57 |
| hberaud | dtantsur: np | 10:57 |
| elodilles | hberaud: there is already a newton-eol for dragonflow as well it seems: https://opendev.org/openstack/dragonflow/src/tag/newton-eol | 10:58 |
| elodilles | hberaud: it just does not match the tip of the stable/newton: https://opendev.org/openstack/dragonflow/commits/branch/stable/newton | 10:58 |
| elodilles | so I guess all the stale newton/mitaka/etc branches have the same issue: the *-eol tag does not match with the last commit's hash | 11:00 |
| hberaud | i see | 11:00 |
| elodilles | i am still thinking what should be the best fix for these situations... maybe we should use some *-eol-fix tags or I don't know... | 11:01 |
| elodilles | and then we can delete the branches | 11:01 |
| iurygregory | hberaud, looking now | 11:03 |
| hberaud | elodilles: I don't know if it will be allowed by our tools, we can give a try | 11:06 |
| hberaud | iurygregory: thanks | 11:06 |
| *** ykarel|lunch is now known as ykarel | 11:11 | |
| opendevreview | Elod Illes proposed openstack/releases master: [dragonflow] Set eol to Dragonflow Ocata https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/796841 | 11:12 |
| elodilles | hberaud: yes, I have that fear that we cannot add such... I'll try that... :-/ meanwhile I've updated the patch to handle at least the ocata branch of dragonflow ^^^ | 11:17 |
| elodilles | hberaud: I don't see ocata-eol there yet, at least... | 11:17 |
| pabelanger | Morning! sorry to ask again, but I'm curious how https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/772357 was generated. It is the release schedule for openstack, I'm curious is it was generted by hand, or more likely via a tool | 12:02 |
| pabelanger | smcginnis: ^ hopefully you'll be able to shed some light, given it was your change | 12:04 |
| *** amoralej is now known as amoralej|lunch | 12:05 | |
| *** marios_ is now known as marios | 12:40 | |
| hberaud | pabelanger: Hello | 12:56 |
| pabelanger | o/ | 12:56 |
| hberaud | I planned to reply you this morning but you was disconnected | 12:57 |
| hberaud | pabelanger: So these planning are generated by following this doc of our process => https://releases.openstack.org/reference/process.html#week-after-milestone-2 | 12:58 |
| pabelanger | yah, sorry about that. I haven't setup znc yet for new irc servers, so just on web | 12:58 |
| hberaud | pabelanger: We own a script to generate a base template that will be fulfilled manually with key dates | 12:59 |
| hberaud | You can find an example of how to launch it in our process doc ^ | 12:59 |
| pabelanger | perfect! thanks | 13:00 |
| pabelanger | let me test it out | 13:00 |
| hberaud | pabelanger: you are welcome | 13:00 |
| hberaud | ok np | 13:00 |
| pabelanger | I'm looking to reuse some of the logic for ansible project, given how awesome openstack releases are | 13:00 |
| hberaud | Cool | 13:00 |
| hberaud | Do not hesitate to ask more questions, we will be happy to help you | 13:00 |
| hberaud | pabelanger: if you are interested in here is our next series' proposed schedule https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/800663 | 13:03 |
| hberaud | pabelanger: and here is an example of our related ML announcement => http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-July/023681.html | 13:05 |
| pabelanger | hberaud: how are the sphinx docs generated? I'm guessing you pipe the output of list_weeks.py into the schedule.yaml file. But still not seeing the sphinx part | 13:06 |
| hberaud | Yes we pipe the output of the list_weeks.py into the schedule.yaml | 13:08 |
| hberaud | pabelanger: and the table is generated using the sphinx extension datatemplates => https://sphinxcontribdatatemplates.readthedocs.io/en/latest/nodata.html | 13:10 |
| *** marios is now known as marios|call | 13:10 | |
| hberaud | pabelanger: data are passed by using params to the extensions, see the line 13 in this file => https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/800663/1/doc/source/yoga/schedule.rst | 13:11 |
| hberaud | pabelanger: and here is our rendering template https://opendev.org/openstack/releases/src/branch/master/doc/source/_themes/releases/schedule_table.tmpl | 13:13 |
| hberaud | (passed to datatemplates) | 13:13 |
| pabelanger | ack, so is the schedule.rst file handcrafted initially? with some static data for dates, then rest is loaded dynamically | 13:13 |
| hberaud | (that correspond to our series schedule) | 13:13 |
| hberaud | yes | 13:13 |
| *** amoralej|lunch is now known as amoralej | 13:13 | |
| pabelanger | got it | 13:14 |
| hberaud | schedule.* are hand crafted | 13:14 |
| pabelanger | that was the step I was missing | 13:14 |
| hberaud | And this kind of patch is mostly for fulfilling with data https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/800663 | 13:17 |
| pabelanger | hberaud: is tox -edocs enough to generate the sphinx files from the schedule.* bits or is there another entry poing? | 13:17 |
| hberaud | pabelanger: nope it's the one | 13:17 |
| hberaud | (yes tox-e docs is enough) | 13:18 |
| pabelanger | ++ | 13:18 |
| hberaud | pabelanger: One main advantage of that is that it allow every team to fulfil their own team planning (teams specific their dates) e.g: https://opendev.org/openstack/releases/commit/9f652aee73a2061b06a66933bcb4d02b94d81980 | 13:21 |
| hberaud | pabelanger: `x-project` dates are cross key dates and `project-specific` dates are specific to teams | 13:23 |
| hberaud | pabelanger: This kind of feature can help the ansible project to reflect your SIG topics per example | 13:24 |
| hberaud | I know that the ansible project split the maintenance into modules/topics (files, auth), so, each ansible maintenance group could define its own specific schedule driven by through the cross goals. | 13:30 |
| *** marios|call is now known as marios | 13:34 | |
| hberaud | #startmeeting releaseteam | 14:00 |
| opendevmeet | Meeting started Fri Jul 16 14:00:09 2021 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is hberaud. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 14:00 |
| opendevmeet | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 14:00 |
| opendevmeet | The meeting name has been set to 'releaseteam' | 14:00 |
| hberaud | Ping list: elod armstrong | 14:00 |
| hberaud | We're way down on line 206 now | 14:00 |
| ttx | o/ | 14:00 |
| hberaud | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/xena-relmgt-tracking | 14:00 |
| hberaud | Will just wait a couple minutes for folks. | 14:00 |
| ttx | added a couple of topics | 14:01 |
| hberaud | ack | 14:01 |
| elodilles | o/ | 14:01 |
| hberaud | Ok let's go! | 14:03 |
| hberaud | #topic Review task completion | 14:03 |
| hberaud | Milestone-2 => https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%2522xena--milestone-2%2522+status:open | 14:03 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Create queens-eol tag for manila-ui project https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/800963 | 14:03 |
| hberaud | A couple of patch just need a final +2 | 14:03 |
| hberaud | Deadline is today so feel free to approve them | 14:04 |
| hberaud | We just have 3 exceptions | 14:04 |
| ttx | I'm on it | 14:04 |
| hberaud | Where people asked to wait for patches | 14:05 |
| hberaud | ttx: thanks | 14:05 |
| ttx | all pretty straightforward | 14:05 |
| hberaud | Excellent | 14:06 |
| hberaud | The next topic is "Ask Cinder team if we should include rbd-iscsi-client for Xena release." | 14:06 |
| hberaud | So, they replied "it's on an independent release model, we have a CI issue to work out, but we intend to release sometime during xena" | 14:06 |
| hberaud | So, no rush for this one | 14:06 |
| hberaud | Concerning the barbican-ui topic, the team replied the same that during Wallaby. They have a patch that's been languishing that has all the basic functionality for barbican-ui. They would rather not abandon it, given that it is in their roadmap downstream, just kind of low priority right now. | 14:07 |
| hberaud | So, I would suggest to give them on more chance | 14:08 |
| ttx | oh, it's independent? | 14:08 |
| *** rpittau is now known as rpittau|afk | 14:08 | |
| hberaud | Apparently yes | 14:08 |
| ttx | then I agree we need no decision | 14:08 |
| ttx | hmm | 14:09 |
| ttx | it would be independent if it existed | 14:09 |
| ttx | We only need to finalize xena content, so as long as it's not xena material we are good | 14:09 |
| hberaud | And the last one was the monasca part, I proposed a patch to retire the project, and the team agreed with that https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/800628 So I think that we can +2 this one | 14:09 |
| ttx | +2 | 14:10 |
| hberaud | ttx: I think that they plan to host this project under the independent umbrella | 14:10 |
| hberaud | but it doesn't yet exist on our side, right? | 14:10 |
| ttx | ok then we are good, they can release when they want | 14:10 |
| hberaud | ok | 14:11 |
| hberaud | And that's all for the discussion part | 14:12 |
| hberaud | The last topic was to catch the ACL issues and apparently no issues have been detected, thanks ttx | 14:12 |
| ttx | yep, empty output means no issues | 14:12 |
| hberaud | Excellent, no news, good news | 14:13 |
| hberaud | Then we go to task assignment | 14:13 |
| hberaud | #topic Assign R-11 tasks | 14:13 |
| hberaud | So | 14:13 |
| hberaud | We only have to handle the remaining exceptions for Milestone-2 | 14:14 |
| hberaud | As you know I'll be mostly offline during the 2 next weeks | 14:14 |
| hberaud | So, ttx, elodilles, I'll let you handle the 3 remaining patches | 14:15 |
| ttx | So it's just about keeping an eye on those for new submissions? | 14:15 |
| elodilles | there are the 3 exception you linked earlier, am I right? | 14:15 |
| elodilles | hberaud: ack | 14:15 |
| hberaud | yes | 14:15 |
| ttx | ok we can keep the watch. Did you give an extra deadline? | 14:15 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Xena-2 Release for openstacksdk https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/800237 | 14:16 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Xena-2 Release for metalsmith https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/800234 | 14:16 |
| hberaud | For now, I didn't gave extra deadline, I'll leave a comment to notify our extra deadline and my PTO to PTL | 14:17 |
| hberaud | PTLs | 14:17 |
| hberaud | Usually Done | 14:19 |
| hberaud | s/Usually// | 14:19 |
| hberaud | And that's all for next weeks assignments | 14:20 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Xena-2 Release for python-ironic-inspector-client https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/800251 | 14:20 |
| hberaud | I already proposed the Yoga schedule but we will discuss about this later during the meeting | 14:21 |
| hberaud | #topic Review countdown email contents | 14:21 |
| hberaud | https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/relmgmt-weekly-emails | 14:21 |
| ttx | I US-ified the dates | 14:23 |
| ttx | All good otherwuse | 14:23 |
| ttx | +i | 14:24 |
| hberaud | Ok | 14:24 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: fix placeholder https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/801041 | 14:24 |
| armstrong | LGTM! | 14:24 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Propose to retire monasca-analytics from deliverables https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/800628 | 14:24 |
| hberaud | Sent! | 14:25 |
| hberaud | #topic SBOMs for OpenStack? | 14:25 |
| ttx | yeah so | 14:25 |
| hberaud | ttx: the floor is yours | 14:25 |
| ttx | There is this thing the Biden administration has been pushing | 14:25 |
| ttx | called software bill of materials | 14:26 |
| ttx | in an effort to better track supply chain issues | 14:26 |
| hberaud | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_bill_of_materials | 14:26 |
| ttx | I noticed that Kubernetes started to work on publishing a formal SBOM doc with each release | 14:26 |
| ttx | We might want to follow suit, before someone else asks | 14:26 |
| ttx | At this stage the idea would be to do our homework and learn about it | 14:27 |
| ttx | and of te various tools being created to help handle them | 14:27 |
| armstrong | I think the Linux foundation is also doing similar | 14:27 |
| hberaud | I really love the idea | 14:27 |
| ttx | LF maintains SPDX which is a standard format | 14:27 |
| ttx | We have pretty good dependency tracking in openstack already | 14:28 |
| ttx | but that may just be one piece of the puzzle | 14:28 |
| hberaud | Maybe we could inspire from the LF | 14:28 |
| ttx | It might not be a Xena thing, but definitely a hot topic for the yeti PTG | 14:28 |
| hberaud | Yes | 14:28 |
| hberaud | yeti? isn't yoga? | 14:28 |
| ttx | So this was more of a flag I wanted to raise so that we all learn more about those | 14:28 |
| ttx | Arh Yoga | 14:28 |
| ttx | Yggdrasil | 14:28 |
| hberaud | lol | 14:29 |
| ttx | Toda whatever | 14:29 |
| hberaud | Good suggestion | 14:29 |
| ttx | It will always be yeti in my mind | 14:29 |
| hberaud | Boys don't cry | 14:29 |
| ttx | http://scd.rfi.fr/sites/filesrfi/imagecache/rfi_16x9_1024_578/sites/images.rfi.fr/files/aef_image/yeti-tintin_0.jpg | 14:30 |
| armstrong | ttx are you too attached to yeti :) | 14:30 |
| hberaud | :) | 14:30 |
| ttx | alright that is all I had on this topic | 14:31 |
| ttx | oh, maybe a link | 14:31 |
| hberaud | Ok I added SBOM to our "things to change" | 14:31 |
| ttx | https://github.com/kubernetes/release/blob/master/docs/bom/create-a-bill-of-materials.md | 14:31 |
| ttx | That's the K8s proposed process around SBOM, pretty new | 14:32 |
| ttx | and very go-centric | 14:32 |
| hberaud | ok | 14:32 |
| ttx | but still interesting to see as a data point | 14:32 |
| hberaud | I'll have a deeper look | 14:32 |
| hberaud | Sure | 14:32 |
| hberaud | +1 | 14:32 |
| hberaud | So, next topic | 14:33 |
| hberaud | #topic Yoga proposed schedule | 14:33 |
| ttx | your email worked for me btw | 14:33 |
| ttx | I think you had a stale PGP sig block | 14:33 |
| hberaud | #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/800663 | 14:33 |
| hberaud | ttx: yes | 14:33 |
| hberaud | Do we want to propose more alternative schedules? | 14:34 |
| hberaud | I prefer to start with this one and spend time on alternative if really needed | 14:34 |
| ttx | At first glance i was thinking... this is short, like it does not account for lost time around new year | 14:34 |
| ttx | But event-wise that may lead to better alignment, so I think we can work with it | 14:35 |
| ttx | like if we do 25w every time we'll skew | 14:35 |
| hberaud | I fear that we miss the ubuntu train if we propose longer schedule | 14:35 |
| ttx | but for now skew is probably a good diea | 14:36 |
| ttx | yeah I know they will appreciate the timing here | 14:36 |
| ttx | so +1 for me, after careful consideration | 14:36 |
| ttx | But I don;t want to influence the feedback | 14:36 |
| hberaud | No problem, we have the time to leave the time to think more about this | 14:37 |
| hberaud | Anything else about this topic? | 14:37 |
| ttx | no | 14:38 |
| hberaud | Ok move on | 14:38 |
| hberaud | #topic Open Floor | 14:38 |
| hberaud | Anything else to discuss today? | 14:38 |
| elodilles | one thing from me | 14:39 |
| hberaud | elodilles: the floor is yours | 14:39 |
| elodilles | I know that the timing is not the best (vacations), but I'm planning to generate release patches for Ussuri to prepare for the EM transition in November | 14:39 |
| elodilles | EOM | 14:39 |
| elodilles | I mean that's it :X | 14:40 |
| hberaud | Can't we wait at least the end of R-11? | 14:40 |
| elodilles | of course we can :) | 14:40 |
| hberaud | Ok, so LGTM | 14:41 |
| elodilles | though i don't know how fast the teams will react | 14:41 |
| hberaud | You'll start by releasing the latest deltas? | 14:41 |
| elodilles | (usually a ~half or so of the patches are abandoned due to missing approval from teams) | 14:41 |
| elodilles | hberaud: yes | 14:41 |
| hberaud | Ok that will limit the back and forth | 14:42 |
| hberaud | At first glance November seems a bit far from us but as you said people take time to react, so... why not | 14:43 |
| elodilles | hberaud: this is not the final release :) | 14:43 |
| elodilles | more like a final-but-one :) | 14:44 |
| hberaud | ok | 14:44 |
| hberaud | :) | 14:44 |
| elodilles | this process was done by smcginnis some time ago, | 14:44 |
| hberaud | Ok | 14:44 |
| elodilles | to avoid breakages with the final releases | 14:44 |
| hberaud | I see | 14:44 |
| hberaud | Sold | 14:45 |
| elodilles | (teams in hurry, releases after deadline, things break, etc) | 14:45 |
| hberaud | Ok no problem you convinced me :) | 14:45 |
| elodilles | ok, thanks :) then I'll generate the patches then around next Friday, is that OK? | 14:46 |
| hberaud | That make sense | 14:46 |
| hberaud | Ok for me | 14:46 |
| elodilles | ack | 14:46 |
| *** ykarel is now known as ykarel|away | 14:46 | |
| hberaud | Anything else that you want to discuss today? | 14:47 |
| elodilles | nothing else from me :X | 14:47 |
| ttx | nope nothing | 14:48 |
| hberaud | OK, thanks everyone. Let's wrap up. | 14:50 |
| hberaud | #endmeeting | 14:50 |
| opendevmeet | Meeting ended Fri Jul 16 14:50:02 2021 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 14:50 |
| opendevmeet | Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/releaseteam/2021/releaseteam.2021-07-16-14.00.html | 14:50 |
| opendevmeet | Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/releaseteam/2021/releaseteam.2021-07-16-14.00.txt | 14:50 |
| opendevmeet | Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/releaseteam/2021/releaseteam.2021-07-16-14.00.log.html | 14:50 |
| elodilles | thanks o/ | 14:50 |
| armstrong | thanks hberaud | 14:51 |
| gmann | hberaud: elodilles as Train is EM, I am going to cut train-last for tempest and its plugins today | 15:47 |
| hberaud | gmann: ack | 15:47 |
| elodilles | gmann: thanks for the heads up! | 16:17 |
| *** marios is now known as marios|out | 16:35 | |
| *** amoralej is now known as amoralej|off | 16:45 | |
| clarkb | as a heads up we're going to try and do a zuul restart later today to ensure it restarts cleanly on Sunday/Monday as part of the Gerrit server move | 16:56 |
| clarkb | will try to remember to let you know as we get closer to that. Hoping to let more of these jobs finish up and do it once we reach quieter friday time | 16:56 |
| opendevreview | Elod Illes proposed openstack/releases master: WIP: [packaging-deb] Transition Ocata to End of Life https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/801122 | 18:05 |
| opendevreview | Elod Illes proposed openstack/releases master: [powervm] Transition Ocata to End of Life https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/801123 | 18:16 |
| clarkb | and now it is looking like we are getting close to doing that restart | 20:31 |
| clarkb | queues are largely empty now | 20:31 |
| opendevreview | Ghanshyam proposed openstack/releases master: [Tempest] Tag train-last https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/801133 | 20:57 |
| opendevreview | Ghanshyam proposed openstack/releases master: [oswin-tempest-plugin] Tag train-last https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/801134 | 21:06 |
| opendevreview | Ghanshyam proposed openstack/releases master: [vitrage-tempest-plugin] Tag train-last https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/801135 | 21:14 |
| opendevreview | Ghanshyam proposed openstack/releases master: [ec2api-tempest-plugin] Tag train-last https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/801136 | 21:18 |
| opendevreview | Ghanshyam proposed openstack/releases master: [trove-tempest-plugin] Tag train-last https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/801137 | 21:22 |
| opendevreview | Ghanshyam proposed openstack/releases master: [cloudkitty-tempest-plugin] Tag train-last https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/801138 | 21:27 |
| opendevreview | Goutham Pacha Ravi proposed openstack/releases master: [manila] Transition stable/queens and stable/rocky to eol https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/801141 | 21:51 |
| opendevreview | Goutham Pacha Ravi proposed openstack/releases master: [python-manilaclient] Transition stable/queens and stable/rocky to eol https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/801142 | 21:53 |
| opendevreview | Goutham Pacha Ravi proposed openstack/releases master: [manila-ui] Transition stable/rocky to eol https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/801143 | 21:57 |
| opendevreview | Goutham Pacha Ravi proposed openstack/releases master: [manila-ui] Transition stable/rocky to eol https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/801143 | 22:09 |
| opendevreview | Goutham Pacha Ravi proposed openstack/releases master: [python-manilaclient] Transition stable/queens and stable/rocky to eol https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/801142 | 22:09 |
| opendevreview | Goutham Pacha Ravi proposed openstack/releases master: [manila] Transition stable/queens and stable/rocky to eol https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/801141 | 22:09 |
| opendevreview | Ghanshyam proposed openstack/releases master: [neutron-tempest-plugin] Tag train-last https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/801146 | 22:19 |
| opendevreview | Ghanshyam proposed openstack/releases master: [senlin-tempest-plugin] Tag train-last https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/801147 | 22:24 |
| opendevreview | Ghanshyam proposed openstack/releases master: [zaqar-tempest-plugin] Tag train-last https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/801148 | 22:29 |
| opendevreview | Ghanshyam proposed openstack/releases master: [magnum-tempest-plugin] Tag train-last https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/801149 | 22:34 |
| opendevreview | Ghanshyam proposed openstack/releases master: [manila-tempest-plugin] Tag train-last https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/801150 | 22:37 |
| opendevreview | Ghanshyam proposed openstack/releases master: [kuryr-tempest-plugin] Tag train-last https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/801151 | 22:40 |
| opendevreview | Ghanshyam proposed openstack/releases master: [telemetry-tempest-plugin] Tag train-last https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/801152 | 22:45 |
| opendevreview | Ghanshyam proposed openstack/releases master: [watcher-tempest-plugin] Tag train-last https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/801153 | 22:49 |
| opendevreview | Ghanshyam proposed openstack/releases master: [zun-tempest-plugin] Tag train-last https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/801154 | 22:52 |
| opendevreview | Ghanshyam proposed openstack/releases master: [sahara-tests] Tag train-last https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/801155 | 22:56 |
| opendevreview | Ghanshyam proposed openstack/releases master: [freezer-tempest-plugin] Tag train-last https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/801158 | 23:40 |
| opendevreview | Ghanshyam proposed openstack/releases master: [blazar-tempest-plugin] Tag train-last https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/801161 | 23:46 |
| opendevreview | Ghanshyam proposed openstack/releases master: [mistral-tempest-plugin] Tag train-last https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/801163 | 23:49 |
| opendevreview | Ghanshyam proposed openstack/releases master: [monasca-tempest-plugin] Tag train-last https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/801164 | 23:52 |
| opendevreview | Ghanshyam proposed openstack/releases master: [octavia-tempest-plugin] Tag train-last https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/801165 | 23:57 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.2 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!
