Thursday, 2021-04-01

*** diablo_rojo has quit IRC00:52
*** xinranwang has joined #openstack-release01:49
*** brinzhang_ is now known as brinzhang02:04
*** evrardjp has quit IRC02:33
*** evrardjp has joined #openstack-release02:33
*** ykarel|away has joined #openstack-release03:50
*** tkajinam has quit IRC03:51
*** tkajinam has joined #openstack-release03:51
*** tkajinam has quit IRC03:52
*** tkajinam has joined #openstack-release03:53
*** ykarel|away is now known as ykarel03:54
ykarelfungi, the tarballs are still not available https://tarballs.opendev.org/openstack/barbican-tempest-plugin/?C=M;O=D and https://tarballs.opendev.org/openstack/manila-tempest-plugin/?C=M;O=D for example03:55
*** whoami-rajat has joined #openstack-release04:17
*** xinranwang has quit IRC04:38
*** armstrong has quit IRC04:46
*** sboyron has joined #openstack-release05:48
*** tkajinam has quit IRC06:02
*** tkajinam has joined #openstack-release06:03
*** tkajinam has quit IRC06:03
*** tkajinam has joined #openstack-release06:03
*** HongKong has joined #openstack-release06:28
brinzhanghello, team, when is the Wallaby release of DDL?06:42
*** DJHongKong has joined #openstack-release06:44
*** HongKong has quit IRC06:47
*** DJHongKong has quit IRC06:57
*** gibi_away is now known as gibi06:58
openstackgerritJulia Kreger proposed openstack/releases master: Creating stable wallaby for ironic  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/78369607:16
openstackgerritBalazs Gibizer proposed openstack/releases master: Release Nova Wallaby RC2  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/78420107:17
hberaudbrinzhang: https://releases.openstack.org/wallaby/schedule.html#w-final07:22
brinzhanghberaud: ack, thanks07:25
*** tosky has joined #openstack-release07:45
*** ykarel has quit IRC08:03
*** ykarel has joined #openstack-release08:05
elodhberaud: fyi, today I'll be mostly AFK and there is a chance that I'll miss today's release meeting :S  but I'll try to be there...08:41
*** dtantsur|afk is now known as dtantsur08:44
ttxhberaud: are we all good with stable branches? i.e. can I approve the devstack/grenade branching?08:52
*** ykarel is now known as ykarel|lunch08:58
openstackgerritMerged openstack/releases master: Clarifying how to deal with tempest-plugin during series  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/78341008:58
openstackgerritThierry Carrez proposed openstack/releases master: Add release notes links for Wallaby  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/78421009:01
openstackgerritMerged openstack/releases master: Puppet OpenStack Wallaby RC1  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/78401409:03
openstackgerritMerged openstack/releases master: Creating stable wallaby for ironic  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/78369609:03
openstackgerritMerged openstack/releases master: Release Octavia Wallaby RC2  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/78413909:03
openstackgerritMerged openstack/releases master: Make a stable/victoria release for all the tripleo things  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/78370709:07
hberaudelod: ack09:37
hberaudttx: let me check09:38
hberaudttx: but AFAIk as I know all stars are now aligned09:38
hberaudttx: Well, I would argue that we are good to go https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:qa-wallaby-release09:44
hberaudttx: All PTLs have been "friendly reminded", all stable branches are now there, all QA patches (devstack and grenade job) are waiting for us, and the reqs are ready for branching too09:46
hberaudFire!09:46
hberaudrequirements still refer to the HEAD of their repo09:48
hberaudprometheanfire: I think that now we are good to go, please can validate this patch just to ensure that everything is ok for you => https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/77983209:55
ttxok looking09:57
hberaudthanks09:57
ttxI'll run a few checks for my peace of mind :)09:57
hberaudsure09:57
hberaudnp I prefer check twice than miss something09:58
*** elod is now known as elod_afk10:01
ttxhberaud: ok my only question/confusion would be around tagless things like openstack-ansible-roles and devstack-plugin-kafka10:04
hberaudWhat's the question?10:04
ttxhberaud: openstack-ansible-roles had a stable/victoria branch defined10:04
ttxit's not "trailing"10:04
* hberaud look10:04
ttxso should it have its stable/wallaby branch cut?10:04
ttxRe: devstack-plugin-kafka it used to have a stable branch cut until ussuri, but we did not cut one in victoria. Same for devstack-plugin-amqp1 and devstack-plugin-container10:05
ttxI know I'm confused by those every time10:05
ttxIt's probably not worth holding grenade/devstack since this are pretty peripheral, but still, would be good to clarify10:06
hberaudso for openstack-ansible-role it have been tagged a posteriori => https://opendev.org/openstack/releases/commit/e838bcf0036c5814aa0d9962d8fd1d49967af61910:07
hberaudmore or less like trailing projects10:07
ttxshould it just be set to trailing then?10:07
hberaudyes maybe we should consider that point10:07
ttxprobably worth a discussion at the meeting, will add10:07
hberaudI'm not fan of ambiguity10:08
hberaudyes thanks10:08
hberaudor maybe simply propose a patch directly and then start discusting that point with PTL10:09
ttxRe: devstack-plugin-kafka it used to have a stable branch cut until ussuri, but we did not cut one in victoria. Same for devstack-plugin-amqp1 and devstack-plugin-container10:09
* hberaud look devstack-plugin-*10:09
ttxlike essentially it was not released in victoria. Should we just drop it then?10:09
*** ykarel|lunch is now known as ykarel10:10
ttxor make it release-manageemnt:none?10:10
ttxhttps://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/723700 is relevant to taht discussion (it's the last time those were released/branched10:12
ttxlike bnemec said "We had agreed to stop branching the oslo.messaging devstack plugins because there wasn't enough activity to justify the effort"10:12
ttxand so we did not branch them in victoria10:13
hberaudso d-p-(kafka|amqp1) are under the oslo's umbrella, I'm not aware of their retirements for now10:13
hberaudfew months ago kguisti retirered zmq and pika10:14
hberaudhttp://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2020-July/016212.html10:14
ttxjust approved the devstack/grenade branching patches10:14
hberaudhttp://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2020-July/016214.html10:14
hberaudso I think we should keep them for now10:14
hberaudand first start a discussion with oslo10:14
ttxshould we branch them for victoria before we branch them for wallaby?10:14
hberaudI would argue that yes10:15
ttxWe can make up SHAs10:15
ttxI guess my question is why this escapes process every time :)10:15
ttxprobably being tagless10:15
hberaudconcerning d-p-container I don't know it's state10:15
hberaudgood question10:15
ttxwe might need an process entry to remember to do them as we do devstack itself10:16
hberaudyes10:16
ttxI'll add a meeting note10:16
hberaudyes I think it's due to the tagless stuff10:16
hberaudI think that we are in a grey area10:17
hberaudand our commands doesn't detect them10:17
ttxok noted10:17
hberaudI think this is why we skipped branching for them10:17
hberaudI didn't see significant activity on kafka and amqp1 since awhile now10:18
hberaudI'll propose a patch to add these devstack stuff at R-2 in our process10:21
openstackgerritMerged openstack/releases master: Create stable/wallaby for devstack  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/78413210:27
openstackgerritMerged openstack/releases master: Create stable/wallaby for grenade  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/78413410:28
openstackgerritHervé Beraud proposed openstack/releases master: Improve R-3 and R-2 documentation  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/78410310:39
hberauddevstack-plugin process added through ^10:39
openstackgerritHervé Beraud proposed openstack/releases master: Improve R-3 and R-2 documentation  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/78410310:42
openstackgerritHervé Beraud proposed openstack/releases master: Branch devstack-plugin-* deliverables  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/78437111:11
openstackgerritHervé Beraud proposed openstack/releases master: Branch devstack-plugin-* deliverables  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/78437611:44
openstackgerritHervé Beraud proposed openstack/releases master: Branch devstack-plugin-* deliverables for Wallaby  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/78437611:45
openstackgerritHervé Beraud proposed openstack/releases master: Branch devstack-plugin-* deliverables for Victoria  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/78437111:46
openstackgerritHervé Beraud proposed openstack/releases master: Moving OSA roles to trailing project  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/78437811:58
openstackgerritHervé Beraud proposed openstack/releases master: Moving OSA roles to trailing projects  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/78437811:58
hberaudttx: Well, I think that all our previous inconscistences are addressed by this couple of patches ^11:59
*** nweinber has joined #openstack-release12:17
openstackgerritDmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/releases master: Release OpenStack-Ansible Victoria  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/78438412:20
*** stand has joined #openstack-release12:55
fungiykarel: yes, we're still waiting on the new remote volume to finish syncing so we have better redundancy. i guess in a few minutes i'll work on a patch to switch to serving tarballs from the read-write path while we wait for the sync process to complete. we didn't expect it to take nearly so long to replicate all the tarball content 1500km12:57
ykarelfungi, ok Thanks for the update, yes if it takes time switching should help12:58
openstackgerritRajat Dhasmana proposed openstack/releases master: Cinder stable/victoria release for os-brick  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/78439413:00
*** jcapitao has joined #openstack-release13:01
*** rosmaita has joined #openstack-release13:04
openstackgerritMartin Kopec proposed openstack/releases master: Add releasenotes link for Tempest 27.0.0  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/78442614:29
*** elod_afk is now known as elod14:29
*** lbragstad has quit IRC14:36
prometheanfirehberaud: voted, looks good (reqs branching)14:43
hberaudexcellent14:43
hberaudttx: We are now good to go with the reqs branching, it just need a final +214:44
ttxon it14:45
hberaudthanks14:45
openstackgerritMartin Kopec proposed openstack/releases master: Add releasenotes link for Patrole 0.12.0  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/78443114:47
*** tkajinam has quit IRC15:02
*** armstrong has joined #openstack-release15:05
*** dtantsur is now known as dtantsur|afk15:06
openstackgerritMarios Andreou proposed openstack/releases master: Make tripleo repos release for stable/ussuri branch  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/78412415:27
*** ykarel is now known as ykarel|away15:43
*** whoami-rajat has quit IRC15:47
*** ykarel|away has quit IRC15:53
*** rosmaita has left #openstack-release15:54
openstackgerritMerged openstack/releases master: add branch for openstack requirements  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/77983215:56
openstackgerritHervé Beraud proposed openstack/releases master: Making devstack-plugin-* branchless  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/78437615:58
openstackgerritHervé Beraud proposed openstack/releases master: Making devstack-plugin-* branchless  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/78437616:00
*** diablo_rojo has joined #openstack-release16:01
diablo_rojoo/16:01
openstackgerritHervé Beraud proposed openstack/releases master: Making devstack-plugin-* branchless  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/78437616:02
hberauddiablo_rojo: o/16:06
prometheanfirek, I'm gonna send an email to say reqs is out of freeze sometime today16:07
hberaudprometheanfire: fire!16:07
hberaudthanks16:07
hberaudpatch is now merged16:07
prometheanfireyarp16:08
*** jcapitao is now known as jcapitao_afk16:21
openstackgerritMarios Andreou proposed openstack/releases master: Make tripleo repos release for stable/train branch  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/78444516:23
hberaud#startmeeting releaseteam17:00
openstackMeeting started Thu Apr  1 17:00:06 2021 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is hberaud. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.17:00
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.17:00
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: releaseteam)"17:00
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'releaseteam'17:00
armstrongo/17:00
hberaud#link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/wallaby-relmgt-tracking Agenda17:00
ttxo/17:00
hberaudPing list: ttx armstrong elod damani17:00
hberaudWe're way down on line 539 now.17:00
hberaudWill just wait a couple minutes for folks.17:00
elodo/17:00
hberaud#topic Review task completion17:03
*** openstack changes topic to "Review task completion (Meeting topic: releaseteam)"17:03
hberaudSo17:03
hberaudThe majority of our tasks are now done, everything is branched, QA stuffs are branched, and reqs are branched too, every PTLs have been "friendly reminded", we don't have exceptions from last week17:03
hberaudI think we can jump directly to...17:03
hberaudRelease notes links addition (ttx): https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/78421017:03
hberaudHow many time we waited before merging this kind of patch during previous series?17:04
ttxI think we can merge it immediately17:05
hberaudI see that Sean already approved17:05
hberaudand many PTL approved17:05
hberaudWFM17:05
ttxIIRC there might be another round needed around releases in case other release notes make it17:05
hberaudSlawek leave questions17:05
hberaudttx: do you want to answer them before merging?17:05
hberauds/leave/left/17:06
ttxI'm not sure what te answer is :)17:06
hberaudhm17:06
hberaudlol17:06
hberaudlot of other deliverable are in the same case17:07
ttxThe tool is supposed to select the ones that have release notes17:07
ttx(afaik)17:07
hberaudmaybe we need to open a bug17:07
ttxmaybe we can check how the tool is supposed to work and why it picked empty notes17:08
ttxah17:08
hberaudor store that question somewhere to address it ASAP17:08
hberaudyes17:08
ttxI think it checks for existence of the HTML file17:08
ttxnot whether the file contains actual info17:08
hberaudah17:08
hberaudthat could explain why17:08
ttxanyway, let's pause and check17:08
hberaudyes17:09
ttxThat patch tends to conflict fast with RC2 requests though17:09
ttxso we should clarify fast17:09
hberaudyes17:09
ttxmaybe add a task for it and assign it to me17:09
hberaudsold!17:09
ttxok adding it myself, you can continue17:10
hberaudok17:10
hberaudthanks17:10
hberaudSo I think that we can move on directly to the next topic17:11
hberaud#topic Assign R-1 tasks17:11
*** openstack changes topic to "Assign R-1 tasks (Meeting topic: releaseteam)"17:11
openstackgerritMerged openstack/releases master: Cinder stable/victoria release for os-brick  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/78439417:11
hberauddone17:12
hberaudI put my name everywhere17:12
armstronghberaud:  great!17:12
ttx+117:12
ttxwe don;t have any stable branching exception left right17:13
hberaudyes17:13
hberaud#topic Review countdown email contents17:14
*** openstack changes topic to "Review countdown email contents (Meeting topic: releaseteam)"17:14
hberaudhttps://etherpad.opendev.org/p/relmgmt-weekly-emails17:14
ttxLGTM17:15
hberaudI didn't find the summit date on openinfra site, that's normal?17:15
fungii don't think it's been scheduled yet?17:15
hberaudeven if it will be virtual17:15
hberaudok17:15
hberaudno idea17:15
fungialso remember they've switched to yearly17:15
hberaudah yes17:16
hberaudso next summit will be in october17:16
fungiprobably, or around then17:16
armstrongbut the next events is coming up soon right? Or only PTG?17:16
hberaudarmstrong: Yes PTG is on the week of April 19.17:17
fungiptg yes. i think the events team has some other ideas for event-ish things too17:17
fungibut nothing nailed down yet17:17
hberaudack17:17
hberaudok next topic17:17
hberaud#topic openstack-ansible-roles is tagged/branched late, and yet it's not "trailing". Should it be?17:18
*** openstack changes topic to "openstack-ansible-roles is tagged/branched late, and yet it's not "trailing". Should it be? (Meeting topic: releaseteam)"17:18
ttxI have no idea why it's not trailing17:18
hberaudSo, I proposed a patch to stick the OSA parent project deliverable type17:18
ttxmaybe OSA folks know :)17:18
fungii had thought all deployment projects were cycle-trailing, honestly17:18
hberaudI didn't see reason to not be trailing there17:19
hberaudme too17:19
hberaudhttps://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/78437817:19
hberaudwhois yoctozepto17:19
* yoctozepto is me17:19
hberaudlol17:19
ttxno I'm yoctozepto!17:19
fungihe's not wrong17:19
yoctozeptolol17:20
hberaudany idea ^17:20
ttxI think it really does not matter17:20
ttxtrailing is more accurate imho17:20
ttxwould avoid it shoewing up in reports17:20
hberaudok17:20
fungii guess the question is whether yoctozepto knows why osa is not cycle-trailing like other deployment projects, but trails the cycle17:20
fungibut regardless, sounds like it should be switched to cycle-trailing17:21
yoctozeptono idea, I work on kolla, we are in friendly relations with other deployment projects though (/me fixing docs links and such)17:21
hberaudyoctozepto: ok np17:22
yoctozeptoI agree osa should be marked appropriately ;-)17:22
hberaudok let's wait for OSA team feedback17:22
yoctozeptonoonedeadpunk ^17:23
hberaudok let's discuss that point directly on the patch17:25
ttxyeah not urgent17:25
hberaudthanks everyone17:25
hberaud#topic devstack-plugin-* are tagless and escape process every cycle.17:25
*** openstack changes topic to "devstack-plugin-* are tagless and escape process every cycle. (Meeting topic: releaseteam)"17:25
hberaudWe should fix process to remember to branch them as we branch devstack17:25
hberaudI started a thread about the oslo part of this puzzle => http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-April/021513.html17:25
hberaudThe QA team said that usually devstack-plugin-* are branchless too17:26
hberaudbut that depends on if plugin needs specific config or not17:26
hberaudFrom the oslo point of view we don't think that we need special config so no reason to branch anymore17:27
hberaudHowever17:27
hberaudI proposed a last branch for Victoria17:27
hberaudhttps://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/78437117:28
hberaudand I proposed to remove these deliverable on wallaby https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/78437617:28
hberaudbnemec said that " I guess when we chose to stop branching them we didn't realize we needed to remove the deliverable files completely."17:29
hberaudI also proposed a patch to update our process if we decide to keep them around => https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/78410317:30
fungimakes sense that there's no point in the release managers tracking a deliverable which does not get tagged or branched17:30
hberaudBut if we stop branch them I'll update that patch to drop that section17:30
ttxok17:31
hberaudThe main question is17:31
hberaudDo we want to branch for Victoria?17:31
hberaudIf we don't address the victoria part that will leave an inconsistence17:32
hberaudSo17:32
hberaudEither we branch it or we drop these file too17:32
hberaudAny opinion?17:32
elodis there a reason not to drop?17:33
hberaudNope17:33
hberaudNobody complained until now17:33
hberaudOk I'll update the Victoria part to drop these files17:34
hberaudand drop the process section17:34
elodthen I guess we can drop them and ask bnemec for a final ACK? :)17:34
hberaudLGTM17:34
hberaudSo I think that we can move on17:35
bnemecTechnically you need hberaud's ack since he's the release liaison. ;-)17:35
elodoh, then it's even better :)17:36
hberaudYes I need to update my email due to the recent gerrit changes17:36
hberaudThis is why it didn't have been PTL approved yet17:36
hberaudThanks bnemec17:37
bnemecI commented on the reviews though.17:37
hberaudYes thanks17:37
hberaud#topic Open Floor17:37
*** openstack changes topic to "Open Floor (Meeting topic: releaseteam)"17:37
hberaudAnything else to discuss today?17:38
ttxno! Dinenr awaits17:38
ttxDinner even17:38
hberaudBon appétit17:38
elodbon appétit :)17:38
ttxthanks hberaud ! Almost there!17:38
hberaudSame thing here17:38
hberaudJust one thing17:39
hberaudDon't forget to vote for the next meeting time17:39
armstrongvote for what?17:39
hberaudThe next meeting time => https://doodle.com/poll/ip6tg4fvznz7p3qx17:40
hberaudThat's all for me17:40
armstrongok17:40
hberaudOk thanks everyone for joining17:41
hberaudAnd enjoy your dinner17:41
elodo/17:41
hberaudLet's wrap up.17:41
hberaud#endmeeting17:41
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Release Managers office - Come here to discuss how to release OpenStack components - Logged at http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23openstack-release/"17:41
openstackMeeting ended Thu Apr  1 17:41:45 2021 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)17:41
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/releaseteam/2021/releaseteam.2021-04-01-17.00.html17:41
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/releaseteam/2021/releaseteam.2021-04-01-17.00.txt17:41
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/releaseteam/2021/releaseteam.2021-04-01-17.00.log.html17:41
elodbon appétit hberaud :)17:41
hberaudMerci elod17:42
fungiby the way, i merged a change to switch the tarballs site to serving the read-write volume until we're finished syncing the new replica we've added17:42
fungiit's not deployed yet, but should be shortly17:42
*** jcapitao_afk has quit IRC17:46
*** jcapitao_afk has joined #openstack-release17:48
*** jcapitao_afk has quit IRC17:55
*** ykarel|away has joined #openstack-release18:13
*** ykarel|away has quit IRC18:25
hberaudack18:40
openstackgerritDouglas Mendizábal proposed openstack/releases master: Release Barbican Wallaby RC2  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/78446818:57
*** slaweq_ has joined #openstack-release19:51
*** slaweq has quit IRC19:52
*** nweinber has quit IRC21:29
*** diablo_rojo has quit IRC21:38
*** armstrong has quit IRC22:44
*** sboyron has quit IRC22:50
*** tkajinam has joined #openstack-release22:57
*** tkajinam has quit IRC22:57
*** tkajinam has joined #openstack-release22:58
*** tosky has quit IRC23:40

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.2 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!